China might look like playing double game, but they're clear with their plans. It was China who helped with the circulation of bitcoin in the earlier days. During those days, even the grown economies and the technology wise developed nations too didn't considered it. At some point fake volume issue were identified during inspection by People's Bank of China. From then onwards it started strict regulation and terminated the operation of few exchanges. Later the ban on cryptocurrency mining, altcoins and bitcoin happened. Every country wants them to be dominant in the technology, and the increasing demand made China stay away from the race.

As OP said China hadn't grown out of making some cheap politics between the powers, it have got the strong manufacturing setup which is the reason it have emerged as one among the strong economy in the last 20 years. USA also a reason, to suppress the supreme power of Russia media started to compare between China and USA which too helped them in the growth.

I have 0 interest in nfts. Nothing better than a graded coin loaded with btc collectible Bitcoin notes, cards, magazines etc are equally amazing

You can see the list of open source hardware wallet here: Open source hardware wallet

I will recommend passport.

Some people also recommend Keystone.

I would have recommended Trezor but the recent coinjoin with the help of Wasabi makes coinjoin to be censored and no privacy anymore as the transactions are monitored by Chainanlysis.

As for Ledger Nano wallet, it has been on of the worst wallets that I can not recommend anyone. I do not recommend the wallet before because they were careless with customers data and also the secure element in all their wallets are all close source.

It's obvious that it's the new hype right now, just a couple of months ago when it was developed and now it's taking the crypto market. Although want bitcoin maximalist doesn't want is that it run on top of the bitcoin's blockchain causing the mempool to clogged and with that, the fee spike.

The thing is that when bitcoin's developers started to close that loophole, then maybe BRC-20 will be on the side then as everyone is being affected by it negatively so I wouldn't be surprised of a patch before the end of the year.

USDC is also actively represented in the TRON network, and has been for quite some time. Only it has not had much effect on the growth of TRON itself. Maybe because USDC is not as popular for simple transfers as USDT? Although on DEXs USDC is also popular in various swaps. Competing networks are better, I agree, but there's obviously not less garbage there, especially in BSC network, where the number of scam tokens is fantastic, probably a record among all networks for the last 2 years.

In other countries, such as Japan and Switzerland, cryptocurrency adoption has been received more openly. They have issued clear regulations to facilitate the growth and development of the cryptocurrency market in their countries and there are also countries that prohibit or restrict cryptocurrencies, such as China which has banned exchange activities and Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs).

However, when viewed as a whole, government actions against cryptocurrencies are still very diverse. The sustainability and future of cryptocurrencies is greatly influenced by how governments and markets can strike the right balance between necessary regulation and supporting market innovation and growth.

Binance hardly supports USDT because they have their own counterpart in the form of BUSD. It is more profitable for them to support it than competitors' coins.  USDT TRC-20 and TRX are very well supported by Huobi, since this exchange is owned by Justin Sun. TRON seems more utilitarian to me now than DOGE, because DOGE is already a toy for speculation of one famous billionaire, but TRX is actively used for USDT transfer. This method is still very popular among the community.

El Salvador could not get loans from the IMF, because Bukele at some point showed that he was not going to do everything that he was told for these loans, in this case it was about bitcoin bonds, when Bukele tried to convince him that this should not be done which is still too early. In the bear market, it’s not easy for everyone who deals with bitcoin, but of course, El Salvador didn’t have any ruins because of this.

Are you now talking about El Salvador's external debt, or about some individual loans? Because the external debt of El Salvador is much higher.

As for ATM's, El Salvador is doing well, despite the fact that they have not yet reached the indicators that they planned earlier, this trend still looks positive for them. While there are many countries where this indicator gets negative readings, when their amount is reduced, due to conflicts with regulators.

Actually there is nothing US government or any other government from other countries can do against cryptocurrencies, because they work in a decentralized format out of governments' control. Authorities can impose how many bans they want on crypto, and their citizens will still use and invest on it, like we have been seeing in China, Egypt, Bolivia and other countries where crypto is illegal.

To deal with crypto is already part of the daily and private routine of many people around the world. It can't be stopped anymore and governments aren't fool: they know about that! So why to start a conflict for something that is out of their control and that can't be solved as they desire? Of course they will go through the diplomatic route.

Well, first thing first, i do not see any default coming to the US because they have a hell lot of money and assets and also Wealthy Patriots who can single-handedly deal with the debt problem currently the USA is facing. Now secondly, if we assume that those patriots are also out of money and US political leaders have no backup plan to deal with this situation which in reality they must have. There will be bad consequences for BTC and for the whole stock market too. Because the US is the main currency for all of the stablecoins and we have seen it recently what effect does their downtrend make on BTC? When the Silicon Valley Bank was bankrupted the value of Stable Coin USDC become more volatile which highly affected the market.

Secondly, the good side of it was, the dominance of BTC was increasing because people need some place to hold their money where it can not lose its value. So, BTC is that place. It also was the main reason for the origin of BTC so that in the next banking crisis (financial Crisis) people have at least something to store their money to keep its value safe. And BTC will be used as one.

Ethereum was captured a long time ago and there is no incentive to make it more decentralized or faster because middle men control staking and validating and make billions of dollars off of this. If you want something fair you need to look into REF on NEAR or Q Blockchain.

It is impossible to buy all new meme coins, and expect that one of them will bring a profit exceeding the purchase costs. Here we need accurate information from the team about the new launch of the meme coin and the budget that is allocated for the pump. But only those investors who have acquaintances in this project can get such information.

I think Solana is a buy under 20usd but these days you don't need to even buy crypto to get rich, just do bounties, airdrops and giveaways. Zealy io has a lot of bounties and there are several accounts on Twitter giving away Q Blockchain tokens right now. You just need to look around and participate.

Debt default is drawing closer and if there is no raising of debt ceiling yet from both parties, then both have two different decisions. A chaotic market ahead.

Bitcoin is now political. News flows by where DeSantis and RFK is into Bitcoin and have BTC to be their tool to in election. BTC is linked to popularity already and a presidential candidate who protcts BTC might win the BItcoiners.

There is nothing decentralized about Crypto, the way greed is destroying this space is very disturbing, the team and VCs hiding under the guise of decentralization by allocating 90% of the tokens among themselves, the funning thing is the community allocation, just ask yourself who the community are? POS is centralization and people seem okay with it and I have a feeling this is going to continue to get worse from here because what these people are doing is aligning themselves with the centralized government and protecting their own arse from government attack, they want to eat their cake and have it.

We'll see what happens to TAMA. If the token is indeed pumped, its price will increase. But seeing what has happened to many coin memes, it looks like TAMA can get a pump, especially if the altcoin season comes, where many coins and tokens will get a pump. That's where we will see which tokens and coins can increase.

It's great that you're investing in TAMA just for fun so we know you're only using the money you can afford. And you also already know what the risks are in investing in meme tokens. And looking at the existing chart, the current TAMA price is still below so if you want to give up some money to invest in TAMA, you can start now but don't get your hopes up because we don't know what will happen later.

Paid