Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 11:12:16 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 »
341  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 16, 2015, 03:43:29 PM
Your only avenue of recourse seems to be reporting the matter to the police. No one else is going to be able to help you.

I'm glad that you have been swayed, as much as any security feature can be hacked they do actually exist for a reason and make a serious difference in protecting you.

Best of luck.
342  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 16, 2015, 12:12:29 PM
And there are the links to posts about the fact  SSL and TLS protocols has a big holes in architecture  which means that
it can easily be hacked!
In english
http://resources.inf...end-ssl-poodle/
In Russian
https://xakep.ru/2014/10/15/poodle
https://xakep.ru/2014/12/09/poodle-tls

You should also link to some resources that cover how 2FA can help to stop unauthorized access.

Given that the exchange just had 7000+ BTC stolen you're probably never going to get help (even with a warrant).
343  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][GEMZ]| SOCIAL MESSAGING APP THAT PAYS | Android App Released | on: February 15, 2015, 11:35:48 PM
I got my dads friend into Getgems, he was pretty much sold when he saw the gif feature : p, a good gateway to bitcoin network.

Despite what some people say in this thread, allowing short gifs (or similar formats) in an unobtrusive manner is a HUGE selling point for a chat application and something that WhatsApp and several others don't think is worth the time of day.
344  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: BTER sunk on: February 15, 2015, 10:00:37 PM
Wow absolutely amazing to see that you still shouldn't store coins on an exchange if you actually care about them!

Funny how the times change!

Maybe people will take that as a lesson in future and improve in their decisions.

They won't, there have been plenty of exchanges before this incident where the exact same thing has happened.

As soon as a viable decentralized exchange presents itself I assume that most of these exchanges (besides ones that actually integrate with your bank account) will disappear rapidly.
345  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: BTER sunk on: February 15, 2015, 04:07:49 PM
Wow absolutely amazing to see that you still shouldn't store coins on an exchange if you actually care about them!

Funny how the times change!
346  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 15, 2015, 02:10:31 PM
Put up the sign.... "Do not feed the troll"

It's just another newbie account, claiming ...."My coins were stolen" !!! .......Anyone can post @#$% like that.

I would take this seriously when it's coming from a ranked member with a good reputation.

If it's real, and from a ranked member trying to hide his/her real identity... then I apologize in advance and says one word.... 2FA  Undecided

I don't personally think its someone making this up; but everything on here (whether from ranked members or new accounts) should be taken with a grain of salt until proven otherwise.

We should still, as a community, read what this person has said to offer advice etc--in this instance the original poster honestly believes that 2FA is pointless and does not want to be swayed the other way. Good for them.
347  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 15, 2015, 12:53:53 AM
2FA enabled or GTFO.   Grin

But really, can someone explain how this happened? 

BTC-e requires clicking a email confirmation link for withdrawals (even without 2FA).  And didn't the OP say his email was not compromised?  Or was it...  Shocked

This is what turns some of clients off from creating 2fa on btc-e (https://btc-e.com/profile#security/2fa)

Quote
Для создания ключа необходимо установить приложение Google Authenticator:
Android: тут
iOS: тут
Windows Phone: тут
J2ME: тут
Google Authenticator есть на многих платформах. Список есть на википедии.

После установки приложения необходимо нажать на кнопку создать ключ и сосканировать QR код.
Если у вас не получается сосканировать QR код попробуйте использовать другое приложение для сканирования QR кодов.
Если же вы не можете сосканировать QR код, то введите ключ в приложение вручную.

После того как ключ был сосканирован, приложение Google Authenticator будет генерировать одноразовые пароли каждые 30 секунд.
Для подтверждения создания ключа необходимо ввести одноразовый пароль и нажать подтвердить.
Note: Перед подтверждением создания ключа сделайте бэкап QR-кода или ключа, чтобы не иметь проблем при утере/сбросе вашего телефона. Бэкап необходимо делать на внешние устройства, такие как USB-флешка.
Note: Так как одноразовые пароли основаны на времени, необходимо чтобы время на устройстве где стоит Google Authenticator было синхронизировано, а так же был выбран верный часовой пояс. В противном случае вы будете получать ошибку что ваш одноразовый пароль неверен.

Its not even translated to english, funny for a site with so much daily trading volume

You probably shouldn't use a site that does not match up to your expectations.
FWIW, most modern browsers can automatically translate different languages. Cryptocurrency is global, so it won't necessarily be delivered to your doorstep in your own language.
348  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 15, 2015, 12:52:21 AM
2FA enabled or GTFO.   Grin

But really, can someone explain how this happened? 

BTC-e requires clicking a email confirmation link for withdrawals (even without 2FA).  And didn't the OP say his email was not compromised?  Or was it...  Shocked

Read the thread fully. This is why I find the initial post to be misleading--nothing was theoretically stolen, just someone accessed this person's account and made unauthorized trades.
349  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [KOBO] Kobocoin - A West African peer to peer micropayment system on: February 15, 2015, 12:30:13 AM
its conflicted not orphaned m8
Sometimes it helps to read the message that you include with my post.

I never said it was orphaned; I believe you may be referring to another user who made that assertion.

Not to go off topic, but as far as I'm aware it is fairly standard for the odd PoS to be conflicted and isn't indicative of any problem.
350  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [KOBO] Kobocoin - A West African peer to peer micropayment system on: February 14, 2015, 10:19:54 PM
first time staking says conflicted.  but why?


Status: conflicted, broadcast through 4 nodes
Date: 2/14/2015 16:45
Source: Generated
Debit: 0.00 KOBO
Net amount: -2036.23987055 KOBO
Transaction ID: 5710caeb1579d9a4778812ca5055d5e29e6048310352939303793fddb1a0160b

Generated coins must mature 60 blocks before they can be spent. When you generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, its state will change to "not accepted" and it won't be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block within a few seconds of yours.


Quote
Generated coins must mature 60 blocks before they can be spent. When you generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, its state will change to "not accepted" and it won't be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block within a few seconds of yours.

Sometimes it helps to read the message that you include with your post.


I may be wrong, but this sounds different than an orphaned block, I would close & re-open the wallet. It works wonders most of the time, in my experience.


I have 3 conflicted stake claims that are the same as described in this situation; the description that I placed emphasis on previously explains exactly why you didn't get it.

Basically you just got unlucky (that's what I understand anyway).
351  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 14, 2015, 09:49:39 PM
Quote
Your thread title is inaccurate. Your money was not 'stolen'. You didn't use 2FA which helps to prevent unauthorized access. Someone gained unauthorized access to your account and made unauthorized trades. This can at least be partially attributed to your refusal to use 2FA, using Tor and a number of other factors that are completely outside of your exchange's control.

If btc-e actually cooperated and provided any information of other customers in this situation (without a police/court order) it would set an alarming precedent and I am sure they would lose many customers over it.


Wouldn't his BTC/Cash still be considered stolen? I mean if someone breaks into your house while your away and you only locked the one door lock, would it make it any less of a break in or explained as a 'unauthorized entry' because the home owner had a dead bolt and/or alarm system that he didn't use? Sure he had extra precautions he didn't utilized that may have prevented the break in, but it doesn't lessen the fact that someone still broken in to his house all the same, no?


As to the OP, you should defiantly enable 2FA if you haven't yet. Say your house gets broken into, you are basically using the argument "I didn't bother to lock my door because thieves could have just picked the lock anyway". Hopefully that puts it into a better perspective.

Very sorry for that loss though, I do hope you get some form of resolution from it

  • From a legal standpoint I assume it would still be theft.
  • From a literal standpoint, no money actually left his account--only unauthorized transactions took place.

Regardless of anyone's personal feelings the distinction between these two is vitally important is that he falls into the second category and is asking the exchange to reveal confidential information about other users of the service without a court order/warrant. The idea that any exchange or organisation would reveal such private information about its customers with no court order/warrant would basically never happen in a million years.

Even with a court order/warrant you're assuming that anyone who was "the other half" of his transactions is guilty and putting their privacy at stake--this is likely impossible to ascertain and sounds more like a matter for a legal investigation.

Should an exchange breach other user's privacy because some guy didn't bother to use 2FA? No, and if the answer was yes then no one would ever use that exchange ever again.

Personally I abhor people that steal or gain access to other users accounts and then proceed to do malicious things, I believe they should be persecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Having said that, in this instance the victim (i.e. the author of this thread) should realize how their naivety and laziness was likely the primary reason for their loss and also that no reputable organization on Earth would go about releasing information about other users in this same situation without a court order/warrant.

I strongly disagree with the title of this thread and the initial post as they are both greatly misleading to most readers who won't bother to be critical and will take it as face value (and no, I'm not associated with the exchange). I think the victim in this situation refuses to admit that their arrogance and naivety when it comes to security caused this issue and nothing else. If you have 40,000 USD on a website you should take security a lot more seriously.

It is also disheartening to see people learning about promising technologies like bitcoin etc while failing to adequately research basic account security. If anyone is reading this right now and has anything of worth stored on their exchange accounts, gmail/dropbox/banking websites and currently does not use 2FA I strongly urge you to start using it. It isn't some fantasia bullshit, it is the 6 digit code that stands between you accessing your account and some random on the internet being able to essentially rob you of 40k USD. Regardless of what anyone says about it being imperfect it still does a lot more to protect your accounts and private data than having nothing at all in place.

Bottom line:
Not having 2FA enabled = 40,000 USD mistake.
352  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [KOBO] Kobocoin - A West African peer to peer micropayment system on: February 14, 2015, 08:05:38 PM
first time staking says conflicted.  but why?


Status: conflicted, broadcast through 4 nodes
Date: 2/14/2015 16:45
Source: Generated
Debit: 0.00 KOBO
Net amount: -2036.23987055 KOBO
Transaction ID: 5710caeb1579d9a4778812ca5055d5e29e6048310352939303793fddb1a0160b

Generated coins must mature 60 blocks before they can be spent. When you generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, its state will change to "not accepted" and it won't be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block within a few seconds of yours.


Quote
Generated coins must mature 60 blocks before they can be spent. When you generated this block, it was broadcast to the network to be added to the block chain. If it fails to get into the chain, its state will change to "not accepted" and it won't be spendable. This may occasionally happen if another node generates a block within a few seconds of yours.

Sometimes it helps to read the message that you include with your post.
353  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 14, 2015, 08:04:03 PM
thats an expensive lesson learned.. always use 2fa.

but even sometimes using 2fa incidents still occur, like the whole blockchain.info wallet madness a couple weeks back or a month ago.

people got like 30 btc stolen forwarded to other accounts etc.

Its not any single point of failure that causes these situations.

Its a multitude of different problems (mostly attributed to people being lazy):
-not activating 2FA
-not activating logging features on their accounts
-sharing email addresses and/or passwords between accounts
-not running antivirus/malware scanner
-assuming your operating system is 100% immune to viruses or malware (dear mac users your operating system is not, has not and cannot be 100% immune to being compromised)
-sharing your computer with idiots
-installing stupid applications and/or opening stupid links
-assuming people you know won't steal your shit when it can never be traced back to them
-letting other people know how much money you have and where
-blindly trusting web-based wallets etc that aren't decentralized
-installing pirated software which can compromise your system
-using wifi, wireless keyboard/mice or stupid technology that could easily compromise your internet money (if you live in the jungle use wifi, if you live in a crowded urban area where anyone within 50 metres of you could sniff all your personal data then you're an idiot)
-keeping all your eggs in one basket; even if I was trading anything even remotely approaching 40,000 USD, let alone 1000 USD I would sure as shit not store it all on one exchange with no fucking 2FA.

You should not be storing 30 btc on a web wallet like blockchain. Period.
You should not be storing 40,000 USD worth of anything on any online account that doesn't have 2FA. Period.

Part of the responsibility does fall on this exchange for not requiring 2FA or not requiring authentication of transactions via email account, however the problem is that this user is basically incompetent (proven by the fact they refuse to believe 2FA is important) and they then go and write misleading statements regarding their account (no, your money wasn't actually stolen which is what prevents the exchange from helping you) and tries to brush off their own irresponsibility and laziness as not having attributed to the situation (if this user had 2FA enabled then I would be in no position to criticize as much).
354  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 14, 2015, 02:29:18 PM
There is a trend here from 'hacked accounts' gambling site stole money cheated etc if they was true they would be very welcome but chances are they are not.

Always newbie accounts and that makes me take little no notice anymore, unlucky on losing that amount of money if i am wrong and you actually did however 'doubtful' but you deserved it keeping that amount of money on an exchange with no 2fa in the first place.

lol

At the end it is his fault at 99% , because he didn't set up the 2FA on his btc-e account. Now the unique way is to contact the support and his police station.

I'd say more like 100% his fault. The best part is that because he didn't have 2FA enabled it is pretty much impossible to ascertain how much of his system/accounts are compromised. If he had bothered to use 2FA and this actually happened then he could be certain that 2FA was hacked (meaning his entire system is compromised).

Without 2FA he is going to have to get some scooby snacks and hire a crew of hippies to drive around the internet in a van looking for the criminal. Good luck with that.
355  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 14, 2015, 02:13:25 PM
BTW if you're still in doubt about 2FA you should check out the comments on the reddit post for this thread (someone submitted it to reddit):
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2vv2ss/someones_complaining_on_bitcointalk_that_his_btce/

Almost all the comments mention the fact that you didn't use 2FA. You should be spending your time right now formatting your computer (or using another computer which is known to be clean) and then checking the security settings of all of your accounts.
356  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][XCP] Counterparty - Pioneering Peer-to-Peer Finance - Official Thread on: February 14, 2015, 02:09:42 PM
Finally got to the first page of the rich list  Grin

Richlist: http://blockscan.com/balance
Account: 1CUNTw77feeweJqXryxGyV5Vr5HfG52zka
Place: #49

I will keep those funds there for a very long time.

Nice address.
357  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Re: Blockchain Wallet Hacked and Bitcoins Stolen on: February 14, 2015, 02:04:11 PM
Quote from: owlcatz
Quote from: jcdmp on February 12, 2015, 04:09:05 PM

here is my reddit link

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2vgmu6/blockchain_wallet_hacked_and_bitcoins_stolen/

thanks


Cool thanks, but i see you never replied there... Did you figure out what happened and was bci of any use/help?

Also wondering about what happened. It makes me scared for my own blockchain wallet. :-/



It shouldn't. You should have logging etc enabled for instances like this so that you can know as much information about what has happened.

If you fail to enable logging etc, you are willingly asking for less information about what happens to your btc.
358  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 14, 2015, 01:44:43 PM
btc-e must be able to see where the majority of those funds went. things like this piss me off, they continually refuse to work with customers in situations like this........

Correct! That is the point! I think that they saw that I have a great amount an my account and took it and made me to be blame of not installing 2FA!
But if they know that not using it is not safe they should insist on using it!

You are to blame though, and if you think anyone else is or that anyone else's privacy should be compromised because you didn't take security seriously you are seriously deluded.

Why even bother with 1password if you don't even activate 2FA on an account that holds more than forty thousand USD?

Today is 2FA tomorrow is 4FA and so on. When I bring my money to bank they say to me what is modern and latest security! If my security measure was out of date they should warn me. Everybody should do what they are professionals in! I don't understand weather it is safe 2fA or not. But they are crypto exchange and they are professionals in it. If it is necessary to install it they should have warned me that my security is under threat

If you really feel that 2FA is that stupid then so be it, it feels like you're impossible to reason with on this point. Don't let the fact that Google/Gmail, Facebook, Lastpass, Dropbox, Steam and dozens of other prominent websites rely and promote 2FA to help increase account security greatly change your mind.

A bitcoin exchange is not a bank. Bitcoin and cryptocurrency itself aren't defined as actual currency in most places.

On the topic of whose responsibility security is you should probably try to better familiarize yourself with the terms of services that you use when it comes to cryptocurrency:

source: BTC-E Terms & Conditions ( https://btc-e.com/page/1 )
359  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 14, 2015, 01:37:55 PM
Using wifi isn't the greatest idea when money is at stake.

It's no better or worse than a wired connection.

You connection to whichever website you're visiting is due to HTTPS/SSL, not because you have a wire plugged into your computer. That's what public key cryptography is about, being able to exchange information along channels that other people can watch. If someone can break your security by watching your wifi connection, then public key cryptography is flawed. But, to the best of our knowledge, that's not the case yet.

Besides which, lets say you're connected to a site that's not secure. Supposing you live anywhere but a city with thousands of people around, do you think the greater risk to your security is going to be the kid who happens to be within snooping range of your wifi, or the dedicated hackers that are picking up the traffic flows to the insecure website you and hundreds or thousands of other people are visiting?

I've used wifi almost exclusively for 10 or maybe even 15 years now. I've traded stocks, bought mutual funds, filed taxes, bought and sold bitcoin litecoin prime coin, done all my online banking, though it, etc... From my house, from the coffeeshop, from the airport. Not a single penny has gone missing. What I do do is make sure that i'm connected to each site securely (look for the padlock... when in serious doubt, and this might be more of a stretch for some people, I've even SSH'ed to a free shell account just to double-check a keys fingerprint (usually at airports, honestly).

What the greater issue is, is how do you connect to things like your email? If you're connecting via port 110 (POP) or 143 (IMAP), your credentials, your emails themselves, everything, are being transmitted across the internet, through who knows how many routers that may or may not be up to date, all in clear text. And being that email access is how services authenticate us, that's the BIGGEST risk, right there, I think.

Sorry... I just think that the whole "don't use wifi, its not secure" thing is way overplayed...

Because just by gaining access to your wifi network (which AFAIK is possible if you snoop enough) is the easiest way someone could compromise your computer. If someone has access to your computer then they don't even need to bother sniffing the traffic between you and a website.

http://null-byte.wonderhowto.com/how-to/hack-wi-fi-cracking-wpa2-psk-passwords-using-aircrack-ng-0148366/

Also--what wifi security did this user use (if any at all given they didn't bother with 2FA)?

And yes, wifi is probably an unlikely factor in this event but it is still a factor nonetheless.

Want to access your exchange account with $100 USD on it? wifi doesn't sound too bad.
Want to access your exchange account with $40,000 USD on it? I sure as hell wouldn't use wifi.
360  Economy / Exchanges / Re: WARNING! 40 000 USD was stolen fom BTC-e.com account! on: February 14, 2015, 01:30:34 PM
-Not having 2FA enabled = asking for money to be stolen - 2FA is safier probably (But there are cases when it is also hacked) if they don't demand  it How can I know what other security measures were done. I can't know about them I do my business they do there.  Safety of my money it is there business. All bitcoins is a question of trust! I chose to trust btc-e because I had to make such a choice otherwise I wouldn't earn my 40 K
-Keeping 40k worth of money on a website that could disappear at any moment = asking for money to be stolen - Where to keep 40 - Where to keep 40 k in bitcoins considering that exchange rate of the bitcoin can make 20 % a day?
-Acting as if macs can't get viruses = asking for money to be stolen - It can but I've checked it has not!
-Using a service which doesn't send you an email to authorize every single transaction and then trusting said service with 40k USD = asking for money to be stolen
-"So everything was ready for the stealing." = you made it ready for stealing by not following basic security procedures (activating 2FA etc) - 2FA can be hacked as well as https if they mean that the password was stolen through that door, especially if an employee envolved.

My questions (please answer all of these so we can see what factors may have attributed to this situation):
-Were you using wifi? - Rarely most of the time I use private modem
-Were you using a wireless keyboard? - never
-What browser do you use? - tor over vpn
-Does anyone else use your computer? - no
-Do you share your wifi access with anyone else? - no
-How long is your password (roughly), is it a dictionary word? or is it a complicated set of numbers/letters. - of cause my passowrd is made by 1password
-Do you share the same password on ANY other service ANYWHERE - never

-Not having 2FA enabled because "it might be hacked" = inexcusable. You made the decision not to use an easy to use security feature, not your exchange. Safety of cryptocurrency is 100% your business and if you rely on anyone else for it you're probably going to get stung.
-That is the risk you take if you want to make that kind of money--you should be using better account security if you have that much at stake.
-Viruses/malware/trojans can & do go undetected; someone who really wants to (especially when 40k is at stake) can easily write custom malware that is undetectable for a long time. This applies to all operating systems.
-Yes it may well be possible to hack 2FA, but you didn't have it enabled in the first place so making that sort of accusation is completely baseless. You can only make that claim when you have 2FA enabled in the first place. You didn't.

-If you've ever used your accounts over wifi it is possible someone has eavesdropped on your account details (although somewhat unlikely depending upon your exact situation)
-Tor nodes can monitor/sniff/save your traffic. I would think it is a better idea to use a reputable VPS provider than tor for financial transactions.
-Did you have 2FA enabled with your 1password account? If not then this is another possibility of where your password was copied from.

As much as I feel bad for you, the reality is your money was not stolen--you didn't use 2FA, someone used your account to create unauthorized transactions and you are now demanding the exchange reveal confidential transaction data of its other customers (who probably had 2FA enabled) without a court/police order?

Your thread title is inaccurate. Your money was not 'stolen'. You didn't use 2FA which helps to prevent unauthorized access. Someone gained unauthorized access to your account and made unauthorized trades.

If btc-e actually cooperated and provided any information of other customers in this situation (without a police/court order) it would set an alarming precedent and I am sure they would lose many customers over it.

WHAT POLICE AND WHAT COURT DO YOU MEAN?Huh WHAT COUNTRY A POLICE  AND A COURT SHOULD BELONG TO?
NIGERIA? MAY BE COLUMBIA? RUSSIA?
IF THERE ARE NO CRYPTO EXCHANGES or CRYPTO BANKS responsible for the safety of the money the future of the project of BITCOIN is soon death!

The country you reside in I would presume. You have to report the unauthorized access, the police then have to investigate the unauthorized access. How this happens depends upon what country you are based in; you should be aware that bitcoin and all cryptocurrencies don't really have many laws that cover their usage, so you are basically operating in a legal grey area (which is why activating things like 2FA is important).

There is no way any company is going to willy-nilly hand over other customers information without this process taking place. If they do they are completely incompetent.

I know it is frustrating to be told by a company that you are at fault--take it from someone who isn't associated with any exchange or bitcoin company: you didn't take your account security seriously enough and this is what can happen.

And yes, 2FA could be hacked, or your phone could be hacked. Does it mean you shouldn't take the precaution of using it? No.

My theory is you were probably targeted by someone who has access to your computer/accounts or watched you enter in your password. You may have been targeted specifically because you didn't use 2FA. Who knows.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!