It says the company has changed its name twice, and changed to BitBanx Ltd on 4 April 2014

It's quite simple:

#1, You said that I can't pay my mom the rent I owe her.
#2, I pointed out that your lame internet insult is an actual fact that applies to Mark Lyford rather than me.


Let me know if you need any further explanation.

But you haven't even gotten payouts equal to what the shares cost.  So you haven't made any money yet.  You've spent more than you've received.









You want to talk about paying rent to Mum?  Mark borrowed £150,000 against his mum's house - at the all-time height of his career - and he wasn't able to pay it back.  Even during his heyday of internet "success", he never actually made any money.  "When he was an internet millionaire" he was taking out loans that he didn't even have his own collateral for.  And that's the successful time of his life that supposedly qualifies him as as a genius internet businessman.

Even for years after that, with multiple new business ventures, he wasn't able to pay back that loan (He admits this in his book). Basically, none of his business ventures have ever been profitable, and he has no idea how to make money or run a successful company.  

That wouldn't necessarily be relevant, except that Mark has made it clear that an investment in Banx is an investment in himself and his business experience.










Therefore, an investment in Banx is an investment in repeated failure with never a profit.  Like you, Mark has spent more money than he's made.  That's his experience:  How to lose money.

Lyrabar and Unitus, because they can both be mined with CPUs.  They can also be mined with GPUs, but CPUs still earn coins.  So even if all your rigs are mining other things and you don't want to stop mining your current coins, you have some available CPUs that can mine in addition to what you're already mining. 

With Lyrabar, it uses the Lyra2RE algo which is designed to keep mining decentralized.  A $100 video card like a GTX 750ti can easily compete with a $600 GTX 980, and a normal CPU gets less but still gets a consistent income from a pool.  And Lyrabar has a maximum supply of under 2 million coins, so even a few coins a day might eventually be worth a lot.

With Unitus, it uses 5 algos.  I've been CPU mining with Yescrypt - an average CPU only using 3 threads still gets more hash than a GPU, and you can merge-mine it too.  Or, you can use a GPU, you can mine Blake 256,  merge-mine Qubit with Myriad, merge-mine CANN on X11, or merge mine it on Skein and profit-switch between Myriad and Digibyte.  So Unitus is great for a lot of reasons, for a lot of people.

I like coins under 2 million.  Lyrabar, Fractalcoin, Keycoin.  I like Unitus too, it has a relatively low supply (now under 30 million) and uses 5 algos which are all merge-mineable.  So with all those miners, of all different algos, a lot of them merge-mining their main coins and dumping Unitus because it's "free", it helps to have a lower supply IMO.

I did like Sapience XAI, which has less than a million, but it's currently in community takeover limbo. 

Every altcoin will be worth less than Bitcoin, for the foreseeable future.  There's no need to generate billions of them to have a cheap coin.

I have cookies turned off

That's because I've been posting your direct quotes mate.  Don't blame me if everything I quote you on was a lie.



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1181883.0

Banx is supposed to be transitioning to BitShares soon, and will then be listed as an asset. 

DGB is on the verge of being ready.  If the price continues to increase, and stays up for a few more weeks without crashing severely, then you could feel more confident to add it.  The same goes for NLG;  a large and persisent community of people who believe that the coin has value will eventually make the perception a reality.

(Full disclosure - I just sold all of my DGB and NLG while they're up and put it into NEM.  If they never go back down, that's bad for me but good for NLG and DGB)

NEM has been in development long enough to qualify, but it's still relatively new and probably also needs some more time to prove itself.

Why does your business prospectus say that BanxShares will be exchanged only for Bitcoin, making BanxShares a pure crypto-based asset?



If you're selling BanxShares for fiat, are you also paying dividends to those buyers in fiat?

You're the one who stalked me to other unrelated topics and tried to spread this argument all over bitcointalk.

Nobody responded to you, of course, because they recognized your weak trolling for what it was. 

If I was a troll like you, there wouldn't be 14 pages of replies to me.

You haven't made any money on Banx so far, unless you've been allowed to sell while other people are not allowed to sell.

Then why couldn't you answer how many weeks BitShares DNS existed?

I provided links with the quotes, everyone can click them and see they're real.

You bought BitShares PTS because you thought BitShares DNS was going to be big, and now you're trying to shit on me for being fooled by BitShares.

How many weeks did BitShares DNS exist? 

As I have said in the other thread, sod off.  Nobody asked you here in the first place, so there's no need to announce that you're leaving.  You can just leave.  Nobody cares.






Except for straight answers.  But like you said, you offered what you can.  That doesn't include straight answers, because your business model doesn't allow you to be honest.





Have you ever heard of "projection"?  I posted an entire play-by-play analysis of the history of your company, and you just showed up and said "Whatever, who cares."

Then you came back, over and over, just to say that you're not going to say anything. 

You continually change the subject and try to confuse the issues to provide a distraction from the facts.


 


If that was true, you would just go do those things instead of talking about it.  I never asked for any of your time - you've gone out of your way to take up as much time here as you could.






Real crypto doesn't have company owners.   






I did my own research.  If people think Banx is one step away from outright theft, that's because they want to think that. 





No one needs to speak to you to make up their own mind.





And yet you can't grasp the same concept.  Either you like what I'm doing here or you don't. 

Read what your own company is doing.






So, according to your definition of IPO combined with Mark's definition of BanxShares, it's an IPO.  But you also said it's an ICO/PIO, and that it's completely different from an IPO.  But it pays dividends;  it's an unregistered security.

You're selling SHARES.  Have you read the name of the thing you're selling?  BanxSHARES.

And ICO is either an Initial Coin Offering - which is the same as an IPO - or it's an Initial Crowdfunding Offering.  Either way, it can't be a Private Investment, since a Crowd is not Private. 

So you either don't know what you're talking about, or you're a liar.  Which is it?

Yes, it is.  He comes here to my topic to tell me he's going to ignore me, after doing his best to derail the conversation so nobody can talk about things he doesn't want us to talk about.

Sod off snotty, this thread is about BitShares PTS.  Don't try to make everything about yourself and your unregistered security which you sell publicly.