OK that link worked.  Thanks! 

But it still doesn't work if I'm on the Fractalcoin dashboard and click "Edit Account".  Maybe it's a bad link, https://fractalcoin.miningpoolhub.com/index.php?page=account&action=edit

That's what it's all about!

Anything is possible with open source.

I don't know if they have btc, but I bet they have herpes

I've been trying to raise my Fractalcoin donation percentage, but the account page has been down for a few days. 

Also, I'd like to donate additional FRAC or BTC to support the pool now that there's not a steady block reward coming in.

FRAC has doubled today at Cryptsy!

Exciting times, my friends.

Excellent point, and I agree.  It is hard for other coins to compete with Fractalcoin, since there are less than 1 million FRAC in existence.  With unlimited billions of coins, how could Dogecoin ever be worth as much as Fractalcoin?  It couldn't. 

Know Your Customer?  That doesn't apply to decentralized cryptocurrencies.  I'm sorry that you think Bitcoin is a company that has to be licensed by the government and keep records of its customers, but that's not the case.   



The Patriot Act was before Bitcoin existed, but feel free to continue fantasizing about George Bush anally penetrating you.

FYI, the rest of us would know if someone rammed a dick up our ass.  Most people assume others are like themselves, so you may be shocked to learn that normal people's assholes aren't so torn up and stretched out that they could have a dick up there and not even know it. 



But please, tell us more about double-spends.




Wow, so you're saying double-spending is a serious issue, even for just a few percent of a single block's transactions.  Tell us more.





OK....

You seem to be doing a great job at arguing against yourself, so I'll leave you to it.

Everyone else, come get some Fractalcoin!  The price is already moving up now that POW is over.

You're saying they could double-spend a very small amount of coins? 



So your explanation of why it's idiotic is idiotic itself.  Who would waste all that hashrate just to double-spend a very small amount of coins?




Because it's idiotic.  Transactions that don't comply with what?  The transaction fee?  And they're going to censor them how?  By making you wait to get into the next block?

The whole coin is anonymous, it makes sense for the devs to be that way too.

Anyway, you want some more KEY?  I'm going to do a giveaway to get more people to download the wallet, but I haven't decided the best way to go about it yet.

Maybe I'll wait until Cryptsy has their wallet under maintenance, so people will have to get their own address. 

I think I'll give 250KEY to the first 50 people who ask.  What do you guys think?  Any promotional ideas?

 

I'm hurting the coin by saying that it still has potential...

And I guess you think these other people are helping the coin by saying it's dead and nobody should buy it?

I'll continue using the regular definitions of words, instead of your backwards definitions.

These people have admitted that they sold their coins for a higher price, and THEN they came here to destroy the price so that the people they sold to will lose money. 

You said the coin was dead.  Why are you here? 



So you admit that you sold your coins to someone else, even though you believed them to be worthless. 

Since you're a scammer by your own words, why should anyone listen to your opinion?

It's not Joe's fault they're bagholding, I was just pointing it out.  Thank you for agreeing.




That's true, so the coin still has the same potential it always had.



Most of the community are expressing that they want the coin to die.  I disagree. 



It was unlikely from the beginning, which is why the coins were so cheap to start with.  Everyone knew it was a high-risk investment, but they saw those dollar signs and wanted to get rich.  I still do.

So...at first you thought this was a viable project, and you believed it was possible for thousands of people all over the world to eventually use Sapience and develop their own AI applications for it.

...but now you think it's impossible that anyone will ever use it for anything.

A few months ago, you thought it was possible for one man to make it all happen.  But now, you don't think the entire community together can make it happen. 

Is that about right?

How many members of the Bitcoin Foundation have been criminally prosecuted?  4?  But you're not too moral to keep promoting Bitcoin, correct?  Is it because you think a trial on Bitcointalk carries more weight than a trial in the legal system?  Or are you just saying that Bitcoin has the most active scammers, and so we should all pool our efforts to make money from those scams instead of this other coin? 

Or are you saying that the crypto community can carry on with a project and make it work regardless of what other people do?



What other reason is anyone complaining about?  You say Joe's actions had a harmful effect on people's investments, and that's why people are angry.    But you don't think I should care about anyone else having a harmful effect on my investment?

Joe never took my money - you people who dumped your coins took my money.  And now you want the price to keep going down. 

So if you think the people who took money for it have a responsibility, then start coding already.

The pool is down, and nobody ever figured out how to solomine

The coin is running, and it's on the 3 biggest altcoin exchanges.  When you say it's "dead", what do you think that word means?



Why?  You said the coin is dead.  Move along.




You keep saying that, but it has nothing to do with anything I'm saying.  I get it, you miss him.  He broke your heart.  Take it to a relationships forum.

Since Joe is not here, but the coin is still here, I'm talking about the coin.  So far, you haven't had anything useful to add.



Then why are you crying and begging Joe to do more work for it?  You don't make any sense, and you need to make up your mind and decide what you even want.




Neither do you, except you're actually trying to make my coins worth less with all this screaming and wailing. 

You are trying to make me lose money, so don't talk about how other people don't care. 

Yawn. 

I support this project, and you're trying to tear it down.  Wow, that is soooo unusual.  I've NEVER seen a bunch of people frothing at the mouth and saying a coin was a scam.  Other than with Bitcoin, and every other coin. 

But THIS time, your outrage and accusations carry SOOOO much weight, I'm sure everyone will pay attention and really do something about it.

Because that's what you want - for someone else to do something.  First you wanted someone else to invent the world's first decentralized AI, and now you want someone else to harass the guy and sue him.  Or something?  Whatever. 

Of course, since you look down on Joe's knowledge of AI, maybe you know more.  Maybe I could pay you 10,000 XAI to develop some AI for Sapience.

But then, if you didn't deliver within a few months, people like you would curse you and throw tantrums. 

I had 2 nodes that lost all connections, so I copied my peers.dat from my 3rd node and used it for the other 2.  They worked for a few days, but then they lost all connections again.

I don't know if it matters, but the node that still has connections is running as an empty wallet without a balance - not staking.  It always seems to get several connections, while the staking wallets usually only get 1 connection.

Also, I don't know if it matters if I have 2 computers active at my house, I thought maybe it could cause an IP conflict, so I only run 1 Keycoin wallet at a time. 

This guy says we need a Linux wallet. 

Is that why he extended the crowdsale and cut the price in half?  So he could fake buy the coin himself? 

And then he couldn't afford enough fake buys to buy all the coins?

I can't read minds, so I don't know his intentions.  We could see if he ever did anything after he got the money.





So you're saying work was done, things were added and improved. 




He added things after he got the money?  So he did things, but he didn't get any more money from his work.  Why did he do that?  What was his intention?