I would assume that park the bus is not really a relevant game style anymore, not that it is not used properly when Rangers did it because they had the talent for it, but Leipzig also had a great roster to counter that whenever they wanted to as well. This provides proof that Leipzig could beat Rangers no matter what Rangers do.

So, why do we not all wager on Leipzig with every single funds we have? Because in football anything could happen and maybe it wouldn't be Rangers beating Leipzig but more like Leipzig losing to Rangers. Sometimes teams play much worse than they could, and that is what I fear may happen and that's why I will wager just a small sum.

The margin trading stop loss is still a dangerous thing, not the stop loss itself but the margin trading is inherently a very difficult thing to achieve. Which means that you need to actually pull off something amazing by calculating at where you should leave to save how much and so forth. Since, it is also quick, even a slight drop and increase would mean that you would be losing your short position for example.

This is why it is very hard to calculate and arrange that stop loss too. Spot trading is easier in comparison, I really do not like stop loss on spot unless I am invested into something that I really don't trust, but at least it would help you a bit more.

I love it when governments lead by example. I mean most of the time we see politicians give rules about things that would not matter to them at all. We are talking about a situation where if a government talks about the minimum wage, they do not have to care about it because in the end they will not be making the minimum wage salary themselves so why would they care about it?

However, when we see this type of stuff then it makes sense because they are taking it seriously on a personal level. If they want to turn bitcoin into a legal tender in Mexico, then having a BTM machine (bitcoin teller machine) would be a great way to prove to public how they actually walk the walk and not just talk the talk.

I’ve never really compared the both of them, but I do use the both without minding whatever would be the difference, and I am assuming that you’re talking about BUSD (Binance USD) which is an alternative of the USDT?

BNB (BinanceCoin) is different and is not a stable coin which makes it the wrong comparison in this case, because you’re meant to compare USDT which is a stablecoin with another stablecoin, so in this case it is BUSD which is also owned by Binance the same way that BNB is owned by the same exchange. If you’re making use of Binance exchange, then BUSD would be a better option to go with.

You said you are still going to be in need of ATM machine, then how do you make use of an ATM machine when you do not have a bank account? Before you can be able to make use of an ATM machine you must have had money saved in a bank before you are able to withdraw from an ATM machine, unless you are referring to a Bitcoin ATM machine? And your exchange cannot serve as a bank, another thing you’re also forgetting is that exchanges can be hacked, and that can lead to you losing your assets.

If you even want to save your money as Bitcoin, then exchanges shouldn’t be the way to store it, you should have a non custodial wallet where you can store your bitcoins offline.

I do not believe that teams start to play horribly just after they guarantee winning. Sure, there could be some players missing in some cases because why would you play tired superstars after you have nothing to play for, but when the team is good enough to miss a few players that shouldn't really be a problem.

I am not saying it just because of this game, it doesn't matter which one, PSG will play more and do you really believe that they will lose them all just because they guaranteed it? Of course not, they will win some, maybe all and that is why we shouldn't consider PSG championship as a reason to bet against them for the upcoming games.

Bitcoin looking weak and not going down wouldn't be a total surprise, it has done that before and it will probably do it again. I am guessing that there is a 50-50% chance as always for it go up as much as for it to go down. However, we should still be careful because it seems like there is a bit of a problem with the current market and it looks like there isn't enough hype.

This isn't just data any more, people are losing hope and excitement about bitcoin which is the most dangerous thing. If the data shows that it will go down, a hyped group of people who create a big enough noise could turn that around, but if the community loses hope, regaining it takes a long time.

Unfortunately that has been going on for a while now. I do not know why people are like that, but I know that it is not healthy and it should be avoided as much as possible. Reality is that we are talking about something that is a bit worse because it is not really profitable right now, at least back in the day it was sort of profitable to worship him, still a bad idea but some people made some money.

Today it is not even profitable and people are just trying to find a reason to get into something and make money that way. Reality is that we are not going to really find a way to profit based on Elon tweets anymore, and people are just hopeless.

That's the thing, where did they move? Maybe ape? Maybe something else, there are so many people with a lot of coins these days.

The main reason is that there are plenty of people who got in early and they are using some of that profit to go coin to coin, token to token and hype that up, make it stay high and hyped and profitable for some people, then when it is at the peak, they leave and take their profit. They can do this because they have a lot of money, it is risky and it hurts the market overall since it consolidates the investments into the hands of few whales, maybe not few, maybe thousands, but still a terrible thing in a market with tens of millions of people all around the world.

I agree that you may not find one "true" answer here because it is never really a objective result with a data backed by it. This is more like how we could do something we think is good in art, but someone else may mock it and not think that it is good. This is why we shouldn't really focus on how we could pick the casino but more about if they are legit or not.

If a website is legit and they do not steal money from the gamblers then it is more than enough. Next step is where we check the support, if the support actually does help then there is nothing wrong with it and you can move on. Lastly we check marketing, if there are promotions and such. This is it. Any place who satisfies you with this is fine.

I believe that Benzma situation is a bit of a unique deal though. I mean he has been with the team since he was much younger, and he had other options that scored instead of him so he wasn't used that much, he was even benched most of the time as well, he wasn't in the starting eleven for many many years, and simply just got subbed in.

All of which allowed him to both grow closer to the team, many players are still same players, but it also allowed him to perfect his craft while getting paid a lot, training with the best trainers, and learning the team at the same time. When the other options left, he was primed to play well with his teammates who he knew for many years and trained together.

Crypto owners have the initiative like us. They also want privacy, that is the reason why they chose this business over the traditional online gambling that needs KYC. It's just the situation now have gotten stricter. It could be the government that forces them to do KYC on their platform or else their business will get shutdown but on some places, there are can be governments that are not like that that are not strict.

This is why we can still see gambling sites which are totally anonymous and don't require such thing as KYC, and if ever they will require it or they have one, they still do an early warning so that users can decide if they still going to continue playing on that casino or not.

If people are looking at bitcoin "just" for the profit then they shouldn't even be here if you ask me. Obviously profit is a major part of bitcoin world, the general crypto world but at the same time it's not the only reason why people should be interested in it. It's such a huge and big deal that we should be focusing on other stuff as well when we are investing.

I personally love it because it brings me so much freedom for example, freedom to be away from government and banks. Making profit is a great addition to that, but they are not addition to profit for me. When I first got into crypto, it was years ago and we weren't really looking for these type of profits, they happened and we were happy but we weren't interested in that initially.

People do not really realize how much nearly 10% return is. I mean they never really considered crypto investment as a stable thing, so when they see a stable"ish" levels of return they do get weird about it. To them, if they want something realistic and normal then they would have stayed in the fiat world and never come to crypto world, but since they are here that means to them they should be making like 500% returns a year or something.

I personally stake everything I can, maybe people do not know this but you could "stake" or basically earn interest because it is not staking in the correct sense of the word, bitcoin, bnb, eth, ltc, usdt, busd and all that. These are trusted coins or stablecoins, and I love the results.

I wouldn't put it past him to change clubs again because he has been dealt a bad hand twice now. Real Madrid was a great team to play for, he shouldn't have changed that, look at how awesome they are right now. I get that Real Madrid took 100 million for him, which is a great deal for them, but Ronaldo could have simply refused if he wanted to.

Juventus had their first ever non-champion year in Serie A for the past 10 or so years when he joined, and ManU is not doing so well neither, not looking good for the future neither. He would have to talk with the manager of course, but he could leave. Going back to his first ever club, at Lisbon could be a great deal for him, both to retire and to be in his home nation as well.

I believe it should be a temporary thing, I get that providers may not want to accept certain coins and that’s understandable. However, not wanting anything to do with all of this at all doesn't really make sense to me at all.

It must be something decent and we should all be focusing on a decent return, probably going to end up with like 4-5 decent coins on all providers, and some providers will accept even more but that’s about it, I do not think that it is going to be "just btc, nothing else" for a long time because that will create a competition difference, anyone who offers more will end up getting all the customers and leave others to dust.

At that point it depends on if you want to gamble something else or want to participate into something else or not. If you want to, then you could end up getting out as quickly as allowed and then go into something else.

However, if you are not sure about it then you are not going to be that much profitable at all and it will end up with something bad in the end because being hesitant is the worst thing you could do, in that case just stay and do not change at all. This means that if we are sure to get out and get into something then we could do this, you need to be sure, but if you are not entirely sure then there is nothing you could do.

Napoli was so close to being the champions, they were either at the top or near the top for so many games in a row. With a 3 game streak where they lost twice and a draw in between, they are now 5 points behind Inter, who lacks one game, so they are behind even more if you consider that.

So, I am guessing that there is a situation where we could see the teams not really doing that well at all when the league comes close if they are not ready for it. Everyone expected the same from Lille last year as well, lose the last games because they were not used to that stage, Napoli failed where Lille succeeded. Inter is still looking better to me.

You mean to say that your friend never show you his losses but only show his profits alone? But, if you are really curious about the losses more than his profits, you should ask him about this, not us because we don't know your friend. It's fine that you will have a hard time as a beginner because you are only just a beginner anyway but once you overcome this, the next steps are not going to be that hard.

You realized that your friend is lying because he don't seem to experience what you have experience when you start trading but don't worry because all pro traders experience that but sometimes they just prefer to be positive by only showing their gains. They don't want to remember their bad start anymore.

Getting rich overnight is not possible even in the new coins because they still need some time in order for them to get listed on an exchange but for the older coins, they usually pump really high after a long time so both need patience for this but its more recommended to invest in older coins because it's much safer.

What you get is only a welcome bonus so it's normal that they don't pay you for the second time around but there are similar platforms that offers the same thing. Depending only on them cannot make you rich but if you want to be rich you need to invest or do trading. Searching for tips and tricks on how get better on those activities are more beneficial than searching for sites offers welcome bonuses.