|
+1
I haven't got my hands dirty there yet, and would rather spend what time I find to do import/export of keys, but that is something that would help some of my scripts a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
Sender sends email
Sender pays to the clearthingy escrow -> Email is unblocked
Receiver clicks "refund"
Sender/Recipient pair whitelisted, not more need to pay escrow
All emails not accepted by recipient have the payment revert to escrow for keeping the system
Where do I sign up for such an email service?
|
|
|
|
I'm trying real hard to understand what the 'Sensitive' in the topic has to do with the offer... Also, if I get emails from unknown people selling me viagra for bitcoins, now I know who to target my wrath at  |
|
|
|
|
I'd vote, but my particular position isn't considered in the poll options...
It's a personal view, but I'm sure some will share it, although it might be hard to express in a small amount of words, still I'd like to try and express it here:
NO. FUCKING. WAY.
But I'm not obsessed with my views and they tend to change over time, so feel free to change WAY to other less offensive synonyms.
|
|
|
|
|
And you send these where, and at what price?
|
|
|
|
Advertising is not good in itself, you have to advertise something positive about a product. If what's advertised in the news is that:
Bitcoin is an "illegal ponzi scheme" by "internet terrorists" to "launder money, fund terrorism, defraud elderly granny, and enable crack smuggling", and people now face "10 years in prison for trading bitcoin" plus 100000$ fine.
What would you think will happen to the demand for bitcoin, and hence its exchange value?
For what target audience? Sure, it would probably be a major set back on getting the general public to get on board, but I'm pretty sure it would make the bitcoins already in the market much MUCH more valuable, though cashing in would be heaps harder, I guess. |
|
|
|
Well. the market would have dropped to about .05 without darkpools.
Ha! Nice answer... though I doubt those putting the dark orders would actually put them that low on the open, but hey. |
|
|
|
I don't know if etrade runs a dark pool but there are dark pools for probably everything traded on etrade.
The dark pool seems to be working very well. It is allowing people to place big orders closer to the market price. The result is greater depth, tighter spreads and less wild swings of the market.
Nice theory... how is that working out lately? :p |
|
|
|
I archived my wallet to be opened 16 years from now. Will I run into a similar problem?
Peer into my crystal ball with me as we predict the future.... No, seriously, upward compatibility (reading old wallet.dat's into new versions of bitcoin) shouldn't be an issue. And Satoshi and I are discussing possible fixes for the upgrade/downgrade/upgrade scenario that we think is causing this. Ok, so I'm repeating myself quite a bit these days, must be the age catching up, but if we want real long term backups, we need a way to both export and import the priv keys... |
|
|
|
|
I really am puzzled about this thread... Why should we even bother to try and call attention to the fact that bitcoins are of great value for an organization such as wikileaks? It is only so if it doesn't get tagged 'illegal' and thus remove our chance of going mainstream first, which is part of what makes it of use to wikileaks.
I mean, technically? Sure, great, resilient, pseudo-anonymous, almost untraceable. But without actual people using it? And yes, I do mean beyound the geeky folk already backing it up, there's no way we'll be able to value bitcoins to the point where their usage is of any interest to organizations...
Also, c'mon, they know about it for sure... someone has told them about it, major coolness, cookie points to you, but give it a rest already. All we are doing now is begging for a witch hunt, old style. I see much value in bitcoins, I'm actually making extended investments in in, but not because it is of great use to undermine governments and powers that be, but because it is a better store of value, period!
Or I am completely out of my league here and I don't know what I'm talking about, but either way I think it is worth noting that while "they can't kill bitcoins", and I agree with this technically, "they" can certainly scare everyone away from it and their cats... just my BC0.02
|
|
|
|
genjix, you're the third person to run into this problem; I'm looking into it.
I suspect the problem is running a later svn version and then running the same wallet with an earlier svn version; the format of wallet transactions changed recently to support the 'accounts' feature.
Your bitcoins are still safe in the wallet (all the private keys are still in there). Stay tuned...
3rd person... ok, I cried wolf here with the collision thing Nothing to see, move along now... |
|
|
|
Are we seeing the first "pretty much impossible" collision here? Time to look for a transaction with that value and age on your histories, folks... |
|
|
|
Is there any way to recover a lost password? Can't login to my account...
PM me all you know about your account (so I can establish you are you) BCIN, BCOUT, login, current balance, last transfer (in or out), last bets, anything that can help me make sure it is your account. |
|
|
|
Well, I never ran the binaries headless, but I did run it many times by compiling myself. I don't remember the exact steps in fixing dependencies, but using macports it wasn't hard at all, but I did have to muck around the makefile to get the paths correct. The following is for r156, but should work pretty much unchanged for current svn head, I think. Just make sure paths are correct for you, and you are using 64bit OSX. If you're on 32bit, change the x86_64 to i386 (untested). Also, build with make -f makefile.osx bitcoind , if you don't specify the target it will try to build bitcoin which is the GUI version. # Copyright (c) 2009-2010 Satoshi Nakamoto
# Distributed under the MIT/X11 software license, see the accompanying
# file license.txt or http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php.
# Mac OS X makefile for bitcoin
# Laszlo Hanyecz (solar@heliacal.net)
CXX=llvm-g++
DEPSDIR=/opt/local
INCLUDEPATHS= \
-I"$(DEPSDIR)/include" -I"$(DEPSDIR)/include/db46"
LIBPATHS= \
-L"$(DEPSDIR)/lib" -L"$(DEPSDIR)/lib/db46"
WXLIBS=
LIBS= -dead_strip \
$(DEPSDIR)/lib/db46/libdb_cxx-4.6.a \
$(DEPSDIR)/lib/libboost_system-mt.a \
$(DEPSDIR)/lib/libboost_filesystem-mt.a \
$(DEPSDIR)/lib/libboost_program_options-mt.a \
$(DEPSDIR)/lib/libboost_thread-mt.a \
$(DEPSDIR)/lib/libboost_regex-mt.a \
$(DEPSDIR)/lib/libssl.a \
$(DEPSDIR)/lib/libcrypto.a
DEFS=-D__WXMAC_OSX__ -DNOPCH -DMSG_NOSIGNAL=0 -DFOURWAYSSE2
DEBUGFLAGS=-g -DwxDEBUG_LEVEL=0 $(DF)
# ppc doesn't work because we don't support big-endian
CFLAGS=-mmacosx-version-min=10.5 -arch x86_64 -O3 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat $(DEFS) $(INCLUDEPATHS)
HEADERS=headers.h strlcpy.h serialize.h uint256.h util.h key.h bignum.h base58.h \
script.h db.h net.h irc.h main.h rpc.h uibase.h ui.h noui.h init.h
OBJS= \
obj/util.o \
obj/script.o \ obj/db.o \ obj/net.o \
obj/irc.o \
obj/main.o \
obj/rpc.o \
obj/init.o \
cryptopp/obj/sha.o \
obj/sha256.o \
cryptopp/obj/cpu.o
all: bitcoin
obj/%.o: %.cpp $(HEADERS)
$(CXX) -c $(CFLAGS) -DGUI -o $@ $<
cryptopp/obj/%.o: cryptopp/%.cpp
$(CXX) -c $(CFLAGS) -O3 -DCRYPTOPP_DISABLE_ASM -o $@ $<
bitcoin: $(OBJS) obj/ui.o obj/uibase.o
$(CXX) $(shell $(DEPSDIR)/bin/wx-config --cxxflags) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $(LIBPATHS) $^ $(shell $(DEPSDIR)/bin/wx-config --libs --static) $(LIBS)
obj/nogui/%.o: %.cpp $(HEADERS)
$(CXX) -c $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $<
bitcoind: $(OBJS:obj/%=obj/nogui/%)
$(CXX) $(CFLAGS) -o $@ $(LIBPATHS) $^ $(LIBS)
clean:
-rm -f bitcoin bitcoind
-rm -f obj/*.o
-rm -f obj/nogui/*.o
-rm -f cryptopp/obj/*.o
|
|
|
|
Paxum is not all that interesting for smallish amount outside the US. Fees are much worst than LR. Although the BTC -> ATM is really interesting |
|
|
|
If somebody is fan of pistols and guns (btw I'm not), that does not mean he shoot kittens every morning.
It doesn't? CRAP!!! * nelisky googles for changing name directions |
|
|
|
Try MoneyStream. They'll do PSC -> LR$ and I've used their service many times. Their English is bad (they're Russian), so be forewarned! lol Heh, €10 -> LR$9... that's even worst. But again, if that is taken into account when making an offer, I will buy PSC for BTC |
|
|
|
I can't find an easy way to convert PSC to money, except for sites that do PSC -> PP like http://www.paysafecard2webmoney.com/paysafecard_en.html but I'm not sure these can be trusted... anyone has experience? Still, if you want to try this out and are willing to cover that exchange rate, why don't you drop by #bitcoin-otc http://bitcoin-otc.com/ and make me an offer? I'm willing to give it a try for a small amount, and if all goes well we can talk larger deals. |
|
|
|
For the record I'm pretty much pro-porn and pro-gun. Though I understand why some people have issues with either one of those, I figure those are their issues and I don't want the government involved. I'm sure we can all think of relevant quotes from the likes of Franklin and Washington. Hell, I don't use any illegal drugs but I'd be for decriminalizing them, setting up some legal way to have prostitution outside of nevada, all kinds of things that are "bad". I don't see how throwing people in cages when they offend ones morals helps any. But that's just my .02 BTC. BTW anyone notice that mtgox is down to around 20 cents? It was close to 29 just the other day, does it always fluctuate that wildly? Maybe people exchanging BTC for dollars for christmas shopping?
mtgox: yeah, it's not the first time, it happens every time someone buys or sells a lot, the market is still very small. pro-stuff: that is the trick, I guess. I don't want to be taken as against anything. I don't own a gun, and I don't own any pornography (believe it or not ). I wasn't trying to say do one and not the other, but rather that we shouldn't try to police this things, when the very nature of bitcoins is to avoid that very control. But I see what I did wrong... I was looking so hard for an excuse to stop working that I posted on the wrong topic... I should have started this on the one where porn was bashed, not here. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
