New fancy sounding name, same scam. - Absurdly high rate of return
- Vague business model
- Anonymous operator with zero verification
SCAM+1 |
|
|
|
|
That's great plan. I just received first dividend. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, ports 8333-8334 are redirected to different machine in my local network. But MultiBit seems to be working OK for months already, except those rare, broken transactions.
Logs sended.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello jim618,
Thanks for your reply!
Lets see reasons you suggest:
- slow network - it's not a case, that's wired broadband connection, I am running web server here and some other services without any problems on multiple devices
- fees too low - I tried fees up to 0.05 BTC and still nothing
- shutdown Multibit and try again - I tried it twice, shutdown and start again. I saw status changing several times from "Connecting..." to "Online", but finally it went "Online" and transaction with "1 peer" has not been sended.
Another clues:
- I just successfully sent 15 BTC to external address with 0.001 BTC fee.
- I am trying 5 times already and I cannot sent ~50 BTC from one wallet to another (both addresses in MultiBit, separate wallets). I tried a fee up to 0.05 BTC and no difference.
- This must be something else bugging. Related to my Bitcoins or addresses, or separate wallets, I guess.
Can I send you debug files?
EDIT:
Some more clues, they may be helpful:
- All transactions I am trying to send, with "Seen by 1 peer. Not seen in chain." are not visible in blockchain/blockexplorer. Transaction ID not found.
- I just received transaction from exchange, with 0 Fee. Multibit saying "Seen by 3 peers. Not seen in chain.", but transaction can be viewed in Blockchain.info without problems.
|
|
|
|
Hello there, I am very happy Multibit user and donor  But one problem makes me worrying. Very often I have my transfers won't ever confirm by network. They just stuck on: "Seen by 1 peer. Not seen in chain." And no progress at all. I cannot use by wallet, and I have to revert blockchain to earlier date or restore whole %APPDATA%\Multibit folder from recent backup. Multibit latest version, 0.4.16, Windows 7 AMD64. Any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
How did you make this step "send the transaction one more time"?
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please contact all shareholders by e-mail and ask to vote in pool? It would be nice to choose together by voting, which exchange we want to move in.
|
|
|
|
There is still a memory leak. P2pool consuming 2.4 GB memory (RES) after running for 7 days.
Are you using most recent version 9.4-13-g5703b70? |
|
|
|
I have even better stats. On total 13187222 shares, 36281 stale shares = 0.275%. Using Ztex's BTCMiner on BitMinter pool. Unfortunately, my p2pool machine is too weak to get similar results on local p2pool with my FPGAs. Bitcoind latency is ~0.5s.  |
|
|
|
So please do it and move your business to Singapure or similar. Then we will invest. At this moment, it's exactly the same service as GLBSE was, and we can expect it's shutdown in couple of months or so. OK. What's your guarantee, that your service is any better than GLBSE? Is there any difference? Even interface looks the same. We will move our investments to your site and what? In 6 months you will close the site, because of legal actions against it?
If a twin look similar to another one, does it mean that they have the same knowledge, personality.... I don't care about their knowledge and personality. I need security of my investment. |
|
|
|
|
OK. What's your guarantee, that your service is any better than GLBSE? Is there any difference? Even interface looks the same. We will move our investments to your site and what? In 6 months you will close the site, because of legal actions against it?
|
|
|
|
|
E-mail received. Waiting for further updates.
|
|
|
|
Here's design of BTCFPGA custom-ASIC:   Pretty cool, isn't?!  |
|
|
|
$ python run_p2pool.py --version
/home/pioruns/p2pool/p2pool/util/pack.py:203: DeprecationWarning: object.__new__() takes no parameters
return Type.__new__(cls, bits, endianness)
9.4-11-g8bc9cd4
 $ python --version
Python 2.6.6 Some incompatibility with python 2.6.6? I tried it on python 2.7.3 (VM) and and no error. |
|
|
|
|
I am not using my node for mining, just for supporting network as 24/7 peer.
Did you make sure that your bitcoind from git had latest blockchain? Files are different from 0.7.1 and may be not compatible when you switching versions with same ~/.bitcoin directory.
EDIT:
Memory usage is really low now:) I left p2pool overnight, and after 12 hours of running, it establish connections to Peers: 5 out, 4 in. Physical usage 296MB, virtual 440MB. Well done, forrestv! I still can use p2pool on my 1GB RAM machine, I will leave it running:)
|
|
|
|
You welcome  So are you going to include var diff to GetWork protocol? It would be great to see, if it's available and useful, of course. |
|
|
|
Can you guys told all ports which are used currently for testing? What's the port for Stratum, var diff or GBT?
Stratum is on 3333 and 5050, GBT is on 8332 (I think). Both of them are out of testing and have variable difficulty enabled. To DrHaribo: This information should be included on first post in topic, as you declare full support to Stratum and GBT - but nowhere we can find info how to connect to it, except single posts inside this huge topic. Thank you. I am using miner BTCMiner from Ztex, which only supports var diff (I think). Can I use it's advantages on standard protocol GetWork (used by BTCMiner)?
Not yet. Variable difficulty hasn't been enabled on GW yet. Thanks for info. I will be waiting |
|
|
|
Yes, a little bit smaller usage in your machine. Your biggest p2pool instance eats 359 MB RAM (564 MB virtual). At this moment, my p2pool memory usage decreased to 442 MB RAM (651 MB virtual). P2pool is first time since v9 - usable, it not losing contact with bitcoind anymore, look at graphs: http://lenny.dnsd.me:9332/static/graphs.html?Hour |
|
|
|
|
Thank you. I am using miner BTCMiner from Ztex, which only supports var diff (I think). Can I use it's advantages on standard protocol GetWork (used by BTCMiner)?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
