|
He should be tagged as scammer. He refuses to pay dividends and buyback bonds. Instead we have agreement to sign with notarized stamp!
|
|
|
|
|
To get full list of shareholders, publish it, everybody confirms it and we start again receiving dividends. Simple as that.
|
|
|
|
Looks like amazingrando hasn't been there for a while. Last Active: October 31, 2012, 09:54:12 AM  Anyone have his contact details? |
|
|
|
My BTC address and shares has just been confirmed by JWU42. Thank you! Waiting for final solution now and first dividends  |
|
|
|
I think he is lying from the beginning about "giving wallet to a friend" Something must be hidden deeper out there @novusordo: Standard client will apply a fee to 1satoshi transfer, right? So it gonna be 100 satoshi + 0.005 BTC fee... |
|
|
|
|
Are those investments outside of GLBSE (1.2k) still making any profit?
|
|
|
|
Did you also get some kind of Code or something that only the share holder get too, to verify his claims?
What kind of "Code" you mean? |
|
|
|
Look at it now! Newest p2pool, newest bitcoind compiled, same machine. It was 5s at the beginning, after customizations 2s, now it is 0.5s !  |
|
|
|
Updated to v9. It seems I'm always one of the last ones to move over (because I'm not as active on these forums anymore). Could I possibly get someone to shoot me an email when a new binary is released? That way I don't get left behind, and we can move the transition to the next version along?  New: Mailing list for urgent news (updates, bugs): http://groups.google.com/group/p2pool-notificationsSubscribe here, you will got your e-mails |
|
|
|
|
So, how many assets we still have outside of GLBSE? Are your trading bot still running and making profit?
|
|
|
|
|
Payment received. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Only for Windows, written with .Net, and closed source. No comments. "everyone has Excel" ... Mate, on what world do you live? |
|
|
|
Gyver, not quite. Share have a flag that indicates whether the node that generated it got a stale share in the past, and from those, nodes can compute the stale share percentage and then the total hash rate with an expression like: unstale_hash_rate / (1 - pool_stale_proportion)
Is it just a flag or a counter? We have whole network stats for DOA and Orphans too, are there 2 flags/counters? With a counter the stale estimation should be pretty good. If it's a flag, multiple stales between shares would be miscounted as an unique stale. What might be underestimated too is the amount of work from nodes which stop mining after stale shares. Note that I don't think it's an actual problem. With around 9-10 GH/s, I've always seen above 100% PPS and I'm currently at around 115% PPS for the last active weeks (computed from my actual earnings vs actual hash power). It matches the : - p2pool.info luck, - my efficiency, - the average tx fee percentage. This is why I'm back mining on p2pool: hashpower promises at least 105% PPS when leasing and falls short due to high rejects, I compared my actual PPS over several weeks and stats are largely in favor of p2pool for me. I left p2pool because I had I/O issues and likes to test novelties, but now bitcoind and p2pool are both on SSDs and they are just flying (at least when I'm not rewiring the whole apartment...). My first SSD should be arriving soon. I'm seriously hoping it decreases my stale rate - like you, I think it's I/O related. M Have you got latest bitcoind from git? It's much faster than stable version, with new database. With latest bitcoind from git my GetWork Latency dropped about 5-10x times. I'll try it on my server. Sounds risky for my main wallet, but main wallet isn't used for mining. Thanks! M That's are my results, on Intel Atom 230 1.6GHz HT + 1 GB RAM:  It was after switching from bitcoind 0.7.1 to newest from git |
|
|
|
Sum of 38BTC proportionately sent out to all depositors.
It's late November already. When you will send next payment? |
|
|
|
Gyver, not quite. Share have a flag that indicates whether the node that generated it got a stale share in the past, and from those, nodes can compute the stale share percentage and then the total hash rate with an expression like: unstale_hash_rate / (1 - pool_stale_proportion)
Is it just a flag or a counter? We have whole network stats for DOA and Orphans too, are there 2 flags/counters? With a counter the stale estimation should be pretty good. If it's a flag, multiple stales between shares would be miscounted as an unique stale. What might be underestimated too is the amount of work from nodes which stop mining after stale shares. Note that I don't think it's an actual problem. With around 9-10 GH/s, I've always seen above 100% PPS and I'm currently at around 115% PPS for the last active weeks (computed from my actual earnings vs actual hash power). It matches the : - p2pool.info luck, - my efficiency, - the average tx fee percentage. This is why I'm back mining on p2pool: hashpower promises at least 105% PPS when leasing and falls short due to high rejects, I compared my actual PPS over several weeks and stats are largely in favor of p2pool for me. I left p2pool because I had I/O issues and likes to test novelties, but now bitcoind and p2pool are both on SSDs and they are just flying (at least when I'm not rewiring the whole apartment...). My first SSD should be arriving soon. I'm seriously hoping it decreases my stale rate - like you, I think it's I/O related. M Have you got latest bitcoind from git? It's much faster than stable version, with new database. With latest bitcoind from git my GetWork Latency dropped about 5-10x times. |
|
|
|
|
Is this voting pool (mentioned before) public? So everybody can vote, even those, who never invest in GBF? If so, I don't see a point in voting. You're holding 440 BTC - they should be distributed immediately to investors.
If you want to vote, please do. But every vote should been assigned to investor (to the number on the list, for example), so only those, who agree to SatoshiDice will bet with their, remaining funds. If someone want to put funds in to SatoshiDice - please do! But only your part, not ours.
|
|
|
|
|
I am absolutely against putting our money into SatoshiDice.
DeadTerra, when you will do first payouts? Since I invested into this fund couple of months ago, I haven't seen even single bitcoin coming back to me.
|
|
|
|
Accessing http://127.0.0.1:9332/static/share.htmlCauses bug in main program, will output this to cmd window. 2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > Error in DeferredResource handler:
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > File "p2pool\util\deferred_resource.pyc", line 24, in render
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 >
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > File "twisted\internet\defer.pyc", line 134, in maybeDeferred
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 >
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > File "twisted\web\resource.pyc", line 216, in render
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 >
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > File "twisted\internet\defer.pyc", line 1187, in unwindGenerator
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 >
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > --- <exception caught here> ---
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > File "twisted\internet\defer.pyc", line 1045, in _inlineCallbacks
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 >
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > File "p2pool\web.pyc", line 195, in render_GET
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 >
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > File "p2pool\web.pyc", line 318, in <lambda>
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 >
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > File "p2pool\web.pyc", line 278, in get_share
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 >
2012-11-12 22:28:29.704000 > exceptions.ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: ''
How fast should a miner ask for updates from P2 pool? I can do 1ms to 10,000 ms. ALSO, if you want to parse the text window output for keywords to cause actions, you can use a program called : SCANCODE Confirming here as well. Newest p2pool from git + newest bitcoind from git, on Debian stable AMD64. 012-11-13 14:03:14.633558 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2012-11-13 14:03:14.633884 > File "/home/x/p2pool/p2pool/util/deferred_resource.py", line 24, in render
2012-11-13 14:03:14.634099 > defer.maybeDeferred(resource.Resource.render, self, request).addCallbacks(finish, finish_error)
2012-11-13 14:03:14.634293 > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 125, in maybeDeferred
2012-11-13 14:03:14.634480 > result = f(*args, **kw)
2012-11-13 14:03:14.634806 > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/web/resource.py", line 210, in render
2012-11-13 14:03:14.635060 > return m(request)
2012-11-13 14:03:14.635283 > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1014, in unwindGenerator
2012-11-13 14:03:14.635476 > return _inlineCallbacks(None, f(*args, **kwargs), Deferred())
2012-11-13 14:03:14.635660 > --- <exception caught here> ---
2012-11-13 14:03:14.635847 > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 893, in _inlineCallbacks
2012-11-13 14:03:14.636031 > result = g.send(result)
2012-11-13 14:03:14.636213 > File "/home/x/p2pool/p2pool/web.py", line 195, in render_GET
2012-11-13 14:03:14.636394 > res = yield self.func(*self.args)
2012-11-13 14:03:14.636575 > File "/home/x/p2pool/p2pool/web.py", line 318, in <lambda>
2012-11-13 14:03:14.636874 > new_root.putChild('share', WebInterface(lambda share_hash_str: get_share(share_hash_str)))
2012-11-13 14:03:14.637101 > File "/home/x/p2pool/p2pool/web.py", line 278, in get_share
2012-11-13 14:03:14.637300 > if int(share_hash_str, 16) not in node.tracker.items:
2012-11-13 14:03:14.637491 > exceptions.ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 16: '' |
|
|
|
Just use IE to download proper web browser....
+1  There's nothing else to say. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
