|
hello, Support for Linux users?
|
|
|
|
NEW ATH 0.00029999  |
|
|
|
In the process of having Bela listed with Bittylicious.
Get ready UK, as you will be able to buy Bela directly with credit/debit cards...
We're targeting Bittylicious as well. It would be so great for Belacam if we can get Belacoin listed because they will provide a gateway for purchasing Belacoin with a credit or debit card, as you said. We would likely integrate their service into Belacam directly. try for listing on changelly.com too  |
|
|
|
I will only be able to invest in stratis in like 1-2 months. Price dont go up!
You will be left in the dust ... don't wait bro |
|
|
|
no update to the bug #12 reported  |
|
|
|
I am trying to compile Blackcoin, following exactly everything from the OP; a@a-VirtualBox:/mnt/blackcoin$ sudo ./compile-blk.sh
./compile-blk.sh: line 6: i686-w64-mingw32.static-qmake-qt5: command not found
make: Makefile.Release: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `Makefile.Release'. Stop.
a@a-VirtualBox:/mnt/blackcoin$ echo $PATH
/mnt/mxe/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin How do I fix this ? i686-w64-mingw32.static-qmake-qt5 it's saying this command is missing do a search for it if it's missing your mxe installation is broken |
|
|
|
Patience is the key in crypto. We'll see some price action in next few days, probably testing 12k sats.
so you are the pumper?  can't imagine how else you could make such a prediction  albeit fudding to create fomo  |
|
|
|
Hi,
I am new to Bitcoin after being a passive but very interested reader of bitcoin and altcoin news for years.
I decided now to invest some money into altcoins b/c I believe that especially Ethereum has a big potential w/ smart contracts in terms of further and ongoing digitalization and also micropayments (Internet of Things and Services).
But also Monero seems to have an interesting concept...
Starting with setting up an Ethereum and one Monero wallet, buying some altcoins via Anycoin Direct and also doing some - even command line based - mining was fun.
Pretty fast I realized that buying altcoins on Anycoin is on the one hand very fast and simple but on the other hand very expensive b/c of very bad exchange rates and (way too) high fees.
So I was looking for another solution w/ low fees, big volumes but nevertheless, audits and good security. I figured out that kraken.com would in my case (funding w/ EURO) the best platform for altcoin trading.
Now the part started which was so far very nasty. Creating an account at kraken.com and going through verification process (until tier 3) took ages. I wrote several emails to the support to ask for speeding up the process.
None of the emails was replied but suddenly I was a verified tier 3 customer.
So I created a FIDOR bank account b/c there was no available alternative funding EURO possible. Again I had to verify my new bank account, sending money to it and afterwards sending money to kraken.com from my FIDOR bank account.
This whole process took days again. Finally (and from an overall process perspective over 1 week later) my funding arrived on kraken.com but is now, since several days "on hold".
I did not exceed my funding limits, I am a verified tier 3 customer so why do I again have to wait that my already transfered money is available for trading?
@Dargo, I wrote you a PM to ask you to take a look on my (again unreplied) support tickets but besides that I am posting my experience in this forum.
Why? No, not to blame kraken, just to provide some feedback that from an "User Experience" perspective digging into altcoin trading is currently NO FUN AT ALL, and at least in my scenario way to complex and takes too much time.
If altcoins want to be successful one day, there is a strong need to simplify and speed up the whole process w/o making it unattractive from a cost perspective (like I experienced w/ Anycoin Direct).
You're now the 2nd confirmed user having issues with deposits on kraken, if i were you use https://gemini.com and or https://bitstamp.net, they are very quick and have excellent support service, highly recommended. Kraken seems to be going down a very bad road lately... when problems start happening with deposits.... that's a HUGE RED FLAG, STAY AWAY |
|
|
|
Any progress to get listed on Bittrex?
Bittrex will not bring anything good to this coin I need it on bittrex, because Polo still hasn't allowed verified users from my state. so buying on polo i have to go in circles |
|
|
|
I received newsletter from Decent that the testnet is set and I saw that only 200 people will be allowed first but to my surprise, I have not seen many people reporting on the testnet, feedback on the testnet would be great to have
cause most users in crypto land are on windows systems. and only linux / MAC available for testnet |
|
|
|
|
Any progress to get listed on Bittrex?
|
|
|
|
Guys.. i already install ipfs.. already running daemon ipfs.. i can already access the web console fancy for ipfs...
then what should i do next? Just double click on "DECENT" did nothing.. there must be a missing step in between here.. ( Linux )
same here i'm where you are at, no GUI opened up when clicking DECENT |
|
|
|
Any feedback from those using it? How's it feeling?
I'm confused cause of this ipfs daemon it needs to use. but it does seem like the DECENT daemon is downloading blocks, but getting some errors with websockets and this: 2530420ms th_a witness.cpp:139 plugin_startup ] No witnesses configured! Please add witness IDs and private keys to configuration.
i'll post later what I find |
|
|
|
Underlying Transport Error:
{"what":"Underlying Transport Error"}
th_a application.cpp:207 reset_websocket_server
1007598ms th_a application.cpp:985 startup ] 13 N11websocketpp9exceptionE: Underlying Transport Error
Underlying Transport Error:
{"what":"Underlying Transport Error"}
th_a application.cpp:207 reset_websocket_server
rethrow
{}
th_a application.cpp:427 startup
1007599ms th_a main_gui_wallet.cpp:210 runDecentD ] Exiting with error:
13 N11websocketpp9exceptionE: Underlying Transport Error
Underlying Transport Error:
{"what":"Underlying Transport Error"}
th_a application.cpp:207 reset_websocket_server
rethrow
{}
th_a application.cpp:427 startup
1007661ms ntp ntp.cpp:177 read_loop ] ntp_delta_time updated to 5462 us
|
|
|
|
|
@DECENT what is the IPFS daemon?
|
|
|
|
Very odd ... already the customer was verified tier 3, and then they requested documents again Why would doing a deposit after already being verified trigger another request for identification documents? I'm a customer on Gemini and this just doesn't happen regardless of the deposit amounts after a verification is completed I'm curious why synapse/kraken is doing that. Is there something in the policy that further verification is done when deposits are made? |
|
|
|
i have sent USD transfer using synapsepay
i have tried to contact synapsepay but all i get is google voice
seriously Google voice? thats the place you guys are directing me to send my funds too?
im also verified 3rd tier
but you guys are asking me to send more info after the 3rd tier verification?
why are you holding my money for no reason?
it took you guys 2 days to answer me after i posted on redit?
i do not want 4th tier verification
i was going to use your exchange as alternative to coinbase but you guys are worse then them
credit my account or send my money back to my bank account
If you PM me your ticket number I can escalate your case with support. i was verified 3rd tier now it says 3rd tier processing again? why make me send funds by telling me i was 3rd tier verified and now you guys have the funds and lower me back to 2nd tier? this is just some bull shit you guys are pulling just send my funds back to may account including the fees i payed still nothing!! i want my money back or credit my account Make sure you have all your ducks in order, copies of any/all transactions you've made with them, including screenshots etc, do you have their legal business address? Find out about the appropriate agency (law enforcement) etc you can report them to that can further assist you. Secondly, Thank you for informing the community of their actions, I will be avoiding them ! |
|
|
|
Hello everybody,
I'm sorry, if I haven't been clear. I mean that in order to evaluate the popularity of different altcoins, I measured their popularity in bitcointalk (number of pages of the topic) and in the web (number of Google results). For this I typed in: "altcoin" "chronobank", "altcoin" "stratis", "altcoin" "Qtum", "altcoin" "decent", ... I wrote always "altcoin", because you can not measure the popularity of "decent" without adding "altcoin". If you add "altcoin" for decent, you add "altcoin" for all altcoins. The results have been normalized to take care of the time. They are not very good for stratis.
The conclusion is that Stratis should make much more marketing.
I would like to show you my table, but I don't know how to enclose a table or an image.
If you think Stratis is lacking in the marketing department, you must not have been following Stratis. Anyways, I don't think Stratis should classified itself as an altcoin. It is one of a kind. Stratis is the future! [/quote It's not an Altcoin, the StratisBitcoinFullNode (aka C# Wallet) is an original code base built from the ground-up, this Token per-say is not a fork of any other coin nor bitcoin itself |
|
|
|
Stratis Announces Breeze Wallet To Improve Bitcoin and Financial Privacy
from nopara73 via /r/Bitcoin
Hi guys, I am one of the developer behind the project. I would like to share some comments on this.
I am working on TumbleBit, a trustless Bitcoin mixer, where not even the Tumbler can deanonymize you. I am not positive about it can solve any scaleability issues, but that's an other topic. At TumbleBit we have a couple of useability issues, like you have to use Bitcoin Core, you have to have a different output wallet, you have to do everything with terminal, etc, and nobody can work on it full time, since we are not getting payed for it.
To sum up: we could use a little more man-power. I had the idea of contacting Stratis if they can lend us some. Stratis is working on a Bitcoin full-node in the same language TumbleBit is written, so they have a competent developer team.
What they gain for it is marketing. An altcoin provides a Bitcoin wallet is a great marketing opportunity. We can outsource to them the GUI development, marketing, some code review and some testing. It's a win-win. Background story finished.
About the wallet:
We are planning 4 stages at the moment (at least me):
1. Full-block SPV wallet.
2. TumbleBit integration.
3. Add Stratis wallet.
4. Decentralized btc <-> strat exchange, based on TumbleBit.
1. Full-block SPV wallet
I went to great lengths to figure out what is the lightest way to preserve privacy when retrieving information from the blockchain. And my conclusion was: today if you are not usin Bitcoin Core, then all your addresses are linked together by various third parties. Since Bitcoin Core receives all the information the Bitcoin network has, therefore nobody can figure out what information your wallet is intereted in.
This can be achieved in a lighter way, by building a full-block SPV wallet, what downloads blocks from the creation of the wallet, notes the transaction it is interested in and throws away the rest (or something like this). Bitcoin Core is also working on a wallet like this.
Therefore if privacy is crucial for you and Core or us came out with our full-spv wallet you might consider changing, even if you are not interested in using TumbleBit.
2. TumbleBit integration
We are going to integrate TumbleBit Classic Tumbler mode.
3. Add Stratis wallet
I cannot comment on this. We don't accept money from Stratis, therefore we are not going to concentrate on it. The development of this part is entirely up to them.
4. Decentralized btc <-> strat exchange
This is a very interesting topic. In theory you could exchange different coins with TumbleBit, just like you are exchanging bitcoins (mixing). We'll see how this topic will evolve, not a priority right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
