In recent days the stagnation continues, and the price may move downwards. I do not know, actually, I thought last increase's continuous will be better. Even, the price rose to $5400, but the end is still unknown.
we have already entered the upward movement and a good momentum has already shaped up so any actual "drop" is highly unlikely at this point. all we may see are small corrections after each time we set a new high after the bottom. like the $5500 high which was followed by a correction right away. with BSV nonsense coming to an end and the token dying for this drop below $6k is also coming to an end and we are going back to the price where bitcoin should have been above a long time ago.
|
|
|
both of these guys are the sides of the same coin! they make outrageous claims about bitcoin price which has never been true and most of the times their statements look more like an exaggerated guess based on their emotions rather than a logical speculation based on analysis. i would equally ignore both of them. luckily for Tom Lee, this year (unlike last) he is at least predicting in the same direction that the market is going while Vays is going against the obvious market trend.
|
|
|
it still surprises me that some people to this day still insist on accepting the lies of CW even though his fraud can not be any clearer than this! all that aside, the funniest thing about all this is that the drama that CW started is biting him in the ass as BSV is dropping so hard these days and is also being removed from the big altcoin exchanges
|
|
|
2015 - $177 2016 - $300(70%)
I just find out how you have calculated the percentage gains. According to me, the return should be 169% for the year 2016. Must be a TYPO or something from your side. that seems correct to me unless you are using different numbers to calculate the percentage. ((300-177)/177)*100 = ~70%
Well I was looking for a website or tool that could help me in calculating the returns for various period of time. For example all the months in a particular year, all the years till date, a range of years etc..
Also if there is not such website I also thought of creating one. Would like to get opinions for the same. Would it be worth it ? Is there a need for such ? I am personally interested in finding such average returns but are there others who think there is a need for such thing ?
it is kind of a weird thing to calculate because it doesn't make much sense. you either want to see how much bitcoin has risen from a certain time in which case you just open any chart and see the price at that time like price at the beginning of 2017. or you are a day trader in which case calculating the "return" is more complicated than that because it requires YOUR orders and their prices.
|
|
|
the days of centralized exchanges are numbered in my opinion and the more they push for more restrictive rules that are bad for the whole community the faster they go in direction of becoming obsolete. the decentralization of exchanges and most other services (such as market places) have begun. Binance is just another exchange like bittrex, they are based in Hong Kong so trying to look more appealing to customers with these regulations, thats it.
but "customers" look for security and assurance that they are not going to get hacked or scam them. regulations and KYC are not guaranteeing that. in fact Bittrex scammed people right after they implemented KYC.
|
|
|
I hare waiting for hours & hours to get a confirmation. I’d rather pay a higher fee & get my transactions confirmed in the next block than try to be a tight ass & end up waiting too long.
you should never pay "higher" fee, instead you should always pay "high enough" fee. try to learn how fees work and come up with the appropriate amount of fee per byte for your needs. then you will see that you will always pay a lot smaller fees while still getting high priority.
|
|
|
We have found our next entertainer for the bitcoin speculation subforum that will replace our favorite bitcoin bull Tom Lee hehehe.
Vinny Lingham is known for his bearish attitude on bitcoin during 2017 when everyone was hyperbullish. He also declared that he sold all his bitcoins on $1250 in that year, I reckon.
Well I think that this guy is a follower of Warren Buffet of the saying "Be fearful when others are greedy and be greedy when others are fearful." Due to his saying, this guy I think followed Warren in a wrong way. He took a wrong turn and those people that were hyperbullish made big profits that year lol. Warren Buffet also says don't invest in things like bitcoin and sticks to physical companies that have some sort of physical product and only invest in those. not to mention that currently people are in "fearful" stage so if anything now should be a buy time!
|
|
|
i honestly don't see why banks printing money has anything to do with bitcoin rising (maybe he things value of fiat is going to tank hard hence bitcoin against fiat should rise) but $10k by the end of the year is not unlikely. considering how in the past price rises occured the same way, i can see it rising to that level and be stuck at breaking that resistance.
|
|
|
Bitcoin should be forked and Satoshi's 1 million Bitcoin destroyed completely, if he really owns that much.
feel free to create your own fork altcoin from the current bitcoin because nobody ever wants a bitcoin that allows others to spend their coins based on arbitrary reasons they think of. if we start with coins that you claim are Satoshi's then there is no stopping there. next someone else will come and say let's spend Ucy's coins because i don't like the guy's name. and we must follow that fork too if we follow your fork.
|
|
|
*sigh* 4% is the normal fluctuations of the bitcoin market that has been happening for as long as bitcoin existed nearly on a daily basis. these drops (or rises) are only important if they are much bigger than this (at least 10%) or if they are breaking some sort of line that was important like breaking the support at $5000 or the resistance at $5500
|
|
|
i have only seen one place that used to offer such a service which allowed users to trade stocks with bitcoin but it failed at some point in the past because it didn't gain enough attention. basically people who own bitcoin and have an interest in trading (want to take the risks) will usually trade altcoins since their pump and dumps can help them increase their bitcoin a lot faster than trading stocks.
|
|
|
most people have proven already that they don't want to listen to these things and they prefer following the FUD instead. most of them don't even pay attention to the mistakes they recently made by not buying in $3k range because soem FUD was telling them the price is going lower!!! now they are repeating the same thing. this is actually one of the reasons why we see so many FOMOs and price spikes each time it breaks a resistance!
|
|
|
we need to start mentioning price in SAT, we need to remove USD the sinking currency from the equation
I think the reason why people prefer using the amount of bitcoin in dollar rather than how much satoshi is that because it is honestly difficult to read fractions of bitcoin since it is composed of decimals. It is more convenient to say the value in dollar than in satoshi. it is actually because of volatility of bitcoin more than anything else. for example if you say something is worth 1000 satoshi today, tomorrow it may be worth 800 satoshi and the next day it can be 1200 satoshi. and that is not desirable. additionally when you say something is worth $1 it is easier to understand how much it is worth but if i say something is worth 1000 satoshi you have to check bitcoin price first then convert that to USD and then understand if 1000 is too much or too little.
|
|
|
the best advice to someone who is starting to buy bitcoin (apart from what was already mentioned) is to not-listen to the nonsense online usually in social media like Twitter or even the big news sites. most of them are spreading misinformation about bitcoin and sometimes even FUD. and a newcomer can easily lose track of reality if they are not careful about what they read and what they trust.
|
|
|
it can not be prevented as long as it is not a problem because miners don't yet see any problem (and they might even be right) so they keep connecting to the same pools they are currently connecting and nothing is wrong with that. but if there was a problem then the same miners would think about a solution and it is not that complicated either because we are talking about individual miners who have from 1 ASIC to many (as in farms) and they can easily switch their pool to spread the hashrate among different pools. but as i said they don't currently see any problems so they stick to the current pools with bigger hashrate.
|
|
|
BTC needs to get it's act together, otherwise Ethereum & Litecoin are going to steal the thunder.
last time someone created a silly "game" on ethereum platform and because of the whole network went down and exchanges had to close down deposits for over a week. yeah, dream on... I don't know if you have heard this news More Than 30% of BTC Traffic Stems from the Veriblock Project . So prior to the sudden spike of the price, mempool have been somewhat clog already. And when the price goes to more than $5k, lots of online trades pushing the mempool + the supposed 30% from VBK project to a bottleneck. But it seems the hype have run out of steam for now and settled the price around $5k and mempool went to 'normal' again. the only reason was the price spike otherwise all of these things already existed. they can't cause spike for no reason. and mempool wasn't clogged anyways before the price spike.
|
|
|
The $800-$1000 price increase earlier was so abrupt that it looks like someone just bought a huge number of coins on an exchange and forgot that they might affect the market,
that was the bots madness (at least the initial big rise). when the resistance was broken, usually there are bots that have open watchers to execute buy orders in case price goes above that level ($4200) and that is exactly what happened. an inflow of lots of automatic buys, then the FOMO begins and the price shoots up to $5000 this is what i think happened: Talking about FOMO, I have a friend who messaged me this morning to say bought a couple of thousand dollars worth at around $4,900, and is upset that it has already lost some value. When I asked him what he had been doing for the last 4 months of sideways movement, he said he'd been "waiting for the right time". What made him think that after a pump of 20% in an hour was suddenly "the right time" is beyond me.
I thought we would correct a bit harder than we have, and I still think we might over the next day or two.
this is one of the main reasons that i have been and still am expecting F.O.M.O. there are a lot of people who are doing the same. they wait for that drop (down to $1000) which someone on the internet promised them!!! then panic when the price rises up and they realize that promise was an FUD.
|
|
|
This explains the spike in the price, because we know there will be a significant injection on the demand side for bitcoins now. considering this news is old and also the post in OP is saying it was from 2 days ago i wouldn't really link this rise with that news. not to mention that we didn't hear about it that much. usually when a rise is linked to a news, the rising actually starts before the news comes out and after it is out the shoot up begins. not 2 days after But I still can't understand why this news couldn't be one of the main reasons for the spike. This news was twitted by Bakkt, which has over 81k followers and was re-twitted hundreds of times and got 1.4k likes. I think some people could decide that "better be early than sorry later", and hence the effect on the market. technically you are correct. this is a big news, and it has been spread enough time to enough people that could have led to a price rise because of the positivity. but historically price has always risen the way i mentioned above (hours before the news and then majorly right after it). there has never been a time where some positive news comes out then days later price moved. so in this case if this news were to cause a spike it would have done it on 29th instead of today (4 days later)
|
|
|
a while ago i started a topic here talking about the FOMO that is going to occur when the price rise begins. here is the topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5108231.0although there weren't that many votes but it seems like most people got the right answer (the shoot up to $5k) which was the FOMO that i was talking about there. the initial leg up which shoots price upwards $1000 in a couple of hours. now another question. what do you think the next leg up is going to be? maybe you think there is no FOMO and only a slow rise this time? lets see how the results are going to be this time...
|
|
|
This explains the spike in the price, because we know there will be a significant injection on the demand side for bitcoins now. considering this news is old and also the post in OP is saying it was from 2 days ago i wouldn't really link this rise with that news. not to mention that we didn't hear about it that much. usually when a rise is linked to a news, the rising actually starts before the news comes out and after it is out the shoot up begins. not 2 days after
|
|
|
|