I'd like to get a loan but I dont know what i have to do . Please help me !
Thanks !
I just have downloaded HYPERSTAKE wallet-qt
My Address: pAXaGf6oNNJevd6pnQGoJP4UFU7mXbpNG6
You won, I'm sending you your 4000 HYP.
|
|
|
Candidates: - +5 eatthetree3 - p9qwRDJz8Rm7Xexfq4BiYJNqJJfKLwcPWA (42 posts)
- +1 m33 - pKNBvmDS3UMce4epLNB8vJnhUFkmugN5rD (94 posts)
- +2 shadowmoon (via PM)
- +1 PryptoMontreal (via PM) - pFE1BUZRTVferkv1EZfU2gBLcQEqNL5Bmg
|
|
|
Winners are: - +6 semidead (56 posts)
- +5 johan11 (via PM)
- +6 Tpruvot (via Wikia, a first!)
- + diabanhxeo - pAXaGf6oNNJevd6pnQGoJP4UFU7mXbpNG6 (45 posts)
Happy loaning, happy stacking!
|
|
|
Some new calculations. My point is that having 100% fail at 71200 means either very bad luck or that 71200 has a somehow low probability of staking (keep in mind that the population is onlt 2 blocks, so not statistically significant, though). Although, I have daily stakes of lower block (the power of randomness/nonce) So, I'm heading to a higher block size and try with 4000, which should give 115491 weight, 60% more weight than a 2400 block. FYI, a block of 3000 would give 20% more weight. The table below shows which values are verified and which are extrapolated Size Days Weight 2000 9 17341 (verified) 2400 30 71200 (verified, 2 out of 2 did not stake after 3 days) 3000 9 26011 (extrapolated) 3000 30 86616 (extrapolated) 4000 9 34682 (extrapolated) 4000 30 115491 (extrapolated, if no 71200 block stake after 3 days, either particularly bad luck or low probability with 71200, thus trying 115491)Update1: David, since your concern is the security of the network I imagine you have a minimum diff as a target. With that parameter you can then play with the others.
I don't have a diff target, I just speculate on the variation of diff. Update2: due to present low diff, I have an unusually lot of blocks staking now. I don't expect this (relatively) low diff to last, though, so it should not impact my considerations.
|
|
|
We'll all probably get away with it (staking small'ish blocks) for another month or so, but I'm guesstimating that soon enough, we'll stop worrying about hitting the cap, and start worrying about having enough size/weight to stake before reaching 30 days maturity. Personally, my block sizes are anything between 2K ~ 4K at the moment, but by the end of the month I'll be aiming at 3K+ blocks. I just realised this could prove bad for network security, since bigger blocks => less block => less security. I'd like your input on this. Extending max age or removing it altogether (like Blackcoin was the first to do, I think) would alleviate this issue and would lead to ever-diminishing blocks (and would require a hard fork). Difficulty would rise exponentially. OTOH, after a transition phase from small blocks to large blocks during which network security would be reduced, we would again gain network security because inflation would lead to more block. Security/Difficulty would increase smaller, though (the larger the blocks, the smaller the difficulty rise). Opinions?
|
|
|
Selling "at market" is a stupid plan. I'd like everyone reading this to read that again. Hell, I'll repeat it. Selling "at market" is a stupid plan. If everyone who has a sell order up would take it down RIGHT NOW and relist at 2K satoshis or higher, do you really think no one would buy? Easy tactic: Place a sell order at the second topmost price. Why? - Sell order for not dumping and what Biomech said - Second topmost instead of topmost because topmost is used by bot. Second topmost may be used by bots too but less of a risk. You can sell at third topmost too (or even farther away from spread) but I doubt most people have the required patience (like for selling at 2K). Plus, selling consistently reduces volatility. Update: if you sell order is not processed, don't close your sell order to place a sell order at a lower price. Just wait for you next stake.
|
|
|
Well, its official.. 2400 blocks are gonna max out... Time to move to 2k.. I did it 9 days ago. Since I already have 36 block maxed out (and more by the day), I wil start moving my new blocks to 1800. The lower the blocks, the more numerous the block, the faster the diff rise - without even accounting for more HYP being available for more blocks. Expect exponential rise. I also moved the chart to open access, so you will not have to request access anymore, sorry about that. One of these days, you guys will be finding out that making the blocks too tiny, will eventually cause them to not stake for over 30 days, at which point they stop gaining weight. With everyone moving to smaller blocks, and with difficulty continuing its rise, it will not be too long before 2K blocks become "to small to stake". We'll all probably get away with it (staking small'ish blocks) for another month or so, but I'm guesstimating that soon enough, we'll stop worrying about hitting the cap, and start worrying about having enough size/weight to stake before reaching 30 days maturity. Personally, my block sizes are anything between 2K ~ 4K at the moment, but by the end of the month I'll be aiming at 3K+ blocks. Interesting times ahead! Happy Staking, You're right, I did not notice that two of my 2400 block already are more than 30 days old. I will start some 3000 blocks, then. The "lesser blocks means more block even if they take longer to stake" consideration is heavily affected by the 30 days limit. Update: The stake calculator is planned to be updated with "wasted coins" (how much I would have gotten if there was no 1000 HYP limit). I propose the stake calculator is further improved by outputting not only the stake, but also the weight - this value being particularly important at 30 days, when reaching max age (and not gaining more weight). Hence a "stake and weight calculator". Also, could the block browser show the block weight? "Block network stake weight" is something different than weight in coin control. FYI, at 2400 HYP per block, 30 days is 71200 of weight. A rule of three gives me this: Size Weight @30days 2400 71200 1000 29667 3000 89000 3033 90000 10000 296667Since I have already two blocks at 30+ days, I believe that 71200 of weight (and so, 2400 of size) does not give enough chance to stake. Granted, I only have two of them stuck here, but I have a total of 44 blocks at 1000 (all with 2400 of blocksize). I will head to 89000 of weight (a nice round number of 3000).
|
|
|
The previous Church's architect, Quicken, had to resign from his position, due to personal matters. We looked after someone to replace him and we are happy to announce that Febo Urso Mortiginto is more than up to the task. His glorious ancestry lives well in him. As is the rule, the Church's architect will have exclusivity on any Church's building, except if he gets overloaded. Signore Mortiginto is allowed to accept third-party requests and his reputation as the architect for most spiritual buildings will certainly attract attention and may in turn increase awareness on buildings he will be the designer of ("it's a Mortiginto"). Think about it when choosing an architect.
|
|
|
Well, its official.. 2400 blocks are gonna max out... Time to move to 2k.. I did it 9 days ago. Since I already have 36 block maxed out (and more by the day), I wil start moving my new blocks to 1800. The lower the blocks, the more numerous the block, the faster the diff rise - without even accounting for more HYP being available for more blocks. Expect exponential rise. I also moved the chart to open access, so you will not have to request access anymore, sorry about that.
|
|
|
I would like to purchase, and then donate the two lots next to the proposed site for the 'Sunrise Club', T23 & T24, to be used to further the aims of this project. It can be used for any purpose the Marquess d'Armagnac sees fit. Maybe a park, maybe a retreat centre for overnight 'slumber parties'; anything that might make the 'Sunrise Club' more enjoyable for younger players and their IRL parents/guardians. I would also like to donate 200M towards building costs and other expenses. I am grateful and pleased the Prince of OZ gifts the Youth Center in such a way. True to the spirit of empowerment that I wish to instill in the Youth Center and its members, I propose the land itself will be left vacant until the members themselves decide what to build on it. The Youth Center had been inaugurated recently and so there is no immediate need to build more terrain - which mean more time to make it something that matters. Regarding the Youth Center: This is a building like no other. Since it was meant for a particular type of population, creative youngsters who will evolve in a way senior citizen may not anticipate, we decided to build what I like to call a modular building. The two first floors have almost no inside walls, making the building one giant room per storey (iwth the exception of one separate room at each storey, to accomodate sound-isolation). The rest of the huge room is meant to be redesigned on the fly with wall-panels similar to oriental fusumas or sliding wall, so that youngsters can adapt the building to their needs, instead of them adapting to the building. This is a massive departure from regular architectural designs, somehing we believe youngsters are the most apt at embracing, thanks to their young minds. We call this design "open space with panels" Panels themselves are located in giant closets to be used at will to create rooms of any size: 1*1, 2*7, 3*4... Similary, mobile furniture (chairs, tables...) is available aplenty to be moved easily from one room to another. Originally there was supposed to be a central "well of light" in the middle, to ensure maximum illumination everywhere. As the design progressed, we move the well of light on the side (so it is not technically a well of light anymore), so that it is possible to create particularly large arrangements (7*7 room). No effort have been spared to accompany the creativity of youngsters In the same idea, several anchor points have been placed on the external wall to accomodate impromptu mezzanines supported by large chains So a room is now modular in the three dimensions: height, width and depth. There are also several hatches in the ceiling to accomadate items of exceptional size or to allow some other creative uses. Many thanks to Febo for his skill, patience ahd proactive help.
|
|
|
We updated the OP to clarify that the "tail emission" (minimum subsidy after the ~18.4 millions are mined) is less than 1% per year (not "weekly", "monthly"...). [2] Actual number of atomic units is M = 264 - 1. A minimum subsidy may be implemented in the future with <1% annual inflation to preserve mining incentives.
It had always been clear in our mind, but we got feedback that that was not the case for anyone. The danger of assumption
|
|
|
And now 4 giga fucking byte is considered short... Valid point, but I'd just say that at 4 GB you are pretty close to a critical point where even a small increase would have a disproportionately large benefit. This was more a general consideration about loss of efficiency in computer at large, loss itself encouraged by ever-increasing hardware, ever-diminishing time-to-release and dare I say less proficient coders (which on the plus side lowers the barrier to entry). Granted, this also allows long filename and ubiquitous use of Unicode, but still... Wirth's law.
* David Latapie remembers working on a 486DX DX and SX for with and without internal maths co processor if I remember Yes, the x87.
|
|
|
If you think that diff 9 is high, think again. ATH is 80 I'm not sure we will ever break it. Source: HYP diffThe last entry on the document is block 173045 at 7,49593. The last ATH is way before half the current lifetime of HYP, so chances are low the ATH is here to say quite some time. Those are all PoW blocks, which have a completely different difficulty, and are not comparable to PoS diff. I once again proved to everyone how stupid I am... I will recalculate starting from block 31781. Block Difficulty Notes 0 0.000244137 Block 0 had the lowest difficulty ever: 0.000244137 31781 0.009388670 First HYP block (before, it was TRK) 33312 0.009421360 First time diff goes above the fork launch block diff (8.73 days min age preventing much staking before) 33315 0.010084600 The symbolic diff 0.01 is broken 33344 0.020335800 Diff 0.02 is broken 33397 0.030417400 Diff 0.03 is broken 34573 0.040048100 Diff 0.04 is broken 35001 0.050303400 Diff 0.05 is broken 35016 0.061330300 Diff 0.06 is broken 35927 0.071156300 Diff 0.07 is broken 35931 0.080601600 Diff 0.08 is broken 35934 0.091189900 Diff 0.09 is broken 43375 0.104294000 The symbolic diff 0.1 is broken 45354 0.203308000 Diff 0.2 is broken 45456 0.306284000 Diff 0.3 is broken 49295 0.413530000 Diff 0.4 is broken 62829 0.500084000 Diff 0.5 is broken 64579 0.607988000 Diff 0.6 is broken 66476 0.711131000 Diff 0.7 is broken 68533 0.811710000 Diff 0.8 is broken 76820 0.901754000 Diff 0.9 is broken 77845 1.031510000 The highly symbolic diff of 1 is broken 94429 2.046340000 Diff 2 is broken 127250 3.062490000 Diff 3 is broken 156051 4.096740000 Diff 4 is broken 158455 5.028010000 Diff 5 is broken 160534 6.031260000 Diff 6 is broken 169825 7.154830000 Diff 8 is broken 169835 9.085750000 Diff 9 is broken 172850 10.210000000 Diff 10 is broken 173045 7.495930000 Latest recorded block
|
|
|
Error, correct values for HYP (these ones are for TRK's PoW phase). If you think that diff 9 is high, think again. ATH is 80 I'm not sure we will ever break it. Source: HYP diff Block Difficulty Notes 0 0,000244137 Block 0 had the lowest difficulty ever: 0.000244137 6 0,000244137 Block 6: first lowering in difficulty - it won't last 16 0,000269512 Block 16: previous ATH broken 26 0,000310479 Block 26: 0.0003 is broken 32 0,000416275 Block 32: 0.0004 is broken 36 0,000506152 Block 36: 0.0005 is broken 40 0,000600732 Block 40: 0.0006 is broken 44 0,000731683 Block 44: 0.0007 is broken 46 0,000806813 Block 46: 0.0008 is broken 49 0,000933689 Block 47: 0.0009 is broken 51 0,00102898 Block 51: the symbolic 0.001 is broken 65 0,0020041 Block 65: 0.002 is broken 74 0,00304504 Block 75: 0.003 is broken 81 0,0041321 Block 81: 0.004 is broken 86 0,00516652 Block 86: 0.005 is broken 90 0,00623955 Block 90: 0.006 is broken 93 0,00714773 Block 93: 0.007 is broken 96 0,00824367 Block 96: 0.008 is broken 99 0,00938436 Block 99: the hundredth block has 40x time more diff that the very first one (block 0) 100 0,00985438 At block 100, difficulty is already 40x times higher than at the start 101 0,0102142 Block 101 breaks the symbolic 0.01 barrier 116 0,0205144 Block 116: 0.02 is broken 125 0,0311326 Block 125: 0.03 is broken 132 0,0413263 Block 132: 0.04 is broken 137 0,0511488 Block 137: 0.05 is broken 142 0,0619258 Block 142: 0.06 is broken 147 0,07174 Block 147: 0.07 is broken 151 0,0835648 Block 151: 0.08 is broken 153 0,0906984 Block 153: 0.09 is broken 156 0,104012 Block 156: the symbolic 0.1 is broken 191 0,200142 Block 191: this one took time, but 0.2 is finally broken 200 0,306339 The symbolic block 200 breaks the 0.3 barrier 206 0,40933 Block 206: 0.4 is broken 211 0,513525 Block 211: 0.5 is broken 215 0,619113 Block 215: 0.6 is broken 218 0,712825 Block 218: 0.7 is broken 221 0,824464 Block 221: 0.8 is broken 226 0,913902 Block 226: 0.9 is broken 229 1,0098 The great symbolic "diff one" is reached on block 229 260 2,05713 Block 260: diff 2 273 3,01339 Block 273: diff 3 284 4,01291 Block 284: diff 4 314 5,02368 Block 314: diff 5 320 6,07584 Block 320: diff 6 325 7,09528 Block 325: diff 7 328 8,00022 Block 328: diff 8 336 9,01646 Block 336: diff 9 345 10,2177 Block 345: diff 10 353 11,2193 Block 353: diff 11! We have yet to come back to this diff 356 12,2017 Block 356: diff 12 358 13,2502 Block 358: diff 13 362 14,0754 Block 362: diff 14 370 15,4477 Block 370: diff 15 371 16,1662 Block 371: diff 16 376 17,0726 Block 376: diff 17 378 18,5404 Block 378: diff 18 379 19,2933 Block 359: diff 19 420 20,1303 Block 420: diff 20 496 6,0221 Block 496: massive dump in diff, from 17 to 6, which means -60% in one block! Probably a very large wallet on several addresses, a.k.a. "whale exiting" 690 21,0347 Block 690: diff 21 706 22,0521 Block 706: diff 22 862 23,3601 Block 862: diff 23 863 24,2132 Block 863: diff 24 867 25,6871 Block 867: diff 25 868 26,8058 Block 868: diff 26 869 27,6449 Block 869: diff 27 870 28,8001 Block 870: diff 28 873 29,8512 Block 873: diff 29 874 30,2447 Block 874: diff 30 879 31,3893 Block 879: diff 31 880 32,7749 Block 880: diff 32 896 33,4743 Block 896: diff 33 897 34,7748 Block 897: diff 34 899 35,0237 Block 899: diff 35 900 36,7779 Block 900: diff 36 930 37,4015 Block 930: diff 37 943 38,4687 Block 943: diff 38 944 39,2126 Block 944: diff 39 945 41,0365 Block 945: diff 41 - straight from 39 to 41 1024 43,0869 Block 1024: diff 43 for this symbolic block 1029 44,797 Block 1029: diff 44 1037 45,2098 Block 1037: diff 45 1042 47,3765 Block 1042: diff 47 1043 49,6646 Block 1043: diff 49 1045 50,2489 Block 1045: diff 50 1079 51,3981 Block 1079: diff 51 1080 52,9775 Block 1080: diff 52 1082 54,08 Block 1082: diff 54 - straight from 52 to 54 1128 55,2783 Block 1128: diff 55 1129 57,5557 Block 1129: diff 57 1130 60,4386 Block 1130: diff 60 1131 61,5054 Block 1131: diff 61 1134 62,1091 Block 1134: diff 62 1143 65,9228 Block 1143: diff 65 1144 68,6388 Block 1144: diff 68 1145 70,5507 Block 1145: diff 70 1146 73,3746 Block 1146: diff 73 1147 74,711 Block 1147: diff 74 1149 76,2412 Block 1149: diff 76 1154 79,7782 Block 1154: diff 79 1156 80,6996 Block 1156: for the first time EIGHTY - and this is the current ATH
The last entry on the document is block 173045 at 7,49593. The last ATH is way before half the current lifetime of HYP, so chances are low the ATH is here to say quite some time.
|
|
|
See bolded above. SSD helps a lot if you are already short of RAM (which at 4 GB, you are). Bump up the RAM on there and a dozen minutes will be down to a minute or two (more or less regardless of drive). * David Latapie remembers working on a 486DX maxed out in RAM (64MB) and playing Baldur's Gate with an indecent amount of RAM (24 MB - would work, but slowly, at a mere 8 MB). And now 4 giga fucking byte is considered short... I'll pastiche Warren Buffet and say the memory footprint has gone up a thousandfold but the producitvity has not gone up thousandfold. Anyway, just a (not-so-old) grumpy man rambling...
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure that most of these scam ICOs, if not all of them, involve the scammers running their own BTC through the ICO and ending up with both the BTC and the coin. So a disguised premine, with some extra BTC (but a much smaller unknowable amount) from idiots as a bonus. I confirm from acquaintances: ICO are faked.
On a particular machine, sure. For example, if you are swapping lot, that will indeed happen on lot faster on a SSD, so it will speed up, but the underlying cause of the bigger slow down is the lack of RAM. People were talking about many minutes to an hour for a save. That is not pushing the limits of any HDD sequential speed, at all. Old machine: Mintbox, 4Gb, 5400 RPM HDD, 4Gb. More than one hour New machine: Laptop, 4Gb, SSD. A dozen minute top. So tell how the HDD is not related? Both machines where running Linux. Mintbox is Arch + Xfce, which takes up less RAM than the new one (Ubuntu + Gnome 3).
I'd like to announce the first alpha release of my unofficial lightweight GUI simplewallet wrapper, lightWallet. Using this program, you don't need to run the bitmonerod daemon on your own computer or do anything on the command line. By default it uses hegemoOn's (a long time Monero supporter) open node, although you can change it to use a different node (Atrides recently announced another one, for instance), or you can set it up to use a local daemon. Added to OP.
This is the alpha version of MoneroClub, I'd like to post today. Added to OP.
|
|
|
This is the reason i suggested giving a private key instead of sending the coins. Don't pay us back?? We yank it back anyways. Back then, I expressed the opinion that people could just transfer the coin and that would be over, but after all, we can notice it and more importantly, they would have to learn something more about HYP. But the main reason I was not that enthusiastic about it is that by then is that I did not completely understood the export and dump priv key thing. And was concerned it would be difficult to explain to others. These issues are over now so I could implement it. Still, I'd prefer to wait for triggers to be implemented, so we could have a time-based trigger. This is not as great as a real smart contract, since the trigger will have to be created by the receiver and we have no technical way to enforce it (contrary to a real smart contract), but that would be a great way to advance in the direction of smart contracts - we would need multisig, at a minimum. Time-lock and enforceable, and we may even prevent transfer of money to another address. Think Bitcoin Halo, ethereum/aethereum and BitBay (except the scam) here. HyperLoan toward smart contract? (escrow = bloating - I could as well be the escrow, then, no one would doubt my reputation - but I'd rather have something as automated as possible) Then again, this requires more dev and we don't have enough at the moment. Especially if we want to deliver webwallet - which is a higher priority than smart contracts, although a lower priority than multisend + trigger, since presstab is already on it. But the main issue about HyperLoan is not technical. As I said, the main reason I postponed this week's HyperLoan is that people did not even care to win. Winners did not contact me to give me an addrress and I suggest that in one month, those who gave me an address back then will not send the money back because they do not even know they have some HYP they won. Wall of shame was populated for a short while, then I realised PM crossed so I removed freedom from the WoS - but if in two day he did not pay, I will have to add him again. Several people were late for paying, but I think they all acted in good well. Thus the need for an automated solution. And for those who want to investigate more about smart contracts: https://hyperstake.slack.com/archives/smartcontracts/
|
|
|
I updated my post by and I thank both His Majesty and the Marquess of OZ for their benevolence.
|
|
|
|