every attribute you seem to have, he seems to have. every attribute he seems to have, you seem to have.
His left eye was losing vision. My right eye is 90% blinded. Whoops. This is really comical. Are you under stress because of the court case? You are acting strange. I suggested you get on Skype so you can see me on web cam. But you refused. pm'd Next day. I will sleep. i'm not interested in talking. one quick glance to verify you're not Armstrong. |
|
|
|
every attribute you seem to have, he seems to have. every attribute he seems to have, you seem to have.
His left eye was losing vision. My right eye is 90% blinded. Whoops. This is really comical. Are you under stress because of the court case? You are acting strange. I suggested you get on Skype so you can see me on web cam. But you refused. pm'd |
|
|
|
but i don't think you are a programmer. i think you're Armstrong.
You are losing your sanity dude. It is really pitiful to watch you go on this delusional tirade. Me not a programmer, hahaha. Btw, Armstrong is a very skilled programmer.
there you go again. every attribute you seem to have, he seems to have. every attribute he seems to have, you seem to have. |
|
|
|
of course not. as long as you continue to constrain it to 1MB.
You missed the technical point. Start was referring to "won't run". i'm pretty sure he meant "start competing". Because you aren't a programmer. Szabo is. first off, Szabo didn't tweet that. Oleganza did. the word "start" is juxtaposed btwn 2 forms of the word "compete". it means "start competing". second, even a non-programmer such as myself realizes that Oleganza would never claim Bitcoin won't even "start running". it IS running currently. he would have said something like it can't "scale". Oleg is a programmer too. Szabo retweeted it thus presumably agreeing with it. At Visa scale it would not run decentralized any more. Meaning it would not run on their home computers any more. I know what he meant because I think as a programmer does. but i don't think you are a programmer. i think you're Armstrong. |
|
|
|
of course not. as long as you continue to constrain it to 1MB.
You missed the technical point. Start was referring to "won't run". i'm pretty sure he meant "start competing". Because you aren't a programmer. Szabo is. first off, Szabo didn't tweet that. Oleganza did. the word "start" is juxtaposed btwn 2 forms of the word "compete". it means "start competing". second, even a non-programmer such as myself realizes that Oleganza would never claim Bitcoin won't even "start running". it IS running currently. he would have said something like it can't "scale". |
|
|
|
of course not. as long as you continue to constrain it to 1MB.
You missed the technical point. Start was referring to "won't run". i'm pretty sure he meant "start competing". |
|
|
|
Game over, Frap.doc. Thus Saith The LORD. Amen! of course not. as long as you continue to constrain it to 1MB. |
|
|
|
that's enough of an explanation to make me abandon it in favor of TPTB being Armstrong.
Now you are being delusional. vokain or anonymint must have said something that put your logic to rest. But you can check yourself that Armstrong was at certain times (schedule is public) in Europe where he was on promo tour for his movie. He had speeches and Q&A sessions. certainly possible. this is the spec forum after all. but then he sure isn't smart putting so much faith in one guy. |
|
|
|
if you believe in the concept of forum plants, then TPTB_need_war fits the bill to a tee.
i don't know about Shelby Moore but i still think his acct could be mulitply owned and used to troll me down. the sleep charts i put up yesterday still hold. The sleep chart is somewhat interesting but you ignore the possibility that his sleep schedule shifts over time, something not uncommon among people who aren't tied to the clock by a 9-5 job or the like, especially those with insomnia. To show that the person/people operating the account aren't sleeping you would have to analyze 24 hour windows and see how many of those don't have a sleep break, not just look at averages over several months. TPTB, you mentioned arguing with me along with rpeitila in your comments about BTC price calls but I doubt that is correct. I rarely make those sort of predictions, and I don't remember doing so, although it is possible I suppose. after going thru many of Armstrongs writings from this link: https://www.scribd.com/kzuur58 the writing styles are alike, imo, and his incessant, continual writings while in prison and even while in a hole seem to me to match that of TPTB and could acct for the lack of a typical sleep rhythm. the constant whining about his own health, comments from other ppl, and the historical references seem very similar. their equivalent outlook on Bitcoin and the NWO and one world currency views are identical. one thing that could obscure the typical slope of the sleep cycles of the top 10 posters is their large #'s compared to Anonymint and TPTB. our larger #'s accentuate our waking bars while the rare middle of the night posts fail to increment in step thus deepening the troughs of our sleep cycles thus making them more visible. that's enough of an explanation to make me abandon it in favor of TPTB being Armstrong. |
|
|
|
|
go back and look at TPTB's posts since registering. they are filled with Armstrong references. does anyone see a problem with that?
i do; it's called lack of diversification. who worships just one guy all the time? no astute investor. that alone is cause for suspicion.
|
|
|
|
Armstrong on Bitcoin: http://forums.silverstackers.com/topic-47472-martin-armstrong-on-bitcoin.htmlOn Monday, Congress held its first congressional hearing on virtual currencies focusing on bitcoin. As Congress discussed bitcoin, the price of one bitcoin soared to more than $750 apiece. Overlooked was the concern focused on anonymity and lack of regulation.
Personally, it is hard to imagine a world where they will allow bitcoin to survive when they are doing everything in their power to hunt down money. Canada is already looking at taxing it and the concerns expressed by Congress clearly place this within the legal definition of what they call money laundering. What once was real washing of illegal money for legal use like the mob buying old 1930s roadside motels and pretending they were fully booked every night to get illegal cash into the system, is now applied to even storing gold or cash in a safe deposit box. Having an account outside the USA is money laundering hiding untaxed money from the government. So bitcoin can fit into that category and what federal judge would rule against the government? NONE!
The downside of such schemes the government interprets as money laundering is they can wipe you out besides 25 year jail terms. There was the old tax-straddle of the '70s where you sold December gold in a rising market and bought Feb gold. You could then move money from one year to the next to avoid taxes. When the IRS figured out the play, that gave birth to mark-to-market accounting and then they retroactively applied penalties, taxes, and interest. Brokers got sued over that and these trades, which were in the courts for years.
The IRS can claim you made a profit now just like stocks on a bitcoin. They can demand retroactive taxes and penalties. When you dance with the Devil, keep in mind he can say anything and do anything. If 25% of the population used bitcoin, you can imagine the loss in taxes and the chase would be off like a good old fashion English fox hunt.
There is no alternative to the dollar. They can change the rules at anytime and hiding money to them is now money laundering so they can take that position and confiscate the whole thing. We have to reform the system. These people will never go quietly into the night.
Do not get all excited that bitcoin will replace the dollar. Sorry, they are exploring the idea and allowing it to get press for one single reason – they intend to go to an electronic "virtual" currency so they get 100% of all taxes. In 1934, they printed $10,000 notes when a Cadillac was $600. Today, $100 is the biggest bill. The next phase is no bills. The euro tried to displace the dollar issuing €500 denomination notes. In Britain, they have made them illegal – it is all about taxes. The virtual dollar is coming. I would say after 2015.75 when the Fed has zero power and they will go electronic. So for now, bitcoin serves a purpose to get people use to the idea of a cashless society.
If they cannot tax it...they WILL NOT use it!
Last edited by TheEnd (2013-11-19 06:26:06) |
|
|
|
who also says gold won't save us?:
This is all about the Sovereign Debt Crisis, the collapse in socialism, and the driving deflationary trend as government clamps down on everything that moves. The precious metals are NOT going to be a hedge against the dollar, hyperinflation, or any of the other nonsense the gold promoters have spun to sell whatever they can like snake oil salesmen. The role of the metals will be as an alternative currency to ELECTRONIC when they terminate “printing” paper money. Wake up and stop listening to propaganda. Open your eyes and look at the real world. It is closing in a hell of a lot faster than people suspect.http://www.silverdoctors.com/martin-armstrong-bitcoin-electronic-money-the-precious-metals/ |
|
|
|
who does this sound like?: We are headed into an electronic currency regardless of what people say. Bitcoin will not survive, but it is useful to get people accustomed to a cashless society. The difference will be that the government version will be no ”anonymity” and what it being touted as a benefit is the elimination of crime – drug dealers will be eradicated (plus the government will get 100% of all its taxes).http://www.silverdoctors.com/martin-armstrong-bitcoin-electronic-money-the-precious-metals/ |
|
|
|
from today. TPTB and Armstrong think in lockstep about Summers: We are simply drowning with people in charge who have no real world experience. According to the former US Treasury Secretary and Harvard economist Larry Summers “the world suffers from a savings surplus and therefore threatens to fall into a secular stagnation.” He looks at the world through fogged glasses – not even a rose colored pair. He claims that now for decades to come we will have to adjust accordingly to slower economic growth and increasing economic and social problems. The reason for this is that in some countries such as China and Germany, people saved too much, rather than consume or to invest. Therefore, they exported their savings abroad and thus led to an oversupply of savings, for there is no sufficient demand. Summers’ solution – the cash-free economy.http://armstrongeconomics.com/armstrong_economics_blog |
|
|
|
Armstrong doesn't like Bitcoin: We are headed into an electronic currency regardless of what people say. Bitcoin will not survive, but it is useful to get people accustomed to a cashless society. The difference will be that the government version will be no “anonymity” and what it being touted as a benefit is the elimination of crime – drug dealers will be eradicated (plus the government will get 100% of all its taxes).
The precious metals are NOT going to be a hedge against the dollar, hyperinflation, or any of the other nonsense the gold promoters have spun to sell whatever they can like snake oil salesmen. The role of the metals will be as an alternative currency to ELECTRONIC when they terminate “printing” paper money. Wake up and stop listening to propaganda. Open your eyes and look at the real world. It is closing in a hell of a lot faster than people suspect.http://armstrongeconomics.com/archives/15830 |
|
|
|
i know everyone has better things to do but if you have time, you should read those prison writings from Armstrong. to me, and i could be imagining things, they sound alot like TPTB. i honestly don't know what to think; all i know is something feels quite fishy: http://www.scribd.com/doc/29561727/From-the-Hole-8 |
|
|
|
Shelby sure does love Armstrong. anyone ever heard of pen names?: I don't know if anyone else has commented already, that Martin Armstrong's "It Is Just Time" prediction made back in October 2008, for a major turn event on March 19, nailed the exact day (after) the Fed announced to start buying government bonds directly.
He had also predicted ahead of time the turn that coincided with the peak in the precious metals prices last March 2008.
Google "Martin Armstrong", for the remarkable story about how accurate his computer model predictions have been, and him being in the maximum security prison without a trial, together with the Shoe Bomber and the Unibomber, alledgedly because of his unwillingness to share his model with the CIA.http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/03.09/justtime.htmland why is Shelby playing around so much with silver and gold when he is supposed to be coding? |
|
|
|
sheesh, i know the feeling: According to lawyers who worked on the case in the early days, the financier’s headstrong manner irritated Judge Owen almost immediately."[10] On August 17, 2006, he pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, commodities fraud and wire fraud.[2][11] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_A._Armstrong |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
