Cypherdoc's stalkers are still 'alive' ...
While nobody is upgrading to core 0.11.0
Your first and most obvious mistake is always assuming all nodes are equal. 903 nodes now. |
|
|
|
Before cypherdoc locked his thread and tried to blame the mods
if you're gonna flat out lie like this, you could at least try a little harder to obfuscate. this one is so far from the truth for all to see, you're now just making an ass of yourself. as you've always done. |
|
|
|
Cypher I told you you will get #REKT...
You're the one getting rekt and don't even know it, lol. . XT + NotXT continuing to ramp. 848! FTFY. Pretending 100% of self-reported node versions are genuine instead of spoofed shows us how dishonest Gavincoiners are. Is there anything you won't do to mislead the public? BTW:  thanks for posting that. the fact that your supposed great Szabo would retweet a stupid tweet like that by btcdrak says alot. 880! |
|
|
|
|
i just went back and looked at every post in this thread.
not one post about gold.
off topic ---> lock.
|
|
|
|
Wha Happened....to the original thread?
theymos via BadBear locked the thread purportedly for being "off topic". really it was b/c we were talking about XT. note how this thread is similarly off topic in that no one talks about gold for the most part. it's all about pushing the Core agenda and the mods don't have any problem with that. I wasn't aware there was such a thing as "off topic" in any thread on BTT. What a bunch of horse shit. i wasn't either; esp when it was my thread to begin with. but maybe that's their problem; me being the OP. plus, any moved thread normally leaves a courtesy notice for a day or so with the clear moniker [MOVED] attached with a link. not this time at_all. just vanished. and note how pages are disappearing from the locked thread as they go thru and censor parts they don't want read. and just what is off topic in a thread that's lasted 4 years and has 1.45M views and 31K posts? for the several days right before it got locked it was racking up about 7000 views per day. that's how popular it was. but that's the pt isn't it? stop the popularity before it gets out of hand. just look at the bullshit from BadBear: The thread shouldn't have been hijacked in the first place, what a mess. The thread is mostly about XT now, and the only graphs posted are XT related.
It would be a lot of work to split or delete all the XT posts. Splitting is not easy to do in SMF, especially with large threads, and many posts to be split. So that isn't an option.
It could stay in speculation since the majority of the thread is relevant, but all XT chat from here on out to be moderated.
Might be better to just lock the thread since it's so far off track at this point.
|
|
|
|
Wha Happened....to the original thread?
theymos via BadBear locked the thread purportedly for being "off topic". really it was b/c we were talking about XT. note how this thread is similarly off topic in that no one talks about gold for the most part. it's all about pushing the Core agenda and the mods don't have any problem with that. |
|
|
|
Your powers of desperately trying to tie any of this to the Blockstream scam is ridiculous. You're dev-child: However, the judge dismissed claims against Simon Barber, stating:"With regard to restitution against Barber individually, plaintiff contends that Barber personally benefitted from the unlawful business practices by taking salary bonuses from the proceeds received on undelivered BabyJet orders," Judge Davila said. "Again, although the allegations may ultimately prove untrue, that determination must wait for another day." Read more at http://www.econotimes.com/Federal-Judge-approves-fraud-claims-against-HashFast-77641#AozrxV2Xvtg04s3z.99 |
|
|
|
Cypher I told you you will get #REKT...
You're the one getting rekt and don't even know it, lol. . XT continuing to ramp. 848! |
|
|
|
Nobody I can think of advocated censoring or sterilizing anything. For all we know cypherdoc himself picked up his ball and went home.
You're still as stupid ever and willing to throw loose allegations around like vomit. You're still going to lose because of all your unethical tactics. ... and here comes the compromised shill to lecture others on ethics. Have you no shame? He's always welcome on my thread even if he is the kind of pansy who messed up his own and tried to blame others for it. Cypherdoc is his own worst enemy when he flaps his gums in the presence of people smart enough and informed enough to matter. BTW, cypherdoc: Gold up, Bitcoin collapsing...thanks in no small part to your own efforts. Notice how your thread is totally devoid of any intellectual content or insight. That's because you're the OP. it will never amount to anything because you have nothing of intellectual value to offer . Just thuggery. That list of guys you put yourself in can and will enjoy each other's circle jerk. |
|
|
|
You guys cheering thermos' censoring of the thread is just sad.
You do understand that just because you silence others that does not make their ideas magically go away, and it does not make you right.
But you always had a losing argument, must feel nice to have the thread censored to get you off the hook of having to continue to defend obvious nonsense.
You guys pulled the nuclear option and deleted/sanitized all discussion you disagree with from /r/bitcoin and bitcointalk.org. If you have to resort to that it always means you are on the wrong side.
So bask in your assumed victory now that there is no one left to question you. It's going to be a short lived one.
Nobody I can think of advocated censoring or sterilizing anything. For all we know cypherdoc himself picked up his ball and went home. You're still as stupid ever and willing to throw loose allegations around like vomit. You're still going to lose because of all your unethical tactics. ... and here comes the compromised shill to lecture others on ethics. Have you no shame? Ah, little marcus, the slime ball Blockstream shill who shamelessly publishes a malicious scammer thread without any evidence and that's in dispute. No guilty verdict there. |
|
|
|
he locked his thread?
Anyone know why?
thread was locked by the admins for being off-topic. I don't necessarily agree but I'm having a big laugh at how cypherdoc must be fuming right now. His life's work, all gone  I'll bet that cypherdoc locked it himself when the laundry-mark that is XT started to really be exposed.The nice thing about allowing attackers to use a forum is that it becomes possible to pin people who have put in a lot of effort. Looking through the now-locked thread, I identify some of the primary petites taches de merde as so: - cypherdoc - justusranvier - peter r - solex - erdogan - zarathustra - smooth/rocks - majamalu - stolfi (honorable mention - still as active as ever elsewhere.) Some of them have really put in some effort over the years. Others not mentioned are more likely to simply have been duped. Interestingly, when I was doing a quick skim to make this list I noticed that most of these folks went dark within a stretch of hours of when cypherdoc did. And the list of some of the people who were especially tenacious at fighting the good fight: - iCEBREAKER - brg444 - hdbuck - Marcus_of_Augustus - tvbcof (me) - odalv and lots of people who chimed in letting people know that they have not been fooled. It's hard to gauge how many people's eyes were opened to the hostile takeover attempt but I'll bet it was a lot. Quite a stark contrast in brain power versus thuggery you got there. |
|
|
|
You guys cheering thermos' censoring of the thread is just sad.
You do understand that just because you silence others that does not make their ideas magically go away, and it does not make you right.
But you always had a losing argument, must feel nice to have the thread censored to get you off the hook of having to continue to defend obvious nonsense.
You guys pulled the nuclear option and deleted/sanitized all discussion you disagree with from /r/bitcoin and bitcointalk.org. If you have to resort to that it always means you are on the wrong side.
So bask in your assumed victory now that there is no one left to question you. It's going to be a short lived one.
Nobody I can think of advocated censoring or sterilizing anything. For all we know cypherdoc himself picked up his ball and went home. You're still as stupid ever and willing to throw loose allegations around like vomit. You're still going to lose because of all your unethical tactics. |
|
|
|
On another note, Peter R., did you have a look at my PMs on reddit?
Yes, sorry, I've been caught up by the strangeness of seeing this thread moved. I'll answer you question here: I do not think we should promote this idea more aggressively until we improve its presentation and address some of the objections. In particular: 1. Solex, Justus, and JorgeStolfi made a good point about the importance of a well-defined limit. I think the graph I posted yesterday was wrong:  I think there will actually be a vertical line of about 60-80% of the hash power at exactly the same limit, with tails on either side. The lower-limit tail will eventually get forked off. If this is true, it would address the concern raised of an attacker publishing a block of just-the-right size to cause a (for example) 47/53 network split. The reason we get the vertical line of "spontaneous consensus" is that everyone knows that unless that line exists, the network could be forked (game theory). 2. We need to make it clear that this is compatible with BIP101, and that we're not even suggesting that the entire network needs to adopt it. In other words, we're sort of raising awareness that the limit can be set by the community rather than by the developers of a particular implementation of Bitcoin. Of course you are free to do as you wish, but I personally would not mail the proposal to the bitcoin-dev list at this time. c'mon Peter, you gotta give me some credit too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=68655.msg12167438#msg12167438 |
|
|
|
The thread shouldn't have been hijacked in the first place, what a mess. The thread is mostly about XT now, and the only graphs posted are XT related.
It would be a lot of work to split or delete all the XT posts. Splitting is not easy to do in SMF, especially with large threads, and many posts to be split. So that isn't an option.
It could stay in speculation since the majority of the thread is relevant, but all XT chat from here on out to be moderated.
Might be better to just lock the thread since it's so far off track at this point.
if your motives were strictly topic related, then why didn't you leave the customary "(MOVED)" notice behind in Speculation redirecting confused readers where to go to find the moved thread? and why did you just remove my new topic thread in Speculation attempting to remedy your deficiency? |
|
|
|
My condolences cypher, this time [nearly] genuine.
~Crumbs
Do not pity him, he is a convicted spammer and also probably a scammer, just look at his trust rate! lol, nothing further from the truth. the case is going nowhere. and even if it does move forward, i fully expect to prevail. |
|
|
|
|
yep, they're trying to hide this thread.
i posted a new topic thread back over at Speculation just now simply saying the thread was moved with a link here, and it was deleted instantly.
normally when threads get moved, there is a courtesy link left behind informing everyone of that fact so they can follow the move. no traces of anything like that this time.
|
|
|
|
The thread shouldn't have been hijacked in the first place, what a mess. The thread is mostly about XT now, and the only graphs posted are XT related.
It would be a lot of work to split or delete all the XT posts. Splitting is not easy to do in SMF, especially with large threads, and many posts to be split. So that isn't an option.
It could stay in speculation since the majority of the thread is relevant, but all XT chat from here on out to be moderated.
Might be better to just lock the thread since it's so far off track at this point.
according to you it's a mess. the thread has always been multi-dimensional and you know that. and the "only" graphs posted are XT? lol. first off, that's not even true. second, you know that any graphs presented vary with the controversy of the day, XT being only a small slice of what the thread is all about over it's 4 y timeframe. "all XT chat is to be moderated"? by who's decision, theymos or you? and like you really cared about it ever being on track before XT came along. |
|
|
|
|
Well, in case you hadn't noticed, those figures I put up yesterday about views demonstrated accelerating growth in the last few weeks/days. Probably by moving it here they thought they could throw off everybody's scent. No one ever notified me.
|
|
|
|
I believe congratulations are in order. We've been moved to the alt-coin section!
WTF is this!? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
