Will Quickseller be confirming these messages so others can at least partially accept their validity? I'm not going to comment on anything at this point until confirmed as there may be some games being played here. Go figure.  |
|
|
|
Yes I know lol..
but considering my current situation. I did not see anymore option. someone suggested me to join amazix bounties's signature campaign. they pay very high rates and also accept red trust accounts.. but the only problem was that I wasn't able to complete the required number of posts (15) each week. I have a lot of things to sort out. including sneaky payment and all the amounts from the unpaid bounties.
so I Talked to a guy who agreed to make 15 posts a week for 50% a payment..
I was busy in shifting from a small apartment (I had to vanish my home).
This post, and other recent posts, unfortunately do not sound anything like the aTriz that was PM'ing me during the alia debacle - I can't be certain before then. IMO, whoever operated the account at that time certainly didn't talk/type anything like this. Be wary! |
|
|
|
Wasn't aTriz also doxxed? As part of the whole alia debacle, *she revealed his real name but stated that she also knew his address and details about his family. IIRC, none of that was ever revealed before she was banned. *If the scammer behind that account was actually female as claimed.I believe there were 2 different doxxes on the aTriz account showing one name, I believe one was in 2017 and the other was alia (and it did post it somewhere). However, early on under the account in 2013, the account owner went by "Adam" in a public post, this post was deleted sometime after 2016 based on the archived date. The account wakes up from a posting gap in April of 2017, after being inactive from 2014, appearing to be hacked or possibly changing hands, the owner ends up later signing a message from a staked address in 2013 which unfortunately had no date... all explained here. The Adam name from 2013 did not match the 2 recent dox names (Ke* Ma*), so I question who the original owner actually was. I may be wrong but I'm under the belief the dox from 2017 may have been fake - including alia's re-use of it, and that the account owner staged the dox in 2017 to potentially gain trust or establish a real life identity to give people comfort, but that's just one guys opinion.  |
|
|
|
Again, the account was attempted to be sold but nixxed the idea upon learning that such course of action would affect my cred, opting to go another route, i.e. sig campaigns. Then both course of actions were stuck up my ass. I was liking getting fuck up the ass till recently seeing that I was missing out, now fucking those up their ass who fucked me up my ass.
Is this not you essentially stating in your sales thread that selling an account effects credibility? https://archive.is/Sk4PJ#selection-3023.0-2936.5You also tell your potential buyers the accounts can be used for signature campaigns, so that "route" seems well known before you decided to sell. I can only imagine what changed your mind? Regardless, you claim to have successfully sold 2 other accounts before deciding to go this other route... I certainly had an elevated level of trust with the Gleb account (and others Bruno controls), and if "bigmelons25" would have contacted me the day after potentially purchasing the Gleb account and asked for help, a loan, etc. without a hint of changing hands, I may not have thought twice. To know that you are willing to give that away to a brand new user, bigmelons25 (or known scammer for all I know) for a few hundred bucks is, to say the least, disappointing. You offered the e-mail & password to bigmelons25, seemingly to completely avoid detection... the whole thing just seems like a pretty lame and petty thing to do. |
|
|
|
I sent them his info, the report from his coworker, the ripoff cache and the 4chan archived thread
According to ripoffreport, you sent them information and content that should not be relied upon... and the accuracy of the information you sent them relies on anonymous authors and commenters.  3. ONLINE CONTENT
Opinions, advice, statements, offers, or other information or content made available through Ripoff Report are those of their respective authors and not of Xcentric, and should not necessarily be relied upon. Such authors are solely responsible for the accuracy of such content.
Xcentric does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information on Ripoff Report and neither adopts nor endorses nor is responsible for the accuracy or reliability of any opinion, advice or statement made. Under no circumstances will Xcentric be responsible for any loss or damage resulting from anyone's reliance on information or other content posted on Ripoff Report.
https://www.ripoffreport.com/terms-of-service |
|
|
|
Quickseller has such low morals he even uses children to forward his agenda. :/ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2028469.msg20239127#msg20239127"It is my understanding and belief that Martin Lawrence is a pedophile." What's more - he complains instantly if anyone uses his real name, but he has no problems using my real name and calling me the worst name in the book... Well Quicky, I have your name, tracing down your location - things are soon going to get as real for you as you made them for me. Anyone who uses children the way you do deserves to be punished as harshly as possible. And right before that comment, in the same post: --snip--
If someone is disputing the charge, then they deserve due process, and proof needs to be presented beyond a reasonable doubt (BadBear used to use the threshold "beyond any doubt").
Where is the beyond any doubt proof of the pedophile comment? Vod has certainly disputed the statement/charge... so doesn't this post seem a little contradictory? |
|
|
|
For reasons I prefer not to state publicly, during the course of due diligence about the situation, certain information was discovered and I told TF that even though I believe someone in Vod's position should be held accountable for his actions, pursuing civil litigation would be against public policy.
Against what public policy? The specific reason I do not want to state publicly would not affect my reputation, and would make Vod look bad....although I don't particularly like Vod, I think this is the right thing to do. Given sufficient pressure from those whose opinions I value (and Vod), I may change course. I would give particular weight to Vods pressure because it involves him personally. I will give no weight to what idiots like o_e_l_e_o and suchmoon have to say.
I find it a little hard to believe you would not disclose information that could make Vod look bad, are you willing to state this reason privately? TF responded by saying that he has other projects/priorities he would rather use the BTC for, and I asked for a signed message requesting the return of the BTC he wanted returned, with a stipulation that sending said amount of BTC to him would absolve further obligations of me to return any BTC to the above mentioned address within the signed message, he provided said signed message, and I promptly returned the BTC.
I assume there is a signed message and transaction from that time proving this? |
|
|
|
Et tu, Bruno?  |
|
|
|
Gleb/Bruno?, I have to take you up on the offer for the picture you had mentioned in PM with my username/today's date. |
|
|
|
I googled... and found some Capitonyms with different pronunciations.  |
|
|
|
Judging by the picture, way too big of a house edge there...  |
|
|
|
Seems like everyone has at least one alt account
Not me... how many alts you got? As for digaran, it's a toss up between an unstable individual and a well fed troll... at the end of the day, it doesn't matter what he says, as long as he says it with inflection, that makes you feel that he'll convey some inner truth or vast reflection... but he's said nothing so far, and he can keep it up, for as long as it takes. And it don't matter who you are, if he's doing his job then it's your resolve that breaks, because the hooook brings him back. Great song |
|
|
|
|
This may be too resource-intensive, but to cut down on redundant threads by legitimate new users, what about some sort of auto-lookup of thread subjects to see similar threads for a particular topic being created? ... Similar to how some knowledge bases work, where it shows articles/questions that already exist similar to the search or question being requested and would provide the user an option to see a list of similar threads, based on the topic subject they are trying to create.
|
|
|
|
|
How do we know this is the original post by suchmoon? Going by your times, the post by suchmoon was last edited 9:27:36, 16 minutes after theymos.
|
|
|
|
Bump. marlboroza is not here yet other than responding to other people on this topic. such an irresponsible DT2 member.
Seems quite responsible to me, given how it went after marlboroza responded to you after the first neg. Not feeding the troll. Don't worry, you won't starve, I'm feeling charitable.A father of 2? kids should think about his own children first. Well it seems like a reasonable time to bring up someones kids in this situation.. /sarcasm You wouldn't be deliberately attempting to elicit an emotional/angry response from someone here, would you? .. which I believe there is another name for on the internet, when people do this type of thing on a forum, wtf is that called again? Is it a mole? a bowl? a roll? I'm pretty sure it sounds something like this bah, I give up... |
|
|
|
... interestingly enough, TF has returned, and has apparently sent 6.3BTC to OgNasty.. NastyMining has recovered 6.51961 BTC as a result of our investment with user TradeFortress. This brings the current amount of BTC held by NastyMining to 16.7217181. NastyMining is also holding 112,306.66 Siacoin. wtf? |
|
|
|
th3 r3al hax0rs d0 n0t us3 cap1tals, and sh0uld als0 m1x numb3rs in the1r w0rds. gl3b, u sh0uld kn0w th1s. th3 r3al hax0rs d0 n0t us3 cap1tals, and sh0uld als0 m1x numb3rs in the1r w0rds. gl3b, u sh0uld kn0w th1s.
@n @nc13nt p0nd / @ frOg jump5 1n / th3 spl@sh 0f w@t3r <touché in 5 ..... 4 .... 3 ...> ... 2 ... 1 ... touché! |
|
|
|
Bump.
@DT1 members, you should care about your minions and their actions. otherwise you would look guilty for their misbehavior.
Avoiding guilty behavior by expecting or requiring every DT1 member to care about every other DT1 member and their actions does not seem sustainable nor feasible. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
