Not sure how people fall for those scams, before investing people should make sure the person behind the project is known and trusted.

Hey guys,

I'm just a worried guy but I have some decent claims regarding this ICO, I'm less active recently so I don't know all the details about this project but I noticed a pretty big similarity between this project and "Opair" which turned out as a scam. not saying it's a scam for sure, but people, open your eyes, many people are not here to change the world, but mostly their bank balances.

The first similarity, the frontend website. It's absolutely the same, with a few photos and text changed, but everyone who have visited the Opair frontend website will notice a huge similarity.
The second thing, the Wordpress ICO script. same as Opair as well. there's no way it's a coincidence.

Third thing, both domains were registered privately. someone doesn't want his identity revealed. I wouldn't put much trust in internet strangers asking for bitcoins.

The fourth thing and probably the best one: THE NAMESERVERS. to those familiar with CloudFlare, each account has nameservers that are static for the account. they have probably hundreds of nameservers with their 10Tbps network, two accounts using the same servers are very unlikely. and to my "suprise" both Opair.co and Ebitz.org domains use the same nameservers. (https://i.imgur.com/HXh9W0E.png). I found this minutes ago and I'm confident both domains are using the same Cloudflare account.

The person behind Opair is likely the person behind Ebitz. look how Opair turned out.

Original Ebitz thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1681965.0
Original Opair thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1558596.0

EDIT: extrabyte is already in panic and sent me a PM to try and contact CF before spreading "FUD". too bad CF keeps customer information secretive.

A little blog post I wrote to those unfamiliar with the Opair scam: https://icobusters.wordpress.com/2016/11/30/the-opair-ebitz-relationship/

BUSTED: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1698889.msg17040029#msg17040029

I second you, this is the cleanest mining rig I've seen to date. well done man!

Making the miner faster doesn't result in more profits as most miners use his miner anyways, so if everyone updates the profit stays the same and who didn't upgrade goes obsolete.

The entire world would buy something that returns its cost in 3 months and keeps making money afterwards, that should give you the answer.

I agree, this motherboard is quite old and unavailable locally. I still wonder why nobody made a similar board for the 1151 socket.

Are you currently mining Zcash or ETH? a really nice setup.

Are you using a different kernel than Silentarmy?

I think those cables should theoretically support more SATA connections than what they have connectors for, but what are you planning to connect to them? SATA drives?

The timestamp of 4417977600 represents January 1st 2110, at 12:00 AM. is this what you're asking?

-i 6 and v8.0 seems to be stable for me. 180H/s on Tahiti, 270H/s on Hawaii Pro and 310H/s on Fiji XT.

The rejected share comes after a block is found.

It happens. sometimes blocks are found within 5 seconds and sometimes it takes a few hours. the average is 10 minutes assuming no major changes in hashrate between retargets.

Over 260H/s on Fury X using 7.0.

You can't make it impossible, but you can make it very difficult to implement on anything but GPUs or CPUs.

You are saying Dagger and Equihash are not ASIC-resistant?

Make a clone of Ethereum or Zcash, both are ASIC-resistant.

They only want to appear modern. "digitalized" fiat is still fiat and not cryptocurrency.

2nd week 17/11/16, joined the signature campaign.

Are you sure this PSU is capable of handling the load? I wouldn't trust a 10-year old PSU to run 24/7 in my house.