some of those requested simplewallet commands require updates to the daemon's RPC functions too we might have some of them done already, lets see knowing which ones they need does help prioritize can you ask them what platform they are running their node on? |
|
|
|
interesting as you may have realized "SYNC" has the most ambiguous SEO ever, I would have never found that, but I didn't read all 500 pages of this thread either Big plans regardless, I don't have whatever shortcomings the "SYNC Foundation" had, my organizations have some funding |
|
|
|
I went ahead and covered the Hitbtc listing fee. As a result we should have a BBR/BTC pairing sometime this week. If anyone in the community would like to pitch in send me a PM.
Excellent work and generous contribution. Thanks on behalf of everybody. Are we changing back to BBR as the official ticker then? What about XBB like it was on Bittrex? I recall reading Bittrex charged an outrageous 1.5 btc just to change the ticker, so let's make we sure get the right best one upfront. I like both tickers, just wondering. My understanding is the X has some official meaning, like 'denotes a non-national affiliation or a monetary metal such as gold or silver'. And XBB has a robust solid look. I'm all for anything that reduces confusion at this point. I also would like to point out that Monero, XMR, had a different symbol at one point called MRO. Their XMR symbol is used on their announcement threads, in the wallets, and on exchanges and their is no ambiguity. Boolberry is still subject to political squabbles, so it doesn't have the same level of consensus as this thread alone still uses the BBR symbol and the wallets currently also use BBR. I would just suggest doing whatever works, since listing anywhere is a green field project right now |
|
|
|
|
Any ETA from HitBTC?
Its a new week
|
|
|
|
what was tradebits supposed to be? |
|
|
|
smokin35 , said he's out of sync because they stole everything.
sorry, what? gonna need the backstory, or at least one side of it |
|
|
|
1blockologist:
You seem to have a good track record with Boolberry, kinda looks like you brought it back from the dead. Keep up the good work.
thank you not everyone agreed with how my work in the Boolberry project turned out so far and the original dev never helped me, but results are all that matters. Several people are still working on it now without my ongoing participation, and they see the direct path for its potential growth that I illuminated this project is quite a bit different in what I'm doing but it does need some things from the community (more people running the software as nodes) and some better software like lite clients first would like to thank everyone that helped get SYNC listed on Novaexchange, lets get on a couple more exchanges, and let the exchanges know I'm involved Can you say what the project is? That way you can motivate more people to run nodes , Although I do not know if you need nodes for this wallet or for a new wallet? Not yet but I had a question, is there a way to see how many coins are staking? Would it be correct to say that even "lost" coins are still staking? One of the ways to find out how many coins are staking, is to look here : https://chainz.cryptoid.info/sync/#!rich or here https://chainz.cryptoid.info/sync/#!wallets . If you look where it says last change, it's the last time the wallet was staking. Though that doesn't mean all those wallets are missing. They can simply be offline or blocked Is there anything we can do to help you with this new project? If I release a new wallet, run it. If I make a new thread, continue it there. If the original dev comes back, encourage collaboration. |
|
|
|
|
My cost basis is .10 BTC/each, slowly lowered thanks to the variety of sells at my wished price of .05 BTC
I am close to my original goal
|
|
|
|
if anyone wants to sell 45K BBR for 2 btc hit me up, ive pretty good trust but we can also use escrow
what is that in satoshis? |
|
|
|
if btrx delisted next question is:
when boolberry list on other exchange or relist on bittrex?
Hey Newton90, the plan is to reach out to additional exchanges and help them understand what considerations Boolberry needs to work on their servers, while simultaneously making it easier for Boolberry to be used at all, which will improve its ability to be listed on other exchanges |
|
|
|
Show the community the rest of the transcript where Ryan posts the address and you provide the transaction ID related to that specific address. That will constitute as proof that you were solely responsible for the ticker change. Thats not even a conspiracy, thats what the blockchain is for. The ticker name change had the exact effect I was hoping for at the time. I offered to show you the tx id. 5f4c5c776d347b47998f60acd55664023dcfe166c9496bb7750a2ca6b3fabb08  I said I would do that, and I did that, and I did other things, and when things failed, I told people exactly what went wrong. The primary thing that went wrong was that all of the developers I worked with got Boolberry codebase changes to work on one platform, say, Windows, but couldn't get it to work on OSX and Linux without segmentation faults. We stopped releasing code changes because people wanted to compile from source. I expect you and your developers to encounter the same issues. I inspired you and others to come back to this project, no matter how that inspiration formed. I reached out to clintar and he's been awesome, no matter who is the self proclaimed steward of the project. If your main criticism of me is not enough focus on the code, (I mean, I think that should be the main criticism) then you, b4h4mu7, should stop getting distracted on less relevant nuances in the past, and focus on the code yourself, because otherwise, unlike me and my great ROI for a lottttt of people and subsequently expanded business, what will you have to show for it? An audit? |
|
|
|
 I couldn't move them off the 1.5btc. Want to see the transaction id as well? Haven't lied about anything. You picking up the baton is only because I brought interest to this community. Cryptozoidberg is what the community actually needs, don't push your frustrations on me. Myself and my developers got blocked on several issues, primarily cross platform issues. The code is on github in my repository, blockchain development company's repository, and javajared's repository. Several people forked it. First of all, donations didn't only come from that person. Second of all, there were several people in this very community that actually were working with me, and agreed with my use of funds. Thirdly, Boolberry needed infrastructure to run this code on, servers are part of development. Funds were pooled, its not an argument, they paid for server costs which are part of development. Rapeghost did not have infrastructure available for us. Fourth, I'm not sure you know what you are talking about. Paying Bittrex is a valid criticism, your criticism is that we didn't pay, and you were dead wrong about that. Why do you think your other arguments are more accurate? Fifth, yeah this is fun talking to you, but there is no 10 bitcoin. As demonstrated, and described, it was used for the benefit of Boolberry development. Have fun debating that, but I tried to get you involved specifically to avoid this exact criticism. You were silent, and kept donating to zoidberg for god knows why. He kept it parked, we didn't. Sixth, if you want to carry the baton, be a community leader, get the database fixed and get it listed. Its not helpful for you to squirrel on about this. Seventh, and I just bought 1.3% of the float. Woot woot. Specifically, funds that I manage for investors because they saw how accurate I am in seeing opportunity. The Boolberry project was the trial run, people are pleased. Like, institutional investors literally love it. They like how blockchains never really die, how we can buy up stuff without really tipping off the markets, and then come in and attempt to improve the markets because the underlying asset is open sourced and can be run by anyone. People don't even get crypto and here we are doing this crazy thing with precise control. There is another story here that you are neglecting and it doesn't matter there's still opportunity here, massive opportunity so just focus on that. Blockchain Development Company is a management company for several funds, and it also hires software engineers to come onto crypto projects and make them valuable. When blockchains are involved, that involves the community. We weren't able to get consensus in Boolberry's community, and thats okay, I'm not going to waste my time in the middle of the most epic altcoin rally in history. It is not possible for me to use their money to settle some arbitrary donation criticism, it wasn't even possible for me to use their money to fund the development, only the management fees earned from them. If actually aligned economic incentives are somehow controversial to you, instead of more like a blueprint, then this is the wrong project because the developer you actually respect has been collecting a 1% tax from the network with little to show for it for two years. |
|
|
|
so,bittrex really delisted?
That's correct. Make sure you have a wallet installed locally so you have a place to store your funds. If you need any assistance let us know. purchased all the boolberry I wanted and withdrew it
We'll be at 10 million valuation when relisted so thats an easy 400% gain.
clintar2's database almost works, we'll reach out to old exchanges again when thats done, and new exchanges while its in progress. this is the cheapest cryptonote coin
No offense, but you don't have the best credibility within this community. You promised a bunch of development and one year later the project is exactly where it was when you first got involved. The only thing that's changed is the ticker and that doesn't matter because in a few hours it won't be listed on any exchanges. You dipped out on the project as soon as it got delisted from Crapoliex, now you're doing the complete opposite when it gets delisted from Shittrex trying to pump it up.. It makes no sense. Boolberry Network Address April 27th 2017
BOOLBERRY DELISTED FROM POLONIEX, BLOCKCHAIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY NO LONGER INVOLVED
A liquid market for Boolberry is a prerequisite for my firm’s involvement, so with the delisting from Poloniex my firm won’t be involved until a liquid market forms elsewhere, currently this would be available on Bittrex and simply requires market participants to post liquidity there.
Changelly, Circle, and other OTC markets were candidates for a liquid secondary market on my firm’s amended roadmap, but the sunk cost risks and lack of liquidity is too great without an existing liquid market to properly align economic incentives.
Boolberry’s resource requirements continue to grow, and currently only Clintar2 is working on the lmdb implementation, alone - which would alleviate the resource requirements - but has repeatedly expressed the lack of available time to work on it due to life obligations.
Fluffypony made myself and Crypto_Zoidberg aware of a double spend vulnerability which affects all cryptonote coins. They have patched it on Monero a long time ago and plan to disclose it mid May.
Between these problems, the lack of support and consensus from the community, and lack of liquid market: good luck with Zoidberg!
The firm's commitment to cryptonote is unwavering, the portfolio will maintain positions in more liquid variants of cryptonote networks.
Blockchain Development Company’s public project has propelled its partnerships in key areas of the finance and blockchain sector, providing premier research to incumbents and funds seeking exposure to public blockchains, and has established relationships with representatives of Silicon Valley Bank, CME Group, Deloitte and various liquidity providers.
I’d personally like to thank trollbox for the inaccurate, humorous and free advertisements, there will be more projects the crypto community can get involved in.
The roadmap for Boolberry is clear, and you can carry the baton to complete it, as well.
Also, I know you received donations from rapeghost to the tune of 10BTC and I'm really interested to know where those funds went. Because I can't see any contributions worth 10BTC to any codebase that is related to Boolberry. One would assume 10BTC would of been enough to handle the db issues. I also don't know of any server costs that would amount to 10BTC unless it was spent on aws mining. Are you using those funds to buy Boolberry? Transparency would be nice since those funds were meant for development. Clintar isn't using the changes to the boolberry codebase that did happen, which are mostly around RPC functions. Its all open source, entertain yourself by synthesizing information based on available sources instead of the mixture of inaccuracy on the forums, aren't you coding now or something? No they were not used to buy Boolberry, they went to development. Donated funds went to servers, social media outreach, ticker name change, and several devs. Not everyone does bounties for pennies. We went over this in PM. I asked you to be part of a multisignature address specifically for donated funds and approving costs, and you respond 6 months later about the lack of transparency. Yeah that ship has sailed, those funds were spent. Re-read all my bi-weekly reports, which were merely a courtesy, while people hampered the project's growth day in and day out. The bi-weeklies talk about the several processes we tried to create around using donation funds before moving forward with spending them. Boolberry is undervalued right now. I bought it. I bragged about it. Next! Not everything worked out that I wanted (the server host is flaky, the reddit redesign didn't pan out because those designers disappeared, etc), it has still been a wild success for my companies, what is hard to understand about that. Everyone loves the activist investing approach, its like the Berkshire Hathaway of Cryptocurrency. If some failing project doesn't actually work because the community fights over dumb irrelevant shit, well thats just one part of the portfolio (other communities are begging for someone to have a direction on their cryptocoin), and if that same failing project sells off 75% because of a silly fixable reason again (and my team has already done all the research), well thats a good buy again. If I get stuck with an illiquid purchase then I'll do what I can to help fix the market inefficiencies by fixing the coding inefficiencies whether I personally do it or not. Its not that controversial. |
|
|
|
|
purchased all the boolberry I wanted and withdrew it
We'll be at 10 million valuation when relisted so thats an easy 400% gain.
clintar2's database almost works, we'll reach out to old exchanges again when thats done, and new exchanges while its in progress. this is the cheapest cryptonote coin
|
|
|
|
1blockologist:
You seem to have a good track record with Boolberry, kinda looks like you brought it back from the dead. Keep up the good work.
thank you not everyone agreed with how my work in the Boolberry project turned out so far and the original dev never helped me, but results are all that matters. Several people are still working on it now without my ongoing participation, and they see the direct path for its potential growth that I illuminated this project is quite a bit different in what I'm doing but it does need some things from the community (more people running the software as nodes) and some better software like lite clients first would like to thank everyone that helped get SYNC listed on Novaexchange, lets get on a couple more exchanges, and let the exchanges know I'm involved Can you say what the project is? That way you can motivate more people to run nodes , Although I do not know if you need nodes for this wallet or for a new wallet? Not yet but I had a question, is there a way to see how many coins are staking? Would it be correct to say that even "lost" coins are still staking? |
|
|
|
|
Forget Bittrex
All of these exchanges have so many crazy things going on behind the scenes. Did you read the BTC-E indictment? The behind the scenes madness is all connected going back to the earliest defunct exchanges like Bitcoinica, and incompetence and poor customer is merely the tip of the iceberg.
This is a red herring to the viability of this project. The database is all that matters.
|
|
|
|
Some good points there b4h4mu7!
I vote for SEC interferance about the taking advantage on trades when uptrending and finishing it with delisting with no warning.
Why do you two think the SEC would be involved? The SEC isn't a "trading police", they are a securities police. Boolberry isn't a security so even if they went after Bittrex for trading and manipulating some of the projects that are securities-like, they wouldn't even be able to launch a case about what happens in the Boolberry market. Lets nip this strange misconception in the bud right now. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I'm buying.
Monero's mempool is full in periods of newfound interest, and no real scaling solution is available on any cryptonote roadmap just yet. Opaque transactions can flow into other cryptonote coins. Just like when litecoin was being used while bitcoin's transaction backlog grew.
Another year, another bullish case, and Monero is even further ahead in valuation showing the potential growth of the cryptonote space.
There are many people that don't want to touch bytecoin, and it is still amateur hour in XDN with very opaque development.
Boolberry? Yeah we need to get organized. We also don't need a 2 million valuation, its still the database issue.
Everything from my year-old boolberry roadmap is still relevant, but other people (clintar2) are working on the database issue first and I'm not involved. Boolberry has largely missed the growth in altcoins, but the community is able to stay involved and find liquidity, and we can do it again.
The story is here, and these current prices are from delisting news only. HitBTC and other exchanges are going to happen, we'll make our own exchange if we have to, even IOTA has their own exchange - necessary for US customers after bitfinex kicks them out - and they have a massive valuation. Boolberry hasn't traded at this few satoshis for a long time.
I wonder how much 1% of all Boolberry would cost these days.
|
|
|
|
Some reasons came along, right after Polniex delisted BBR, the DDOS attack came trying to destroy blockchain, why on earth would someone destroy such a small cap coin already in the dump faze when was delisted. And why on Bittrex someone is buying all the coins if its no worth.
Exactly Who would be using this network if it was worthless? Even in the almost two years with no progress on the coin, one known pool had 75% of the hashrate, but then there was an unknown miner and additional (or the same) entity constantly attacking the other pool This has been going on for a long time. so lets play a game, you could use Boolberry as a private payment rail Over The Counter. Someone is. I try to ignore them. |
|
|
|
There is a disturbing recurring pattern which makes me wonder if there really is some conspiracy at work here to keep Boolberry down.
There's always been some strange stuff on the boolberry network and around its infrastructure. The main thing for us is the database thing though, it is really a prerequisite honestly, and can kick start the discussions. We've been at this for over a year and fortunately since crypto changes at a breakneck speed, there are more exchanges now. Monero integration is happening on more exchanges, which means basic cryptonote integration. These guys just can't have 1 blockchain taking so much RAM. They are running most of these things on 256mb docker containers, and boolberry needs a 6 gb bare metal server. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
