Are bonuses offered for investors?
this isn't an ICO, no. |
|
|
|
Where is your team located btw?
Silicon Valley w/ some contractors in Western Europe and India |
|
|
|
You have to unlock the wallet for staking, requires your wallet passwords.
Shame about Nova, we'll have to put in for another exchange!
I don't think an exchange is necessary right now. Without development there is currently no one interested in buying. If 1blockologist says there will be no exchange until February 2018, we won't know what he has in mind until that date.  No exchange AFTER February 2018 plenty of time to ensure the continuity of a secondary market |
|
|
|
That would be great! . For some reason, it's the only wallet I have that consumes so many resources.. I haven't looked this up, how do you stake? The windows wallet doesn't have an obvious STAKE button just keep the wallet running right? I have a VM so I wouldn't even notice the resources being used |
|
|
|
|
Novaexchange is closing
so SYNC won't have an exchange by February 2018
if you want to get out of SYNC I have . 5 BTC worth of liquidity posted on the order book
|
|
|
|
There's a slight delay on BBR deposits. They had some issues syncing the client, which has in turn slowed down wallet integration. We'll update everyone as the situation matures.
Who could have seen that coming, a market with no cryptonote integrations having issues. I'm glad they are actively dealing with it, when other exchanges just tossed up their hands If they get this right they can be a market leader, there are a couple of listings that are good performers on their exchange exclusively |
|
|
|
|
Will believe it when I see it! Party time!
|
|
|
|
So the dev's SYNC was stolen and game over? Is that so simple? smokin35 still active on twitter.
No trade on SYNC now, so why someone still say it worth 0.2 - 0.4 BTC?
And I am very curious why you guys still talk about a death project. More than 500 pages already...
Just really curious. Am I wrong or something?
I have a plan for sync, I make claims about sync based on the plan I have, I make value propositions based on what I know about my plans, I also bought a bunch of sync from members here before we even got listed on Novaexchange, I can't mention the extent of my plans to the community right now, aside from the general improvements to the wallets but don't worry about it, its my problem. |
|
|
|
That brings me to another thing:
clintar2 and occasionally another dev is adding improvements to Boolberry's code base. Whether it is accessibility functions for being added to exchanges or the LMDB improvements
while b4h4mu7 is working with a parallel set of developers on a private repository that forks off of bytecoin, with the possibility of a coinswap to make this compatible, instead of merging the code base with Boolberry's existing code
[1]am I understanding this correctly? These are two parallel things?
Bytecoin uses RocksDB IIRC, while Monero went with the LMDB direction.[2] Since these can be stark differences, amongst others, is there intended to be any cross drift in the commits being done between repositories?
[1]Somewhat. Clintar is no longer working on his LMDB code. At this point it doesn't make any sense to commit resources to the old codebase given the amount of work we're putting into the new one. The other developer you're speaking of, face, only took a break from the new codebase to make necessary API requirements so trading could resume for Boolberry. In hindsight, part of that effort turned out to be a waste of dev time since Hitbtc attempted to extort us for more funds. On the bright side Bisq.io will be adding BBR soon as a result of more recent improvements. Since the developers are being paid in BBR it makes sense they have access to liquidity if they need to pay bills. I've been supplying them with BTC as they need it to manage the situation. Regarding LMDB and RocksDB: We're doing extensive profiling between the two concepts and at the moment RocksDB is outperforming LMDB. We're still making optimizations to see if LMDB is worth making the switch. There are also other potential candidates for future profiling, most notably NuDB used by Ripple and SimDB. Ironically, Ripple was using RocksDB until they ran into scaling issues that made them create NuDB. The drawback is that its SSD only so users without SSD would need to revert back to RocksDB as is the case with Ripple or LMDB if that optimization proves otherwise. https://github.com/vinniefalco/NuDBhttps://github.com/LiveAsynchronousVisualizedArchitecture/simdb[2] Cryptonote 2.0 codebase has been completely refactored from the original Bytecoin 1.0 (AEON, BBR, XMR, etc). So bringing in commits cross stream is no trivial task since essentially they are two separate projects. It's doable, but it doesn't make a lot of sense. So, what do you want to do? All of the aliased addresses on Boolberry's chain will be gone, do you want to import that feature? It has kind of half baked tying an alias to a block. Do you want to import the dev tax? The peculiarities around Boolberry's scaling "solution"? or just relaunch a new cryptonote fork and do the swap, and start developing more from there There are still bunches of things a cryptonote coin can do that others are not doing, to make it stand out |
|
|
|
|
That brings me to another thing:
clintar2 and occasionally another dev is adding improvements to Boolberry's code base. Whether it is accessibility functions for being added to exchanges or the LMDB improvements
while b4h4mu7 is working with a parallel set of developers on a private repository that forks off of bytecoin, with the possibility of a coinswap to make this compatible, instead of merging the code base with Boolberry's existing code
am I understanding this correctly? These are two parallel things?
Bytecoin uses RocksDB IIRC, while Monero went with the LMDB direction. Since these can be stark differences, amongst others, is there intended to be any cross drift in the commits being done between repositories?
|
|
|
|
|
Very curious about the coinswap, I can agree that a hardfork can be difficult to pull off properly
How would you do a transparent coinswap of a cryptonote coin? I don't think you can do this purely on-chain, may need a google form or API to keep track of recipients and their payments.
Talking this through I guess you could use the payment ID field and publish the viewkey so people could match up transactions
|
|
|
|
Sounds good,
The private keys will be encrypted on the server and we'll use the 12 words to back up our wallet?
Are you planning on making a mobile wallet?
private key creation would still all be client side. if SYNC was patched up it will inherit the ease of use that all bitcoin forks use, so the 12 word HD wallets would be easy to use, whether that was wrapped in an Electrum client or Jaxx or Coinomi etc. Actually hoping not to reinvent the wheel at this phase Just want to make it easy to do a few important things ....  |
|
|
|
Surprised the current wallet is still functioning this well. But a swap maybe should be considered, because right now we have 3 years of useless chain that has to be synced up every time. Either way, I'm excited to see what you do.
If an electrum client was created and a few servers hosted it then there wouldn't be syncing necessary. |
|
|
|
I was wondering what kind of utility are you looking to apply to SYNC? The supply is low, so a burn/buyback that was outlined in the old tradebits program is not even necessary and a grey security area. Masternode would probably just be 1 SYNC, bot to say it could'nt work lol. I think a renewed coin with a working wallet and redesign, maybe a fork onto the eth or etc or ubq chain would garner a lot of interest, but are you looking to do something different too?
Working wallet and redesign would be one of the primary goals, along with a light client like Electrum, but not a swap to another token on one of the other chains. |
|
|
|
Who is the developer? I checked out their github repo and they could really help propel this project! |
|
|
|
|
Great to see the collaborative effort
Hoping in the future to help support some of the paid relistings, or purchase more Boolberry over the counter
|
|
|
|
If anyone is interested, I need to sell a large portion of my coins for medical reasons.
I know I'm giving it away but I'm willing to sell 20 sync for 0.20 btc each .
this coin with a little development, could be worth 5 btc each
sorry to hear this you need the equivalent of 4 bitcoin? the SYNC order books may not be the best choice, there are a lot of sync (~8) already for sell before that price, and all throughout the last 30 days they have been selling for .04 bitcoin each. 0.20 is not the market. I hope you are able to reach your medical costs |
|
|
|
|
I worked on Boolberry for a few months, would love to see cryptonote coins up there like Monero and Boolberry
I currently use Changelly to go between Waves and other blockchains, hope to use Tidex instead!
|
|
|
|
okay these changes aren't in the codebase copies I have
clintar2 working on this?
We submitted the first part of the API changes to Hitbtc and they tried to extort us for an additional 12 BTC to list BBR. For those that aren't aware, we already sent them 5.4BTC which at the time was around $25,000USD.. Now they are asking for an extra 12BTC to list the project which is absolutely unbelievable. The request for these API changes was odd because we looked through the AEON codebase and they don't have these changes either. I reference AEON because they have a listing there. In addition, they never charged AEON for a listing fee. I suspect they never had the intention of following through with the listing. I requested a refund for the listing fee and am waiting for them to follow through. We're working on getting the project listed on bisq.io to get everyone trading again. In the meantime, we've reached out to numerous exchanges to get the project listed.  sorry to hear that, I dealt with all sorts of shady exchange practices too until they finally just stopped talking to me, it is a distraction then, I would say focus more on the code. |
|
|
|
|
okay these changes aren't in the codebase copies I have
clintar2 working on this?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
