Most of the project files have Andrey Sabelnikov's name on them, and the libraries used in it and have more futurama references.

This was all detailed back in 2014 amongst Cryptonote/Bytecoin/+forks confusion. Draw your own conclusions from that, but most of the cryptonote networks share the same kind of "genius developer that doesn't want to give it up or help the community because the dev is THE INFALLIBLE DEV [until they aren't]" meme. Monero had similar beginnings and most of the community mindshare went to that project.

In 2017, cryptonote networks are a force to be reckoned with, spearheaded still by Monero, and this is an opportunity for the Boolberry network to become something much greater than it is today in feature set and valuation.

Boolberry has a dual advantage because "the" dev still makes promises to release a much enhanced version, any day now. So there are going to be advanced Boolberry clients on the network in any scenario. Whether my effort is the only effort, whether we collaborate for an accelerated effort, whether we don't collaborate and both have efforts for different but compatible Boolberry clients on the network.


Thanks. There has always been an easy rebuttal along the lines of "CEOs and Product Managers don't code" but since I do code, just wait for it

Nice, send them my way, we have dev funds for this specific purpose

Would love to chat about some nuances with the epee library. Andrey Sabelnikov and other cryptonote devs have always been tough to collaborate with, from LOOOOOONG before I showed up here. So I don't know why people put so much stock in my collaboration with a person that was assumed Missing In Action.

This is happening, lets speed it up!

5 million coins have been dumped and we are still at 24,000/sat instead of 8,000? up 300%? wow, amazing when you put it that way!


I know exactly which whales have bought, and I know exactly which whales the new whales bought from. I get a lot of information and I'm not phased by the speculator market.

good catch, you're right I worded that wrong! the point is that the nodes are compatible and this is merely intended to be a more featured client on the network. Analogous to how there is BitcoinJ - a java implementation of bitcoin which all of the mobile apps use. If the other client doesn't get updated and people don't want the miners tax then people won't use it, but it won't be incompatible. There is a protocol that it follows.

It was at least a few people buying  

I've routinely bought at prices 100% above what the prior market price was in order to accumulate a position due to lack of liquidity. I assume other people do as well. It is fine to ignore the speculators that jump on an asset just because the chart printed a higher number or percent. None of the trollbox analysts have ever been correct about the reasoning for price action in Boolberry, I've read most of it.

poloniex.com/exchange#btc_xbb   this redirects to bbr, you are ahead of trollbox

the miner's tax is a based on a vote set by command line when people start the boolberry client. in his client this is by default set to 'yes' which gives him the miner tax, in my client this is by default set to 'no'. read up on how the dev 1% works.

cross posting from here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1611499.msg17867770#msg17867770

Boolberry Network Address February 15, 2017

Donations
The donations have allowed us to bring more developers on, alongside our servers. Any criticism about how much code we’ve pushed since November is completely accurate and we are working on it.

Current developers are Clintar, Myself, Javajared, devs hired from the fund that will reveal themselves when they make pull requests.

The structure of the donations is still in the process of being modified. The structure will be a 3-of-4 multisig bitcoin address.

A 3-of-4 multisig bitcoin address will allow for transparent holding of the funds, as well as the inability for any one person to move funds. For accounting purposes, an HD wallet is being pursued, as this will allow the community to fund individual projects by address without adding administrative burdens to the multisig key holders.

I attempted to use Bitpay’s CoPay app for this, where some community members were invited to hold the keys. Unfortunately, upon further inspection it turns out that CoPay is missing a crucial feature for being able to control addresses within the wallet. So we will be switching to Electrum. The bitpay project was notified and this can be followed here:

https://github.com/bitpay/copay/issues/5568

Please don’t donate to the prior donation addresses, as I would like to provide more transparency to the community.

Rebranding

All of the exchanges are aware of the XBB ticker symbol, and poloniex already redirects the URL for the BTC_XBB market to Boolberry. The ticker symbol has nothing to do with the name of the asset. This is just preparation for including Boolberry in more larger and more liquid markets.

Community

The real Crypto_zoidberg clarified that there were people masquerading as him and that he has his own slack channel.

Investors should understand that Crypto_zoidberg is not collaborating with us in any way.

Investors should also understand that this is good for the network whether we collaborate or not.

The vision is clear, and Crpyto_zoidberg either helps us with it, or randomly releases an improved Boolberry client that also accomplishes the vision.

All nodes on the network will be able to sign transactions with the wild keccak algorithm and accept the same blocks. There is zero disagreement on anybody’s roadmap.

Also note, that I will pull from more advanced open source code if it exists.

The reddit page is again administered by myself, alongside javajared and crypjunkie and sebsebastion.

Twitter and other social outreach/management is in progress and will administered by several people with access controls.

Markets

A lot of Boolberry changed hands during the past two weeks, and the volume and liquidity in the secondary market stays improved. Newcomers should be aware of the vision, and why larger holders are buying Boolberry. These are still the very early days of the network, and people are willing to accumulate at prices 100% above the last person because of that.

Development

- the DNS seed nodes records can be viewed here

http://viewdns.info/dnsrecord/?domain=xbb.seeds.blockology.org

and the Boolberry client will append port number 10101 onto those IP addresses

- the Linux/OSX segfault is being fixed, it is caused by a bad assumption of the string data type in the peer version information. So it is simply being replaced with vector char

I actually need more people to show demand to Poloniex support, now that we've got the daily volume up from practically zero

While you are at it ask for a USDT market as well

Welcome to the community!

Hey try to get Poloniex to have Boolberry listed under their margin market, so you can short it, I might need the liquidity soon. Its an ok way to have an economic incentive to follow through with your opinion. I'll lend some of my BBR out at a decent interest rate

I talked with Charles Hoskinson over the phone about some his theories back in 2014  nice to see the same names come up. I'm glad he got control over a branch of the Ethereum project again

wait till the next Bi-weekly, its coming mid next week, buy when others are fearful

The only source of truth is the bi-weekly updates of which I've consistently released... guess... "BI-WEEKLY". Its your fault and your fault only for buying into the FUD perpetuated by other people.

Alot the communication happens on the slack channels, of which there are many many links and reminders for. "Rapeghost" was extremely active there. He has donated to the dev fund and self funds his own development team to contribute.

I've been accused of being part of at least FIVE different pump groups. I've been accused of other baseless rumors within the Boolberry community. I've been accused of being CZ, I was accused of creating the fake CZ's that joined the slack group. And none of it matters for the reason we're all here: Improving Boolberry and bring it on par with more heavily developed cryptonote networks. None of the FUD undermines any of that, there were impressionable people that used the wrong source of truth (trollbox LOL), who believed that my lack of response was tacit agreement with the lies, where my lack of response was beneficial to me and everyone else that needed liquidity to continue buying as weak hands sold. They thought we were dumping, they thought we were pumping, but they have no insight whatsoever. Get with the program, the only source of truth provides for greater utility for boolberry, and the speculator market is independent of that.

The economic incentives are aligned for anyone that understands the vision.

We're actually fairly compatible.

I have developers working on parts of the infrastructure

Rapeghost has developers working on parts of the infrastructure

Coinopoly has developers working on it

Shadowcash team has developers working on it

Crypto_zoidberg is working on it

This is the easiest trade ever, period.

You can willingly ignore that we're up from 8,000 sat to 30,000 sat just because some speculators FOMO'd up to 94,000 sat a few days ago, but thats cognitively negligent. Myself and other people that wanted to buy a lot of Boolberry ROUTINELY bought 100% above the market price because there was nobody to buy from. This time, Boolberry is still 400% up and the market is pretty liquid now, and it is easy to move the same amounts without moving the market much.

I and others have been dis-incentivized to try to dispel rumors, because every time fluffypony or anyone calls it a scam, someone sells their boolberry, into me. The same boolberry I was willingly paying a 100% premium for.

Stay tuned for some commits, this is colloquially called "a team", of contributors

which further suggests that the second picture is unrelated to the first


if polo has reason to suggest the source funds are illicit, it is likely from a public and liquid blockchain. Monero and Boolberry are not, so the first picture was likely funded with bitcoin and this was incongruent with the verification process polo did, so that the whale could raise their withdrawal limit.

the second image shows only sells and no buys. so that would be the opposite of the 'pumper with a frozen account' who is suspected to have been buying through last week's rally. the screenshot shows sells all through years past, with one sell in 2017. this image is more so evidence that the economic incentives are properly aligned for older holders, as this person has been able to continuously sell without crashing the market.

the first image supports the large buyer though

I am not sure how those two fit in the same series together

not sure, difficulty is pretty high historically, but what do the mining calculators say? there aren't a lot that have the wild keccak algorithm to compare against

yes, these things will allow features such as remote nodes and web wallets so that people can keep using boolberry while the database is implemented

all the information is in the announcement thread, it is comical that people think they are so good at googling and finding the wrong answers when it is all right here. there are honestly few people on my team interested in refuting all the allegations, because they like the low prices more. the remote nodes are still going to happen, the seed nodes are still going to happen, we still have one of the most advanced cryptocurrencies on the market, and now everyone is selling to us at 25k satoshis when we could barely move 3 bitcoin in this market before? yeah how about we just don't say anything

The bi-weeklies are bi-weekly.

I'm glad to see someone has been following so closely

The bi-weeklies will continue to be bi-weekly and there's been no deviation from that regardless of price

people buying above the spot price who have a longer investment horizon than weekend traders