-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Address:
14PUebVa1CpYuFVEvdyCB1vG37SpmBtWQL
Message:
This is Gimpeline 2016.5.23
Signature:
HP7m/5CS9Xa2EutrWynzv5IqTDXSgJtX1lbWsUlUiZ6sQTT+oGDDmFw4B13fSFL+cKWlDRpve2qZGZsbXYdyHw4=
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
|
|
|
I think Max Keiser have a lot of bitcoins. No idea how much
|
|
|
|
An interesting post but it is more of an argument against the traditional mechanism of Darwinian evolution where evolution is felt to be driven by random mutation combined with natural selection then an argument that there is no evolution. Right in the first line you quoted it says: Apostolou establishes that parental choice is primary in human evolutionary history: ... Note that it says, "human evolutionary history." It doesn't specify the history of human family tradition. Then later it refers to evolutionary history again: Therefore human evolutionary history has left modern individuals, in a world where parental choice and control has been all-but eliminated from mainstream life, woefully ill-equipped to manage their sexual lives. Is this really talking about human traditions when it says "evolutionary history?" Personally, I understand to mean that family traditions are controlled by the process of evolution, which has to do with random selection, which is mathematically impossible in the extreme by any known process.  Garbage in garbage out. Henry M. Morris have degrees in civil engeneering and not evolution or mathematics. It's obvious to anyone that know alittle about the evolution theory that he don't have a clue what he talks about Perhaps about Morris. But you don't know how to do the math or you would see that Morris is right in this area. Morris went easy on the evolutionists in two ways. First, he assumed a evolutionary stance of every other mutation being a beneficial mutation... something that would never happen in nature even once. Second, he didn't take into account all of nature that would have destroyed any mutation, good or bad, had a mutation even happened. The point is that evolution is not only impossible, but it is so extremely impossible that any scientist that looks into evolution should be embarrassed beyond blushing that he is considered part of the scientific community. Since impossible evolution is believed among so many, it is a religion, hands down. So explain what good and bad mutation have to do with evolution. As I have said earlier. Read a few books about what the evolution theory is. It's changes over time. Not "mutations" Are you a perfect copy of your father or have some things changed? If you are not a perfect copy and some mutations have happened. Does that mean that you most likely will die soon since most mutations according to the article is bad? |
|
|
|
An interesting post but it is more of an argument against the traditional mechanism of Darwinian evolution where evolution is felt to be driven by random mutation combined with natural selection then an argument that there is no evolution. Right in the first line you quoted it says: Apostolou establishes that parental choice is primary in human evolutionary history: ... Note that it says, "human evolutionary history." It doesn't specify the history of human family tradition. Then later it refers to evolutionary history again: Therefore human evolutionary history has left modern individuals, in a world where parental choice and control has been all-but eliminated from mainstream life, woefully ill-equipped to manage their sexual lives. Is this really talking about human traditions when it says "evolutionary history?" Personally, I understand to mean that family traditions are controlled by the process of evolution, which has to do with random selection, which is mathematically impossible in the extreme by any known process. Garbage in garbage out. Henry M. Morris have degrees in civil engeneering and not evolution or mathematics. It's obvious to anyone that know alittle about the evolution theory that he don't have a clue what he talks about |
|
|
|
|
I like the Pastafarian I rather you didn'ts:
1.
I'd Really Rather You Didn't Act Like A Sanctimonious Holier-Than-Thou Ass When Describing My Noodly Goodness. If Some People Don't Believe In Me, That's Okay. Really, I'm Not That Vain. Besides, This Isn't About Them So Don't Change The Subject.
2.
I'd Really Rather You Didn't Use My Existence As A Means To Oppress, Subjugate, Punish, Eviscerate, And/Or, You Know, Be Mean To Others. I Don't Require Sacrifices, And Purity Is For Drinking Water, Not People.
3.
I'd Really Rather You Didn't Judge People For The Way They Look, Or How They Dress, Or The Way They Talk, Or, Well, Just Play Nice, Okay? Oh, And Get This Through You Thick Heads: Woman=Person, Man=Person. Samey-Samey. One is Not Better Than The Other, Unless We're Talking About Fashion And I'm Sorry, But I Gave That To Women And Some Guys Who Know The Difference Between Teal And Fuchsia.
4.
I'd Really Rather You Didn't Indulge In Conduct That Offends Yourself, Or Your Willing, Consenting Partner Of Legal Age AND Mental Maturity. As For Anyone Who Might Object, I Think The Expression Is Go F*** Yourself, Unless They Find That Offensive In Which Case They Can Turn Off The TV For Once And Go For A Walk For A Change.
5.
I'd Really Rather You Didn't Challenge The Bigoted, Misogynist, Hateful Ideas Of Others On An Empty Stomach. Eat, Then Go After The B*******.
6.
I'd Really Rather You Didn't Build multi million-Dollar Churches/Temples/Mosques/ Shrines To My Noodly Goodness When The Money Could Be Better Spent (Take Your Pick): A. Ending Poverty B. Curing Diseases C. Living In Peace, Loving With Passion, And Lowering The Cost Of Cable. I Might Be A Complex Carbohydrate Omniscient Being, But I Enjoy The Simple Things In Life. I Ought To Know. I AM The Creator.
7.
I'd Really Rather You Didn't Go around Telling People I Talk To you. You're Not That Interesting. Get Over Yourself. And I Told You To Love Your Fellow Man, Can't You Take A Hint?
8.
I'd Really Rather You Didn't Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You If You Are Into, Um, Stuff That Uses Alot Of Leather/Lubrication/Las Vegas. If The Other Person Is Into It However (Pursuant To #4), Then Have At It, Take Pictures, And For The Love Of Mike, Wear A CONDOM! Honestly It's A Piece Of Rubber, If I Didn't Want It To Feel Good When You Did It I Would Have Added Spikes, Or Something.
|
|
|
|
|
Both parties have always nominated "pathological liars to whom American ideas of personal liberty are completely foreign" so there is nothing really new there.
I doubt it will be any big change no matter who wins.
|
|
|
|
|
The article would be more convincing if his area was climate science. It's not. His area is Psychology.
Tittles are not worth anything if you are outside your field.
Its like a dentist talking about volcano activity. He got a tittle, but its worthless when it comes to volcanoes.
|
|
|
|
|
Made a paper wallet and printed out the wrong private key ages ago, so it was my own fault
|
|
|
|
Have to call bs on that one. back in the days when Jesus was supposed to live lifespan was much shorter than today, so 50 years back in the days are around 200 yeas in your reality. Take an example. Elvis dies in 76, around 40 yeas ago. If you want to find out what Elvises favorite food was you get loads of different results. After only 40 years no one know what Elvises favorite food was. many don't believe that Elvis died. If they start a cult we get a religion. The Dead Sea Scrolls proves nothing.
People have always lived a variety of ages. Right now you can find people who live to more than a hundred. And you can find people who live only to 35 or 40. Back 4500 years ago, multitudes of people lived to be 400 to 500 years ago. Nobody can refute this. The Bible is witness to it. Neanderthal man lived back then, and is simply an example of people living to 400 or 500 years old. Youtube search on "Dr. Don Patton" and watch some of his videos to see how modern archaeological scientists misdate archaeological history. You mean this guy? https://skeptic78240.wordpress.com/tag/don-patton/ |
|
|
|
|
Have to call bs on that one. back in the days when Jesus was supposed to live lifespan was much shorter than today, so 50 years back in the days are around 200 yeas in your reality. Take an example. Elvis dies in 76, around 40 yeas ago. If you want to find out what Elvises favorite food was you get loads of different results. After only 40 years no one know what Elvises favorite food was. many don't believe that Elvis died. If they start a cult we get a religion. The Dead Sea Scrolls proves nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
Having this guy in DT is like having ISIS as a moderator. they say. " believe in the god I will or live in fear from terror". He uses the same tactics. "Invest your bitcoins where I want or have your reputation ruined".
|
|
|
|
|
Funny thing is. If I'm right. Nothing will happen, if BADecker is right he will end up in hell for breaking at least 2 commandments on this forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Thing is also that they often say people like Newton was christian. We will never know what scientists back in the days believed.
If they said anything against the church they would burn at the stake.
Was newton a christian or Leonardo da Vinci christians?
We will never know. If they said what they believed, they would be killed.
Religious people are known through history to kill anyone that disagree, and if someone didn't want to be burned at the stake, the religious nuts took advantage of their knowledge by saying. "oh. We didn't kill him so he agreed with us"
|
|
|
|
Bible doesn't say or suggest anything crazy. Atheists twist the words of the Bible, without understanding, or by intent. Whatever you think, if you are not even giving God the honor even to suggest that He exists, you are setting yourself up for the same kinds of disasters that befell the Bible unbelievers. It will hit suddenly. There will be no escape. Its all in your head. calm down and take your medicine |
|
|
|
|
If it was true that the religious people had special celestial knowledge, religious people would stand up in history as the true inventors. Most of the time it turns up that the religious people are at the bottom half of the intelligence and they are torturing the smart people to silence them. I will never bow down to a God that thru history have used torture to shut up smart people.
|
|
|
|
|
In the iron age, God was no wiser than a goat herder, in the dark ages, he was no wiser than the guy who wrote the witch hammer. Before Columbus, God thought the earth was flat, and he's wish was to torture you if you thought other things...It's almost like they are making this link to all knowing wisdom up
|
|
|
|
What an irrevent wording you use! You may don't believe in christianity but it doesn't give you right to insult. I think you don't have anything to believe History gives us any right to insult and shit on Christians. Christians destroyed our world for centuries. They've been the plague of Europe. I may agree with you but you said that Christians destroyed. Not Christianity. By the way, Christians made our life easier and faster by technology they founded. You don't talk about that. I don't like when people insult religion for what a member of that religion did. No any religion orders destroying world. Because they didn't. Christians and Christianity are responsible for the Dark Age of science. They made the most disgustful retarded fallback in science progress ever done. They lost centuries of time doing nothing but destroying knowledge and science! Actually once again you're right but i mentioned that it is not religion's mistake. It is about misconstrue of religional authority of time. I mean that do not insult people who are member of a religion or their religion. Religious people always say they get their knowledge from God. Its strange that it seems like God never knows more than the people at the time they live in |
|
|
|
|
It's because wife's are like hand grenades. Remove the ring and the house disappears.
|
|
|
|
|
So please tell me, Oh Lord, how to make a politically correct post that please your highness in the marked section without getting red trust.
Assholes like you that want to limit peoples free speech needs to be called out. You are making the reputation system worthless.
I'm guessing you are searching for any post I made there to give it red trust. I have never posted there and this is the only account I have so good luck
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
