Pbremen01,
You are displaying obsessive compulsive behavior in numerous forums that would make anyone question your mental well being (or lack thereof).
You are either off your OCD meds or you haven't been formally diagnosed yet.
Please seek help as soon as possible.
You seriously need it.
-- On behalf of just about EVERYONE.
Wow, I didn't know that I was member of numerous forums. Do I also have dissociative identity disorder? I think he meant on numerous threads. Just curious, why havent you hit up XC, cloak or VRC yet? I didn't have enough time to thoroughly analyze their implementations of anon features. And I also thought that people were smart enough to see that most of the implementations of anon features are a joke. Funny since when you first signed up you immediately jumped straight to the CryptCoin thread and started your fud.. |
|
|
|
|
Why is the original thread locked?
|
|
|
|
Apex takeover & rebranding
We are soon going to fork the coin for the takeover. A new dev team is in place.
What will happen next?
1. Hard fork & rebranding (more info on this later today)
2. Multipool will be up and running next week (this will help get the volume up)
3. Redistribution of the 51% Coins, will be held by bittrex as ICO
4. New wallet with webkit (as promised by previous dev)
5. Anon transactoins (whitepaper will be released monday)
6. Our PR team is Stratobitz & Coinrocket - they have experience and a good reach in the cryptocommunities.
7. We will be adding some other features that are already in the works (SURPRISE!!! from the devs)
8. A forum for other suggested features will be opened, but we won't be adopting the poll-system from previous devs.
The final decisions about which features to adopt will be made by the current dev team.
The takeover process started a week ago as we saw the current dev was not up to the task.
No more empty promises. Thanks for your support!
Thanks for the info, great news! What does the 51% ICO means? How does it effect current account holders? It shouldn't effect us at all. They can't take away what you paid for originally. This is a good thing actually. |
|
|
|
If youre NOT capable of showing that it doesnt work then your point is just as useles. All you do is fud. If you cant prove or disprove something yourself dont look for croonies to do it for you. Obviously youre not intelligent enough to do it yourself. You couldnt even figure out how to get on IRC.
So please explain what kind of proof that the anonymity doesn't work can someone provide when you don't have access to source code. You have a program that deanonymizes anonymous transactions: http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/and there is also a "recipe" how the transactions can be deanonymized: http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c9obo/example_of_how_keycoin_transaction_can_be/Anybody can try it. About IRC: Did you manage to configure your system to access IRC without compromising your identity in the first try? FYI, many IRC servers block access from IP addresses that belong to anonymizing proxies (tor etc.). I've tried it, doesn't do anything, can't find any transactions being linked. I've read all the replies to the post and again, no one else can get this to work. I've followed his steps to the letter and nothing. The only people saying this works is you and the original poster. You tried to reproduce steps in this recipe? http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c9obo/example_of_how_keycoin_transaction_can_be/Where (at which step) did you get different result? Can you explain what do you mean by "transactions being linked"? There is probably no chain of transactions from the sender wallet to the recipient's wallet. That is the purpose of the mixer (if it is not broken). However, that doesn't mean that the recipient can't determine sender's addresses without having access to his wallet. Just tried it and it doesn't work. I really don't see your point anymore. Why don't you post a video of yourself using the program proving your correct? Please don't tell me your to busy or you don't have your linux laptop with you again. |
|
|
|
|
I think btc38 will wait till the 8th or possibly later till the anon exchange is out. I'm sure they are well aware of what happened within the last week and they will probably wait to see if something gets released. Even though there is nothing to worry about, im sure they want to provide some protection to the people who do trade on there site.
|
|
|
|
Looks like the whales have decided to take us back up to 200k
The buy support is at 170, the "whales" are at 150k, It's bots that have taken it to 200k. you have a lot to learn.. who do you think owns these bots? small day traders? |
|
|
|
|
Looks like the whales have decided to take us back up to 200k
|
|
|
|
So, is this coin another fuck? Hit's highs of 300k then declines with a few small ups until back to under 0.001?.....Did I just get sucked in again and fucked twice over? Hope you guys have a plan instead of all fudders "quote" us to still get on the rocket...so called rocket....same 10 people on this thread over and over again - - - - 22 crew members? Show yourselfs Regards.... I Think  What happened yesterday looked like a test pump to me |
|
|
|
A good rally
that was me again  DATE TYPE BID/ASK UNITS FILLED VOOT UNITS TOTAL VOOT ACTUAL RATE COST / PROCEEDS 07/31/2014 05:37:32 PM Buy 0.00000577 41445.40900781 41445.40900781 0.00000576 0.23973784 07/31/2014 05:35:56 PM Buy 0.00000577 16660.17970671 16660.17970671 0.00000576 0.09636726 07/31/2014 05:33:33 PM Buy 0.00000580 54508.47536332 54508.47536332 0.00000572 0.31273936 07/31/2014 05:31:25 PM Buy 0.00000560 288.61596010 288.61596010 0.00000559 0.00162028 |
|
|
|
I just quoted you on your XC comment, so thats what I am inquiring about now. Dan Metcalf is highly competent. Why haven't you gone into the XC thread asking similar questions?
Which questions?
No. Nobody has proved that xc anonymity actually works (and it is very likely that it doesn't).
Your "anonymity" questions |
|
|
|
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following
1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin
He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.
Hmm he's xc buddy?! Hgrrrr No. Nobody has proved that xc anonymity actually works (and it is very likely that it doesn't). Ok... If your that fixated on anonymity and it's obvious you feel it doesn't work then why haven't you gone into there thread asking your usual questions? It's obvious you like to challenge the developers am I not right? Which threads? In most of the threads there are not many competent people that are capable of answering technical questions. See this KeyCoin thread for example. Challenge the developers? By asking questions? I personally think that the anonymity is extremely important thing and that it shouldn't be abused (for example, for pump&dumps because of anonymity features that in reality don't provide any anonymity). I just quoted you on your XC comment, so thats what I am inquiring about now. Dan Metcalf is highly competent. Why haven't you gone into the XC thread asking similar questions? |
|
|
|
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following
1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin
He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.
Hmm he's xc buddy?! Hgrrrr No. Nobody has proved that xc anonymity actually works (and it is very likely that it doesn't). Ok... If your that fixated on anonymity and it's obvious you feel it doesn't work then why haven't you gone into there thread asking your usual questions? It's obvious you like to challenge the developers am I not right? |
|
|
|
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following
1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin
He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.
Yes, I'm mostly only interested in the anonymity. I find it interesting that you have avoided Cloak XC Super Even in the earlier days when development was still going on. |
|
|
|
|
I was curious, so I decided to go through all of pbremen01's history...He seems to be very fixated on the following
1) CryptCoin (majority of his posts)
2) Darkcoin
3) KeyCoin
4) PinkCoin
He only posts in those and its pretty much only about the anonymity of a coin.
|
|
|
|
Just want to learn more. What are the technical differences between Keycoin and Darkcoin?
0 instamine |
|
|
|
the thing i dont understand about this scam is, why would announce it now... the promise was made for monday, why not announce it then?
scammers arent always logical. dont forget they gotta dump and get their money out. he probably cleaned out his coins when he locked the thread. Bingo The twitter pumpers are thanks to that. @IconicExpert @BTCarchitect @TheBlackHand @satoshi00000001 NICE PICK telling everyone the buy back at 2500 was legit. Same scam as URO. LOLOL. Guys, thank the guys that sucked you in When the pumpers are pumping a certain coin, I look elsewhere (ignoring) the coin in question and look at abnormal volume and pricing and a few other factors, I think 1/2 these pumps are a coverup or distraction from the main coin thats going to be pumped a few days after. I'm still testing my picks so its a WIP atm. Although PayPro was totally obvious when I saw the charts on Monday. I actually had my order filled at 94!. The morning I saw IE pumping along with everyone and I knew I was set. I sold at 300, but oh well. I didn't want to get caught up with greed. Plus there were supposivly 55 million coins in circulation already plus a new 105mill new mined a year? lol even 1k per coin was simply outragous let alone a 2-4k price target. |
|
|
|
the thing i dont understand about this scam is, why would announce it now... the promise was made for monday, why not announce it then?
scammers arent always logical. dont forget they gotta dump and get their money out. he probably cleaned out his coins when he locked the thread. Bingo The twitter pumpers are thanks to that. |
|
|
|
If we can't release anon ex, we will be dead, plz, be quick.. Delayed for 5 days? If voot lost investors' confidence, it will be over.
The death of the main coders family member was tragic, but that alone single handedly i'snt the cause for this delay (they were already delayed before hand). But something like this definately affect the work. He is the lead developer of the exchange and i can promise he is not back to full speed yet. I know, my point was that they were already delayed prior and no sort of "Warning" was given in advance. |
|
|
|
If we can't release anon ex, we will be dead, plz, be quick.. Delayed for 5 days? If voot lost investors' confidence, it will be over.
This is the only thing that bothers me about this whole situation. Were already behind 5 days soon to be 6. That means there was NO communication between the 2 teams (Dev and Smoke) and a warning SHOULD of gone out before Saturday. The death of the main coders family member was tragic, but that alone single handedly i'snt the cause for this delay (they were already delayed before hand). Now we wait and continue to wait. |
|
|
|
Not trying to toot my own horn, but here is what wasn't deleted. I might go into my opinion later, but no point now https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=643028.msg8113331#msg8113331This was a scam from the get go...I could see Virwox and Paypal POSSIBLY acting together, but his bank to? lol NO. Anyways this "Proof Of Developer" has failed. Scammerz gonna scam |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
