It's not easy to find the right formation to rotate some players, they had a very bad two weeks in the league, the players lost confidence and continued to be under pressure, until in the end Eric Ten Hak took the alternative of rotating players, the strategy worked very well and proved capable of making Liverpool difficult to score goals.
A good start for the revival of Manchester United, because they were able to beat Liverpool, will then be proven against Southampton, whether Eric Ten Hak is able to give a second win.

Trent Alexander-Arnold made no attempt to cover Jadon Sancho's space as another Liverpool player fell, opening up Jadon Sancho's chance to pull the ball and deflect a shot on target.
Eric Ten Hak must be proud of him, because the goal opened the hopes of victory, so Manchester United played open until the game was over

There are two reasons people don't believe in bitcoin.
1. Frustration, this is caused by being too imaginative, maybe you are a person who failed in investing, so bitcoin becomes a scapegoat for your failure.
If you live in the Jahiliyah era, maybe some will never believe Mobile, airplanes and technology will exist, because at that time the only transportation used was horses, no cellphones and technology.
One thing you forget, that the journey of the Jahiliyah era to the present, many things we see are beyond logic, but in fact they have been enjoyed by people.

Don't narrow down knowledge, we are taught to enter into different fantasies, but not to resist progress.

2. You got to know bitcoin from the wrong person.
This story is unique, because in the area where I live, many people used to think bitcoin was not real, but finally they understood bitcoin and were not allergic to explore further, what I understand from the post you made, this is a concept of fear and something that design for a specific purpose.

I saw the post history along with your comments on the forums, people say you are a bank worker, this is understandable when you hate bitcoin so much, are you guys deliberately designed to continue attacking bitcoin.
"this looks funny"

It looks like you've been giving a speech in the middle of a soccer field for a long time, but unfortunately your speech was not heard by the audience!!!

Erik Ten Hak's strategy worked flawlessly in that match, Super Pressing was done very well by the players, the rotation was quite impactful, with Erik Ten Hak using Diogo Dalot, Raphael Varane, Lisandro Martinez and Tyrell Malacia to defend the defence.

Manchester United's game scheme already looks good from the start of the game, despite losing possession of the ball, the only player I think is less than optimal is Bruno Fernandez, this player has lost the ball at his feet several times due to holding too much.
so there are some opportunities that can't be solved perfectly.

Other Manchester United players played quite impressively, even Mohamed Salah was made difficult to develop and create chances, so Liverpool had quite a hard time breaking into United's defense, many Liverpool players were frustrated and couldn't do much in the match.

But the resources they have can allow it to be realized more quickly, legalization of bitcoin as a means of payment is possible, or limited to the few products and services that can be used. In general, they can also refine things that are deemed necessary after the rules are put in place first

Looks like you misquoted, I'm not saying Singapore is the most Bitcoin friendly after El Salvador, you can reread my posts and comments.

Singapore has abundant capabilities and resources, technology in the country is also quite developed, it is not impossible that Singapore will be the best country for crypto startups, but time is decisive and opportunities must be seen as positive, that's how developed countries work to accept something new.

Maybe this mess is related to tera luna, as are some of the releases I've read, forcing them to review the standard rules, maybe it's also a way of suppressing decentralized transactions, so crypto is the only one that works and doesn't. have many entrances for other (Controling)

It is not appropriate to compare Singapore with El Salvador in terms of economic growth, these two countries have vast differences. But I don't mean that, but rather the method of adopting bitcoin by El Salvador, so that Singapore can legalize bitcoin as a legal means of purchase at a later date, after regulations are established and the public begins to accept it.

My point is only on legal tender, but the comparison remains with El Salvador, because the only country that is trying to be different, towards the adoption and legalization of bitcoin, might be a third, fourth country for Singapore

But it also doesn't rule out the possibility, it hasn't been agreed by Singapore to make bitcoin a legal tender, this is just a discussion and analysis that I made. Based on the new rules they are starting to develop, but at least Singapore is starting to open up to a more advanced direction, in the context of crypto in general and bitcoin in particular.

I never mentioned price controls, I mean money laundering controls or bad behavior involving bitcoin, nor am I sure right now they're a total flop, because from all the news circulating, the people who come to protest don't really know how bitcoins work.
It could be that this is specially designed and financed by the people concerned. The goal is the same, so that El Salvador is no longer trusted by its citizens.
This country is almost generally aware of how bitcoin works and its adoption, so far I haven't found a compelling reason to use bitcoin forcibly, so it's very possible that this was specifically designed by people, many news sources I searched for, the discussion is almost the same, meaning this is happening not because of something the people there want, but the riders to bring down El Salvador

To be honest, I am very happy and touched by your humble way towards these less fortunate children. But my focus is more on the rules that apply in your country.
Humanly you have earned points from the activity, the children feel happy with the gentle touch.

But speaking of the law, will this not have an impact on you, regarding the allegations of exploiting children for the promotion you run.
"You mentioned the prohibition against the promotion of bitcoin".

I still support the activities that you do, but fellow people who live in a country of law, it never hurts to remind each other, hopefully this is not used as an excuse, for legal problems that are directed at you.

Very respect and full support for your activities friend!!!!

Trying to assume more extreme, I believe that Bitcoin is at a low price El Salvador will have a large enough impact, if it is true that the news report from the IMF they use greater public money in the adoption of Bitcoin in the country.
I mean chaos will be specifically designed by people who try to weaken El Salvador, as a country that recognizes the existence of Bitcoin and invest some state money.
This design aims to undermine El Salvador, towards the adoption of Bitcoin as a financial freedom, thus the Fiat currency does not feel disturbed by some people.
This moment is the same as the beginning of the emergence of dollars in the country, where there is a special agreement on the purchase of products from those who must use dollars and are not justified using other currencies. The goal is the same, they can take two sides of the profit
1. Dollar is maintained and stable
2. Exchange of money will provide multiple benefits for the country, because the currency of other countries if exchanged with dollars will generate huge profits for them.

Has our discussion shifted away, please forgive me?

The second point concerns criminal behavior, this is easier to do if El Salvador experiences distrust from its people.
Well, based on these suspicions, it is necessary to strengthen El Salvador in any way, especially since they are a country that is free to adopt bitcoin and openly legalize bitcoin.

The biggest goal is that bitcoin and fiat currencies can grow at the same time, without being tied to competition or having to kill one of them.

Hopefully my wild assumptions are wrong and don't cause problems, honestly I'm very proud to discuss with you, greetings from me master @jayjuaneee

But on the one hand, the volatility of Bitcoin can lead to a buildup of debt that results in countries in Acquisitions, recessions and state revenue chaos, this is proportional to the larger funding of the public money they manage.
I even read some news about El Salvador's economic growth slowing in 2%.

My prediction is that el salvador will experience a much bigger wave of protests from its citizens, so that when the price of bitcoin drops, certain parties will experience serious problems and the state will be blamed, if it is not able to provide a solution.
Possible solutions that they can develop only in the preparation of special funds, through third parties, but still carried out together, so that they can achieve stronger economic growth in the future.

If this power can be built, it can also stop those who want to use bitcoin/crypto in terms of money laundering, taxation and other crimes, because the state can completely control the growth of bitcoin, by not being given too much access.
Please correct if I'm wrong

They don't really have anything in common when it comes to bitcoin adoption, especially when their government doesn't invest some of the country's money in bitcoin, but Singapore's resources are very likely.
Maybe just a matter of time?

Technology strongly supports the development of bitcoin in a better direction, currently the largest income in Singapore is through the industrial sector, where many foreign companies are growing and developing there, it is not impossible that industries related to crypto and bitcoin development will dominate the country, because there guarantees, regulations and taxes are much easier compared to other countries.

At least they are starting to talk about legal payments using bitcoin, although it has not been fully implemented in the country's journey, when viewed from the readiness to face technology, the opportunities for Singapore are much easier and faster

Accepting is definitely starting to open up, with some considerations that cannot be implemented in the near future. Such a developed country does not rule out the possibility to change the previous income pattern by implementing a new system, so that the country becomes stronger in terms of economy, industry and technology.

On the basis of the previous chaos caused by Terra Luna and other disasters, Singapore began to make new rules on this issue.

Of course bitcoin is not yet considered a legal payment, but interestingly Singapore is starting to talk about this seriously, meaning they are starting to see the great potential in bitcoin, by accommodating all their needs.
Technology and Industry will be able to collaborate simultaneously, so that the State's income can increase and become stronger.

My personal analysis, by following the current development of Singapore, is of course not entirely correct.

El Salvador has clearly accepted bitcoin in its entirety in his country, even offerings related to taxes and citizenship are a company dream.
The question is whether everyone who works in the company will be granted citizenship, or only a few people?
Because as I know, it's difficult to get citizenship, because every country has its own rules governing the matter, or this rule doesn't apply to El Salvador, Please correct me if I'm wrong

Singapore makes regulations first before crypto or Bitcoin begins to be used as a means of payment for transactions for goods or services, they care about the friendliness of developing technology, so it is necessary to make clear regulations as a legal umbrella, both to maintain economic growth and early detect money laundering caused by transactions involving crypto.

I do not agree, that this country is a place to hide regulatory obstacles to legal umbrellas in other countries, because they also make special rules governing this issue, which distinguishes Singapore from other countries only in terms of "regulatory certainty" or guarantees for industry players and consumers. also guaranteed to know information about companies that can be trusted.

Singapore is also a country that has a huge income for every native and immigrant, allowing bitcoin to grow rapidly there, and it is possible to achieve status as a Bitcoin hub and become bigger like El Salvador.

Coincidentally this reasoning might sound convincing enough, assuming a child is using his father's account.
but the question is where did he know about this forum?
so that he easily uses the account, even though his father is dead and agrees what does he mean?


Usually people will know the account has changed hands by looking at the previous post and comparing it with the latest post, or going to the profile and pressing trust, there will see the account has been changed email, password and wake up from a long sleep, this is a simple way to detect that the account has changed hands.
So where is your fault?


But for the negative feedback that is given, has a different view, must have a basic reference, as long as it can be proven correctly and doesn't blame the rules, then I think it's a fair thing for you to do.
Because if switching accounts is justified, more and more accounts that were dead will come back to life.

It's a great achievement my friend, you have become part of your thinking, quality and way of giving an understanding of bitcoin and this forum to others, actually this forum is a place for us to get to know the new world, technology, bitcoin and others.
What I understand and the most important is "Trust".
do not cheat and always run in accordance with forum regulations.

We are motivated to follow in your footsteps, hopefully the quality improvement will be more real.
Happy Agbe

To quote some of your concerns, regardless of someone's contribution while on this forum, because as usual people will become more mature, responsible and continue to improve their knowledge, as long as they are given the opportunity and feel valued.

Personally I learned a lot from the posts you made, the comments you gave,
The way you motivate low rankings is quite touching.

What's interesting to me at this point is that you're still assigning responsibilities to other people, if they have or are close to getting promoted, where we won't look great, just because of the abilities we have.
I doubt everyone is able to make quality posts, maybe I am too, but as long as they are willing to learn and continue to grow, there is no harm in helping.

I also don't dare to count down the rankings, because there are still many posts that I have that haven't been included in the perfect category, or even I'm still in the repair stage to avoid spammers.
Quite proud of the philanthropist you greet, I respect and thank you very much, because this is quite helpful for many people

Liverpool doesn't seem to be in the best condition, the two games they played, only managed to collect two points, in the second match Darwin Nunez actually got a red card, it looks like Liverpool this season is very difficult to get full points. Although in the transfer market, their target player was successfully brought in, but the player's contribution was not so prominent until the second week.
Compared to last season, the two games they played were very different, Liverpool's quality was not in satisfactory condition.
What's with the Liverpool team now?

This season Atletico Madrid has the opportunity to compete with Barcelona and Real Madrid, as long as they are able to maintain a positive trend in every match played, Barcelona experienced problems at the beginning of the match, the financial crisis they faced had quite an impact.
Real Madrid also struggled to play in the first match, they conceded first, although in the end they were able to secure the three points.
If this can be used by Atletico Madrid, then there is a great chance that they will win this season, as long as they are able to maintain consistency match by match.

Something surprising, Barcelona were forced to draw with Rayo Vallecano, even though Barcelona played in front of their own supporters, this was far from expectations for new players brought in this season, it seems Xavi has not found the right formation for his team, even though judging from the match, Barcelona's chances to very big win.

This shows that the performance of the players and coach (Xavi) has not been optimal and perfect in the first match, meaning that there must be an overhaul in the next match, in order to stay on track for the title this season.

For the long run, I think Ethereum is quite feasible to invest, this coin has a much better level of stability, so the opportunity to avoid risk can be maximized. Regarding the hacker case, it really depends on what people use in the exchange, because usually the level of security is only we can maximize it, because before we use, it must be through research and then make the decision to choose which one

Not even so, Manchester United are experiencing setbacks and players lose confidence in playing, so it is quite influential from every match they play, Ronaldo is still quite productive when seen last season, the coaching style of the rights is also not as fully as you said.
Maybe they will be very difficult in dealing with Manchester City, Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea, but Ten Rights have known their weaknesses now, just waiting for improvement and motivating players
This is the same as @mumang siat's question, how Manchester United when facing big clubs like Liverpool, two successive defeats experienced by Manchester United, become a strong signal about his future at Old Trafford, this will be a bet as a predicted coach It will succeed, the demands of managers and fans have not been achieved.
The match against Liverpool is the beginning of the resurrection of Erik Ten's foster children or is an increasingly difficult step, even though we know that the quality of Manchester United is now far enough to beat Liverpool, it is interesting to wait for the match

It has not been proven that the use of bitcoin is committed for crime, from the cases that have ever existed, it shows that it is not in large numbers, in fact fiat currency also dominates crime when compared to bitcoin, this does not make sense to outsmart the reasons for crime.

But the fear of losing control of financial activities, this is a little more reasonable, but in my opinion it is not the finances of the citizens, but rather the local government, because if the reason is citizens, at this time we have adopted bitcoin in the application of investment or financing of certain goods and services.

Criminal activity involving bitcoin is very small according to my knowledge?