pirate payments list -- accounts paid: 23/459

[ineededausername]

Code:

[19:16] <@pirateat40> Total Accounts Repaid: 21/459 (subject to required information)

Since he's paying out again, it might be a good idea to start a new thread.

update: 22 now.

[1714259167]

1714259167

[1714259167]

1714259167

[1714259167]

1714259167

[1714259167]

1714259167

[1714259167]

1714259167

[1714259167]

1714259167

[payb.tc]

Code:

[19:16] <@pirateat40> Total Accounts Repaid: 21/459 (subject to required information)

Since he's paying out again, it might be a good idea to start a new thread.

would be nice to have 21 people confirming this. were they 100% paid?

[bitcoiners]

He's not paying out.

"(subject to required information)"

lol what a joke.

And with that I got banned from #btcst. lol.  Seems to me he's trying to put pressure on PPT managers to turn over the information he has asked for.

Don't give in.  Fuck this guy.  Seriously.

[Coincomm]

Fuck pirate. This information business is an insincere tactic.

[Tomatocage]

It's fuckin bullshit that some accounts (the smaller ones he paid initially) were paid out 100%, while the bigger ones will most likely get fractional amounts.

[Raoul Duke]

It's fuckin bullshit that some accounts (the smaller ones he paid initially) were paid out 100%, while the bigger ones will most likely get fractional amounts.

How do you know?

[PinkyPie]

Code:

[19:16] <@pirateat40> Total Accounts Repaid: 21/459 (subject to required information)

Since he's paying out again, it might be a good idea to start a new thread.

update: 22 now.

any transaction ID's?

[Fluttershy]

If I were Pirate I'd pay out to vocal members of this forum who'd only invested tiny amounts, just so I could have more people support me as I propped up my mining scam.

[purplesquid]

He's not paying out.

"(subject to required information)"

lol what a joke.

And with that I got banned from #btcst. lol.  Seems to me he's trying to put pressure on PPT managers to turn over the information he has asked for.

Don't give in.  Fuck this guy.  Seriously.

Getting kicked from his silly channel seems to be a nice right of passage. I am glad I can say I was banned too.

[ElectricMucus]

Oh that's cute 

A pass-through operator posting pirates self-published info.

[ErebusBat]

I find this information useful as I can not hang out on irc at the moment.


Thanks.

[malevolent]

Anyone out of those 22 people can confirm that they got paid? 

[edd]

Code:

[19:16] <@pirateat40> Total Accounts Repaid: 21/459 (subject to required information)

Since he's paying out again, it might be a good idea to start a new thread.

update: 22 now.

This doesn't make sense to me. Does "Repaid" mean paid in full, or just as much as he's planning on paying them? Is he saying that there are 459 accounts that might be paid if they provide "required information" and that he's already paid 21 (or 22)? Or is he saying that he has enough funds to pay back 21 (or 22) of the 459 accounts if they provide the "required information"?

That phrase is much too ambiguous for me to understand with any certainty.

[bitcoiners]

Code:

[19:16] <@pirateat40> Total Accounts Repaid: 21/459 (subject to required information)

Since he's paying out again, it might be a good idea to start a new thread.

update: 22 now.

This doesn't make sense to me. Does "Repaid" mean paid in full, or just as much as he's planning on paying them? Is he saying that there are 459 accounts that might be paid if they provide "required information" and that he's already paid 21 (or 22)? Or is he saying that he has enough funds to pay back 21 (or 22) of the 459 accounts if they provide the "required information"?

That phrase is much too ambiguous for me to understand with any certainty.

Pirate has put pressure on PPT operators to turn over their clients information for "legal reasons".  This seems to me a game pirate is playing to see if he can create an outrage among PPT bond/account holders to get them to hand over their info so they can be first in "line".

I see nobody reporting they have been paid.  At all.

[imsaguy]

Oh that's cute 

A pass-through operator posting pirates self-published info.

Yeah, because it wasn't witnessed by 256 other people or anything. 

[finkleshnorts]

This is insulting. BTCST is a product of this forum. Nobody confirms = it didn't happen.

[ElectricMucus]

Oh that's cute  

A pass-through operator posting pirates self-published info.

Yeah, because it wasn't witnessed by 256 other people or anything.  

It's pirate's credibility which is in question here not inau's.

My post mainly addresses the irony of that happening.

[imsaguy]

Oh that's cute  

A pass-through operator posting pirates self-published info.

Yeah, because it wasn't witnessed by 256 other people or anything.  

It's pirate's credibility which is in question here not inau's.

My post mainly addresses the irony of that happening.

Here's the thing, as long as the number keeps going up, its going to hit someone eventually that will post to the forums.  So as long as the number is increasing fairly regularly, let's just sit tight.

[edd]

Code:

[19:16] <@pirateat40> Total Accounts Repaid: 21/459 (subject to required information)

Since he's paying out again, it might be a good idea to start a new thread.

update: 22 now.

This doesn't make sense to me. Does "Repaid" mean paid in full, or just as much as he's planning on paying them? Is he saying that there are 459 accounts that might be paid if they provide "required information" and that he's already paid 21 (or 22)? Or is he saying that he has enough funds to pay back 21 (or 22) of the 459 accounts if they provide the "required information"?

That phrase is much too ambiguous for me to understand with any certainty.

Pirate has put pressure on PPT operators to turn over their clients information for "legal reasons".  This seems to me a game pirate is playing to see if he can create an outrage among PPT bond/account holders to get them to hand over their info so they can be first in "line".

I see nobody reporting they have been paid.  At all.

Yes, but adding "(subject to required information)" as a qualifier doesn't make any sense; either he's paid back 22 accounts or he hasn't. If he's saying that there might be some accounts that won't be paid if they don't cooperate, he should spell it out.

[imsaguy]

Yes, but adding "(subject to required information)" as a qualifier doesn't make any sense; either he's paid back 22 accounts or he hasn't. If he's saying that there might be some accounts that won't be paid if they don't cooperate, he should spell it out.

I think he did already.. just some people don't consider it possible to comply.