Up Like Trump

[robbylove]

How would Gabbard know the true number of supporters she has if ~they~ don't vote for her. Also, maybe Clinton could run again. It would be a political shield against her husband and his legendary love for the Lolita Express.

I very well might help fund and/or support her campaign (in certain ways) like I did with Trump, but again, I'm unlikely to cast a ballot for reasons stated on the thread about voting.

I like Gabbard, but my liking of her started way back when she first ran.

Glad to hear.  That's sort of the demographic I'm imagining being fairly strong and why I make my prediction.

I actually wrote in Elizabeth Warren back in the day just so I didn't have to vote for Obama.  That was back when it seemed pretty clear that the bankers didn't like her.  Also when I was more of a liberal and didn't understand the true cancer behind some of their policies.  At that time I was writing it off to ignorance and not pure evil.

There was a difference between a ~liberal~ and a ▼commie▼. I still want to believe this to be true.

[1714944966]

1714944966

[tvbcof]

There was a difference between a ~liberal~ and a ▼commie▼. I still want to believe this to be true.

I think that the 'Liberals' either got squeezed out (like me) or warmed to pinko-ism (+ other idiot-isms) so that they could maintain their friends and relationships.  Sad.

[robbylove]

What if (((THEY))) invented Bitcoin?
...

I've never ruled it out, but almost all of my observations thus-far argue against it.

The strongest hypothesis seems to me to be the standard story that it was done by some group who was pissed off about 2008.  Probably pissed off before that, but 2008 was the incentive to start coding.

A beautiful (standard) story for children to help them sleep at night. Who are converting their fiat into BTC the most right now? The 'little people' with little savings, or the sociopaths like Jack Dorcey?

Everything should be questioned, even the beautiful story of BTC's Genesis...

[robbylove]

There was a difference between a ~liberal~ and a ▼commie▼. I still want to believe this to be true.

I think that the 'Liberals' either got squeezed out (like me) or warmed to pinko-ism (+ other idiot-isms) so that they could maintain their friends and relationships.  Sad.

True.

[robbylove]

https://youtu.be/TGCfvWqaHnU

(((THEY)))   Vs   ))) ALL OF US (((

[moonhub]

Trump vs computer games. Hahaha 

[moonhub]

Trump vs computer games. Hahaha 

it's the jewish supremacists vs the world... if trump wasn't protecting the pedos, he would get it, but he can't, it's his own daughter... anyway, anything from the us has lost all relevance... PLA4EVA !

His own daughter?

[moonhub]

Trump vs computer games. Hahaha 

it's the jewish supremacists vs the world... if trump wasn't protecting the pedos, he would get it, but he can't, it's his own daughter... anyway, anything from the us has lost all relevance... PLA4EVA !

His own daughter?

yeah, she chose to become an enemy of One China by siding with the jewish supremacists... what's her new war name? check it on another post...

did you hear the little princess about pedo island jeffrey epstein? no... why? this is the question... but at the end who cares...

PLA4EVA !

Yes, that's all, I understood what you mean. Recent news is about her statement on white excellence and terrorism.

[moonhub]

Trump vs computer games. Hahaha 

it's the jewish supremacists vs the world... if trump wasn't protecting the pedos, he would get it, but he can't, it's his own daughter... anyway, anything from the us has lost all relevance... PLA4EVA !

His own daughter?

yeah, she chose to become an enemy of One China by siding with the jewish supremacists... what's her new war name? check it on another post...

did you hear the little princess about pedo island jeffrey epstein? no... why? this is the question... but at the end who cares...

PLA4EVA !

Yes, that's all, I understood what you mean. Recent news is about her statement on white excellence and terrorism.

some said she had done "stuff" when she was young, like slut shaming, and there are the vids, like the poor Paris Hilton... by the way... another way of the jewish supremacists?

Seriously? I'm about her "stuff".

[robbylove]

Ted Cruz Says Universities Are Raising A "Generation Of Pansies"

https://youtu.be/0q4PLOvLFFs



What A Democratic Socialist Convention Is Like

https://youtu.be/UPLQNUVmq3o



)))  (((

[BADecker]

amerians have become the proxies of the jewish supremacists... that's it, or have they only be ever nothing more than that?

And the Jewish people are their slaves.     

[tvbcof]

amerians have become the proxies of the jewish supremacists... that's it, or have they only be ever nothing more than that?

When you control a nation's money supply you can make them into anything you desire although it takes time.  It's possible to move to fast and cause a negative reaction.  Gangrene lost the war against people when people mastered the art of amputation.

Wealthy Jews in North America pre-dated the formation of the country.  Their religion is favorable towards slavery and towards trading, and the two combine as a potent wealth generation mechanism.  Since Christianity was generally dis-favorable toward both slavery and toward usury at the time Judaism had an advantage here.

It does seem clear that the founding of our country is intertwined with Freemasonry.  Also it seems evident that Freemasonry was at some time prior taken over by Kabbalahists and that philosophical framework became integral to that organization.  So says Albert Pike.  It very well could be a driving force at the top.

It is absurd to suggest that as a people the United States was 'nothing more than [Jewish proxies]', but one could entertain a hypothesis that the top-level leadership of the country and the 'invisible hand' that guides them had always had as a priority the furtherance of what came to be called 'Zionist' priorities.  If so, our utility in service to Zionism surely waxed and waned over the decades as various fortunes turned.  Genuine 'antisemitism certainly does exist and has existed over our nation's lifespan.

We've fought two world wars which, by accident or design, ended up being instrumental to the rise of political Zionism.  Both after the privately owned 'Federal Reserve' took over our monetary system.  The methods by which Wilson and Roosevelt led us into these wars, and a study of the handlers of these two 'leaders', uncovers facts which are suspicious indeed.

We are, according to some, scheduled to fight a third and final world war for the cause.  And all sides are to parish leaving a vacuum to be filled.

Edits:  Slight.

[robbylove]

... A vacuum to be filled by... Spectre? I hope there will be enough white cats still alive after WWIII...

 

[tvbcof]

...
A vacuum to be filled by... Spectre?
...

According to the designer of the strategy, the group that the designer was a part of.  Unsurprisingly.

One really does not need to be highly educated or informed to understand the principle of 'creative destruction' and see it all around.  Simply speaking, it isn't exactly rocket science.

[tvbcof]

What if (((THEY))) invented Bitcoin?
...

I've never ruled it out, but almost all of my observations thus-far argue against it.

The strongest hypothesis seems to me to be the standard story that it was done by some group who was pissed off about 2008.  Probably pissed off before that, but 2008 was the incentive to start coding.

A beautiful (standard) story for children to help them sleep at night. Who are converting their fiat into BTC the most right now? The 'little people' with little savings, or the sociopaths like Jack Dorcey?

Everything should be questioned, even the beautiful story of BTC's Genesis...

I made it clear that all I have is a hypothesis which seems to line up best with the observations I've made.  I question BTC's Genesis' all the time.  Nothing would surprise me.  People like me don't have any psychological need to 'know' anything.  Only to have considered a broad range of hypotheses, and to be constantly entertaining new ones as old ones die.  If you've got some proof that the 'fable' is impossible, I'll drop it.  If you have a 'feeling' then I won't.

As for who's buying BTC, I have no idea.  Probably a lot of classes of people.  BTC's 'big thing' is that whoever is buying them, they are buying something which is not being debased, and even more critically, something which is not someone else's liability.

[robbylove]

What if (((THEY))) invented Bitcoin?
...

I've never ruled it out, but almost all of my observations thus-far argue against it.

The strongest hypothesis seems to me to be the standard story that it was done by some group who was pissed off about 2008.  Probably pissed off before that, but 2008 was the incentive to start coding.

A beautiful (standard) story for children to help them sleep at night. Who are converting their fiat into BTC the most right now? The 'little people' with little savings, or the sociopaths like Jack Dorcey?

Everything should be questioned, even the beautiful story of BTC's Genesis...

I made it clear that all I have is a hypothesis which seems to line up best with the observations I've made.  I question BTC's Genesis' all the time.  Nothing would surprise me.  People like me don't have any psychological need to 'know' anything.  Only to have considered a broad range of hypotheses, and to be constantly entertaining new ones as old ones die.  If you've got some proof that the 'fable' is impossible, I'll drop it.  If you have a 'feeling' then I won't.

As for who's buying BTC, I have no idea.  Probably a lot of classes of people.  BTC's 'big thing' is that whoever is buying them, they are buying something which is not being debased, and even more critically, something which is not someone else's liability.

What would be your ultimate store of value, for you not everyone else, BTC or gold?

[tvbcof]

What would be your ultimate store of value, for you not everyone else, BTC or gold?

I've always suggested that everyone have both (provided that they already have taken the responsibility to have one and they are not an average idiot when it comes to monetary science.)  Someone who did well in BTC should, in my opinion, trade some of it for silver at least (junk coins) and if they have a large budget gold as well.  Conversely, as I've always suggested, people who protected their wealth by putting it into PM's before BTC came along should really consider converting some of it into BTC or one of the other more well maintained crypto-currencies.

BTC and PM's are, to me, nearly identical asset classes.  Both are in the category where one can autonomously control them without the participation of other entities, and are not 'someone elses liability' (meaning you don't have to rely on someone else to make good on a piece of paper and rely on a functional court system to enforce your property rights.)  At the same time, BTC and PM's have vastly different capabilities in terms of transportation in particular.  Also in the anticipated usability during a crisis.

We're getting a ways off the topic of this thread though.  But you asked.

[tvbcof]

...
1. it's an interesting topic, before the creation of the usa (maybe all along a proxy to hedge the risks of the crown of england in the shared power "agreement" in the uk?) thanks for mentioning this aspect. I think Cristobal Columbus was a child rapist too?

I've read that Columbus himself may or may not have been a 'Marrano', but there is strong evidence that his crew when he discovered the 'New World' were.

Marranos were Jews who converted to some other religion when Judaism was outlawed in Spain.  Catholicism mainly in that area.  Certainly a fraction of them maintained their religion in secret.  That is, they became 'crypto-Jews.'

It was actually quite common for Jews to be banished from a country.  Supposedly it's happened over 100 times through history.  Often the legal findings were assaults against children, but that may just be the offense which really gets ethical people's blood boiling.  There are a fair number of 'Saints' who, as infants, were reportedly killed and mutilated in Jewish occult practices.  Various passages from the Talmud, in addition to it's overall philosophy of ethnic supremacy, actually make the stories somewhat more believable!

2. the take over of freemasonry by the jewish supremacists... interesting, it's the problem of secrecy oriented organization, if some critical positions are taken over by stealthy invaders it's hard for the whole to realize the take over. an interesting perspective,

The aforementioned 'protocols' suggest adopting the local religions and infiltration of them.

Some say that being ancestrally Jewish is a prerequisite to being a real Jesuit in the Catholic faith.  I've read that three people 'converted' from Judaism to Catholicism and were instrumental in the 'Nostre aetate' signed in in 1965.  Some call the post period 'Vatican II'.  I've read that two of the three 'converted' back to Judaism after their work was done.

The Catholics have their first Jesuit pope now, and he got in under unusual circumstances...which involved sexual abuse of children just for what it's worth...  He is rumored to have, as a cardinal in South America, sent is underlings to Jerusalem to learn about 'the seven noahide laws.'

finally the only question left is if the usa was created as a proxy or became one of the JS. I guess many "americans" believed in the "pieces of papers" (Constitution and Bill of Rights), sadly, reality like the recent pedogate, illustrate the limits of the narrative...

I just hope that the crushing of the jewish supremacists proxies will not be too ecologically damaging. For the rest, or Mankind defeat them, or get enslaved until the next uprising... at least with the Muslims you can always convert and become Khalifh...

As for 'ecological damage', a fair number of the more radical of the Jews are prone to threaten the destruction of the human race as retribution for attacks on them.  You can even find it on this board.

With genetic engineering I suspect that it would be entirely possible to make good on such a threat.  For 30 years I've been much more concerned about biological weapons than about nuclear weapons.  But that's just me.

[ðºÞæ]

Up like the Trump wall

[robbylove]

What would be your ultimate store of value, for you not everyone else, BTC or gold?

I've always suggested that everyone have both (provided that they already have taken the responsibility to have one and they are not an average idiot when it comes to monetary science.)  Someone who did well in BTC should, in my opinion, trade some of it for silver at least (junk coins) and if they have a large budget gold as well.  Conversely, as I've always suggested, people who protected their wealth by putting it into PM's before BTC came along should really consider converting some of it into BTC or one of the other more well maintained crypto-currencies.

BTC and PM's are, to me, nearly identical asset classes.  Both are in the category where one can autonomously control them without the participation of other entities, and are not 'someone elses liability' (meaning you don't have to rely on someone else to make good on a piece of paper and rely on a functional court system to enforce your property rights.)  At the same time, BTC and PM's have vastly different capabilities in terms of transportation in particular.  Also in the anticipated usability during a crisis.

We're getting a ways off the topic of this thread though.  But you asked.

I don't believe I could derail my own thread, and since TRUMP did talk about BTC, that was the underlying context of my question.

And I thought (((THEY))) were the ones setting up the value of PM's, maybe down to one famous family name...