💸 DigiCube 🔷 NOW ON RAWX (NEW MCXNOW) 💸 EARN 50K CUBE/WEEK WITH TWITTER!

[Nobitcoin]

I still my idea of going back to the roots of CUBE would be good. Say when CUBE become 200m supply divide by 10k and launch CUBEZero. Giving 20k Total Supply and keeping the existing 5.47% and having minimum stake of 150 CUBE.

[roadhog]

But wouldn't that leave us in the same position as now? 
only the people with large amounts would benefit.
and the small investor would dip out.

if people are going to invest then shouldn't they all receive the same benefits? that way they may invest more.

probably just my way of thinking.

[GREEDYJOHN]

But wouldn't that leave us in the same position as now? 
only the people with large amounts would benefit.
and the small investor would dip out.

if people are going to invest then shouldn't they all receive the same benefits? that way they may invest more.

probably just my way of thinking.

The situation would be different, if DIGICUBE was a very expensive coin.

The enhanced POS technology should be kept, BUT the %POS should be drastically reduced.

[Nobitcoin]

But wouldn't that leave us in the same position as now? 
only the people with large amounts would benefit.
and the small investor would dip out.

if people are going to invest then shouldn't they all receive the same benefits? that way they may invest more.

probably just my way of thinking.

Surely the people who invested early should benefit because they paid more for their CUBEs whilst people who are buying now or have a small amount should buy more since is so damn cheap. I paid around 0.01 - 0.01 for my CUBEs ! You do the maths who's more out of pocket 

[D3m0nKinGx]

But wouldn't that leave us in the same position as now? 
only the people with large amounts would benefit.
and the small investor would dip out.

if people are going to invest then shouldn't they all receive the same benefits? that way they may invest more.

probably just my way of thinking.

Surely the people who invested early should benefit because they paid more for their CUBEs whilst people who are buying now or have a small amount should buy more since is so damn cheap. I paid around 0.01 - 0.01 for my CUBEs ! You do the maths who's more out of pocket 

hmm, well i came into CUBE around 420 sats. and i still made back my initial investment even with the drop in price + stakes

[Nobitcoin]

But wouldn't that leave us in the same position as now? 
only the people with large amounts would benefit.
and the small investor would dip out.

if people are going to invest then shouldn't they all receive the same benefits? that way they may invest more.

probably just my way of thinking.

Surely the people who invested early should benefit because they paid more for their CUBEs whilst people who are buying now or have a small amount should buy more since is so damn cheap. I paid around 0.01 - 0.01 for my CUBEs ! You do the maths who's more out of pocket 

hmm, well i came into CUBE around 420 sats. and i still made back my initial investment even with the drop in price + stakes

With my initial investment in CUBE I made further money in order to invest but waiting for Spots and his plan for CUBE world domination as deservedly the best POS coin ever created.

[D3m0nKinGx]

But wouldn't that leave us in the same position as now? 
only the people with large amounts would benefit.
and the small investor would dip out.

if people are going to invest then shouldn't they all receive the same benefits? that way they may invest more.

probably just my way of thinking.

Surely the people who invested early should benefit because they paid more for their CUBEs whilst people who are buying now or have a small amount should buy more since is so damn cheap. I paid around 0.01 - 0.01 for my CUBEs ! You do the maths who's more out of pocket 

hmm, well i came into CUBE around 420 sats. and i still made back my initial investment even with the drop in price + stakes

With my initial investment in CUBE I made further money in order to invest but waiting for Spots and his plan for CUBE world domination as deservedly the best POS coin ever created.

I don't understand why POS doesn't dominate the markets better than coins still being mined with very low returns/mining costs compared to minimal hardware/staking

[Nobitcoin]

But wouldn't that leave us in the same position as now? 
only the people with large amounts would benefit.
and the small investor would dip out.

if people are going to invest then shouldn't they all receive the same benefits? that way they may invest more.

probably just my way of thinking.

Surely the people who invested early should benefit because they paid more for their CUBEs whilst people who are buying now or have a small amount should buy more since is so damn cheap. I paid around 0.01 - 0.01 for my CUBEs ! You do the maths who's more out of pocket 

hmm, well i came into CUBE around 420 sats. and i still made back my initial investment even with the drop in price + stakes

With my initial investment in CUBE I made further money in order to invest but waiting for Spots and his plan for CUBE world domination as deservedly the best POS coin ever created.

I don't understand why POS doesn't dominate the markets better than coins still being mined with very low returns/mining costs compared to minimal hardware/staking

Well once Bitcoin halving really kicks in I think people will look at CUBE once again but the stigma of its a Spots coin does have an effect on investors due to past history which people in the community told me before I invested but so far so good and I don't see what the great fuss is about. Its just about using you calculator.

[GREEDYJOHN]

But wouldn't that leave us in the same position as now? 
only the people with large amounts would benefit.
and the small investor would dip out.

if people are going to invest then shouldn't they all receive the same benefits? that way they may invest more.

probably just my way of thinking.

Surely the people who invested early should benefit because they paid more for their CUBEs whilst people who are buying now or have a small amount should buy more since is so damn cheap. I paid around 0.01 - 0.01 for my CUBEs ! You do the maths who's more out of pocket 

hmm, well i came into CUBE around 420 sats. and i still made back my initial investment even with the drop in price + stakes

With my initial investment in CUBE I made further money in order to invest but waiting for Spots and his plan for CUBE world domination as deservedly the best POS coin ever created.

I don't understand why POS doesn't dominate the markets better than coins still being mined with very low returns/mining costs compared to minimal hardware/staking

Well once Bitcoin halving really kicks in I think people will look at CUBE once again but the stigma of its a Spots coin does have an effect on investors due to past history which people in the community told me before I invested but so far so good and I don't see what the great fuss is about. Its just about using you calculator.

This coin can succeed, if IGOTSPOTS cheers up 

[roadhog]

I don't see much  problem with the coin my self except the rapid growth.
And the limited reward for new investors
And as for spots rep I think there are a lot more Dev's out there that have done a lot worse.

At least with spots coins you stand a chance of getting your investment back.

[D3m0nKinGx]

it's like all the ppl on the thread that ask questions like what's happening with bleutrade, what's goin on cube pos, they want other's do the work for them so they can just sit back and try to ride to riches. but it doesn't work like that! money doesn't grow on trees, even with crypto!

too many ppl just looking for easy money and lazy fucks don't wanna work for it

[roadhog]

O you mean like requesting it on Cryptopia and buying coins to vote with and requesting it on other sites too mmmmm

[Nobitcoin]

it's like all the ppl on the thread that ask questions like what's happening with bleutrade, what's goin on cube pos, they want other's do the work for them so they can just sit back and try to ride to riches. but it doesn't work like that! money doesn't grow on trees, even with crypto!

too many ppl just looking for easy money and lazy fucks don't wanna work for it

Yes your right a lot of people should put money where their mouth is I have contributed a lot towards CUBE buying the dumps almost daily and now I've run out of BTC because my stupidness to gamble leaves me in a helpless position.

[iGotSpots]

Click the image below to download the Windows wallet. Github has been updated to v2.0

Click the image above to download the Windows wallet. Github has been updated to v2.0

[Toninho]

Click the image below to download the Windows wallet. Github has been updated to v2.0

Click the image above to download the Windows wallet. Github has been updated to v2.0

Wallet needs to be locked ?

[D3m0nKinGx]

main.cpp: In function 'int64 GetProofOfStakeReward(int64, int)':
main.cpp:953:1: error: expected primary-expression before '<<' token
 <<<<<<< HEAD
 ^
main.cpp:953:3: error: expected primary-expression before '<<' token
 <<<<<<< HEAD
   ^
main.cpp:953:5: error: expected primary-expression before '<<' token
 <<<<<<< HEAD
     ^
main.cpp:953:7: error: expected primary-expression before '<' token
 <<<<<<< HEAD
       ^
main.cpp:953:9: error: 'HEAD' was not declared in this scope
 <<<<<<< HEAD
         ^
main.cpp:954:5: error: expected ';' before 'if'
     if (nHeight > 500000) {
     ^
main.cpp:948:8: warning: unused variable 'nVariableStakeRate' [-Wunused-variable]
  int64 nVariableStakeRate = ((nCoinAge % 500) + 1) * CENT;
        ^
main.cpp:950:11: warning: unused variable 'nMinReward' [-Wunused-variable]
     int64 nMinReward = nHeight * .0011;
           ^
main.cpp:951:11: warning: unused variable 'nMaxReward' [-Wunused-variable]
     int64 nMaxReward = nHeight * .01;
           ^
main.cpp:952:11: warning: unused variable 'nSquish' [-Wunused-variable]
     int64 nSquish = nSubsidy / 1000000;
           ^
main.cpp:4314:1: error: expected '}' at end of input
 }
 ^
main.cpp:4314:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
main.cpp: At global scope:
main.cpp:105:13: warning: 'bool GetTransaction(const uint256&, CWalletTx&)' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 bool static GetTransaction(const uint256& hashTx, CWalletTx& wtx)
             ^
main.cpp:140:13: warning: 'void SetBestChain(const CBlockLocator&)' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 void static SetBestChain(const CBlockLocator& loc)
             ^
main.cpp:147:13: warning: 'void UpdatedTransaction(const uint256&)' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 void static UpdatedTransaction(const uint256& hashTx)
             ^
main.cpp:154:13: warning: 'void PrintWallets(const CBlock&)' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 void static PrintWallets(const CBlock& block)
             ^
main.cpp:161:13: warning: 'void Inventory(const uint256&)' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 void static Inventory(const uint256& hash)
             ^
main.cpp:168:13: warning: 'void ResendWalletTransactions()' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 void static ResendWalletTransactions()
             ^
main.cpp:918:16: warning: 'uint256 GetOrphanRoot(const CBlock*)' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 uint256 static GetOrphanRoot(const CBlock* pblock)
                ^
make: *** [obj/main.o] Error 1

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

got the same error compiling both locallly on ubuntu 16.04 and on the vps ubuntu 14

[iGotSpots]

Ugh, Github added a bunch of shit for some reason. Upload bug; fixed

[D3m0nKinGx]

Perfect

[Anarchy101]

@iGotSpots first of all thanks a lot this update, and secondly do we need resync whole blockchain?

[D3m0nKinGx]

@iGotSpots first of all thanks a lot this update, and secondly do we need resync whole blockchain?

do not need to resync