Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 07:38:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they believe that the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 [720] 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 »
  Print  
Author Topic: IOTA  (Read 1471700 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2856
Merit: 1518


Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206


View Profile WWW
July 10, 2018, 07:46:52 PM
Last edit: July 11, 2018, 09:06:19 AM by Gyrsur
 #14381


LOL IOTA doesn't even work with a centralized coordinator and you are talking about removing it!! Thats classic denial... OMG. Keep it! Stay strong now!  Grin

Satoshi didn't go with Tangle because obviously its a dead end.
Compared to btc, IOTA is undervalued.
A word to all my maximalist friends, diversify now. Wink

IOTA will ever be cheap because it was not intended as a store of value or for speculation. intended for M2M communication but not sure about if IOTA is necessary in favor of. Lightning has the same functionality and can be used for M2M communication.

1714160294
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714160294

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714160294
Reply with quote  #2

1714160294
Report to moderator
1714160294
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714160294

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714160294
Reply with quote  #2

1714160294
Report to moderator
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714160294
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714160294

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714160294
Reply with quote  #2

1714160294
Report to moderator
Come-from-Beyond (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
July 10, 2018, 08:29:48 PM
 #14382

WilderX, I have to ban you from this thread for the post which will be deleted in few minutes. And better move to another forum with racist posts.
zenfo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 10, 2018, 08:34:28 PM
 #14383

The Internet of things will be a trillion dollar industry, and perhaps the future will be bigger. I think iota can grow much more but they need to make it completely decentralized.
Xantrax
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 827
Merit: 502



View Profile
July 12, 2018, 11:24:16 AM
 #14384

Is there a good (reliable) wallet which i can download and use? My IOTA is currently on Bitfinex and i'm unsure whether this is a good idea.
Scooby903
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 12, 2018, 11:28:44 AM
 #14385

Posting a tar and a using certs to verify the owner of a file is easy and practically archaic. VW has been thinking of the over the air updates using IOTA; what are the benefits of this over just downloading from a site?
Alohaboy?!
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 506



View Profile
July 12, 2018, 11:39:45 AM
 #14386


LOL IOTA doesn't even work with a centralized coordinator and you are talking about removing it!! Thats classic denial... OMG. Keep it! Stay strong now!  Grin

Satoshi didn't go with Tangle because obviously its a dead end.
Compared to btc, IOTA is undervalued.
A word to all my maximalist friends, diversify now. Wink

IOTA will ever be cheap because it was not intended as a store of value or for speculation. intended for M2M communication but not sure about if IOTA is necessary in favor of. Lightning has the same functionality and can be used for M2M communication.

That is one of the funny things related to the project. It is not meant to be a store of value or even P2P payment. That's why the price is actually symbolic and it could be one of the projects with a broad usage even without increasing multiple times in value. The price peaks are purely speculative right now since most of the people don't even use any crypto project in any different way than to increase their wealth.
kronos123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 391



View Profile
July 12, 2018, 03:52:47 PM
 #14387

I read a bit of backlog and it seems to me that it has not been mentioned:

https://winiota.com/
THE FIRST DECENTRALIZED ON-TANGLE PROVABLY FAIR CASINO & AI ENHANCED SPORTSBETTING PLATFORM

from July 1st to July 14th Pre-Ico, and then from August 1st to September 1st Ico
the first Ico on Tangle Iota; initially the known Erc-20 will be released while in phase 2, Q3 2018, they will be converted 1: 1 in Tangle Iota, the first of its kind.

This is amazing news for Iota as well as its ongoing partnerships!
StarkTony
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 1


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 08:05:23 PM
 #14388

I'm currently comparing other IoT projects to IOTA, and it seems to me that IOTA really lacks critical features.

One of these is privacy: I mean, how can IOTA ever become the infrastructure of IoT if it can't guarantee privacy? Connecting IoT devices to a global network means sharing very personal informations, possibly more than what we share now on socials by means of our smartphones. What about our home devices? And health data?

Also I've been left to the status of IOTA in October 2017: at that time the wallet was having huge problems connecting and transactions didn't go through. How is the transaction time at the moment? Is it like 2 minutes as someone wrote above? If so, how do you expect IOTA to support IoT transactions? In IoT scenarios, embedded devices are expected to react relatively quickly to changes in the environment (think of house doors closing when I leave my apartment... 2 minutes looks like enough time for a thief to make it into my house).

There are excellent blockchain solutions popping up out there, look at IoTex: is IOTA going to be up to it? Honestly, I don't think so.
BitcoinArsenal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 556


View Profile
July 13, 2018, 11:04:28 PM
 #14389

I'm currently comparing other IoT projects to IOTA, and it seems to me that IOTA really lacks critical features.

One of these is privacy: I mean, how can IOTA ever become the infrastructure of IoT if it can't guarantee privacy? Connecting IoT devices to a global network means sharing very personal informations, possibly more than what we share now on socials by means of our smartphones. What about our home devices? And health data?
...

I doubt you really did a proper comparison or your research was sloppy.

Quote
Anyone interested in privacy and anonymity is recommended to read it.
https://blog.iota.org/research-on-private-transactions-in-iota-cd546751e2c4

Artemsv
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 269



View Profile
July 14, 2018, 07:21:42 AM
 #14390

MIOTA under maintenance
COBINHOOD exchange is currently implementing system maintenance for MIOTA as a fullnode issue was detected, the team is checking the issue with IOTA Foundation. Deposit and withdrawal functions of MIOTA will be temporarily suspended on the exchange, while trading is accessible as per normal during this period of time. We expect to resume MIOTA deposit/ withdrawal as soon as we can once we confirmed the issue with IOTA Foundation.
https://cobinhood.com/announcements/be54e9de-088b-48a4-bbfb-83e89a00f462
StarkTony
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 1


View Profile
July 14, 2018, 12:44:17 PM
 #14391

I'm currently comparing other IoT projects to IOTA, and it seems to me that IOTA really lacks critical features.

One of these is privacy: I mean, how can IOTA ever become the infrastructure of IoT if it can't guarantee privacy? Connecting IoT devices to a global network means sharing very personal informations, possibly more than what we share now on socials by means of our smartphones. What about our home devices? And health data?

Also I've been left to the status of IOTA in October 2017: at that time the wallet was having huge problems connecting and transactions didn't go through. How is the transaction time at the moment? Is it like 2 minutes as someone wrote above? If so, how do you expect IOTA to support IoT transactions? In IoT scenarios, embedded devices are expected to react relatively quickly to changes in the environment (think of house doors closing when I leave my apartment... 2 minutes looks like enough time for a thief to make it into my house).

There are excellent blockchain solutions popping up out there, look at IoTex: is IOTA going to be up to it? Honestly, I don't think so.


I doubt you really did a proper comparison or your research was sloppy.


Well, I didn't say I did a comparison, I said that I'm currently doing it, and that's the reason why I'm asking these questions.

Quote
Anyone interested in privacy and anonymity is recommended to read it.

https://blog.iota.org/research-on-private-transactions-in-iota-cd546751e2c4


I checked out your link, so based on what I can read there IOTA was not designed with privacy in mind, and research is ongoing to find a solution to implement some level of privacy, at leat transactions mixing, but that's made difficult basically because the missing "consensus/mining" concept of IOTA does not allow such feature development.

So I think we can safely say IOTA is missing a privacy feature at the moment and adding it, even a partial privacy implementation, is made complicated by the initial IOTA design.

What about transactions speed? Can anyone provide numbers on how fast transactions are getting confirmed on average, and how the confirmation speed is expected to change in a real IoT scenario where billions of devices are connected and transacting?
yurimir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1044



View Profile
July 15, 2018, 08:13:43 PM
 #14392

Really good article  Smiley

Fascinating article: "IOTA: A DISTRIBUTED FRAMEWORK FOR DATA-DRIVEN MACHINE INTELLIGENCE" by Martin Banov, published by Coin Pupil

https://coinpupil.com/altcoins/iota-distributed-framework-data-driven-machine-intelligence/

Please give this article a good read. Author makes several analogies between artificial neural networks/machine learning and the tangle. Does an exceptional job at explaining the tangle in high level terms, with great detail in such a short article.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Iota/comments/8yzhj6/fascinating_article_iota_a_distributed_framework/
coloredcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 199
Merit: 101


View Profile
July 16, 2018, 07:54:25 AM
 #14393

I'm currently comparing other IoT projects to IOTA, and it seems to me that IOTA really lacks critical features.

One of these is privacy: I mean, how can IOTA ever become the infrastructure of IoT if it can't guarantee privacy? Connecting IoT devices to a global network means sharing very personal informations, possibly more than what we share now on socials by means of our smartphones. What about our home devices? And health data?

Also I've been left to the status of IOTA in October 2017: at that time the wallet was having huge problems connecting and transactions didn't go through. How is the transaction time at the moment? Is it like 2 minutes as someone wrote above? If so, how do you expect IOTA to support IoT transactions? In IoT scenarios, embedded devices are expected to react relatively quickly to changes in the environment (think of house doors closing when I leave my apartment... 2 minutes looks like enough time for a thief to make it into my house).

There are excellent blockchain solutions popping up out there, look at IoTex: is IOTA going to be up to it? Honestly, I don't think so.
Please list the mainnet active IOT projects first. Grin
wenwen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 728
Merit: 251


View Profile
July 18, 2018, 05:03:08 AM
 #14394

Good afternoon. A trillion dollars will be but after 5 years, I think. The coin is interesting with a great future. I wish everyone good luck.

The Internet of things will be a trillion dollar industry, and perhaps the future will be bigger. I think iota can grow much more but they need to make it completely decentralized.
yurimir
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1044



View Profile
July 18, 2018, 07:50:40 PM
Last edit: July 18, 2018, 08:06:00 PM by yurimir
 #14395

IOTA Summer Summit 2018 - Full report, many photos  Smiley

In the serene surroundings of Norway’s Oslofjord the IOTA Foundation had its first official summit.



https://blog.iota.org/iota-summer-summit-2018-9f9ced6ec1fe
romeox6x
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 183
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 03:34:34 AM
 #14396

So, what about sending tons of money per transaction ?1% of fees, like in other crypto, is a lot of money if you send thousands every days). To me, the fee-less system looks very interesting for sending large amount of money (just 0.Why Iota always say their system is good for "micro-payement", and not just " any payment
Duderino123
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 07:57:07 AM
 #14397

Does anyone know why IOTA losing value although Btc is rising? All my other altcoins follow the trend🤔

Stay Cloakstrong!
50cent_rapper
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 19, 2018, 04:15:01 PM
 #14398

Does anyone know why IOTA losing value although Btc is rising? All my other altcoins follow the trend🤔

It's easy - price felled cause some sold.
hzjixiang
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 09:35:12 PM
 #14399

I personally believe that ways to remove bad stars from the assembly will be a good addition over time. If the Qubic inventor can determine what assembly to utilize he'd probably go for the main one with constant consensus. The "value" of the assembly will therefore be higher.

StarkTony
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 1


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 10:17:09 PM
Last edit: July 19, 2018, 10:54:16 PM by StarkTony
 #14400

I'm currently comparing other IoT projects to IOTA, and it seems to me that IOTA really lacks critical features.

One of these is privacy: I mean, how can IOTA ever become the infrastructure of IoT if it can't guarantee privacy? Connecting IoT devices to a global network means sharing very personal informations, possibly more than what we share now on socials by means of our smartphones. What about our home devices? And health data?

Also I've been left to the status of IOTA in October 2017: at that time the wallet was having huge problems connecting and transactions didn't go through. How is the transaction time at the moment? Is it like 2 minutes as someone wrote above? If so, how do you expect IOTA to support IoT transactions? In IoT scenarios, embedded devices are expected to react relatively quickly to changes in the environment (think of house doors closing when I leave my apartment... 2 minutes looks like enough time for a thief to make it into my house).

There are excellent blockchain solutions popping up out there, look at IoTex: is IOTA going to be up to it? Honestly, I don't think so.
Please list the mainnet active IOT projects first. Grin

Well, my favourite one is IoTeX (www.iotex.io | www.t.me/iotexgroup): the team is too good to be true, and after only three months from token issuance the mainnet preview is expected for October 31st.

I agree that there are no active IoT mainnets except IOTA, and that makes things even more interesting: even IOTA, after one (or two I'm not sure) years of development still could not overcome many limitation due to the Tangle design (like an "innovation in blockchain innovation") which could take still years before it finds it's role into the distributed networks space.

If IoTeX will deliver, I think very soon we will have the first IoT blockchain actually working: they provide:
- unlimited tps,
- massive scalability,
- instant tx confirmation,
- full privacy,
- subchains to compartimentize different devices classes/manufacturers/applications,
- lightweight cryptography to run privacy even on embedded devices...
- smart contracts

all of this is in testnet already, to be delivered in mainnet-preview by October 31, developed by a team of PhDs, expert engineers coming from Facebook, Google, Uber, and Bosh, and many other top level members.

Honestly, I see that like the IoT leaders with a ready working blockchain very soon.  
Pages: « 1 ... 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 [720] 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!