[ANN] Fantom | CPU Mineable | DarkSend | Masternode | Tor+I2P | sMP Releasing Sn

[jc12345]

It is very interesting to see the BCT cancer spreading and the toxin doing its work in the thread of yet another alt-coin.

Anyways, if the Fantom dev fixes the code and gets everything sorted out, Dark Silk becomes obsolete. I think that this is the biggest threat to the original coder and probably the motive driving all the posts which explains the hostile behavior. The decisive factor is not if the Fantom dev is 10 or 14 or 20 or 60 years old, but if he can make the code fully productional. It is long overdue to have a proper CPU mineable coin and this could be it if the Fantom dev delivers the goods. There can be arguments for and against the code being released in its current state. A lot can be said for going to market first even with buggy code. It is not a foreign concept with even well known software companies going to market quickly with unfinished code and sorting out bugs and flaws later.

[arteleis]

If BCT would really trace back IP addresses, don't you think they would have used it to expose who the dev(s) are that are including RATS in their code? That seems a lot more important than to try and tie this dev to some kid(s) who do nothing but clone and implement broke code. Sorry, unleashing Trojans is much more serious than someone unleashing broke code.

I really don't understand why these self-made super investigators feel happy if they succesfully trace down the dev. Who the fuck cares if it's a 12 yo kid. At least he's trying. ATM, the most important thing is to get al the bugs fixed and not flaming the dev

It will be fixed soon after the code that SLievensDRKSLK is working on is fixed. (If DuckYeah doesn't throw in the towel before then.)  I now have my eye out for Darksilk.

I really hope this embarassment doesnt make it on an ezchange.   crypto has had enough scams/incompetent devs

 and yep lots of room for people interested in a real dev developing this project over at Silk.

[arteleis]

Guys, it is not the right place to discuss this matter.

I'm talking about Fantom, if the Fantom thread isn't the right place, where is?

As I see he copied your source. So what ?
But when silkcoin was started what source was copied from ?

P.S.
Takovering daying coin is a very good idea.You have as much "premine" as you want and nobody can prove/count it.

No I'm accusing him of taking source and making hardly any changes and launching a coin. This isn't about money or making money from using the source.

Silkcoin and DarkSilk are two different coins. Also I forked DarkSilk from crave and have spent thousands of hours working so for someone to take the work, make no change, keep the same magic numbers and ports, give no creditation. Then yeah I will say something. Anyway I'm done here. I'm going back to the silkcoin thread and back to fixing my code in preparation for the prelaunch of DarkSilk as I'm thoroughly testing my software prior to release as it is unfinished.

Whats the problem? it clearly says its forked

LordOfTheCoin/fantom
forked from SCDeveloper/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate

https://github.com/LordOfTheCoin/fantom

Maybe his problem is that he forgot that making the code public somebody could fork it, but he actualy pointed the fact that the code isn't complete, for the rest is all just a scream because DuckYeah when forked the code didn't made tons of changes......

Nope.  we publicly released the code full well knowing someome can fork it.  thats why its called Github.   I hope for the sake of crypto he knows what he is doing with it.  As at this point it seems not so much.  (why we put the warning not for mining or exchanges) lol

[Sir_Astral]

Advertising continues...

[arteleis]

Advertising continues...

Well seeing as though the coin (your coin) is not finished and is currently broken. (of course your dev would know this if he was a dev) this a warning not an advertisement.   

[arteleis]

It is very interesting to see the BCT cancer spreading and the toxin doing its work in the thread of yet another alt-coin.

Anyways, if the Fantom dev fixes the code and gets everything sorted out, Dark Silk becomes obsolete. I think that this is the biggest threat to the original coder and probably the motive driving all the posts which explains the hostile behavior. The decisive factor is not if the Fantom dev is 10 or 14 or 20 or 60 years old, but if he can make the code fully productional. It is long overdue to have a proper CPU mineable coin and this could be it if the Fantom dev delivers the goods. There can be arguments for and against the code being released in its current state. A lot can be said for going to market first even with buggy code. It is not a foreign concept with even well known software companies going to market quickly with unfinished code and sorting out bugs and flaws later.

Would be delightful to follow fantom devs  commits.   thats what open source dev is about! but keep the hopes up.  i will too.

[CryptoVote]

Advertising continues...

I think the biggest issue is fantom forked a project that has not been released yet.  There are reasons the parent project hasn't been released.  From my experiences, this dev can be wreckless but he is only 12 years old.

And yes, this is relevant since we are talking about the developer of YOUR coin.

I don't think the dev is trying to hide niitassin == duckyeah! since it is public info on Github.  They have the same name:


duckyeah! did write the Velvet algorithm, which is interesting: https://github.com/LordOfTheCoin/fantom/blob/master/src/crypto/hash/velvet.h

[arteleis]

Guys, it is not the right place to discuss this matter.

I'm talking about Fantom, if the Fantom thread isn't the right place, where is?

As I see he copied your source. So what ?
But when silkcoin was started what source was copied from ?

P.S.
Takovering daying coin is a very good idea.You have as much "premine" as you want and nobody can prove/count it.

No I'm accusing him of taking source and making hardly any changes and launching a coin. This isn't about money or making money from using the source.

Silkcoin and DarkSilk are two different coins. Also I forked DarkSilk from crave and have spent thousands of hours working so for someone to take the work, make no change, keep the same magic numbers and ports, give no creditation. Then yeah I will say something. Anyway I'm done here. I'm going back to the silkcoin thread and back to fixing my code in preparation for the prelaunch of DarkSilk as I'm thoroughly testing my software prior to release as it is unfinished.

Whats the problem? it clearly says its forked

LordOfTheCoin/fantom
forked from SCDeveloper/DarkSilk-Release-Candidate

https://github.com/LordOfTheCoin/fantom

The answer is literally in your post.  releaae-candidate..

And yes have been polite here.  ill leave as soon as folks here stop fudding their own thread

[arteleis]

Advertising continues...

I think the biggest issue is fantom forked a project that has not been released yet.  There are reasons the parent project hasn't been released.  From my experiences, this dev can be wreckless but he is only 12 years old.

And yes, this is relevant since we are talking about the developer of YOUR coin.

I don't think the dev is trying to hide niitassin == duckyeah! since it is public info on Github.  They have the same name:


duckyeah! did write the Velvet algorithm, which is interesting: https://github.com/LordOfTheCoin/fantom/blob/master/src/crypto/hash/velvet.h

Persinally if he is 12 there is nothing wrong with child geniuses imo.  hopefully he is a genius.

[arteleis]

Guys, it is not the right place to discuss this matter.

I'm talking about Fantom, if the Fantom thread isn't the right place, where is?

if you re read all my posts you will see that i'm pointing to the scam accusation sub-forum, i hope is the last time i ever write this because i'm getting even tired to see this kind of cat fight happening where on theory we are talking of the coin (you are talking about that he took your source and is getting money from it)

If money was the issue we wouldnt still be doing this. (developing the code this coin is using)

[Sir_Astral]

This is not MY coin this is not MY dev I just don't like when somebody spams thread about other coin. This is not first time. In different threads different people advertising coin they likes.
I like some coins. Should I spam other threads about that

This coin can be good or bad. But this thread for this coin and not about others.

[Bitdonator]

I made some design for coin. If dev and community like design
and want to use it, Il be happy to send all source files and do
other graphic for advertisement, wallet, website, OP....

Logo is 4000 x 4000 px PNG image with transparent background.
Also, I can make a new one if community give me idea...

Link to high res. image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/fo77zmsmcykvux3/FantomCoin_logo.png?dl=0



If you like design, feel free to donate some FCX:
FW5NfDkLycbF4jatHu54PtmofwTsGFaYh6

 

[CryptoVote]

Persinally if he is 12 there is nothing wrong with child geniuses imo.  hopefully he is a genius.

Yes, he is a coding genius if 12 y/o.  If we could only harness that genius.

[Shkembe]

Guys, it is not the right place to discuss this matter.

I'm talking about Fantom, if the Fantom thread isn't the right place, where is?

if you re read all my posts you will see that i'm pointing to the scam accusation sub-forum, i hope is the last time i ever write this because i'm getting even tired to see this kind of cat fight happening where on theory we are talking of the coin (you are talking about that he took your source and is getting money from it)

If money was the issue we wouldnt still be doing this. (developing the code this coin is using)

Dude, 7 of 10 last post are yours.... 

[arteleis]

Guys, it is not the right place to discuss this matter.

I'm talking about Fantom, if the Fantom thread isn't the right place, where is?

if you re read all my posts you will see that i'm pointing to the scam accusation sub-forum, i hope is the last time i ever write this because i'm getting even tired to see this kind of cat fight happening where on theory we are talking of the coin (you are talking about that he took your source and is getting money from it)

If money was the issue we wouldnt still be doing this. (developing the code this coin is using)

Dude, 7 of 10 last post are yours.... 

yep just responding to references of our project as posted in this threas.

[Shkembe]

It seems the dev have to hire some moderator as the enemy side hires FUDers  

[arteleis]

I made some design for coin. If dev and community like design
and want to use it, Il be happy to send all source files and do
other graphic for advertisement, wallet, website, OP....

Logo is 4000 x 4000 px PNG image with transparent background.
Also, I can make a new one if community give me idea...

Link to high res. image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/fo77zmsmcykvux3/FantomCoin_logo.png?dl=0



If you like design, feel free to donate some FCX:
FW5NfDkLycbF4jatHu54PtmofwTsGFaYh6

 
deadly logo sweet work man!

[arteleis]

It seems the dev have to hire some moderator as the enemy side hires FUDers  

Not seeing enemies here.   just truth and untruth.  and a level of standard in cryprocurrency regarding overall open source ethics and of course development

[Shkembe]

It seems the dev have to hire some moderator as the enemy side hires FUDers  

Not seeing enemies here.   just truth and untruth.  and a level of standard in cryprocurrency regarding overall open source ethics and of course development

provide me a link where I can read more about open source ethics, please!

[arteleis]

It seems the dev have to hire some moderator as the enemy side hires FUDers  

Not seeing enemies here.   just truth and untruth.  and a level of standard in cryprocurrency regarding overall open source ethics and of course development

provide me a link where I can read more about open source ethics, please!

 lol it doesnt exist.  isnt that a shame.