Lolzzzzzzz
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
 |
December 03, 2015, 12:59:58 PM |
|
How many JINN have been send to the crowdsale? Where can we track the JINN deposits? I wan't to know what's the combined total amount.  |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
December 03, 2015, 01:09:10 PM |
|
I'm not going to make any specific recommendations until you are ready, however, I would like to make a huge request that you integrate two variations of the same color schema-- one light variant, and one dark.
It's been my experience that most users, generally, prefer brighter interfaces, while a smaller subset (which includes myself) suffer rather strained eyes when staring at white interfaces for hours upon hours. Every black/dark interface we can look at provides a few minutes of rest before we have to return to looking at the garish, bright-hued wash of most applications.
Good idea, perhaps I'll use a separate CSS file. |
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
December 03, 2015, 01:10:13 PM |
|
How many JINN have been send to the crowdsale? Where can we track the JINN deposits? I wan't to know what's the combined total amount. Number of sent JINNs = 100'000 - [Available Supply] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
December 03, 2015, 02:54:01 PM |
|
Some transactions are not confirmed yet, those who sent them should hope that miners will set block timestamps in the past, otherwise they will likely get only 7.5% bonus. |
|
|
|
|
|
Azeh
|
|
December 03, 2015, 03:05:33 PM |
|
aaaand that's about the max that will be raised. I don't see many more buying now that the 15% incentive is gone. Congratulations, everyone on the extra 15%. Effectively everyone has 0% extra because we all cancel eachother out  Unless of course I'm wrong and a lot more is raised from here on out. |
|
|
|
|
superresistant
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1130
|
|
December 03, 2015, 03:25:54 PM |
|
aaaand that's about the max that will be raised. I don't see many more buying now that the 15% incentive is gone. Congratulations, everyone on the extra 15%. Effectively everyone has 0% extra because we all cancel eachother out Unless of course I'm wrong and a lot more is raised from here on out. Do you want to bet on it ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Azeh
|
|
December 03, 2015, 03:45:07 PM |
|
aaaand that's about the max that will be raised. I don't see many more buying now that the 15% incentive is gone. Congratulations, everyone on the extra 15%. Effectively everyone has 0% extra because we all cancel eachother out Unless of course I'm wrong and a lot more is raised from here on out. Do you want to bet on it ? I did say I could be wrong, so no. My bet is the money I spent on Iota  |
|
|
|
|
|
AltcoinScamfinder
|
|
December 03, 2015, 03:58:19 PM |
|
aaaand that's about the max that will be raised. I don't see many more buying now that the 15% incentive is gone. Congratulations, everyone on the extra 15%. Effectively everyone has 0% extra because we all cancel eachother out Unless of course I'm wrong and a lot more is raised from here on out. Compare to ETH, Augur etc. Depending on publicity quite a bit can come in after the first discount phase. I expect to buy more in the coming week. |
FOR RENT.
|
|
|
lordoliver
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1020
expect(brain).toHaveBeenUsed()
|
|
December 03, 2015, 04:39:58 PM |
|
Some transactions are not confirmed yet, those who sent them should hope that miners will set block timestamps in the past, otherwise they will likely get only 7.5% bonus. what are you talking about? I don't see any not confirmed one here https://blockchain.info/address/1G8hh3bHMMhZSATwisBVbGFSYBKK3Suib8edit: ahh ok on page 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rlh
|
|
December 03, 2015, 05:20:15 PM |
|
aaaand that's about the max that will be raised. I don't see many more buying now that the 15% incentive is gone. Congratulations, everyone on the extra 15%. Effectively everyone has 0% extra because we all cancel eachother out Unless of course I'm wrong and a lot more is raised from here on out. I'll likely invest a little more. The Nxt wave on exchanges has been fun these past few days. I've been buying and selling on the peaks and making a good profit. I'll likely finally cash out for BTC, with a 20-30% profit, and the net-increase for IOTA should be more than making the cut-off. This is how I invest " ...plans within plans within plans." |
A Personal Quote on BTT from 2011:
"I'd be willing to make a moderate "investment" if the value of the BTC went below $2.00. Otherwise I'll just have to live with my 5 BTC and be happy. :/" ...sigh. If only I knew.
|
|
|
|
AltcoinScamfinder
|
|
December 03, 2015, 06:20:03 PM |
|
Question: If I add to my original purchase from the same BTC address, will you calculate the % correctly? Aka. I don't have to worry about my entire purchase getting 7.5% or 0% if I add-on purchase from my original 15% purchase BTC address.
|
FOR RENT.
|
|
|
Wob
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
December 03, 2015, 06:28:01 PM |
|
I think I messed up. When I read:
This means that you can not purchase via depositing directly from an account at an exchange or equivalent which often change the sender address repeatedly.
I went to my Poloniex account history and never saw my btc address being changed over the past months, so I assumed it was safe and Poloniex isnt an exchange that changes the btc address from time to time. But now it seems Poloniex use a different address themselves for transactions (seeing that on the blockchain). 1.32 btc down the drain?
|
|
|
|
|
|
iotatoken (OP)
|
|
December 03, 2015, 06:29:31 PM |
|
Question: If I add to my original purchase from the same BTC address, will you calculate the % correctly? Aka. I don't have to worry about my entire purchase getting 7.5% or 0% if I add-on purchase from my original 15% purchase BTC address.
Yea, we separate those. So only the BTC sent after the 'pioneer period' will get less. |
|
|
|
|
rlh
|
|
December 03, 2015, 06:41:21 PM |
|
I think I messed up. When I read:
This means that you can not purchase via depositing directly from an account at an exchange or equivalent which often change the sender address repeatedly.
I went to my Poloniex account history and never saw my btc address being changed over the past months, so I assumed it was safe and Poloniex isnt an exchange that changes the btc address from time to time. But now it seems Poloniex use a different address themselves for transactions (seeing that on the blockchain). 1.32 btc down the drain?
I recommend contacting Polo, ASAP. True, this isn't IOTAs nor Polos issue but assuming they have reasonable support, there is no reason why you can't ask them to open a support ticket and in a few weeks assist you in getting your funds. |
A Personal Quote on BTT from 2011:
"I'd be willing to make a moderate "investment" if the value of the BTC went below $2.00. Otherwise I'll just have to live with my 5 BTC and be happy. :/" ...sigh. If only I knew.
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
December 03, 2015, 06:58:39 PM |
|
1.32 btc down the drain?
No, if the exchange agrees to send the 2nd transaction from the same address. They can also export the private key and hand it over to you. |
|
|
|
|
Wob
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
December 03, 2015, 07:01:30 PM |
|
Thanks guys, I will contact them now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AltcoinScamfinder
|
|
December 03, 2015, 07:01:57 PM |
|
I think I messed up. When I read:
This means that you can not purchase via depositing directly from an account at an exchange or equivalent which often change the sender address repeatedly.
I went to my Poloniex account history and never saw my btc address being changed over the past months, so I assumed it was safe and Poloniex isnt an exchange that changes the btc address from time to time. But now it seems Poloniex use a different address themselves for transactions (seeing that on the blockchain). 1.32 btc down the drain?
Yes, that's why we read. The fact that your deposit address hasn't changes doesn't matter at all. Jezus people, why do we not read? |
FOR RENT.
|
|
|
|
AltcoinScamfinder
|
|
December 03, 2015, 07:04:10 PM |
|
I think I messed up. When I read:
This means that you can not purchase via depositing directly from an account at an exchange or equivalent which often change the sender address repeatedly.
I went to my Poloniex account history and never saw my btc address being changed over the past months, so I assumed it was safe and Poloniex isnt an exchange that changes the btc address from time to time. But now it seems Poloniex use a different address themselves for transactions (seeing that on the blockchain). 1.32 btc down the drain?
Also, Polo is an exchange. That's EXACTLY what it is. |
FOR RENT.
|
|
|
|
