Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it

[bibilgin]

ok first send me a declaration with    you name
                                                                                   last name
                                                                                   birth day
                                                                                   who you leave  and dont forget you id to scan and put on that file can you send me PDF ON ME EMAIL  
                                                                                   and write that you accept this just for education ok and i make oficial with video

Okay, let's do it like this.
I'll open Teamviewer, Anydesk, Anyviewer or RDP for you, it'll be faster. Okay? lol

Come on kid, to another playground. Don't talk nonsense without knowing who the other person is.

[nomachine]

I think I’ve approached all of this the wrong way.

I’m offering a 0.1 BTC bounty for the formal proof of any traversal method that provides a statistical edge over a linear scan for puzzle 69. By statistical edge I mean that this new traversal method running on a statistically significant number of executions requires significantly fewer checks (let’s put the threshold at 5%) to find the key.

Conditions :
- Has to be written using math semantics. Not “where does John lives” metaphors.
- Has to be empirically validated using a python / nodeJS script.
- First one posting it to this thread will be recipient of the bounty.

I can show you my method—it has nothing to do with random or sequential search or patterns. It's pure statistics. But it would be stupid to make it public for obvious reasons. This has to be a private message.

[Bram24732]

I think I’ve approached all of this the wrong way.

I’m offering a 0.1 BTC bounty for the formal proof of any traversal method that provides a statistical edge over a linear scan for puzzle 69. By statistical edge I mean that this new traversal method running on a statistically significant number of executions requires significantly fewer checks (let’s put the threshold at 5%) to find the key.

Conditions :
- Has to be written using math semantics. Not “where does John lives” metaphors.
- Has to be empirically validated using a python / nodeJS script.
- First one posting it to this thread will be recipient of the bounty.

I can show you my method—it has nothing to do with random or sequential search or patterns. It's pure statistics. But it would be stupid to make it public for obvious reasons. This has to be a private message.

Feel free to DM.
Ofc the bounty is now for puzzle 71, not for puzzle 69, for obvious reasons

[yxlm2003]

https://upfile.live/zh-cn/files/af2b5355
Can anyone analyze whether this Cyclone.exe has a backdoor?

[fantom06]

https://upfile.live/zh-cn/files/af2b5355
Can anyone analyze whether this Cyclone.exe has a backdoor?

in file very well virus

[2008TOKi]

I think I’ve approached all of this the wrong way.

I’m offering a 0.1 BTC bounty for the formal proof of any traversal method that provides a statistical edge over a linear scan for puzzle 69. By statistical edge I mean that this new traversal method running on a statistically significant number of executions requires significantly fewer checks (let’s put the threshold at 5%) to find the key.

Conditions :
- Has to be written using math semantics. Not “where does John lives” metaphors.
- Has to be empirically validated using a python / nodeJS script.
- First one posting it to this thread will be recipient of the bounty.

I can show you my method—it has nothing to do with random or sequential search or patterns. It's pure statistics. But it would be stupid to make it public for obvious reasons. This has to be a private message.

Feel free to DM.
Ofc the bounty is now for puzzle 71, not for puzzle 69, for obvious reasons

I want to send you my proof, but since my account is only 7 months old, I get a message saying "Bram has blocked messages from new users."

[nomachine]

Feel free to DM.
Ofc the bounty is now for puzzle 71, not for puzzle 69, for obvious reasons

I don’t expect anything from this because there are no rules here. Maybe others have already considered these aspects too. And if it happens that you solve the puzzle a little faster than before—remember me.

[bibilgin]

Statistically speaking, there must be another puzzle within 0.7% of the starting range—specifically, between 71 and 160. But which one? 

85. Did you check the wallet?

1Kh22PvXERd2xpTQk3ur6pPEqFeckCJfAr

[yxlm2003]

https://upfile.live/zh-cn/files/af2b5355
Can anyone analyze whether this Cyclone.exe has a backdoor?

in file very well virus

I downloaded it here
https://www.imgcc.cloud/image/Yhu6Qu

[Akito S. M. Hosana]

Feel free to DM.
Ofc the bounty is now for puzzle 71, not for puzzle 69, for obvious reasons

I don’t expect anything from this because there are no rules here. Maybe others have already considered these aspects too. And if it happens that you solve the puzzle a little faster than before—remember me.

I don’t thrive on uncertainty... what new invention have you just created? 

[Bram24732]

I think I’ve approached all of this the wrong way.

I’m offering a 0.1 BTC bounty for the formal proof of any traversal method that provides a statistical edge over a linear scan for puzzle 69. By statistical edge I mean that this new traversal method running on a statistically significant number of executions requires significantly fewer checks (let’s put the threshold at 5%) to find the key.

Conditions :
- Has to be written using math semantics. Not “where does John lives” metaphors.
- Has to be empirically validated using a python / nodeJS script.
- First one posting it to this thread will be recipient of the bounty.

I can show you my method—it has nothing to do with random or sequential search or patterns. It's pure statistics. But it would be stupid to make it public for obvious reasons. This has to be a private message.

Feel free to DM.
Ofc the bounty is now for puzzle 71, not for puzzle 69, for obvious reasons

I want to send you my proof, but since my account is only 7 months old, I get a message saying "Bram has blocked messages from new users."

Now you can

[nomachine]

Feel free to DM.
Ofc the bounty is now for puzzle 71, not for puzzle 69, for obvious reasons

I don’t expect anything from this because there are no rules here. Maybe others have already considered these aspects too. And if it happens that you solve the puzzle a little faster than before—remember me.

I don’t thrive on uncertainty... what new invention have you just created? 

Not an invention. Just something obvious that I hadn’t considered before. 

[POD5]

Hey guys, there is a new Cyclone on the block

Still working hard, hu?  
Some new interesting features?

Now, I even have a faster version on GitHub, where I'm experimenting with compiler flags. 

Yes, around 30-40% faster

[bitcoinpuzzles621]

whatever you all do, dont keep giving bram more of your code.  he already has 3000 computers and the rest of us might only be using two.  so giving away all of your code secrets to him will only make sure that the rest of us end up broke with no money when he uses that knowledge to solve every remaining puzzle.   dont say i never warned you when it happens.  lol   i do believe in some knowledge sharing though.  but he has too big of an advantage already over the rest of us.  just my opinion or thoughts. 

[nochkin]

whatever you all do, dont keep giving bram more of your code.  he already has 3000 computers and the rest of us might only be using two.

I don't see a point. If you are saying he has "3000 computers" and the rest of us is just two, then it won't make any difference anyway.

[Bram24732]

whatever you all do, dont keep giving bram more of your code.  he already has 3000 computers and the rest of us might only be using two.  so giving away all of your code secrets to him will only make sure that the rest of us end up broke with no money when he uses that knowledge to solve every remaining puzzle.   dont say i never warned you when it happens.  lol   i do believe in some knowledge sharing though.  but he has too big of an advantage already over the rest of us.  just my opinion or thoughts. 

I think I already said I’m not working on any puzzle now that they are no longer profitable.

[fantom06]

whatever you all do, dont keep giving bram more of your code.  he already has 3000 computers and the rest of us might only be using two.  so giving away all of your code secrets to him will only make sure that the rest of us end up broke with no money when he uses that knowledge to solve every remaining puzzle.   dont say i never warned you when it happens.  lol   i do believe in some knowledge sharing though.  but he has too big of an advantage already over the rest of us.  just my opinion or thoughts. 

I think I already said I’m not working on any puzzle now that they are no longer profitable.

I sent you a scrypt, check your private messages

[Bram24732]

whatever you all do, dont keep giving bram more of your code.  he already has 3000 computers and the rest of us might only be using two.  so giving away all of your code secrets to him will only make sure that the rest of us end up broke with no money when he uses that knowledge to solve every remaining puzzle.   dont say i never warned you when it happens.  lol   i do believe in some knowledge sharing though.  but he has too big of an advantage already over the rest of us.  just my opinion or thoughts. 

I think I already said I’m not working on any puzzle now that they are no longer profitable.

I sent you a scrypt, check your private messages

Please do not send me generic AI generated scripts which don’t even make sense.

[bitcoinpuzzles621]

oh did you stop solving for now?   you are probably right though about what you said about most people here.  they are just using AI code and hoping for a miracle to happen someday.  LOL!

[Akito S. M. Hosana]

BREAKING NEWS: Local Code Hoarder Bram Now Controls 3001 Computers—Scientists Fear He’s One Laptop Away from Singularity

But let’s be real. if we stop feeding him our code, he’ll just write it himself while sleep-compiling in binary. The man’s basically a Roomba for puzzles—sucks ‘em up, solves ‘em, and leaves the rest of us vacuuming up breadcrumbs.

Meanwhile, half the people here are just sit here, refreshing GitHub like it’s a lottery ticket.