Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 04:22:43 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 106 »
  Print  
Author Topic: btt  (Read 407298 times)
miTgiB
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 100


Du hast


View Profile
June 26, 2013, 11:35:19 AM
 #521

Wait, so it is getting split or isnt it...

It is if the motion passes.

YES: 3479 - NO: 5 - ABSTAIN: 2

Over 2500 Yes votes, unless someone makes a massive change, impossible to fail
creativex (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 26, 2013, 02:31:40 PM
 #522

EDIT: it passed Cheesy

That's good news. Liquidity is rather anemic.

I have a few hours set aside today to babysit the Avalons. As they seem to be 100% stable with the latest firmware flashed, I'm going to try my hand at overclocking them a bit.

Cheers.

creativex (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 26, 2013, 04:38:19 PM
 #523

Both Avalons seem content to operate at 325Mhz with only a modest(1c) change in temps, though fan speeds are up. More testing is needed to see if we can run stable here long term, but it looks great at this point.



Note, this is approximately 33% of our Avalon mining power as they're both still balanced across three pools.

miTgiB
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 100


Du hast


View Profile
June 26, 2013, 06:10:05 PM
 #524

There's a growth fund built into bASIC-MINING's contract as it stands
...
The growth fund(or Reinvestment Fund) was suspended by shareholder vote on 12/29/12 after delays to the original ASIC hardware shipment
...
we have received nearly twice the hashing power it would've provided had BTCFPGA not gone south.


I would you like to raise that the Reinvestment fund be reinstated (if it isn't already).

The mining power we now have more than covers it.

This should not require a motion as the terms have been met. I'll reinstate the fund tomorrow.

Cheers.

You'll exclude the ASICMINER-PT dividends and continue to do a 100% pass through on those?
creativex (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 26, 2013, 06:13:55 PM
 #525

There's a growth fund built into bASIC-MINING's contract as it stands
...
The growth fund(or Reinvestment Fund) was suspended by shareholder vote on 12/29/12 after delays to the original ASIC hardware shipment
...
we have received nearly twice the hashing power it would've provided had BTCFPGA not gone south.


I would you like to raise that the Reinvestment fund be reinstated (if it isn't already).

The mining power we now have more than covers it.

This should not require a motion as the terms have been met. I'll reinstate the fund tomorrow.

Cheers.

You'll exclude the ASICMINER-PT dividends and continue to do a 100% pass through on those?

Absolutely.

Carnth
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 634
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 26, 2013, 07:50:32 PM
 #526

You'll exclude the ASICMINER-PT dividends and continue to do a 100% pass through on those?

Absolutely.

Do we still need the AM-PT? I admit it's very nice. At what point should we look at trading them for more hardware?
When the third Avalon is delivered?

I'm just asking for thoughts.
creativex (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 26, 2013, 08:04:23 PM
 #527

You'll exclude the ASICMINER-PT dividends and continue to do a 100% pass through on those?

Absolutely.

Do we still need the AM-PT? I admit it's very nice. At what point should we look at trading them for more hardware?
When the third Avalon is delivered?

I'm just asking for thoughts.

No we don't need the shares any longer. I'd prefer to liquidate them at a beneficial price rather than based on an event.

creativex (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 26, 2013, 08:09:34 PM
 #528

Today's dividend is paid. The breakdown is as follows:

Mining revenue: 3.82764463
Asicminer-PT: 0.25858686
Total Dividend: 4.08623149
Total Dispersed: 2.93793810
Reinvested: 1.14829339

I'm putting the finishing touches on the spreadsheet for uploading just now, so the information will be available shortly.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ArTS7AD--9SWdDNfb0lRNElqS1k1eGRoWEw2TGM4NlE#gid=0

Cheers.

miTgiB
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 100


Du hast


View Profile
June 26, 2013, 08:16:53 PM
 #529

You'll exclude the ASICMINER-PT dividends and continue to do a 100% pass through on those?

Absolutely.

Do we still need the AM-PT? I admit it's very nice. At what point should we look at trading them for more hardware?
When the third Avalon is delivered?

I'm just asking for thoughts.

No we don't need the shares any longer. I'd prefer to liquidate them at a beneficial price rather than based on an event.

Without something on the near term horizon, they are better than holding bitcoin currently, once we are able to put a majority of bitcoin on hand to work, I agree liquidating would benefit, it's just if you liquidate now, and do what with the proceeds? 
creativex (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 26, 2013, 08:48:58 PM
 #530

Without something on the near term horizon, they are better than holding bitcoin currently, once we are able to put a majority of bitcoin on hand to work, I agree liquidating would benefit, it's just if you liquidate now, and do what with the proceeds?

While I feel no urgency to liquidate them as they have been much better than holding bitcoin, we have a respectable gain on the shares and they've fulfilled their intended purpose. If I were a wiser man I'd have written an exit strategy into the motion that saw us purchasing them. Tongue

If these were in my personal portfolio I'd either liquidate them in baskets(25*4) marked up a few percent over current ask or write a reasonably attractive call option against them with a short term expiration(10 - 14 days). This way we continue to collect dividends on all or most of the shares and if someone buys them from us they'll do so at a premium. If they do not get sold/exercised then we'll be where we are now...which is still a pretty good place to be.

Cheers.   


miTgiB
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 100


Du hast


View Profile
June 26, 2013, 09:12:28 PM
 #531

If these were in my personal portfolio I'd either liquidate them in baskets(25*4) marked up a few percent over current ask or write a reasonably attractive call option against them with a short term expiration(10 - 14 days). This way we continue to collect dividends on all or most of the shares and if someone buys them from us they'll do so at a premium. If they do not get sold/exercised then we'll be where we are now...which is still a pretty good place to be.

Writing calls certainly sounds like an attractive exit strategy.  I wasn't the hippest on buying these in the first place, and now that we have them, I hesitate exiting prematurely as we have nothing better to replace them with as far as available hardware, and we still have 1200+ banked looking for a home.

Just discussing, as always.
lunarboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 544
Merit: 500



View Profile
⇾ Re: btt
June 26, 2013, 09:21:16 PM
 #532

If i can chime in... i'd vote for liquidating any asci shares when we actually need the cash. i'e `the 1200 or so BTC should be used; fist once that is spent then liquidate any outstanding shares at market value.

 my vote only, not to be taken as financial advice Cool
creativex (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 27, 2013, 12:26:29 AM
 #533

wow did the price take off...bought 3 @ .66 looking pretty good right about now...wish i could have bought more...I'm hoping the split goes through Smiley have 5 btc inbound via coinbase

Avalon really came through for us. We've reached a milestone 5000BTC market cap. Smiley

...and less than 24hrs after I posted that we've reached the 6000BTC market cap milestone. Thanks to everyone that's helped make bASIC-MINING a success!

MilkyLep
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 583
Merit: 500


Bitcoin for all & all for Bitcoin


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 04:14:42 AM
 #534

Could you elaborate on the timeframe of the 10:1 split. And will trading have to be "paused" as everything takes effect?

Either you own the bitcoins(private keys) or you don't. However with moneroj, nobody knows what you own.
Secure. Private. Untraceable.
creativex (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 27, 2013, 05:16:01 AM
 #535

Could you elaborate on the timeframe of the 10:1 split. And will trading have to be "paused" as everything takes effect?

Hi MilkyLep. I can share my limited understanding of the procedure. The time frame will largely be up to burnside as he's the one that has to do all the work and he's kept pretty busy. Now that the motion is over 79% approval it's safe to say it's passed, and I'll give him the go ahead to proceed. The order book will be cleared and trading will be halted while the script runs, but it's unlikely to take very long.

Cheers.

killerstorm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1015



View Profile
June 27, 2013, 07:03:03 AM
 #536

Current market cap is 10050 BTC (5000 shares @2.1. BTC).

We can remove liquid assets out of equation (as creativex can simply sell them and pay dividends):

1247 BTC
100 ASICMINER shares @3.5 BTC each: 350 BTC

What's left is 8453 BTC, attributed to 4 GPUs, 3 avalon units and creativex's creativity Smiley

If GPU value is negigible at this scale, that's like 2800 BTC per unit.

Reality check: 360 BTC was spent on ASIC miners, they are worth 8400 BTC now.

Are you sure you aren't overpaying, people?

Or perhaps I underestimate creativity... Smiley

Chromia: a better dapp platform
matt4054
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1035



View Profile
June 27, 2013, 08:35:53 AM
 #537

Market will decide, but in terms of dividends, we're not bad even at 2.0+

The reinvestment fund is what makes BASIC-MINING a long term "compatible" asset, unlike PMBs and co.
killerstorm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1015



View Profile
June 27, 2013, 10:58:43 AM
 #538

If you believe that Avalon units purchased are worth 3x more than the market price they were purchased at, BASIC-MINING market cap should be 360*3+1247+350 = 2677 BTC, 0.53 BTC per share.

Anything above that means you see value in intangible assets. Brand recognition, maybe? Smiley

This is unrelated to PMB: I'm using market value as a reference.

(And situation with ASICMINER is different because it owns significant intellectual property/intangible assets: they produce their own chips and units.)

Chromia: a better dapp platform
miTgiB
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 100


Du hast


View Profile
June 27, 2013, 11:23:54 AM
 #539

If you believe that Avalon units purchased are worth 3x more than the market price they were purchased at, BASIC-MINING market cap should be 360*3+1247+350 = 2677 BTC, 0.53 BTC per share.

Anything above that means you see value in intangible assets. Brand recognition, maybe? Smiley

This is unrelated to PMB: I'm using market value as a reference.

(And situation with ASICMINER is different because it owns significant intellectual property/intangible assets: they produce their own chips and units.)

Your logic to shake weak hands is flawed, troll better, not louder

1247+350 can and will be used to purchase mining equipment in the future, so the market has placed a value on future earnings.  Liquidity is another factor, few are willing to sell shares at any price currently.
killerstorm
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 1015



View Profile
June 27, 2013, 12:12:25 PM
 #540

Your logic to shake weak hands is flawed, troll better, not louder

Market value of assets BASIC-MINING has is about 2000 BTC, which means ~0.39 BTC/share. And company got ~1900 BTC from sale of shares.

So company had about 8.4% profit. It isn't bad. But market cap is bullshit-based.

1247+350 can and will be used to purchase mining equipment in the future, so the market has placed a value on future earnings.

Eh, anyone can purchase mining equipment with money.

Suppose I make my own mining stock and get 1000 BTC from investors, is it going to have 5000 BTC market cap too? Why not? I can use 1000 BTC to purchase mining equipment in future, after all.

What is more likely, some people saw tremendous increase in hashrate and thought that share price should go up too. But they have missed the fact that high hashrate was already priced in at that point. In fact, I thought it was overpriced back when shares were trading around 0.6 BTC.

Sure, I'm trolling, but can you explain why 1 BTC controlled by creativex is worth 5 BTC? What's your logic? Where does 5x factor come from?

I'd say it comes from people who can't do the math.

On the other hand, if company buys chips and boards in bulk and assembles them, it might be valued significantly above cost of assets. But that's not what creativex is doing.

Chromia: a better dapp platform
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 106 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!