WARP - Something different - VPN Wallet BETA Release - Bittrex/YoBit

[Makingsure]

hey guys this launch looks pretty clean so i guess ill come create some FUD so i can catch your coins, 900shat crowdsale up too is too much for my cheap ass ;p
1; another spots dev
2; this dev has no stake, basically told "make this successful, we both get rich" (by still anon 3rd party)
3; easily an exit scam, account value of 0.03 for 10btc?

anywayz, chew on that
take care yourself guys

[1715360958]

1715360958

[1715360958]

1715360958

[shapetwist]

hey guys this launch looks pretty clean so i guess ill come create some FUD so i can catch your coins, 900shat crowdsale up too is too much for my cheap ass ;p
1; another spots dev
2; this dev has no stake, basically told "make this successful, we both get rich" (by still anon 3rd party)
3; easily an exit scam, account value of 0.03 for 10btc?

anywayz, chew on that
take care yourself guys

You won't be catching any coins with your FUD attempt
900 shat is expensive? Show me a coin with 1 mil supply and solid innovative features that offers such price at launch.

I know what Spots is because they commented on this thread bashing me for not doing it via escrow.

Account value? My account has no price, it is mine. It represents my views. Check: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330716.msg13583952#msg13583952

Good attempt! Hah

[CjMapope]

hey guys this launch looks pretty clean so i guess ill come create some FUD so i can catch your coins, 900shat crowdsale up too is too much for my cheap ass ;p
1; another spots dev
2; this dev has no stake, basically told "make this successful, we both get rich" (by still anon 3rd party)
3; easily an exit scam, account value of 0.03 for 10btc?

anywayz, chew on that
take care yourself guys

You won't be catching any coins with your FUD attempt
900 shat is expensive? Show me a coin with 1 mil supply and solid innovative features that offers such price at launch.

I know what Spots is because they commented on this thread bashing me for not doing it via escrow.

Account value? My account has no price, it is mine. It represents my views. Check: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330716.msg13583952#msg13583952

Good attempt! Hah

SLAYED! haha, good retort
don't mind those accounts i swear there's an army of fud shills on here ;p

[shapetwist]

SLAYED! haha, good retort
don't mind those accounts i swear there's an army of fud shills on here ;p

I really don't mind. I knew what I was getting into from the beginning.
Never hide, answer honestly, face everything. A lesson for many coin developers out there that wish to make a real honest project.

[shapetwist]

Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

[warper]

Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

[shapetwist]

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

Fine by me! More thoughts?

[Buds]

Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.

[shapetwist]

Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.

Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear.
The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong.

I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins.

[trader19]

Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.

Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear.
The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong.

I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins.

yes, for expl. do bounties for translations. can win you some extra audience  GL

[pokeytex]

Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

I say destroy them so the initial plan works!

[Buds]

Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.

Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear.
The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong.

I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins.

If this is the case and all coins have already been accounted for in the initial supply for the crowdfund and any bounties etc. and if there are no new bounties they can be allocated to then the best course of action would be to destroy/burn them.

[warper]

Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.

Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear.
The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong.

I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins.

Well, in this case, I agree with pokeytex: better to destroy them, and stick the initial plan

[antho281]

Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers.

The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.

Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear.
The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong.

I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins.

Well, in this case, I agree with pokeytex: better to destroy them, and stick the initial plan

Agreeing with Pokeytex

[riceberry]

Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.

I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.

I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.

I say destroy them so the initial plan works!

You could destroy them, or you could donate them to be a faucet for warp?

What do people think about having a warp faucet with the 601.30386127 WARP as it's base?

If they are destroyed, I'm sure some people will donate to a faucet anyways.

[warper]

WARP translation to the Portuguese language is live at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1342230 (still needs better formatting)

[Zebedee23]

Is there a countdown timer to when to when sale ends??

[galacticpilgrim]

I'm impressed with the momentum thus far.

Just for fun, let's throw out our guesses of the final total for the funding.

I'll go with 22 btc...

[SwingFirst]

IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.

Fine by me! More thoughts?

You should definitely do it!

[Buds]

Is there a countdown timer to when to when sale ends??

As per info graphic in opening post "Crowdfunding opens Monday, 18th Jan, 12:00 CET and closes Thursday, 28th Jan, 12:00 CET"