Makingsure
Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 10
Judge a Man not by his postcount,but by activity
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:29:03 PM |
|
hey guys this launch looks pretty clean so i guess ill come create some FUD so i can catch your coins, 900shat crowdsale up too is too much for my cheap ass ;p 1; another spots dev 2; this dev has no stake, basically told "make this successful, we both get rich" (by still anon 3rd party) 3; easily an exit scam, account value of 0.03 for 10btc? anywayz, chew on that take care yourself guys
|
|
|
|
shapetwist (OP)
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:40:18 PM |
|
hey guys this launch looks pretty clean so i guess ill come create some FUD so i can catch your coins, 900shat crowdsale up too is too much for my cheap ass ;p 1; another spots dev 2; this dev has no stake, basically told "make this successful, we both get rich" (by still anon 3rd party) 3; easily an exit scam, account value of 0.03 for 10btc? anywayz, chew on that take care yourself guys You won't be catching any coins with your FUD attempt 900 shat is expensive? Show me a coin with 1 mil supply and solid innovative features that offers such price at launch. I know what Spots is because they commented on this thread bashing me for not doing it via escrow. Account value? My account has no price, it is mine. It represents my views. Check: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330716.msg13583952#msg13583952Good attempt! Hah
|
|
|
|
CjMapope
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
|
|
January 26, 2016, 08:58:25 PM |
|
hey guys this launch looks pretty clean so i guess ill come create some FUD so i can catch your coins, 900shat crowdsale up too is too much for my cheap ass ;p 1; another spots dev 2; this dev has no stake, basically told "make this successful, we both get rich" (by still anon 3rd party) 3; easily an exit scam, account value of 0.03 for 10btc? anywayz, chew on that take care yourself guys You won't be catching any coins with your FUD attempt 900 shat is expensive? Show me a coin with 1 mil supply and solid innovative features that offers such price at launch. I know what Spots is because they commented on this thread bashing me for not doing it via escrow. Account value? My account has no price, it is mine. It represents my views. Check: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1330716.msg13583952#msg13583952Good attempt! Hah SLAYED! haha, good retort don't mind those accounts i swear there's an army of fud shills on here ;p
|
~Got this girl in my bed, a roof over my head, i mint a couple coins a week, and thats how i make bread~ ~On the 12th day of Hatzvah, OGminer said to me: "compute root of the merkle hash tree!"~ Prohashing -- Simply the best Multipool!
|
|
|
shapetwist (OP)
|
|
January 26, 2016, 09:06:41 PM |
|
SLAYED! haha, good retort don't mind those accounts i swear there's an army of fud shills on here ;p
I really don't mind. I knew what I was getting into from the beginning. Never hide, answer honestly, face everything. A lesson for many coin developers out there that wish to make a real honest project.
|
|
|
|
shapetwist (OP)
|
|
January 26, 2016, 10:13:14 PM |
|
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.
I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.
I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.
|
|
|
|
warper
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
January 26, 2016, 10:21:20 PM |
|
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.
I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.
I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.
IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.
|
|
|
|
shapetwist (OP)
|
|
January 26, 2016, 10:27:58 PM |
|
IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.
Fine by me! More thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Buds
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 190
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
January 26, 2016, 10:38:03 PM |
|
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.
I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.
I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.
IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers. I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers. The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything.
|
|
|
|
shapetwist (OP)
|
|
January 26, 2016, 10:45:44 PM |
|
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.
I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.
I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.
IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers. I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers. The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything. Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear. The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong. I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins.
|
|
|
|
trader19
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 26, 2016, 10:50:19 PM |
|
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.
I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.
I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.
IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers. I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers. The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything. Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear. The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong. I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins. yes, for expl. do bounties for translations. can win you some extra audience GL
|
|
|
|
pokeytex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 26, 2016, 10:54:50 PM |
|
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.
I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.
I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.
I say destroy them so the initial plan works!
|
|
|
|
Buds
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 190
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
January 26, 2016, 11:04:11 PM |
|
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.
I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.
I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.
IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers. I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers. The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything. Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear. The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong. I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins. If this is the case and all coins have already been accounted for in the initial supply for the crowdfund and any bounties etc. and if there are no new bounties they can be allocated to then the best course of action would be to destroy/burn them.
|
|
|
|
warper
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
January 26, 2016, 11:35:59 PM |
|
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.
I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.
I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.
IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers. I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers. The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything. Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear. The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong. I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins. Well, in this case, I agree with pokeytex: better to destroy them, and stick the initial plan
|
|
|
|
antho281
|
|
January 26, 2016, 11:47:33 PM |
|
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.
I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.
I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.
IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers. I agree with warper donate them to the initial crowdfund amount so they can be distributed to the buyers. The only other option I see is to offer them as a community bounty if you have the need for help with anything. Thing is, the calculations are exact for the initial supply we have. If I add more coins to the distribution, it will be more confusing and less clear. The platform on which you all bought WARP is not expecting for a change on the total supply. So the total distribution share will look wrong. I think we need to think of an other way to use these coins. Well, in this case, I agree with pokeytex: better to destroy them, and stick the initial plan Agreeing with Pokeytex
|
|
|
|
riceberry
|
|
January 26, 2016, 11:58:13 PM |
|
Hey so for people that don't know, I've started to move the WARP chain so all wallets do sync now.
I've made a staking test too, which resulted in 601.30386127 WARP being generated.
I'm willing to destroy these coins or donate them. Would like to hear people's opinions about this.
I say destroy them so the initial plan works! You could destroy them, or you could donate them to be a faucet for warp? What do people think about having a warp faucet with the 601.30386127 WARP as it's base? If they are destroyed, I'm sure some people will donate to a faucet anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
Zebedee23
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2086
Merit: 1001
|
|
January 27, 2016, 12:59:41 AM |
|
Is there a countdown timer to when to when sale ends??
|
|
|
|
galacticpilgrim
|
|
January 27, 2016, 01:03:13 AM |
|
I'm impressed with the momentum thus far.
Just for fun, let's throw out our guesses of the final total for the funding.
I'll go with 22 btc...
|
|
|
|
SwingFirst
|
|
January 27, 2016, 02:17:27 AM |
|
IMO the extra WARP generated should be added to the initial supply, being so distributed proportionally among the crowdfunding buyers.
Fine by me! More thoughts? You should definitely do it!
|
|
|
|
Buds
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 190
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
January 27, 2016, 03:06:30 AM |
|
Is there a countdown timer to when to when sale ends??
As per info graphic in opening post "Crowdfunding opens Monday, 18th Jan, 12:00 CET and closes Thursday, 28th Jan, 12:00 CET"
|
|
|
|
|