[ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers

[Splatters]

Gret job Oliver 0.3.2 is working fine for now, already forged 2 blocks in it!

[Poly#Crypto]

Gret job Oliver 0.3.2 is working fine for now, already forged 2 blocks in it!

Right, excellent work.

0.3.2 works for me.

Now I need some votes 

polycrypto_test
3409637010115081459L

[trader19]

Gret job Oliver 0.3.2 is working fine for now, already forged 2 blocks in it!

Right, excellent work.

0.3.2 works for me.

Now I need some votes  

polycrypto_test
3409637010115081459L

yes, 0.3.2 works great and what a surprise   there is an bapp called "bitbooks", after i installed and started it got message app not ready.. still serves as a great POC. good job Lisk.

[Poly#Crypto]

Gret job Oliver 0.3.2 is working fine for now, already forged 2 blocks in it!

Right, excellent work.

0.3.2 works for me.

Now I need some votes  

polycrypto_test
3409637010115081459L

yes, 0.3.2 works great and what a surprise   there is an bapp called "bitbooks", after i installed and started it got message app not ready.. still serves as a great POC. good job Lisk.

I have not started, the app asks for a Master Passphrase ...

[trader19]

Gret job Oliver 0.3.2 is working fine for now, already forged 2 blocks in it!

Right, excellent work.

0.3.2 works for me.

Now I need some votes  

polycrypto_test
3409637010115081459L

yes, 0.3.2 works great and what a surprise   there is an bapp called "bitbooks", after i installed and started it got message app not ready.. still serves as a great POC. good job Lisk.

I have not started, the app asks for a Master Passphrase ...

you can find your master password in your config.json, after "nano config.json" just scroll to the bottom.

[honolulumark]

wake up, Lisk still lying in shambles

[Msile]

Hey I have a question about lowering the transaction fees.

Why would delegates agree to lower transaction fees? They'll suddenly receive less money unless the transaction volume goes up a lot.

Sure people could vote them out if they don't want to help, but it sounds pretty hard to get a majority, why is this not a problem?

[jjmv]

speaking of volume...

does anyone else thinks its odd that lisk volume is pretty much #5 @ almost two million, but the cap is barely @ 21mil?  Isn't that obvious collecting?  And why would folks collect lisk? 

Im just saying...  get in while prices are low...

[cryptoboy.architect]

speaking of volume...

does anyone else thinks its odd that lisk volume is pretty much #5 @ almost two million, but the cap is barely @ 21mil?  Isn't that obvious collecting?  And why would folks collect lisk? 

Im just saying...  get in while prices are low...

Yup. I've seen same with ETH and FCT, etc. -- slow accumulation, then moon.

[bluedude]

speaking of volume...

does anyone else thinks its odd that lisk volume is pretty much #5 @ almost two million, but the cap is barely @ 21mil?  Isn't that obvious collecting?  And why would folks collect lisk? 

Im just saying...  get in while prices are low...

Yup. I've seen same with ETH and FCT, etc. -- slow accumulation, then moon.

Waiting for the DAPPS revolution

[danherbias07]

speaking of volume...

does anyone else thinks its odd that lisk volume is pretty much #5 @ almost two million, but the cap is barely @ 21mil?  Isn't that obvious collecting?  And why would folks collect lisk? 

Im just saying...  get in while prices are low...

Thanks for the heads up. I will be buying later. I see it came down and thingking it will again. I think this low is enough and profits will be there later.

[Herp]

Is Charles Hoskinson still an adviser? Can you involve him in a more direct capacity? He seems to have enough time on his hands since he said he might test some stuff on ETC. Why not test some of his apps on Lisk?

[bbc.reporter]

I see somebody attempted to fight the market and tried to pump LSK. This is a big mistake because if the price continues to fall then he will have to dump to avoid a big loss making the price fall more again. Without market sentiment it is good to avoid doing anything for now.

[Mr.Pro]

I see somebody attempted to fight the market and tried to pump LSK. This is a big mistake because if the price continues to fall then he will have to dump to avoid a big loss making the price fall more again. Without market sentiment it is good to avoid doing anything for now.

How much cheap do you want? If you are dreaming that it will hit below ico price then you are wrong..

[starmman]

Hey I have a question about lowering the transaction fees.

Why would delegates agree to lower transaction fees? They'll suddenly receive less money unless the transaction volume goes up a lot.

Sure people could vote them out if they don't want to help, but it sounds pretty hard to get a majority, why is this not a problem?

The transaction fees were one of the reasons what put me off buying Lisk originally (other being the price at the time). If the price increases substantially they will have to drop or a number of smaller players will not even consider using Lisk due to the fees. It could be a barrier (or at lest braking factor) to growth. I understand it is important, but should it scale down with volume or price to keep the coin attractive and keep delegates happy?

[BTCwriter]

Lisk volume on POLO say it's about to pop the cherry
When it's happen these ETH, EAT, ETC craps will have no chance in crypto world. The volume and anticipation say it all.

[bbc.reporter]

I see somebody attempted to fight the market and tried to pump LSK. This is a big mistake because if the price continues to fall then he will have to dump to avoid a big loss making the price fall more again. Without market sentiment it is good to avoid doing anything for now.

How much cheap do you want? If you are dreaming that it will hit below ico price then you are wrong..

I am not saying anything of that sort. I am merely observing the LSK market and making a speculation. As I said fighting the market should not be done. You should save your money for now and patiently wait and observe the market.

[starmman]

Lisk volume on POLO say it's about to pop the cherry
When it's happen these ETH, EAT, ETC craps will have no chance in crypto world. The volume and anticipation say it all.

Lets see, can't see anything yet - but can certainly see a big list towards lisk (pun intended) once the result of ETH/ETC war has been decided. Neither may come off in good shape by the end of proceedings. The waters don't seem choppy yet this morning, but the markets haven't fully woken yet

[bitseedmike]

Hey I have a question about lowering the transaction fees.

Why would delegates agree to lower transaction fees? They'll suddenly receive less money unless the transaction volume goes up a lot.

Sure people could vote them out if they don't want to help, but it sounds pretty hard to get a majority, why is this not a problem?

The transaction fees were one of the reasons what put me off buying Lisk originally (other being the price at the time). If the price increases substantially they will have to drop or a number of smaller players will not even consider using Lisk due to the fees. It could be a barrier (or at lest braking factor) to growth. I understand it is important, but should it scale down with volume or price to keep the coin attractive and keep delegates happy?

Yes, this was set when it was assumed Lisk would be at a lot lower market value. Delegates are meant to be paid mainly from forging rewards, not fees, the reason for the flat fee instead of a percentage like Crypti, which had no forging rewards other than fees.

I would also like to see a much lower fee for naming accounts as well.

[starmman]

Hey I have a question about lowering the transaction fees.

Why would delegates agree to lower transaction fees? They'll suddenly receive less money unless the transaction volume goes up a lot.

Sure people could vote them out if they don't want to help, but it sounds pretty hard to get a majority, why is this not a problem?

The transaction fees were one of the reasons what put me off buying Lisk originally (other being the price at the time). If the price increases substantially they will have to drop or a number of smaller players will not even consider using Lisk due to the fees. It could be a barrier (or at lest braking factor) to growth. I understand it is important, but should it scale down with volume or price to keep the coin attractive and keep delegates happy?

Yes, this was set when it was assumed Lisk would be at a lot lower market value. Delegates are meant to be paid mainly from forging rewards, not fees, the reason for the flat fee instead of a percentage like Crypti, which had no forging rewards other than fees.

I would also like to see a much lower fee for naming accounts as well.

If it can be proven that the high transaction fee is a barrier to growth, and it wasn't designed to be this high, then I suspect that it would be in everybodies interest to reduce the fee. I wonder if the dev team and wider community agree and how easy it would be to alter.