|
allinbox
|
 |
May 16, 2016, 09:42:46 PM |
|
MP is approaching the 200 000 000 Bet Any promos for announced ?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to get the maximum amount of activity points possible, you just need to post once per day on average. Skipping days is OK as long as you maintain the average.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
allinbox
|
|
May 16, 2016, 09:50:53 PM |
|
I've noticed some users wait again a couple of hours for confirmations and the situation wont become better at all, blocksize most likely wont be changed next time. Please try to send all wd with high priority, ive seen even transactions without fees sent with high prio tho.
So I guess it would be a good idea to let the users decide themself how much transaction fee they want to send with.
I could think to just let them enter a number or give options with short "hint" like:
0 bits - Transaction will most likely take ~ 6 years to confirm
100 bits - Confirmation may take up to 6 blocks (~ 1 hour)
etc...
Some other sites already changed to 200 bits because this is gonna be the new standart it seems.
I think best would still be to let them completly decide how much they want to add, because everybody has different needs and some want it instant and others dont care when, as long as it arrives at some point.
|
|
|
|
Bitspenser
Member
 Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
|
|
May 16, 2016, 10:45:51 PM |
|
I've noticed some users wait again a couple of hours for confirmations and the situation wont become better at all, blocksize most likely wont be changed next time. Please try to send all wd with high priority, ive seen even transactions without fees sent with high prio tho.
So I guess it would be a good idea to let the users decide themself how much transaction fee they want to send with.
I could think to just let them enter a number or give options with short "hint" like:
0 bits - Transaction will most likely take ~ 6 years to confirm
100 bits - Confirmation may take up to 6 blocks (~ 1 hour)
etc...
Some other sites already changed to 200 bits because this is gonna be the new standart it seems.
I think best would still be to let them completly decide how much they want to add, because everybody has different needs and some want it instant and others dont care when, as long as it arrives at some point.
lol 6 years, don't forget that once a tx is in the mempool for a long amount of time, nodes will forget about it. Then people who are cheap and want to save in the fee with make scam accusations with crap like "my tx never confirmed!!!!!!!!!!!!! they double spent it because I can't find it in the network". I think custom fees are good, but with a 100 bit minimum. |
|
|
|
|
joksim299
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1014
Bitdice is scam scam scammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
|
|
May 17, 2016, 12:28:19 AM |
|
What about self-exclude option for desired app for desired time-frame?
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
 Online
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710
|
|
May 17, 2016, 01:49:00 AM |
|
I've noticed some users wait again a couple of hours for confirmations and the situation wont become better at all, blocksize most likely wont be changed next time. Please try to send all wd with high priority, ive seen even transactions without fees sent with high prio tho.
So I guess it would be a good idea to let the users decide themself how much transaction fee they want to send with.
I could think to just let them enter a number or give options with short "hint" like:
0 bits - Transaction will most likely take ~ 6 years to confirm
100 bits - Confirmation may take up to 6 blocks (~ 1 hour)
etc...
Some other sites already changed to 200 bits because this is gonna be the new standart it seems.
I think best would still be to let them completly decide how much they want to add, because everybody has different needs and some want it instant and others dont care when, as long as it arrives at some point.
lol 6 years, don't forget that once a tx is in the mempool for a long amount of time, nodes will forget about it. Then people who are cheap and want to save in the fee with make scam accusations with crap like "my tx never confirmed!!!!!!!!!!!!! they double spent it because I can't find it in the network". I think custom fees are good, but with a 100 bit minimum. Honestly those transaction will never confirm. I actually had to make a node forget a transaction because I sent a fee that was like 1/10th the regular fee by accident. Took about 2-3 weeks to get those BTC back. |
|
|
|
ranlo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1007
|
|
May 17, 2016, 03:14:22 AM |
|
I've noticed some users wait again a couple of hours for confirmations and the situation wont become better at all, blocksize most likely wont be changed next time. Please try to send all wd with high priority, ive seen even transactions without fees sent with high prio tho.
So I guess it would be a good idea to let the users decide themself how much transaction fee they want to send with.
I could think to just let them enter a number or give options with short "hint" like:
0 bits - Transaction will most likely take ~ 6 years to confirm
100 bits - Confirmation may take up to 6 blocks (~ 1 hour)
etc...
Some other sites already changed to 200 bits because this is gonna be the new standart it seems.
I think best would still be to let them completly decide how much they want to add, because everybody has different needs and some want it instant and others dont care when, as long as it arrives at some point.
lol 6 years, don't forget that once a tx is in the mempool for a long amount of time, nodes will forget about it. Then people who are cheap and want to save in the fee with make scam accusations with crap like "my tx never confirmed!!!!!!!!!!!!! they double spent it because I can't find it in the network". I think custom fees are good, but with a 100 bit minimum. Honestly those transaction will never confirm. I actually had to make a node forget a transaction because I sent a fee that was like 1/10th the regular fee by accident. Took about 2-3 weeks to get those BTC back. The client is supposed to reject/return after 48h... |
|
|
|
absy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1008
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
|
|
May 17, 2016, 04:10:44 AM |
|
I've noticed some users wait again a couple of hours for confirmations and the situation wont become better at all, blocksize most likely wont be changed next time. Please try to send all wd with high priority, ive seen even transactions without fees sent with high prio tho.
So I guess it would be a good idea to let the users decide themself how much transaction fee they want to send with.
I could think to just let them enter a number or give options with short "hint" like:
0 bits - Transaction will most likely take ~ 6 years to confirm
100 bits - Confirmation may take up to 6 blocks (~ 1 hour)
etc...
Some other sites already changed to 200 bits because this is gonna be the new standart it seems.
I think best would still be to let them completly decide how much they want to add, because everybody has different needs and some want it instant and others dont care when, as long as it arrives at some point.
lol 6 years, don't forget that once a tx is in the mempool for a long amount of time, nodes will forget about it. Then people who are cheap and want to save in the fee with make scam accusations with crap like "my tx never confirmed!!!!!!!!!!!!! they double spent it because I can't find it in the network". I think custom fees are good, but with a 100 bit minimum. Honestly those transaction will never confirm. I actually had to make a node forget a transaction because I sent a fee that was like 1/10th the regular fee by accident. Took about 2-3 weeks to get those BTC back. The client is supposed to reject/return after 48h... True , if your transaction doesn't get confirmed within 48 hours , then the client will reject it and you will receive your btc back in your wallet . But also , yes the confirmation takes a lot of time , Although i send a standard fee of 10k sats , sometimes i need to wait for more than a hour to recieve the coins. |
|
|
|
|
allinbox
|
|
May 17, 2016, 04:37:17 AM |
|
I've noticed some users wait again a couple of hours for confirmations and the situation wont become better at all, blocksize most likely wont be changed next time. Please try to send all wd with high priority, ive seen even transactions without fees sent with high prio tho.
So I guess it would be a good idea to let the users decide themself how much transaction fee they want to send with.
I could think to just let them enter a number or give options with short "hint" like:
0 bits - Transaction will most likely take ~ 6 years to confirm
100 bits - Confirmation may take up to 6 blocks (~ 1 hour)
etc...
Some other sites already changed to 200 bits because this is gonna be the new standart it seems.
I think best would still be to let them completly decide how much they want to add, because everybody has different needs and some want it instant and others dont care when, as long as it arrives at some point.
lol 6 years, don't forget that once a tx is in the mempool for a long amount of time, nodes will forget about it. Then people who are cheap and want to save in the fee with make scam accusations with crap like "my tx never confirmed!!!!!!!!!!!!! they double spent it because I can't find it in the network". I think custom fees are good, but with a 100 bit minimum. Honestly those transaction will never confirm. I actually had to make a node forget a transaction because I sent a fee that was like 1/10th the regular fee by accident. Took about 2-3 weeks to get those BTC back. The client is supposed to reject/return after 48h... Sadly this doesnt work in each case it seems... but at least you will get them back after some time. You could basically get "lucky" and few btc get stuck somewhere and when youre old and bitcoin is worth few bucks you get them back. Hopefully wont die because of a heartattack then XD |
|
|
|
JackpotRacer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1014
All Games incl Racer and Lottery game are Closed
|
|
May 17, 2016, 06:53:48 AM |
|
please check link for more details |
|
|
|
Helix61be
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
May 17, 2016, 01:07:52 PM |
|
Still no one that thinks its martingle strategy thats hitting the bankroll the past days?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capradina
|
|
May 17, 2016, 01:14:37 PM |
|
Still no one that thinks its martingle strategy thats hitting the bankroll the past days?
The strategy is good enough, just that it has a much greater risk of the profits obtained. I think the strategy is going to be used for those who do business who want the speed the introduction of its products. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
moneypot
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Official MoneyPot.com Account
|
|
May 18, 2016, 02:48:21 AM |
|
We have other users that have also lost large sums, that is true of every casino. The particular user you have mentioned makes up roughly 1/4 of our total volume, outside of the 50 BTC win that occurred a couple months ago MoneyPot's profit has been pretty consistent with what is expected. |
MoneyPot.com -- Your Bitcoin Gambling Wallet
|
|
|
shulio
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1016
|
|
May 18, 2016, 06:15:19 AM |
|
It is always funny to see a newly created account account that post such comment a minute after it was created and it could be coming from an unsatisfied competitior's shill account. Stop spreading FUD , moneypot is doing great so far, in few more years there could be more casino on their site |
|
|
|
|
Shogen
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 18, 2016, 06:28:03 AM |
|
Investor Profit is now at 180.9 btc, which I believe is an all-time high. Congrats to every investor and MP.
|
|
|
|
|
J_ROC
|
|
May 18, 2016, 06:30:47 AM |
|
idk probaly just a little hurt from a previous loss https://bit-exo.com all bets provably fair. |
|
|
|
taxmanmt5
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1024
|
|
May 18, 2016, 06:40:18 AM |
|
Molloype is a regular player and its not that he lost all at once.. its a cumulative loss i am sure The profit of a Network need not depend on single user there are peeps who are only in profits |
|
|
|
|
Helix61be
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
May 18, 2016, 06:41:09 AM |
|
I think you forget that investors profit is only a Part of the profit.... the real profit is 320 btc And a few casinos have been in the Red for a Long Time https://dicesites.com/moneypot |
|
|
|
|
|
BTCforJoe
|
|
May 18, 2016, 09:16:47 AM |
|
Molloype is a regular player and its not that he lost all at once.. its a cumulative loss i am sure The profit of a Network need not depend on single user there are peeps who are only in profits You're probably very correct. As soon below, that user joined 10 months ago. I doubt that he "just" lost 135. Idiot noobs and their FUD   We have other users that have also lost large sums, that is true of every casino. The particular user you have mentioned makes up roughly 1/4 of our total volume, outside of the 50 BTC win that occurred a couple months ago MoneyPot's profit has been pretty consistent with what is expected. I'm invested with several accounts on MoneyPot, and I've been tracking a steady growth on my investments. Better than any bank or savings account can accrue. Yes, I understand that there are risks involved with bankrolling MP, but for the past two months, now, my investments have been very fruitful. |
|
|
|
|
EngiNerd
|
|
May 18, 2016, 09:34:41 PM |
|
All that being said, still though...137 BTC is nearly $70,000 lost :-P Even if that was over 10 minutes or 10 months it'd still suck so bad, but I guess the size of the loss is directly proportional to the size of the bankroll  |
|
|
|
|
