[ANN][XRB]Cryptocurrency's killer app: RaiBlocks micropayments

[bruges]

That's interesting. Nano is on coinbase custody radar. As I understand it is coinbase wallet?
https://twitter.com/nano/status/1025494624654249984?s=19

[dorabuckest]

A project for me is exciting and new, I will look at this and looking forward to the project will be successful.

[LemonAndFriesOne]

What a bear market we are losing value consistently than it is really hard to know where it is bottom for this coin. Although the team is active but it didn't giving any relief to this coin to get recover or find the way to get stable.

I'm sure the team is thinking about what's best for this coin. Under these conditions, without knowing how far the Nano goes down, what I do is take the opportunity to buy Nano gradually every the price drops

It'll be a while before recovery, rebranding should have been done after a good base was established. The devs decided to follow the rest of rebranding trends at the time.

[almost30]

What a bear market we are losing value consistently than it is really hard to know where it is bottom for this coin. Although the team is active but it didn't giving any relief to this coin to get recover or find the way to get stable.

I'm sure the team is thinking about what's best for this coin. Under these conditions, without knowing how far the Nano goes down, what I do is take the opportunity to buy Nano gradually every the price drops

It'll be a while before recovery, rebranding should have been done after a good base was established. The devs decided to follow the rest of rebranding trends at the time.

i don't think the name has to do anything about low price . you should think twice .
i prefer ( NANO ) .

[bruges]

Nice summarizing of some key features of NANO.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/94hnf7/nano_the_currency_of_the_future/

[clixcoin]

Nice summarizing of some key features of NANO.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/94hnf7/nano_the_currency_of_the_future/

it means this is still bet of the year if we keep patience and show strong faith into this coin. This coin potentially looking very promising and in next rally it will get succeed to restored to new stable floor. Only strong hands will be the winners when it will reach at good floor.

[LemonAndFriesOne]

What a bear market we are losing value consistently than it is really hard to know where it is bottom for this coin. Although the team is active but it didn't giving any relief to this coin to get recover or find the way to get stable.

I'm sure the team is thinking about what's best for this coin. Under these conditions, without knowing how far the Nano goes down, what I do is take the opportunity to buy Nano gradually every the price drops

It'll be a while before recovery, rebranding should have been done after a good base was established. The devs decided to follow the rest of rebranding trends at the time.

i don't think the name has to do anything about low price . you should think twice .
i prefer ( NANO ) .

The price dip during rebranding speaks for itself.

[Victory33]

That's interesting. Nano is on coinbase custody radar. As I understand it is coinbase wallet?
https://twitter.com/nano/status/1025494624654249984?s=19

That's very nice news! Coinbase adds Ethereum Classic and it's huge step forward for that project. I hope they will choose NANO next as a project with unique code and really huge community!

[Lucius]

I will say this now and will say it again like before:

Devs should have kept the name RaiBlocks. It was good, unique and catchy. Nano is just basic. Big mistake rebranding and not being consistent with rebranding everything related to RaiBlocks.

I can only say that RaiBlocks was unique name and I like it, Nano is as you say fairly simple, generic name and does not reflect anything unique - we have hardware wallet Ledger Nano and we have some Japanese American singer with the same name.

But I do not think that the reason for such low price is in the rebranding, main reason is BitGrail hack and fact that thousands have lost coins there and not only coins but trust in the project. Also we've seen the evidence that someone was selling large quantities of Nano in last few months, more supply then demand and current BTC price = we get what we have now.

That's interesting. Nano is on coinbase custody radar. As I understand it is coinbase wallet?
https://twitter.com/nano/status/1025494624654249984?s=19

It is a service by Coinbase which offer safe storing of coins, and it is intended for institutional clients. Nano is just one of the coins which are under consideration. It has nothing to do with their exchange service or simply said Nano is not in the plan to be listed on Coinbase exchange for now.

[irwanjabryg]

How many successful businesses are successful with an unfinished product?  You need a better grasp of the timescales of cryptos and the technology involved it seems. Why not go to a crypto that puts marketing first then if thats what you prefer? Me personally, I believe its better to get solid foundations right first.  The devs have enough funds to keep development going, you need to look at the long term picture, the price fluctuations now are not important to Nanos future.

[cubonho2k]

Whew. Been waiting for months to go all in on XRB, but never in a few years did I think it would drop back to a dollar.

My condolences to anyone who bought the coin too soon. Looks like an aggressive fund or two wants all the XRB, and is willing to drive out all hope of recovery.

Theres not enough to go around at 1 dollar and anyone captiluating with a 90%+ loss is an idiot.

Bring out your dead

I also think that looks like an active fund or two want all the XRB, and ready to drive out all hope of recovery.And buying a lot of coins soon was a loss

[LemonAndFriesOne]

I will say this now and will say it again like before:

Devs should have kept the name RaiBlocks. It was good, unique and catchy. Nano is just basic. Big mistake rebranding and not being consistent with rebranding everything related to RaiBlocks.

I can only say that RaiBlocks was unique name and I like it, Nano is as you say fairly simple, generic name and does not reflect anything unique - we have hardware wallet Ledger Nano and we have some Japanese American singer with the same name.

But I do not think that the reason for such low price is in the rebranding, main reason is BitGrail hack and fact that thousands have lost coins there and not only coins but trust in the project. Also we've seen the evidence that someone was selling large quantities of Nano in last few months, more supply then demand and current BTC price = we get what we have now.

That's interesting. Nano is on coinbase custody radar. As I understand it is coinbase wallet?
https://twitter.com/nano/status/1025494624654249984?s=19

It is a service by Coinbase which offer safe storing of coins, and it is intended for institutional clients. Nano is just one of the coins which are under consideration. It has nothing to do with their exchange service or simply said Nano is not in the plan to be listed on Coinbase exchange for now.

You have very good points there, some of us got a lot of free Raiblocks during the faucet phase. Some even hired workers to do the clicking so it makes sense some of the coins will be dumped in phases during highs.

[kamiyama]

Developer Update: 8/6/2018

https://medium.com/nanocurrency/developer-update-8-6-2018-86e244ba4c7e?platform=hootsuite

[degelio]

What a bear market we are losing value consistently than it is really hard to know where it is bottom for this coin. Although the team is active but it didn't giving any relief to this coin to get recover or find the way to get stable.

I'm sure the team is thinking about what's best for this coin. Under these conditions, without knowing how far the Nano goes down, what I do is take the opportunity to buy Nano gradually every the price drops

It'll be a while before recovery, rebranding should have been done after a good base was established. The devs decided to follow the rest of rebranding trends at the time.

i don't think the name has to do anything about low price . you should think twice .
i prefer ( NANO ) .

The price dip during rebranding speaks for itself.

if the project accomplishes all its objectives and the cryptocurrency has real uses in the real world i don't care if it's named shitblocks, people will use it and the value will increase, the important thing is a good development, in this case in my opinion the best features of nano is no transaction fees and fast transactions, Bitcoin is the king but if want to buy a coffe i think nano is better option

[wilberthh]

I'm seriously confused as of why this project is HIGHLY UNDERVALUED. Take a look at paypal, super expensive fees even when receiving money from others (my last fee was $6+ from people out of my country) while NANO in the other hand is completely feeless. Nano should be the universal payment method actually.

NANO is x100 times better than paypal in every aspects possible (kinda biased but well it's a fact, for me). The price is seriously madness right now, $2 for a gem? holy crap..

What do you guys might have driven the price to this low? any idea guys?

[almost30]

I'm seriously confused as of why this project is HIGHLY UNDERVALUED. Take a look at paypal, super expensive fees even when receiving money from others (my last fee was $6+ from people out of my country) while NANO in the other hand is completely feeless. Nano should be the universal payment method actually.

NANO is x100 times better than paypal in every aspects possible (kinda biased but well it's a fact, for me). The price is seriously madness right now, $2 for a gem? holy crap..

What do you guys might have driven the price to this low? any idea guys?

 

:



I can only say that RaiBlocks was unique name and I like it, Nano is as you say fairly simple, generic name and does not reflect anything unique - we have hardware wallet Ledger Nano and we have some Japanese American singer with the same name.

But I do not think that the reason for such low price is in the rebranding, main reason is BitGrail hack and fact that thousands have lost coins there and not only coins but trust in the project. Also we've seen the evidence that someone was selling large quantities of Nano in last few months, more supply then demand and current BTC price = we get what we have now.

 

[petushka]

Really love this feature https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBJvMTn0_jM
Have anyone read about this https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/94lx28/distributed_nano_pow_subscription_system/?sort=old ? Nice to see the team is working on different solutions. What do you think on this specific one?

[kamiyama]

https://twitter.com/LBXSocial/status/1026743369706418176

LBX and @NANO are delighted to offer the world’s first NANO/GBP pair!

To celebrate this partnership we have launched a London treasure hunt - with the chance to win a Ledger Nano containing £5,000 of NANO!

#RealCryptoHunt $Nano $NANOGBP

Read more here; http://www.lbx.com/RealCryptoHunt

[bitcircle]

Really love this feature https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBJvMTn0_jM
Have anyone read about this https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/94lx28/distributed_nano_pow_subscription_system/?sort=old ? Nice to see the team is working on different solutions. What do you think on this specific one?

Agreed with you this is good stuff to understand about this ecosystem and how this will resolve some issues. I believe in future this tech will reach to its potential and thanks for sharing this with us.

[almost30]

Really love this feature https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBJvMTn0_jM
Have anyone read about this https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/94lx28/distributed_nano_pow_subscription_system/?sort=old ? Nice to see the team is working on different solutions. What do you think on this specific one?

 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WAOxKOmR90