CryptoKuv
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 28, 2018, 01:30:09 AM |
|
>Nano has 756 TPS [1]. For a self-proclaimed global currency, it’s a total joke. VISA can handle over 56,000 TPS [2]. Nano’s claim to be global currency is either delusional or fraud.
>7,000 TPS was boosted and promoted in Dec 2017. Reality, a meagre 100-200 TPS [3].
>Lead Devs are jumping ship. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and future problems.
>Millions of USD sold from the Nano Developer Wallet lately at extremely low prices. Not a good sign that Devs are dumping Nano in fire sale [4].
>Dev fund is dangerously low, they may burn through that in a matter of 1-3 years [4]. Also; pending lawsuit against Nano foundation.
>Constant node issues. Withdrawals/deposits suspended on several exchanges due to security and stability issues, multiple times, every single month. This despite being miles behind having any sort of global currency traffic. Nano could be years away from even having the potential to be a well-functioning global currency. One example from today [5].
>Coinbase will only use coins stable for multiple months. Nano is far away from that, see above and [5]. Best case scenario is having Nano on Coinbase late 2019, leaving Nano hopelessly behind other cryptocurrencies.
>One single miner can destroy the network via DDoS with 500 GPUs at no cost. A critical attack vector never seriously addressed by the Nano dev team. Nano is wide open for a massive spam attack crippling the network for a long time. Not ready for global adoption.
>Nano team seem like tech amateurs. Don’t understand the difference between Random (not cryptographically secure) and SecureRandom. Don’t even understand basic cryptography, disaster in waiting.
>Nano team marketing strategy is to have no marketing strategy.
>Nano team adoption strategy is to have no adoption strategy. Doomed. Will go to zero.
>Nano essentially following same strategy as Betamax vs VHS and HD vs BluRay.
>First coin on Amazon/eBay/etc will be the global currency. Nano’s avoiding partnership. Nano’s publicly stated “strategy” is to not seek strategic partnership, basis being that USD has no partnership as a currency, so why should Nano have one. Ridiculous.
>No smart contracts. Masternode coins utilising high capacity data contracts on their second layer are the future. Nano can't do any of this, it cannot compete with other coins.
>Must run expensive nodes for free. A borderline insane and untested business model.
>Nano team are business amateurs. Pushed BitGrail when clearly a dangerous exchange. Guaranteed bomber as a good guy. Rebranded to Nano right before BitGrail exploded. Retarded decision. Marketing disaster.
>Going from UDP to TCP too late and too slowly [6]
>Hired pretty girl, G. Coxton, who’s done nothing. Why’s she not on YouTube pushing Nano?
>Nano has no ‘human face’ for people to connect with. It’s just an empty logo, unlike other top 10 coins – e.g. Ethereum has Vitalik, Tron has Justin Sun, Litecoin had Charlie Lee. NEO has Da Hong Fei. EOS has Dan L. etc.
>Ongoing lawsuits against Nano Devs personally and Nano foundation. Will drive price down, could go bankrupt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
almost30
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2018, 01:36:53 AM |
|
>Nano has 756 TPS [1]. For a self-proclaimed global currency, it’s a total joke. VISA can handle over 56,000 TPS [2]. Nano’s claim to be global currency is either delusional or fraud.
>7,000 TPS was boosted and promoted in Dec 2017. Reality, a meagre 100-200 TPS [3].
>Lead Devs are jumping ship. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and future problems.
>Millions of USD sold from the Nano Developer Wallet lately at extremely low prices. Not a good sign that Devs are dumping Nano in fire sale [4].
>Dev fund is dangerously low, they may burn through that in a matter of 1-3 years [4]. Also; pending lawsuit against Nano foundation.
>Constant node issues. Withdrawals/deposits suspended on several exchanges due to security and stability issues, multiple times, every single month. This despite being miles behind having any sort of global currency traffic. Nano could be years away from even having the potential to be a well-functioning global currency. One example from today [5].
>Coinbase will only use coins stable for multiple months. Nano is far away from that, see above and [5]. Best case scenario is having Nano on Coinbase late 2019, leaving Nano hopelessly behind other cryptocurrencies.
>One single miner can destroy the network via DDoS with 500 GPUs at no cost. A critical attack vector never seriously addressed by the Nano dev team. Nano is wide open for a massive spam attack crippling the network for a long time. Not ready for global adoption.
>Nano team seem like tech amateurs. Don’t understand the difference between Random (not cryptographically secure) and SecureRandom. Don’t even understand basic cryptography, disaster in waiting.
okay little boy, i am going to selling my coins, right now < panic > ohh i forgot , there an ignore button right Next to your name . |
|
|
|
|
CryptoKuv
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2018, 01:53:00 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
almost30
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2018, 03:22:59 AM |
|
Great . 
|
|
|
|
|
scambust
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
|
|
August 28, 2018, 10:26:10 AM |
|
OMG. Same old game of fudding. Stop explaining price rallies with your stupid assumptions. The price chart shows the truth, learn to read it.
|
|
|
|
|
cryptodv
|
|
August 28, 2018, 01:11:33 PM |
|
Dude, I just checked your profile. All of your posts have been nothing but FUD against $NANO, especially Colin. Did you lose your coins in the Bitgrail fiasco? Are you upset at the fact that they didn't fork $NANO as Bomber wanted to? If so, you should of just bought some more when $NANO was around $.80 cents. It's part of the game, learn your lesson and move on. |
|
|
|
|
petushka
|
|
August 28, 2018, 03:23:07 PM |
|
We're on top5 volume and top3 gainers on Binance. Has there been an announcement or is this just FOMO?
great project and still at cheap price , Nano was $37 recovering faster than most other projects I would not say it's cheap, we can never predict investments movement. But for sure this is a matter of time, adoptions and organic growth and being a perfect payment tool nano can easily get into top 5. |
|
|
|
|
almost30
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2018, 04:41:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samarkand
|
|
August 28, 2018, 04:50:42 PM |
|
Nano In future   a golden future The chart that you posted shows the price development of Gold before and after the introduction of Gold ETFs. There won´t be an ETF for XRB ever therefore it is highly laughable that you try to compare these charts. We won´t even see a Bitcoin ETF for years and XRB is way too unknown to be the base for financial products like an ETF. |
|
|
|
|
almost30
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2018, 05:16:12 PM |
|
Nano In future a golden future The chart that you posted shows the price development of Gold before and after the introduction of Gold ETFs. There won´t be an ETF for XRB ever therefore it is highly laughable that you try to compare these charts. We won´t even see a Bitcoin ETF for years and XRB is way too unknown to be the base for financial products like an ETF. yes i know . these charts look similar to me . i am a believer in Nano Future and the team behind the project. |
|
|
|
|
LemonAndFriesOne
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 28, 2018, 05:34:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
almost30
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2018, 08:39:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cryptodv
|
|
August 29, 2018, 01:27:37 AM |
|
Nano In future a golden future Close, but not quite... Nice try though. Anything to get this party started.  |
|
|
|
almost30
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 0
|
|
August 29, 2018, 02:01:41 AM
Last edit: August 29, 2018, 02:30:37 AM by almost30 |
|
Close, but not quite... Nice try though. Anything to get this party started. The party is already started My friend . Now we are taking a break for quite some time . |
|
|
|
|
onirecon2018
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 2
|
|
August 29, 2018, 03:37:01 AM |
|
The RaiBlocks node’s RPC protocol appears relatively mature while the protocol itself is simple with without a mechanism to neither automatically reject payment nor capture timestamps on transactions. Everything aside, BrainBlocks WooCommerce Plugin is another high.
|
|
|
|
|
|
petushka
|
|
August 29, 2018, 10:16:50 AM |
|
It's ridiculous, once some project achieves a positive results someone definitely starts trying to discredit it. Nano is a good solution which deserves recognition with no regard for all these exchanges issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simss
|
|
August 30, 2018, 12:47:12 AM |
|
What I predict is that in the future merchants in 1st world countries will accept USD pegged stablecoins for payment because they care about cash flow management more than they care about inflation, and merchants in emerging markets with high inflation will accept free floating crypto like NANO or other coins. Either way the cost of transaction fees or running a NANO node will be way cheaper than paying fees to VISA/MC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
petushka
|
|
August 30, 2018, 07:36:11 AM |
|
Developing countries is one of the most perspective directions for cryptocurrencies. I'd suggest the team to think on lending nano platform backed by authorities. It requires lots of work but would be great achievement. |
|
|
|
|
Piston Honda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1064
Juicin' crypto
|
|
August 30, 2018, 01:21:47 PM |
|
i see nano is doing great.....................................................  LOL rekt |
$ADK ~ watch & learn...
|
|
|
|
