WAVES. Ultimate crypto-tokens blockchain platform.

[b1007]

how much one can earn with the signature?

=>

1) The stakes will be distributed weekly to the participants

2) All members need to post at least 50 posts by the time the ICO ends to be eligible for a reward. This means that members participating today have 9 weeks to meet the criteria, while last week ones have only one week.
 
3) The stakes will be distributed weekly in the following ratio:
Legendary/Hero : 2 Stakes
Sr./Full : 1.5 stakes
Member: 1 Stake

4) The whole bounty pool will be divided among the participants proportionally to the amount of their stakes. If, by the end of the ICO, we have 1000 stakes, then each stake will be worth 300 Waves.

[URL: https://blog.wavesplatform.com/signature-campaign-details-e66628f761bf#.p6szqf1ce]

yes but how much is one stake in bitcoin term?

There is no way to tell until after ICO and the Signature campaign is over with to see how many people sign up.

It's the irony, the more you promote Waves platform the more Waves tokens you will receive, but the more Waves platform is promoted the more people will claim Waves tokens and so less tokens are available for the individual participants.

Good distribution.

True, will Waves tokens also have other functionalities in the future than the ones that are currently known? like I don't know, turn them into some sort of store of value or anything?

[buddu]

Wow, the website looks awesome!

http://ico.wavesplatform.com/

The waves effect is so good

Really awesome and great piece of work.It is called professional work.Just gave it a visit to see how it looks like.I am also raising some money to get bonus of first day.Hopefully this time I will be on time there in this ICO.

[Pietpiraat]

When the ICO ends how long with it take before it hits an exchange ??

[cienki7]

When the ICO ends how long with it take before it hits an exchange ??

Waves ICO will commence on April 12, 2016 and end on May 31, 2016

[Msile]

So I followed the Twitter, how do I like, make sure I get a part of the bounty?

[colombuszka]

Hungarian thread is updated with the new infos.

[MagicIsMe]

I've noticed that the Filipino translation is sloppy and might have used Google Translate. Please confirm with Imnotoctopus that this is a manual translation.

(I can tell the difference as a native speaker. )

[bezbezbez]

So I followed the Twitter, how do I like, make sure I get a part of the bounty?

you will confirm your social accounts on ico site, it will be ready during the ico, as for signature excel https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1RO52N5rh0-vu1DDzlBYdPjgq6w0YgmrKnJP6I8Nphfg/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=1340336905

[mxxxxxx]

Some more info:

seebettor - Ben (wavesplatform) BOT [2:28 AM]
I've done some reading. I'm intrigued on the idea of a decentralized efficient trading platform that works with, rather than against, fiat currencies. I want to invest in the potential success of this. However, I'm still at a loss for attempting to model in my mind, and makes some speculative volume guesses, and understand exactly how the tokens of value we buy at ICO, how they make this system work, in which ways they are used. Are trades paid for and executed in a decentralized way incentivised by the trader spending the tokens to complete a trade, the miner confirming execution of the trade and earning? What else, voting? Please help me understand this better.

sasha35625 (wavesplatform) BOT [2:44 AM]
Hi, welcome

[2:44]
you pay with WAVES tokens for everything you do on Waves blockchain, including trading, tokens or fiat transfer etc

[2:45]
in a way it's like ether in Ethereum. you can't do without

seebettor - Ben (wavesplatform) BOT [3:29 AM]
Hi. Thank you for the explanation. How would I begin to model what that is like. What I mean specifically, is how do I grasp how much each type of 'everything done on Waves' costs? Ethereum, I believe this is set by miners, through competition, market driven. On Lisk, I believe the prices are set by the Dapp (which concerns me btw). How do I begin to grasp whether making a trade or fiat transfer or the many things that Waves can do, how do I make somewhat of a guess at whether this costs me .00001 Wave Tokens or .001 Waves Tokens?

leandro [6:44 AM]
@sasha35625:  what is the diference betwen  Waves and Ethereum?

sasha35625 (wavesplatform) BOT [10:03 AM]
@leandro We are just the opposite to ETH probably.  What they do is develop Bitcoin scripting, do everything using contracts, it's very fundamental but makes certain things very complicated. We took another road, where things are simpler, very easy to add all functionality you need using plug-ins, don't have to code complicated contracts. Also our focus is on mass adoption, we're specifically target two markets : fiat transfers on blockchain and crowdfunding on blockchain. They are very ripe for disruption, and we'll be offering a product for a very general audience, basically the main end-user client is just a plugin you can install from Chrome or FF store

fern [10:04 AM]
How long will transactions take?

sasha35625 (wavesplatform) BOT [10:08 AM]
in mainmet 1.0 ~ 30 sec.  after that there'll be a fork,  the transactions time will lie in 1 sec range. don't want to have it at launch,  first the focus is on custom tokens, decentralized trading etc.

sasha35625 (wavesplatform) BOT [10:09 AM]
for 1 sec tx's some new POS is going to be implemented, LPOS, where lite node choose a full node to lease their balance to, they still receive the rewards, but the transactions become much faster

[10:10]
due to the fact that only full nodes process them effectively

sasha35625 (wavesplatform) BOT [10:17 AM]
@seebettor:  we will have fixed fees at launch, with 90%  probability. would like to launch faster. then yes, there'll be competition between the nodes that process the transactions

[Breasal]

I read the entire OP and saw nothing about escrow.

Please tell me that all BTC invested during the ICO will be escrowed and if something goes off kilter during the ICO, will BTC will be returned?

[mxxxxxx]

I read the entire OP and saw nothing about escrow.

Please tell me that all BTC invested during the ICO will be escrowed and if something goes off kilter during the ICO, will BTC will be returned?

Yes, crowdfunding funds will be escrowed, 3 great partners, will be announced soon.

[Breasal]

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

[Breasal]

I read the entire OP and saw nothing about escrow.

Please tell me that all BTC invested during the ICO will be escrowed and if something goes off kilter during the ICO, will BTC will be returned?

Yes, crowdfunding funds will be escrowed, 3 great partners, will be announced soon.

Great, thanks!

One more question: will I be able to send ICO BTC from a non-signable wallet (i.e. Coinbase) or will blockchain.io be preferable?

[mxxxxxx]

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

I think you are asking in wrong thread

vanbreuk (sprnt) BOT [9:00 PM]

[9:01]
Multigateway (or an equivalent development over Waves) would require coding work to be adapted for Waves, it's not a matter of server configuration only since the Nxt API is deeply ingrained in it. But of course a Waves MGW is an interesting idea to consider.

[sasha35625]

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

MGW is working fine actually now
we have on our team the admin who supports it at the moment
actually the software is not so complicated, we'll make it work perfectly.

[Breasal]

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

I think you are asking in wrong thread

vanbreuk (sprnt) BOT [9:00 PM]

[9:01]
Multigateway (or an equivalent development over Waves) would require coding work to be adapted for Waves, it's not a matter of server configuration only since the Nxt API is deeply ingrained in it. But of course a Waves MGW is an interesting idea to consider.

Well the OP mentioned that the MGW idea would be used. I guess this means a new codebase for the MGW will be coded from scratch for waves?

[Breasal]

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

MGW is working fine actually now
we have on our team the admin who supports it at the moment
actually the software is not so complicated, we'll make it work perfectly.

nothing is perfect. But an improvement over MGW would suffice, I guess.

[mxxxxxx]

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

I think you are asking in wrong thread

vanbreuk (sprnt) BOT [9:00 PM]

[9:01]
Multigateway (or an equivalent development over Waves) would require coding work to be adapted for Waves, it's not a matter of server configuration only since the Nxt API is deeply ingrained in it. But of course a Waves MGW is an interesting idea to consider.

Well the OP mentioned that the MGW idea would be used. I guess this means a new codebase for the MGW will be coded from scratch for waves?

Two options - MGW can be configured/modified for Waves what would enable influx of other cryptos into system or equivalent development will follow

[kalgecin]

This is my first post I have joined this awesome sig campaign. How do we get the money afterwards?

Thanks

[Breasal]

Last I checked up on SuperNET, the MGW has a history of being very squeaky and has to be "force fed" every few days when requests get stuck server-side. Have you guys improved the current implementation of MGW for launch? If so, what have you done to improve the current problems? How many servers will be used initially for the MGW?

Thanks.

I think you are asking in wrong thread

vanbreuk (sprnt) BOT [9:00 PM]

[9:01]
Multigateway (or an equivalent development over Waves) would require coding work to be adapted for Waves, it's not a matter of server configuration only since the Nxt API is deeply ingrained in it. But of course a Waves MGW is an interesting idea to consider.

Well the OP mentioned that the MGW idea would be used. I guess this means a new codebase for the MGW will be coded from scratch for waves?

Two options - MGW can be configured/modified for Waves what would enable influx of other cryptos into system or equivalent development will follow

Thanks mxxxxxx.

One final Q: will Coinbase be okay to send BTC for ICO or will a signable wallet be required?