Balthazar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 11, 2013, 11:40:29 PM |
|
Looks like it either has problem with cgminer, or it has problem with getwork for solo mining. Blocks are being rejected due to wrong hash submitted via getwork. Balthazar, are you sure that getwork is properly supported? Have you tested with cgminer?
I think that it's result of 120s expire time, which is default value for cgminer and hard-coded value for reaper. I seen people which mined it at 4-8 mh/s... Of course, they got stales, but stales rate not so dramatic. There is no magic. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) P.S. Tested it with reaper at diff 0.0004, got almost 100% of stales... Then I switched to cgminer with -E 1 and got "only" 55% stales at this difficulty. P.P.S. Target is 6 blocks per hour (like PPC and Bitcoin), so situation will normalize in near future.
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 11, 2013, 11:56:47 PM |
|
I have successfully mined a block using getwork. I am now testing artforz's fork of pushpool https://github.com/ArtForz/pushpoolFor blkmon, I use: #!/usr/bin/env python from jsonrpc.authproxy import AuthServiceProxy import sys import os
access = AuthServiceProxy("http://RPCUSER:RPCPASS@127.0.0.1:8332") blockcount = access.getblockcount() from time import sleep while(True): newcount = access.getblockcount() if newcount > blockcount: os.system("killall -s SIGUSR1 pushpoold") sys.stdout.write("B") sys.stdout.flush() blockcount = newcount sleep(1) else: sleep(0.1)
Credit due to metonymous in https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=8797.0
|
|
|
|
Balthazar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2013, 12:08:22 AM |
|
There is a -blocknotify=/path/to/your/script.sh option, you can use it instead of blkmond. script.sh will be executed for each new block event.
|
|
|
|
xorxor (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2013, 12:11:05 AM Last edit: February 12, 2013, 03:25:57 PM by xorxor |
|
ok, ill try once again.
solo mining 4500kh/s with cgminer -E 1
/edit:
blocks being found,
solution is public, 4848 blocks and 249097.89 coins, February 12, 2013, 02:09:34 AM
/edit2:
pool works again, noticed some bugs fixed also.
|
fuck deeponion, fuck bitcoincash, all glory to one BITCOIN
|
|
|
Zedster
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2013, 09:42:18 PM |
|
Having serious problems connecting to nova pool. Did as site instructed but get no connection. And I guess i am not clever enough to figure out how to solo for NVC
|
|
|
|
Balthazar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2013, 10:03:05 PM |
|
2013-02-13 01:46:08.388212 Pool: 80659H/s Stale rate: 0.0% Expected time to block: 2.3 days Currently working on patches for p2pool... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2013, 10:08:42 PM |
|
2013-02-13 01:46:08.388212 Pool: 80659H/s Stale rate: 0.0% Expected time to block: 2.3 days Currently working on patches for p2pool... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Good idea. Are you adding it to both the SHA256 and scrypt sides? How about also adding merged mining? On the scrypt side that would be a first, and people would have something to merged-mine alongside litecoin. Though personally I am more interested in the merging with the SHA256 side. -MarkM-
|
|
|
|
Balthazar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2013, 10:53:03 PM |
|
2013-02-13 01:46:08.388212 Pool: 80659H/s Stale rate: 0.0% Expected time to block: 2.3 days Currently working on patches for p2pool... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Good idea. Are you adding it to both the SHA256 and scrypt sides? How about also adding merged mining? On the scrypt side that would be a first, and people would have something to merged-mine alongside litecoin. Though personally I am more interested in the merging with the SHA256 side. -MarkM- Hm... By the "SHA256 side" you mean PPCoin?
|
|
|
|
Zedster
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2013, 10:58:46 PM |
|
Actually I got up solo mining. More to see if I could.
|
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2013, 11:02:23 PM |
|
Hm... By the "SHA256 side" you mean PPCoin?
Oh never mind I was thinking of RUCoin - both types of hashing. All you Russian coins look alike hahahahah. But adding it to PPCoin as well would be nice, sure. -MarkM-
|
|
|
|
Balthazar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 12, 2013, 11:34:26 PM |
|
I was thinking of RUCoin - both types of hashing. All you Russian coins look alike hahahahah.
I remember only one such ridiculous fork, it's rucoin. Not sure what are you talking about. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
smoothie
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1473
LEALANA Bitcoin Grim Reaper
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 13, 2013, 12:59:07 AM |
|
I was thinking of RUCoin - both types of hashing. All you Russian coins look alike hahahahah.
I remember only one such ridiculous fork, it's rucoin. Not sure what are you talking about. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Potato, Potahtoe...same difference lol
|
███████████████████████████████████████
,╓p@@███████@╗╖, ,p████████████████████N, d█████████████████████████b d██████████████████████████████æ ,████²█████████████████████████████, ,█████ ╙████████████████████╨ █████y ██████ `████████████████` ██████ ║██████ Ñ███████████` ███████ ███████ ╩██████Ñ ███████ ███████ ▐▄ ²██╩ a▌ ███████ ╢██████ ▐▓█▄ ▄█▓▌ ███████ ██████ ▐▓▓▓▓▌, ▄█▓▓▓▌ ██████─ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌ ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─ ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩ ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀ ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀` ²²² ███████████████████████████████████████
| . ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM My PGP fingerprint is A764D833. History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ . LEALANA BITCOIN GRIM REAPER SILVER COINS. |
|
|
|
Balthazar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 13, 2013, 05:06:18 AM Last edit: February 13, 2013, 05:25:04 AM by Balthazar |
|
I was thinking of RUCoin - both types of hashing. All you Russian coins look alike hahahahah.
I remember only one such ridiculous fork, it's rucoin. Not sure what are you talking about. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Potato, Potahtoe...same difference lol Try again better, and then I'll pay you 0.1 btc. Your trolling skill not so good, as we can see.
|
|
|
|
dreamwatcher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 13, 2013, 05:40:59 AM |
|
Novacoin suffers the same issue as PPCoin did with the base58.h file. My commit merged into the PPCoin official development Tree allows Vanitygen private addresses to be imported. This also corrects the Base58 private key version the daemon produces when dumping a private key. https://github.com/Hartland/ppcoin The patch file should work exactly the same in Novacoin, with no changes needed. I can fork and request a pull, or the Novacoin developers can just patch it themselves, either way is OK with me. Vanitygen will need -X 08 switch to produce Novacoin addresses. First digit of the pattern must be "4". ./vanitygen -i -X 08 4eee Difficulty: 19627 Pattern: 4eee Address: 4EEEQXVTLYCTBTMG5hcYM93crXUmTEfaFN Privkey: <private key redacted>
|
|
|
|
Zedster
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 13, 2013, 05:47:54 AM |
|
Been solo mining for a few hours now. All my found blocks are being rejected. Used -E 1 fro cgminer but still no joy. Any ideas?
|
|
|
|
xorxor (OP)
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 13, 2013, 06:29:09 AM |
|
Been solo mining for a few hours now. All my found blocks are being rejected. Used -E 1 fro cgminer but still no joy. Any ideas?
post screen or log , maybe diff<target only "BLOCK!! on pool 0 " are real finds
|
fuck deeponion, fuck bitcoincash, all glory to one BITCOIN
|
|
|
Balthazar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 13, 2013, 08:00:32 AM |
|
Novacoin suffers the same issue as PPCoin did with the base58.h file. My commit merged into the PPCoin official development Tree allows Vanitygen private addresses to be imported. This also corrects the Base58 private key version the daemon produces when dumping a private key. https://github.com/Hartland/ppcoin The patch file should work exactly the same in Novacoin, with no changes needed. I can fork and request a pull, or the Novacoin developers can just patch it themselves, either way is OK with me. Vanitygen will need -X 08 switch to produce Novacoin addresses. First digit of the pattern must be "4". ./vanitygen -i -X 08 4eee Difficulty: 19627 Pattern: 4eee Address: 4EEEQXVTLYCTBTMG5hcYM93crXUmTEfaFN Privkey: <private key redacted> You can create pull request and I'll merge it. Thank you ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
Zedster
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 13, 2013, 09:12:37 AM |
|
Been solo mining for a few hours now. All my found blocks are being rejected. Used -E 1 fro cgminer but still no joy. Any ideas?
post screen or log , maybe diff<target only "BLOCK!! on pool 0 " are real finds From what little I understand that you said. I am still confused. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fimg833.imageshack.us%2Fimg833%2F2449%2Fscreenie1lb.jpg&t=665&c=4FufkLM2FarkKQ) Uploaded with ImageShack.us
|
|
|
|
K1773R
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1008
/dev/null
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 13, 2013, 09:19:14 AM |
|
Been solo mining for a few hours now. All my found blocks are being rejected. Used -E 1 fro cgminer but still no joy. Any ideas?
post screen or log , maybe diff<target only "BLOCK!! on pool 0 " are real finds From what little I understand that you said. I am still confused. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fanonymouse.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fanon-www.cgi%2Fhttp%3A%2F%2Fimg833.imageshack.us%2Fimg833%2F2449%2Fscreenie1lb.jpg&t=665&c=bi3gkMpFgrdo4Q) Uploaded with ImageShack.uswinblows ppl dont get the difference between scrypt and sha256d lol
|
[GPG Public Key]BTC/DVC/TRC/FRC: 1 K1773RbXRZVRQSSXe9N6N2MUFERvrdu6y ANC/XPM A K1773RTmRKtvbKBCrUu95UQg5iegrqyeA NMC: N K1773Rzv8b4ugmCgX789PbjewA9fL9Dy1 LTC: L Ki773RBuPepQH8E6Zb1ponoCvgbU7hHmd EMC: E K1773RxUes1HX1YAGMZ1xVYBBRUCqfDoF BQC: b K1773R1APJz4yTgRkmdKQhjhiMyQpJgfN
|
|
|
Zedster
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 13, 2013, 09:21:25 AM Last edit: February 13, 2013, 10:38:39 AM by Zedster |
|
winblows ppl dont get the difference between scrypt and sha256d lol
Yes my ignorance abounds. Thank you for the helpful insight. And thanks to your insight I figured it out.
|
|
|
|
|