[ANN] ION [ION] | POS 3.0 | Mobile Gaming | Join the ionomy today!

[o0o0]

Proposal to Inrease Number of Masternodes to Improve the Network Stability

Proposal #4 would see the collateral needed for a masternode size cut by 50%. If this proposal is agreed upon, everyone with a masternode now would then be able to have 2. This would double the ION masternode network and lower the threshold for others interesting in hosting which is essential to “protect profitability and make sure the network can achieve what it needs to achieve to drive the protocol level value of ION as a whole.” Combined with proposal #3 these updates have the potential to rocket ION beyond its imagined destination.

awesome.... timelock coins and let the devs double their masternodes with their premine. block times same so those with less coins still get nothing while devs get more chances for masternode reqards.

another stupid idea.

maybe focus on network use first and core use before trying for price increase. still 0 third party games on ion even after going to an expo.

how many years does matlack need?

[1714818404]

1714818404

[1714818404]

1714818404

[1714818404]

1714818404

[1714818404]

1714818404

[suchmoon]

maybe focus on network use first and core use before trying for price increase. still 0 third party games on ion even after going to an expo.

how many years does matlack need?

If they were capable of producing games they wouldn't need the gimmickry with the masternodes.

[o0o0]

so basically price isnt increasing how they want so try to encourage people to lock for long times so less coins sold to have a false price economy....

gotcha. what a stupid suggestion.

So what do you suggest ?

something gaming related... thats what the coins core vision is right?

[o0o0]

maybe focus on network use first and core use before trying for price increase. still 0 third party games on ion even after going to an expo.

how many years does matlack need?

If they were capable of producing games they wouldn't need the gimmickry with the masternodes.

what i cant understand is this api is all done working tested right? so why dont they use unreal engine... its free. make a deathmatch game with included unreal assets. use the blueprint system make basic games. the engines tried and tested. it is compatiable with ios and android..,

ok so games creation isnt their thing? why dont they leverage existing games link api, reward gamers for kills.

ok so they are maybe shit at that too? host tournaments rent game servers fortnite, cs:go. view matches reward winners in ion.

ok so they might be shit at that? use all that horded premine which has increased through staking and pay someone in ion or sell to btc (cause we know nobody wants that ion shit) to host this for you. reach out to twitch and known gamers.

matlack is just so horrible at what he does. i dont even think he knows what hes doing. prolly just paying himself in bounties.

[WildShark]

[suchmoon]

https://i.gyazo.com/ee13a38ea89240d705111ffab87e0c66.png

15k sat, gravity is kicking in (pun intended).

[WildShark]

[korvas128]

If you think ion/ionomy and myself are frauds

Who lied about the number of employees ionomy had in 2016? You or Matlack or both?

If you don't know the answer ask on discord and report back.

Why don't you use your journalistic/investigative skills which may require a bit more than

i.e. Hey Google how many employees did Ionomy have it 2016   

Bait, Switch, Report back, Bait, Switch, Report Back........ so lazy.......... but I guess when your BCT police you have a heavy case load so I'll forgive you.

[korvas128]

so basically price isnt increasing how they want so try to encourage people to lock for long times so less coins sold to have a false price economy....

gotcha. what a stupid suggestion.

Not really that stupid it's a proposal for an additional reward for keeping your coins locked on the network. Today irrelevant of how long your running a node the reward level is the same.

Price is not the key driver, network stability & growth is

[korvas128]

How many years is it now you've been calling me a liar. Again me thinks since ION ICO'd at 20 cents you've been calling me that. Now at $1.33 I'm still a liar. Wonder what I'll be when ION hits $4+ ? At what point do I stop being a liar ?

You're a liar because you're lying, nothing to do with ION price. So who lied about the number of employees ionomy had in 2016? You or Matlack or both?

BTW the premine included a lot more than just those two addresses. 100% premine, ~75% in team's hands.

The only reason ION price doesn't come into the discussion is it doesn't fit your narrative The reality is you have been trolling ION/IONOMY  since it's inception that's over 2 years and you still use the same tactics..... yawn

What tactics is that? Not falling for your lies? Yeah that's me.

But ok, let's discuss price going from 45k-55k sat down to 17k immediately after you answer this:

who lied about the number of employees ionomy had in 2016? You or Matlack or both?

I agree on this. You are the only user here that fighting against this such of fraud. Keep up the good fight!

If you think ion/ionomy and myself are frauds then you are 100% wrong. To make an assessment based on BCT posts especially suchmoon's is just being naive.

This is what fraud looks like....  



Hype without substance only lasts for so long, in Paycoin's case it was $13 to 7 cents in 6 mths.

This what fraud doesn't look like



ION started life 20/25 cents. Ion is now 2 years 2 months old. No fraud here, what you see is an active development team.

If you think this is all rubbish that's fine your choice but to call us frauds is just plain wrong. BTW the only reason I'm responding is I've looked at your post history seen you've made some good posts so am kinda surprised by this one

how many satoshi did ion start life as and how many now?

What's your point ?

[korvas128]

Proposal to Inrease Number of Masternodes to Improve the Network Stability

Proposal #4 would see the collateral needed for a masternode size cut by 50%. If this proposal is agreed upon, everyone with a masternode now would then be able to have 2. This would double the ION masternode network and lower the threshold for others interesting in hosting which is essential to “protect profitability and make sure the network can achieve what it needs to achieve to drive the protocol level value of ION as a whole.” Combined with proposal #3 these updates have the potential to rocket ION beyond its imagined destination.

awesome.... timelock coins and let the devs double their masternodes with their premine. block times same so those with less coins still get nothing while devs get more chances for masternode reqards.

another stupid idea.

maybe focus on network use first and core use before trying for price increase. still 0 third party games on ion even after going to an expo.

how many years does matlack need?

You need to factor in that soon they'll be multiple tokens running on the same block chain, this needs more nodes to function correctly and yes multiple tokens = multiple rewards...... nodes get paid to jobs. 

how many years does matlack need?

  good question I guess it's however long it takes

Anyway

Don't you think it's a good thing the devs offer some proposals for community discussion instead just going with what they think is best ?? This is a massive change headed in our direction so don't you think it's right these options are discussed or would you prefer to be dictated too ?

[korvas128]

I want to know more & more about ionomy mobile Gaming

I suggest you visit and join https://ionomy.com

Then play the game 'The Moon or Bust' available on Apple or Google.

Then join the community on discord and ask whatever questions you may have https://discordapp.com/invite/vuZn7gC

[narking]

so basically price isnt increasing how they want so try to encourage people to lock for long times so less coins sold to have a false price economy....

gotcha. what a stupid suggestion.

Not really that stupid it's a proposal for an additional reward for keeping your coins locked on the network. Today irrelevant of how long your running a node the reward level is the same.

Price is not the key driver, network stability & growth is

Stability and price growth in the market where there is a very long fall is not a priority. This should be in the growing market, but when everything falls the team must change its view of the price and add price support.

[suchmoon]

If you think ion/ionomy and myself are frauds

Who lied about the number of employees ionomy had in 2016? You or Matlack or both?

If you don't know the answer ask on discord and report back.

Why don't you use your journalistic/investigative skills which may require a bit more than

i.e. Hey Google how many employees did Ionomy have it 2016   

Bait, Switch, Report back, Bait, Switch, Report Back........ so lazy.......... but I guess when your BCT police you have a heavy case load so I'll forgive you.

There is nothing to investigate. I asked Matlack back in 2016 and he responded with numbers that add up to as many as 15 employees. You said they had 3 employees. So who lied about the number of employees ionomy had in 2016? You or Matlack or both?

[korvas128]

If you think ion/ionomy and myself are frauds

Who lied about the number of employees ionomy had in 2016? You or Matlack or both?

If you don't know the answer ask on discord and report back.

Why don't you use your journalistic/investigative skills which may require a bit more than

i.e. Hey Google how many employees did Ionomy have it 2016   

Bait, Switch, Report back, Bait, Switch, Report Back........ so lazy.......... but I guess when your BCT police you have a heavy case load so I'll forgive you.

There is nothing to investigate. I asked Matlack back in 2016 and he responded with numbers that add up to as many as 15 employees. You said they had 3 employees. So who lied about the number of employees ionomy had in 2016? You or Matlack or both?

Not so long ago your signature was



Part of your futile attempts to link ION to XPY

Now it's



You start apologising for 2+ years of misinformation and I'll possibly consider answering all your questions.

Until then I'll decide what I respond too 

[korvas128]

so basically price isnt increasing how they want so try to encourage people to lock for long times so less coins sold to have a false price economy....

gotcha. what a stupid suggestion.

Not really that stupid it's a proposal for an additional reward for keeping your coins locked on the network. Today irrelevant of how long your running a node the reward level is the same.

Price is not the key driver, network stability & growth is

Stability and price growth in the market where there is a very long fall is not a priority. This should be in the growing market, but when everything falls the team must change its view of the price and add price support.

Sorry to be clear i'm only talking about 1 of 4 proposals that were presented to the community for discussion & review.

Your right though if you ignore today tomorrow might never come.

Although when it comes too masternodes you need an eye on tomorrow. Currently there are 330+ coins that support masternodes ( https://masternodes.online/ ). How many of these coins will still be around in 6 months time ? As a masternode owner tomorrow is just as important as today. 

[suchmoon]

Not so long ago your signature was



Part of your futile attempts to link ION to XPY

Good point. I have refreshed the thread with some updates: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1673001.msg39734277#msg39734277

Now it's



You start apologising for 2+ years of misinformation and I'll possibly consider answering all your questions.

Until then I'll decide what I respond too 

You seem to have some sort of illusion that by not answering you look less of a liar. It's quite obvious that both you and Matlack are blatant liars but your attempts to weasel out of this are quite amusing.

[korvas128]

Not so long ago your signature was



Part of your futile attempts to link ION to XPY

Good point. I have refreshed the thread with some updates: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1673001.msg39734277#msg39734277

Now it's



You start apologising for 2+ years of misinformation and I'll possibly consider answering all your questions.

Until then I'll decide what I respond too 

You seem to have some sort of illusion that by not answering you look less of a liar. It's quite obvious that both you and Matlack are blatant liars but your attempts to weasel out of this are quite amusing.

Ah yes that's the thread you setup in November 2016  post what you want it's your thread I don't care

Of all the scams and shitcoins in crypto you decide to pick on a coin that isn't and then spend the next 2.5 yrs trying to justify it....... now that is amusing  oops sorry wrong word, it was amusing a year ago now it's hysterical.

     

[WildShark]

[Donwoods001]

https://i.gyazo.com/e043c61d0ef977c3f4c1cb2b72e2b811.png

We're up. ION is so innovative.