Lasergun (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1155
Merit: 1174
https://keybase.io/lasergun
|
|
March 21, 2018, 10:45:01 PM |
|
Hi ! 42-coin is available on LycheeBit. Happy mining Thank You. And one more pool with a blockexplorer and a list of nodes: http://secretpool.ruConfig. example: -o stratum+tcp://secretpool.ru:3433 -u Your42Address -p c=42
|
|
|
|
Ucicha
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
March 22, 2018, 09:00:56 AM |
|
I am not formally educated to find a thing but would really like to confirm someting so asking for help...I started learning to code/about coding a few days ago on my own, and I have grasped the basic principle of what is happening.
Where can I take a look at the "math/physics"/original code of 42? (like a notepad file or something I can start reading) Is it a very complex, almost infinite "while" loop with probabilities ranging <0.00000001<x<1? please pardon my lack of better terminology
|
|
|
|
Lasergun (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1155
Merit: 1174
https://keybase.io/lasergun
|
|
March 22, 2018, 09:49:33 AM |
|
Where can I take a look at the "math/physics"/original code of 42?
https://github.com/42-coin/42
|
|
|
|
Ucicha
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
March 23, 2018, 12:00:57 PM |
|
What would be the target space/length of the hashes, if im formulating this right?
|
|
|
|
Lasergun (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1155
Merit: 1174
https://keybase.io/lasergun
|
|
March 23, 2018, 01:15:27 PM Last edit: March 23, 2018, 08:54:36 PM by Lasergun |
|
What would be the target space/length of the hashes, if im formulating this right?
This is a specified time span between the blocks to which the network aspires. More details in wiki: https://en.bitcoinwiki.org/wiki/42-coin.
|
|
|
|
Than-Ioan
Member
Offline
Activity: 183
Merit: 12
|
|
March 23, 2018, 07:35:52 PM Last edit: March 24, 2018, 08:55:59 PM by Than-Ioan |
|
Withdrawals at TradeSatoshi are not working today...they promised that they will fix the issue 'soon'! UPDATE: 3/24/2018 Withdrawals back again!
|
|
|
|
IMZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 24, 2018, 03:50:30 AM Last edit: March 25, 2018, 05:41:34 AM by IMZ |
|
Nova is supposed to re-open deposits early next month. And I am patiently patiently working on the DEXchanges: much more complicated than I understood, and very interesting.
EDIT: and do you know we have four undeveloped pairs on Tradesatoshi? -BTC, -DOGE, -LTC, -BCH
|
|
|
|
IMZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 26, 2018, 12:15:18 AM |
|
Withdrawals at TradeSatoshi are not working today...they promised that they will fix the issue 'soon'! UPDATE: 3/24/2018 Withdrawals back again!
Got any advice/insight into Tradesatoshi, Than? I would like to give them a trial.
|
|
|
|
Ucicha
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
March 26, 2018, 03:48:27 PM |
|
I used Tradesatoshi, had minor GUI issues (had to reload page), otherwise everything works. They used to have an open chat, it was first restricted with rules a few weeks ago, and now it has been removed(chat was mostly just FUD spam and p2p trade, and fortunetelling). I had a positive experience when I opened my support ticked. Overall good exchange but low volume of trade.
|
|
|
|
IMZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 27, 2018, 10:49:32 AM |
|
Nice review, Ucicha!
I know it's an unpopular view, but I still think that putting volume on the exchanges we already have is the first step towards . . . everything else, including getting new listings.
And there's a little traffic on the Discord channel.
|
|
|
|
IMZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 02, 2018, 12:05:10 AM |
|
Whooo! I've finally started trialling Tradesatoshi.
|
|
|
|
Ucicha
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
April 03, 2018, 01:43:37 PM |
|
Tradesatoshi withdrawals not going through at the moment, stuck on pending, will post update
UPDATE: working again
|
|
|
|
IMZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 04, 2018, 06:51:41 AM Last edit: April 04, 2018, 09:08:18 PM by IMZ |
|
https://www.coindesk.com/ethereum-asics-means-whats-next/One thing about 42 that really interests me is the way that it 'straddles' POW and POS. I see articles about ASIC-resistance and hard forks to outflank those, and [edit ETH's] intentions to go 'full POS.' So, do I understand correctly that we are nicely positioned -- certainly being deflationary -- to manoeuvre around these issues in coming years?
|
|
|
|
cryptocommoner
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 5
|
|
April 05, 2018, 02:47:24 PM |
|
https://www.coindesk.com/ethereum-asics-means-whats-next/One thing about 42 that really interests me is the way that it 'straddles' POW and POS. I see articles about ASIC-resistance and hard forks to outflank those, and [edit ETH's] intentions to go 'full POS.' So, do I understand correctly that we are nicely positioned -- certainly being deflationary -- to manoeuvre around these issues in coming years? I'm trying to wrap my head around the PoW + PoS model. All of the coins have been mined already and the PoW model utilizes miners. The PoS utilizes forgers. Is there a dual verification happening where the transaction fees are divided between miners and a percentage to the forgers? The deflationary model is inherent in the name, 42-coin, where no new coins will be mined. ETH is pushing to utilize CASPER to go full PoS to be 'greener' and decrease energy requirements. This will not change them from being inflationary and new ETH will continue to be created. Can somebody better explain what is exactly happening with the transaction fees with a combination of PoW and PoS?
|
|
|
|
Lasergun (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1155
Merit: 1174
https://keybase.io/lasergun
|
|
April 05, 2018, 10:04:59 PM Last edit: April 06, 2018, 09:17:16 AM by Lasergun |
|
https://www.coindesk.com/ethereum-asics-means-whats-next/One thing about 42 that really interests me is the way that it 'straddles' POW and POS. I see articles about ASIC-resistance and hard forks to outflank those, and [edit ETH's] intentions to go 'full POS.' So, do I understand correctly that we are nicely positioned -- certainly being deflationary -- to manoeuvre around these issues in coming years? Existing PoS models are not suitable to go to full PoS due to 42 very limited supply and 0 block reward, only PoS based on CoinAge is working, but very slow and it can not be the main method of transaction confirmation. Low transaction costs work in 42 as a protection mechanism against ASICs. With the current tx fee, 42 mining will not be profitable until the price is $100m+ per one coin.
|
|
|
|
Lasergun (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1155
Merit: 1174
https://keybase.io/lasergun
|
|
April 05, 2018, 10:08:36 PM |
|
Is there a dual verification happening where the transaction fees are divided between miners and a percentage to the forgers? Can somebody better explain what is exactly happening with the transaction fees with a combination of PoW and PoS?
The fees are not divided. 42 uses Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake block generation methods, blocks in 42 blockchain are random, either PoW or PoS. Thus, transaction fees can either go to PoW miner or be destroyed by PoS miner. We can't predict what exactly will happen with the fees.
|
|
|
|
IMZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 06, 2018, 08:10:04 AM |
|
https://www.coindesk.com/ethereum-asics-means-whats-next/One thing about 42 that really interests me is the way that it 'straddles' POW and POS. I see articles about ASIC-resistance and hard forks to outflank those, and [edit ETH's] intentions to go 'full POS.' So, do I understand correctly that we are nicely positioned -- certainly being deflationary -- to manoeuvre around these issues in coming years? Existing PoS models are not suitable to go to full PoS due to 42 very limited supply, only PoS based on CoinAge is working, but very slow and it can not be the main method of transaction confirmation. Low transaction costs work in 42 as a protection mechanism against ASICs. With the current tx fee, 42 mining will not be profitable until the price is $100m+ per one coin. Thanks for your patience, Laser. My outfit -- you surely know some of them -- spend enormous effort analysing types of (rare) cryptos. I have devved at length on two. Shall keep reading. (Found a 42 history that clarifies a lot of stuff, like the re-launch.) But the 'recipe' here is exciting.
|
|
|
|
IMZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 06, 2018, 08:10:53 AM |
|
Is there a dual verification happening where the transaction fees are divided between miners and a percentage to the forgers? Can somebody better explain what is exactly happening with the transaction fees with a combination of PoW and PoS?
The fees are not divided. 42 uses Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake block generation methods, blocks in 42 blockchain are random, either PoW or PoS. Thus, transaction fees can either go to PoW miner or be destroyed by PoS miner. We can't predict what exactly will happen with the fees. Whoo!!
|
|
|
|
sirslayer
|
|
April 06, 2018, 09:03:56 AM |
|
Yup!!, Lasergun is one smart cookie!!!!
|
|
|
|
cryptocommoner
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 5
|
|
April 06, 2018, 02:41:05 PM |
|
Is there a dual verification happening where the transaction fees are divided between miners and a percentage to the forgers? Can somebody better explain what is exactly happening with the transaction fees with a combination of PoW and PoS?
The fees are not divided. 42 uses Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake block generation methods, blocks in 42 blockchain are random, either PoW or PoS. Thus, transaction fees can either go to PoW miner or be destroyed by PoS miner. We can't predict what exactly will happen with the fees. Thank you for the quick reply! It's very interesting that all of the blocks are random. I think this adds to the elusiveness of this coin. You will never know what block you will have your transaction verified through and who will be verifying it!
|
|
|
|
|