Cool, even then, I never spewed garbage while participating in a signature campaign. Im just saying because you post a couple shitposts while wearing a signature is not the end of the world, but I was cautious about it and still ended up there.
Really?
Nobody knows about bitcoin in real life. If you could go and ask to 10 people, you would find out that 0 would know what bitcoin is. So its like 1 in 100 people maybe have heard of it.
Post #219
Go all in on Bitcoin, pretty sure we will be above 1000 in a year, it's that easy to be honest.
Post #503
I can see kids making bitcoins in the future through youtube video and social media. Some kids now have huge followings and make money with ad revenue.
Post #1550
Yeah I already saw it, it's prety decent and professional, but I would not recommend blockchain.info to store any relevant amount of bitcoins.
Post #5; you're simply using vague and general terms to describe the ad yet fail to explain why - this sentence could apply to many threads.
We don't stop seeing people saying how they lost passwords, hard drives and so on, losing coins forever.
Is this rate of coins being lost bigger than the rate coins are being generated at?
Created thread: this is a pointless thread and can only lead to senseless spam
I trust institutions increasingly less yearly, I only feel safe by carrying bitcoins at this point.
Post #870
Though I don't deny that you have some quality posts there, I found far too many useless ones. When the thread already has so many replies and you post with a generic answer that can be thought of in less than 10 seconds, is that really constructive?
That's just a list of signature campaigns. What are your intentions by posting this?
You are going to raise standards so high that you'll end up banning like 99% of people from campaigns.
~18% of the total users (normal list + special list + banned list) are currently enrolled in Bitmixer. I've actually had a small *spike* of very constructive users lately, thus your argument is invalid.
I never had a single problem in the endless sig campaigns i've participated at, always told that I did a good job. It's only after the SMAS thing started that I get insta rejected because all managers do is copy+c on your nickname and ctrl+f on this thread, if you are there then you are fucked, it's as simple as that, and it's unfair. Im sure I would have been able to participate in all those campaigns managed by yahoo in a pre-SMAS environment.
Managers operate at their own discretion. They can choose to follow the SMAS list or not.