Both candidates is not very suitable for the presidency. Soon we find out who will now lead the country and what policies will the man
I agree. This year there is no candidate for whom I would vote. We're not voting for someone but against someone. It's bad but what to do?
VOTE THIRD PARTY -- for the FUTURE
'Third Party' == 'Donald J. Trump'
Not trying to electioneer at this late date, but that's the way I feel...with somewhat greater than a 50% degree of confidence I hasten to add. Still, that's about "greater than 50% " minus 1% better chances than I ever expected to see as a realistic option in the U.S. ever again insofar as an option for POTUS goes.
---
I'll just answer the guy who questioned my 'Hillary vs. Stalin' rhetoric on one of these thread here:
That is actually not untrue. I would prefer a Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin to a Hillary Dahmer Clinton (and it looks increasingly like the Dahmer part might map to reality as crazy as that sounds. Really!)
The poster's complaint was that Stalin murdered 20x10^6 people or whatever. I would argue that Bush Jr. +Obama have done 'better' than that here in the good old U.S.A. with vaccines, GMO's, non-functional health care, economic warfare against us, etc. How much of the table was set by Bush Sr. + Bill Clinton with their various policies I'm yet computing.
Stalin certainly went hard on controlling the media and dispatching any potential enemies on an individual basis. Often enough to their deaths in Siberia. Hillary basically promises to do the same thing, and the scary thing is that in her mind the more brutal and painful the experience for her victims the more power accrues to her and her ilk in their twisted minds. Maybe Stalin felt the same way? I've not yet researched whether he was or was not an occultist.
About the only thing which Stalin had that Hilary does not is health. I'm fairly confident that she will never be sworn in due simply to health issues and/or the 'counter-coup' that (the late?) Dr. Pieczenik spoke of. But it's basically the same thing whether it's Hillary or some replacement chosen by her puppeteers. I'm getting the hell out of dodge, friends, if this eventuality comes to pass. Or at least setting up to do so and trying to not be to late.
By my calculation, the udder of the U.S. cow is just about milked dry, but there is still a lot of meat on the bone. We could switch to a different phase of extraction any day now. That's what really bothers me. We probably do have at least one more calving left in us which could extend our useful life for another time-slice, and I would hope that Trump would take that tact. Hillary is, I feel, an operative for a different farming group. A producing cow on our North American farm is nothing but a complicating economic hassle and menace to the group she works for.
Before I bought my first Bitcoin I realized that what BTC meant (among other things) to an individual was the ability to wash up on the shore anywhere in the world with not but the shirt on one's back and have at least the potential to arrange a degree of security. Now may be the test. The U.S.'s (or I should say, U.N.'s) footprint is so large that it would be kind of a matter of trying to pick the most hospitable shore. (Thoughts on this issue anyone?)
