[ANN][INCNT] Incent Loyalty | Waves Token | Traded on Bittrex

[mummybtc]

As  i am a investor from the "first hour"  and bought a lot of more between price range from 5000-3000 satoshis i am interested in how, beside the business itsself, you are in contact with bigger exchanges to make Incent more "pupular" to a broader audience. Nothing against cryptopia, its the beginning, but even there the daily volumne is about just 10 BTC, the spreads for buying and selling are way too big (right about now its nearly 30%!!!). Maybe another try with BITTREX would not the worst idea of all.

We have been in contact with a bigger exchange - everything should be ready to go, so not sure what the delay is.
Other than that, we'll be bringing volume to the exchanges. That comes under the heading 'by the business itself', I suppose, but the point is that having exchanges without adoption and external demand is the tail wagging the dog (even if it's the norm in crypto).

I am already happy with Liqui and Cryptopia plus Open Ledger is improving IMO. But of course i'll be more happy if Poloniex will add Incent in the near future.

Forget Poloniex, I think people are needs to understand that what this project is suffering is lack of proper marketing strategy, no matter how good your project is with little or no marketing no ne will use it. I don't think wallet development should be prioritize now.

Seriously? Did you read any of our materials? Do you even understand what this project is doing?

Saying you will do something is different from actually doing it, I read the whitepaper that is why I invested into the project, but seen the price dropped to 1800sat makes me doubt the ability of this team. Can you name any partnership your team has entered into presently. if there is no adoption on Incent then investors have lost their investment and that is the obvious truth

[1714048953]

1714048953

[1714048953]

1714048953

[1714048953]

1714048953

[1714048953]

1714048953

[1714048953]

1714048953

[Cassius]

As  i am a investor from the "first hour"  and bought a lot of more between price range from 5000-3000 satoshis i am interested in how, beside the business itsself, you are in contact with bigger exchanges to make Incent more "pupular" to a broader audience. Nothing against cryptopia, its the beginning, but even there the daily volumne is about just 10 BTC, the spreads for buying and selling are way too big (right about now its nearly 30%!!!). Maybe another try with BITTREX would not the worst idea of all.

We have been in contact with a bigger exchange - everything should be ready to go, so not sure what the delay is.
Other than that, we'll be bringing volume to the exchanges. That comes under the heading 'by the business itself', I suppose, but the point is that having exchanges without adoption and external demand is the tail wagging the dog (even if it's the norm in crypto).

I am already happy with Liqui and Cryptopia plus Open Ledger is improving IMO. But of course i'll be more happy if Poloniex will add Incent in the near future.

Forget Poloniex, I think people are needs to understand that what this project is suffering is lack of proper marketing strategy, no matter how good your project is with little or no marketing no ne will use it. I don't think wallet development should be prioritize now.

Seriously? Did you read any of our materials? Do you even understand what this project is doing?

Saying you will do something is different from actually doing it, I read the whitepaper that is why I invested into the project, but seen the price dropped to 1800sat makes me doubt the ability of this team. Can you name any partnership your team has entered into presently. if there is no adoption on Incent then investors have lost their investment and that is the obvious truth

Please tell me where I can buy for 1800! I put an order in at 3400 and it's not being filled.
Our blogs and updates detail who our partners are. To my knowledge nothing has changed there. I can't say who Merchant #1 will be but it will be a pleasant surprise.

[disconnectme]

As  i am a investor from the "first hour"  and bought a lot of more between price range from 5000-3000 satoshis i am interested in how, beside the business itsself, you are in contact with bigger exchanges to make Incent more "pupular" to a broader audience. Nothing against cryptopia, its the beginning, but even there the daily volumne is about just 10 BTC, the spreads for buying and selling are way too big (right about now its nearly 30%!!!). Maybe another try with BITTREX would not the worst idea of all.

We have been in contact with a bigger exchange - everything should be ready to go, so not sure what the delay is.
Other than that, we'll be bringing volume to the exchanges. That comes under the heading 'by the business itself', I suppose, but the point is that having exchanges without adoption and external demand is the tail wagging the dog (even if it's the norm in crypto).

I am already happy with Liqui and Cryptopia plus Open Ledger is improving IMO. But of course i'll be more happy if Poloniex will add Incent in the near future.

Forget Poloniex, I think people are needs to understand that what this project is suffering is lack of proper marketing strategy, no matter how good your project is with little or no marketing no ne will use it. I don't think wallet development should be prioritize now.

Seriously? Did you read any of our materials? Do you even understand what this project is doing?

Saying you will do something is different from actually doing it, I read the whitepaper that is why I invested into the project, but seen the price dropped to 1800sat makes me doubt the ability of this team. Can you name any partnership your team has entered into presently. if there is no adoption on Incent then investors have lost their investment and that is the obvious truth

Please tell me where I can buy for 1800! I put an order in at 3400 and it's not being filled.
Our blogs and updates detail who our partners are. To my knowledge nothing has changed there. I can't say who Merchant #1 will be but it will be a pleasant surprise.

Are you serious, when did you place your order? 2 or 3 days ago the price was in 1000sat range. Even mentioning 3400sat is funny because the minimum ICO price was 10000sat per token. I know there is nothing the developers can do about that, you can't force anyone not to sell their tokens at any price, 4 months ago some people sold their Ethers at $5.50 now it is $40. People need to understand crypto investment is not always a get rich quick thing but it worth investing in some. This is the time for guys on the main street

[Cassius]

Are you serious, when did you place your order? 2 or 3 days ago the price was in 1000sat range. Even mentioning 3400sat is funny because the minimum ICO price was 10000sat per token. I know there is nothing the developers can do about that, you can't force anyone not to sell their tokens at any price, 4 months ago some people sold their Ethers at $5.50 now it is $40. People need to understand crypto investment is not always a get rich quick thing but it worth investing in some. This is the time for guys on the main street

I've had a few in the 3xxx range in the last week or so, but on Cryptopia where the volume is higher. I think the fall to 1k was on Liqui, where the orderbooks are so thin that it doesn't take much to push the price down that far. If they'd sold on Cryptopia they could have got 3x more, so I assume it was just an impatient bounty dumper.
I can agree that 3xxx is frustrating if you bought at ICO (which I also did) but that is the nature of the crypto markets. Equally, though, I'd like to give the Sydney team credit for the work they're doing. They are on schedule for release at the time given 6 months ago when we first put out word about the ICO. That is incredibly rare when you consider the delays routinely incurred on other crypto projects. So I won't accept any criticism that we're not doing what we said we would do, based solely on a market that is notoriously fickle. In another 6 months if there's no movement in price, then maybe it would be warranted. Right now, though, with dev on the wallet almost done, a marketmaking and settlement strategy about to launch, and business development looking pretty cool, that seems unlikely.

[cattano]

I think INCNT must listed on other exchanger like bittrex or poloniex

[mm0104]

I think INCNT must listed on other exchanger like bittrex or poloniex

That wouldn't change anything. Increase in value woll come when merchant #1 is online, maybe earlier with the trading bot and MobileGO ICO.

[Cassius]

I think INCNT must listed on other exchanger like bittrex or poloniex

That wouldn't change anything. Increase in value woll come when merchant #1 is online, maybe earlier woth the trading bot amd MobileGO ICO.

Thank you, someone who gets it!
The trading bot will add depth/liquidity, which won't inherently add buy pressure but should be attractive for traders since it will reduce slippage. It's necessary for settlement because we need to be able to show customers a price on their app, and slippage would be a problem.
The MobileGo ICO starts on 25 April. Merchant #1 should be up and running before that.

[KoinMaster]

Yes, I agree with @cassius lasting price increase is going to come from partnership announcements.

[NJB18]

Hmm since btc is so low in value maybe people should hide some of it into altcoins. Incent should be a great investment. And btw I also tried to snatch some 1k price Incents at Liqui but noone dumped at me order.

[2012]

I will not even think to touch my assets until I see real usage of Incent tokens after what very first merchant will appear by the end of next month as per announced by team. It is real usage and effectiveness of any token/asset than just being on any big exchange. They will not be very helpful so have patience and wait for good times.

[rendravolt]

I think INCNT must listed on other exchanger like bittrex or poloniex

That wouldn't change anything. Increase in value woll come when merchant #1 is online, maybe earlier woth the trading bot amd MobileGO ICO.

Thank you, someone who gets it!
The trading bot will add depth/liquidity, which won't inherently add buy pressure but should be attractive for traders since it will reduce slippage. It's necessary for settlement because we need to be able to show customers a price on their app, and slippage would be a problem.
The MobileGo ICO starts on 25 April. Merchant #1 should be up and running before that.

Good news, expect better going forward.

[exemplaar]

Any beta testers here before launching with first merchant, in case if eventually any bugs are found?

BTW great project, hope the merchants will love the app.
 

[FANCIER]

hi, just discovered this project. what was ICO price? thank you

Go to: ICO DETAILS

http://icorating.com/project/4/Incent

[KoinMaster]

Test version is being developed at the moment. As soon the devs will have the first beta version you can test it, I am sure. We are not there yet, but will be at the end of April....

Any beta testers here before launching with first merchant, in case if eventually any bugs are found?

BTW great project, hope the merchants will love the app.
 

[kellendil]

Cant wait for the first merchant integration and im sure many will follow after that.

[NathanJB]

Cant wait for the first merchant integration and im sure many will follow after that.

Incent is really undervalued right now. Should be a great time to buy more.

[TeraBite]

Cant wait for the first merchant integration and im sure many will follow after that.

Incent is really undervalued right now. Should be a great time to buy more.

It's undervalued at the moment but I have enough tokens into my waves wallet and waiting patiently how progress is going one. I also quite sure after implementation of first merchant it will bring huge rise for sure.

[connexus]

Cant wait for the first merchant integration and im sure many will follow after that.

Incent is really undervalued right now. Should be a great time to buy more.

Maybe though I think Incent need to prove something first that the ICO was indeed a good buy. The merchant integration is a good start.

[vincetcm]

Cant wait for the first merchant integration and im sure many will follow after that.

Incent is really undervalued right now. Should be a great time to buy more.

Maybe though I think Incent need to prove something first that the ICO was indeed a good buy. The merchant integration is a good start.

The project was not properly managed, the investors fooled and abandoned their fate.
It may be sensible to take it from the market, but the pre-sale is a complete fiasco.

[KarlKarlsson_]

Cant wait for the first merchant integration and im sure many will follow after that.

Incent is really undervalued right now. Should be a great time to buy more.

Maybe though I think Incent need to prove something first that the ICO was indeed a good buy. The merchant integration is a good start.

The project was not properly managed, the investors fooled and abandoned their fate.
It may be sensible to take it from the market, but the pre-sale is a complete fiasco.

I have honestly no idea what you are talking about.

70% of investors have received their payouts within 10 days, the other 30% hadn't submitted a payout address within that time. One of the fastest distributions in ICO history, I'd say.

Furthermore, Incent's price has been more or less stable in fiat terms. It's natural that we took a beating in BTC terms considering Bitcoin increased by 100% since our ICO concluded. I would even go that far and say that we have been one of the most professional ICOs ever and we will continue to keep honoring this exact value.

To me it looks all lined up: MobileGO ICO starts in a month, development is progressing nicely and we are, consequently, on track for the first merchant integration.