Bitcoin Forum
May 27, 2017, 09:41:50 PM *
News: If the forum does not load normally for you, please send me a traceroute.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 429 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ARK - Blockchains Interoperability with SmartBridge 🔹 ARK on BiTTREX 🔹  (Read 395068 times)
ArkEcosystem
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
October 31, 2016, 06:27:20 PM
 #861

Bounty from email subsription?

We are not doing those since its the worst kind of spam there is and some just input enromous number of emails to get more shares and we think its not fair to true supporters so you can get some sweepstakes via this link : https://gleam.io/W3AB7/ark-pretoken-exchange-sweepstakes for doing social things. But you can still email subscribe on https://tec.ark.io/ to get informed on when will our full TEC site be up and running.

Good point, but gleam may attract lots of spam like in iconomi project. BTW, gleam is the best campaign site.

Gleam has been wonderful and we will certainly use them in the future.  I would also recommend any other project that wants to do a social media campaign to try gleam out.  It's a highly advanced tool.
1495921310
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495921310

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495921310
Reply with quote  #2

1495921310
Report to moderator
POLONIEX TRADING SIGNALS
+50% Profit and more via TELEGRAM
ALTCOINTRADER.CO
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1495921310
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1495921310

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1495921310
Reply with quote  #2

1495921310
Report to moderator
bcmine
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644


View Profile
October 31, 2016, 06:36:12 PM
 #862

alot of nothing here, not just github.

will follow.
cannabanana
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448



View Profile
October 31, 2016, 06:51:03 PM
 #863

alot of nothing here, not just github.

will follow.

So why are you following a lot of nothing for?

If you think there's nothing here, GTFO.

ArkEcosystem
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
October 31, 2016, 07:32:14 PM
 #864


Wow Thank You very much ICONEWS!
Livermore_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 223



View Profile
October 31, 2016, 07:43:08 PM
 #865

It will be allowed reimbursement for those who invest in Lisk?

bioly
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 258


View Profile
October 31, 2016, 07:43:24 PM
 #866

Polish translation is ready! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666847.0 All best for ARK  Smiley

Lisk delegate Bioly Lisk Online Wallet | Explorer | Snapshot server | Lisk tools   | Twitter
25% incomes sharing with voters! My Lisk pool
ARK delegate Bioly - 70% rewards share with voters | Pool site | Explorer
cannabanana
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448



View Profile
October 31, 2016, 07:44:23 PM
 #867

It will be allowed reimbursement for those who invest in Lisk?


Yes, if we don't raise the starting 2000 BTC valuation then all the LISK that we collect will also be refunded.

freemind1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile
October 31, 2016, 07:57:24 PM
 #868

Polish translation is ready! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1666847.0 All best for ARK  Smiley

Thank you for your support mate Grin

ruletheworld
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 818



View Profile WWW
October 31, 2016, 08:08:16 PM
 #869

It will be allowed reimbursement for those who invest in Lisk?


Yes, if we don't raise the starting 2000 BTC valuation then all the LISK that we collect will also be refunded.
It is a risky market to be raising money into. 2000 BTC seems quite high in the current market conditions. Any plans to lower this amount or revisit the threshold in the future?

cannabanana
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448



View Profile
October 31, 2016, 08:13:05 PM
 #870

It will be allowed reimbursement for those who invest in Lisk?


Yes, if we don't raise the starting 2000 BTC valuation then all the LISK that we collect will also be refunded.
It is a risky market to be raising money into. 2000 BTC seems quite high in the current market conditions. Any plans to lower this amount or revisit the threshold in the future?

Depends.  The hardware aspect of our project is one of the major factors that we must be able to deal with so there must be a certain amount of funding required. 

If anything, if the goal is not met, we may just launch and provide an OTC exchange for ARK with consistent price increases but to be honest, we haven't put a lot of thought into a contingency.

We really do believe we can raise the requirement so I guess we will cross that bridge when we get to it.

ruletheworld
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 818



View Profile WWW
October 31, 2016, 08:24:29 PM
 #871

It will be allowed reimbursement for those who invest in Lisk?


Yes, if we don't raise the starting 2000 BTC valuation then all the LISK that we collect will also be refunded.
It is a risky market to be raising money into. 2000 BTC seems quite high in the current market conditions. Any plans to lower this amount or revisit the threshold in the future?

Depends.  The hardware aspect of our project is one of the major factors that we must be able to deal with so there must be a certain amount of funding required. 

If anything, if the goal is not met, we may just launch and provide an OTC exchange for ARK with consistent price increases but to be honest, we haven't put a lot of thought into a contingency.

We really do believe we can raise the requirement so I guess we will cross that bridge when we get to it.

That sounds reasonable, but I ask because it might cause people to be a little hesitant to support the project, knowing the token sale might be canceled. For example, people do have to put in effort for bounties. They may hold off on doing so before they feel more certain the project can raise 2000 BTC. This will cause it to reach fewer people, ultimately causing it more likely to miss its targets. In my experience, it is usually not a good idea to cap ICOs for this reason. Happy to be proven wrong of course.

cannabanana
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448



View Profile
October 31, 2016, 08:32:50 PM
 #872

It will be allowed reimbursement for those who invest in Lisk?


Yes, if we don't raise the starting 2000 BTC valuation then all the LISK that we collect will also be refunded.
It is a risky market to be raising money into. 2000 BTC seems quite high in the current market conditions. Any plans to lower this amount or revisit the threshold in the future?

Depends.  The hardware aspect of our project is one of the major factors that we must be able to deal with so there must be a certain amount of funding required. 

If anything, if the goal is not met, we may just launch and provide an OTC exchange for ARK with consistent price increases but to be honest, we haven't put a lot of thought into a contingency.

We really do believe we can raise the requirement so I guess we will cross that bridge when we get to it.

That sounds reasonable, but I ask because it might cause people to be a little hesitant to support the project, knowing the token sale might be canceled. For example, people do have to put in effort for bounties. They may hold off on doing so before they feel more certain the project can raise 2000 BTC. This will cause it to reach fewer people, ultimately causing it more likely to miss its targets. In my experience, it is usually not a good idea to cap ICOs for this reason. Happy to be proven wrong of course.
Yes you are right about the cap as it can make people hold off on investing but we have put a lot of thought into it and have had heated discussions on if we should have a starting limit.  We also don't want to be stuck with too little funding and cannot deliver on promises.  That's not how we like to work.



MarioV
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350



View Profile
October 31, 2016, 08:54:44 PM
 #873



Click the image above or copy this link for our two week Pre-Token Exchange Sweepstakes Smiley

https://gleam.io/W3AB7/ark-pretoken-exchange-sweepstakes

100,000 ARK Up for Bounty!  Enter every day!

When and where you see the winners?

Mario

cannabanana
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448



View Profile
October 31, 2016, 08:56:26 PM
 #874



Click the image above or copy this link for our two week Pre-Token Exchange Sweepstakes Smiley

https://gleam.io/W3AB7/ark-pretoken-exchange-sweepstakes

100,000 ARK Up for Bounty!  Enter every day!

When and where you see the winners?

Mario

The sweepstakes ends on November 6th and the winners will be announced here and on our official forums.

ArkEcosystem
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
October 31, 2016, 09:32:21 PM
 #875

Bounty from email subsription?

This bounty type is abused too often sadly.
ruletheworld
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 818



View Profile WWW
October 31, 2016, 09:52:08 PM
 #876

It will be allowed reimbursement for those who invest in Lisk?


Yes, if we don't raise the starting 2000 BTC valuation then all the LISK that we collect will also be refunded.
It is a risky market to be raising money into. 2000 BTC seems quite high in the current market conditions. Any plans to lower this amount or revisit the threshold in the future?

Depends.  The hardware aspect of our project is one of the major factors that we must be able to deal with so there must be a certain amount of funding required. 

If anything, if the goal is not met, we may just launch and provide an OTC exchange for ARK with consistent price increases but to be honest, we haven't put a lot of thought into a contingency.

We really do believe we can raise the requirement so I guess we will cross that bridge when we get to it.

That sounds reasonable, but I ask because it might cause people to be a little hesitant to support the project, knowing the token sale might be canceled. For example, people do have to put in effort for bounties. They may hold off on doing so before they feel more certain the project can raise 2000 BTC. This will cause it to reach fewer people, ultimately causing it more likely to miss its targets. In my experience, it is usually not a good idea to cap ICOs for this reason. Happy to be proven wrong of course.
Yes you are right about the cap as it can make people hold off on investing but we have put a lot of thought into it and have had heated discussions on if we should have a starting limit.  We also don't want to be stuck with too little funding and cannot deliver on promises.  That's not how we like to work.


Thanks for your very reasonable answers. Wishing the team the best in the project.

thebitstreet
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266


🌟-=BitCAD=-🌟 New_Business_Era


View Profile
October 31, 2016, 10:01:47 PM
 #877

Is there anyone use gleam.io bounty ?
I didnt understand the use

                       
                               ▄▄▄
                             ▄█████▄
               ▄██         ▄█████████▄
              ██████▄    ███████▀███████
               ▀██████▄███████     ███████
                 ▐██████████         ███████▄
      ▄███▄        ▐██████             ███████▄
     ▐███████         █▀                 ▐██████▄
        ███████▄                           ▐███████
          ███████▄             ▄█▄            ███████
         ▄███████            ▄██████            ▐██████▄
       ▄██████▀            ███████████            ▀██████▄
     ▄██████▀            ██████▀   █████            ▐██████▄
   ███████▀           ▄██████▀       ▐███             ▐███████
 ███████            ▄████████        ▐████               ███████
 █████            ▄██████  ████▄    ▄█████               ███████
 █████          ██████▀      ▀███████████             ▄███████
 █████         ▐█████          ██████▀▀             ▄███████
 █████           ▐████▄        ████               ▄██████▀
 █████             ▐████▄    ▄█████              ▐██████
 █████▄              ▐████████████                ▐███████
 ████████▄              ▀▀█████▀           ▄         ███████
 ███████████▄                            ▄████▄        █████▀
 █████ ▐██████▄                        ▄████████▄        ▀▀
 █████   ▀███████                    █████████████▄
 █████     ▐██████                 ███████   ▐███████
 █████       ▐██████            ▄███████       ▐████
 ████████████████████████████████████▀
 ██████████████████████████████████▀
 ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀


cannabanana
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448



View Profile
October 31, 2016, 10:43:23 PM
 #878

It will be allowed reimbursement for those who invest in Lisk?


Yes, if we don't raise the starting 2000 BTC valuation then all the LISK that we collect will also be refunded.
It is a risky market to be raising money into. 2000 BTC seems quite high in the current market conditions. Any plans to lower this amount or revisit the threshold in the future?

Depends.  The hardware aspect of our project is one of the major factors that we must be able to deal with so there must be a certain amount of funding required. 

If anything, if the goal is not met, we may just launch and provide an OTC exchange for ARK with consistent price increases but to be honest, we haven't put a lot of thought into a contingency.

We really do believe we can raise the requirement so I guess we will cross that bridge when we get to it.

That sounds reasonable, but I ask because it might cause people to be a little hesitant to support the project, knowing the token sale might be canceled. For example, people do have to put in effort for bounties. They may hold off on doing so before they feel more certain the project can raise 2000 BTC. This will cause it to reach fewer people, ultimately causing it more likely to miss its targets. In my experience, it is usually not a good idea to cap ICOs for this reason. Happy to be proven wrong of course.
Yes you are right about the cap as it can make people hold off on investing but we have put a lot of thought into it and have had heated discussions on if we should have a starting limit.  We also don't want to be stuck with too little funding and cannot deliver on promises.  That's not how we like to work.


Thanks for your very reasonable answers. Wishing the team the best in the project.
np dude, good talk.

ArkEcosystem
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
November 01, 2016, 01:07:55 AM
 #879

2000 BTC total valuation,,Otherwise,, participipan will be refund.

I LIKE THIS
The more we exchange after this point allows us to create better hardware and use cases.  More features and abilities for users to make ARK.

Also, the bounty will refund too if 2000 btc not gathered, right?

If we do not meet the starting goal then there may be no ARK so yes, they will be refunded.
Inchain is running this risk, i'm talking about ARK to as many people possible!



Let's get them all on the ARK!
cannabanana
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448



View Profile
November 01, 2016, 01:54:45 AM
 #880

Is there anyone use gleam.io bounty ?
I didnt understand the use

Login using your social media and then click on the buttons to get entries.  Twitter tweets and watch youtube video.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 ... 429 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!