|
adamvp
|
 |
November 11, 2016, 06:27:18 PM |
|
Plus, he dislikes linux, because many things are harder to do
Just to say about that line...Coin always has 2 sides...it may be harder for you...but not for others. He meant harder for Claymore to develop on Linux. That's unfortunate, a new Silentarmy fork released today, which work on Linux and is faster than Claymore 4.0... what are you talking about? I can't find anything... |
I am looking for signature campaign  pm me |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
rudane2014
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
SMOKING W33D
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:27:30 PM |
|
Yes. Claymores miner does work for zclassic but currently not as profitable. Tested on 3.1.
I need help resolving high latency shares currently getting avg. 500ms on US servers regardless of pool.
I am in the midwest USA and zcl.suprnova.cc:4042 is at 187ms and that is through a VPN! my whattomine link shows ZCL as more profitable than ZEC. I'am getting 140-200 ms. I'am in Jamaica not using any vpn. |
|
|
|
|
Meech
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:27:50 PM |
|
It must be something on my computer or firewall or opening a port.
Profibility changes daily. My observation of zclassic was a couple days ago. Its currently not a stable coin to mine due to support and longevity.
|
|
|
|
|
rudane2014
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
SMOKING W33D
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:28:18 PM |
|
Can anyone tell me your speed with R9 380 4gb? I'am getting roughly 45 Sols/s.
Do anyone use a R7 370 4gb vaporX? Whats your seed like I'am getting 40-45 Sols/s.
I really want to compare so I can see if I'am getting the same speed as others.
Thank you.
mine 380 4G doing around 42-44 Kool thank you |
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:36:54 PM |
|
Surprisingly, it appears that for the same rig, ZEC is still more profitable than ETH  |
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:42:30 PM |
|
Surprisingly, it appears that for the same rig, ZEC is still more profitable than ETH That's because it is. I've been getting 140%+ all week on ZEC over ETH. |
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:45:00 PM |
|
Its profitable for the older GPUs, like 280x and 290. Not the RX series.
|
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:48:29 PM |
|
Its profitable for the older GPUs, like 280x and 290. Not the RX series.
For me, my RX480 are still more profitable mining ZEC. Pulling 500 sol/s across six RX480. |
|
|
|
|
boysie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:49:07 PM |
|
3.1 is faster on my 5 card MSI 390 rig with a G1840 than v4.0
by about 5Sol/s each card
The CPU runs around 97% on both versions so its not that.
Boysie
|
|
|
|
|
|
alexcrys
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:50:33 PM |
|
Its profitable for the older GPUs, like 280x and 290. Not the RX series.
the best is 7900 and r9 280x with hynix memory ? elpida is not good ? thx |
|
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:51:00 PM |
|
3.1 is faster on my 5 card MSI 390 rig with a G1840 than v4.0
by about 5Sol/s each card
The CPU runs around 97% on both versions so its not that.
Boysie
My seven 290x rig is faster using -i 0 than 1 or 2. Try that, getting around 10% CPU time with a Celeron G1840 |
|
|
|
|
fr4nkthetank
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2294
Merit: 1182
Now the money is free, and so the people will be
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:51:47 PM |
|
yeah second that. use 4.0 with -i 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:54:36 PM |
|
yeah second that. use 4.0 with -i 0
Actually, just that.... Even with my RX480s and a 4.4GHz 4790k i7 pumping them, -i 0 is faster than 1 and 2. Your results of course may vary, but with these things you have to trial and error. |
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710
|
|
November 11, 2016, 06:54:48 PM |
|
Its profitable for the older GPUs, like 280x and 290. Not the RX series.
the best is 7900 and r9 280x with hynix memory ? elpida is not good ? thx Up to 90 sols with hynix 280x https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1676474.0 |
|
|
|
Simon_Grape
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
November 11, 2016, 07:00:49 PM |
|
yeah second that. use 4.0 with -i 0
Actually, just that.... Even with my RX480s and a 4.4GHz 4790k i7 pumping them, -i 0 is faster than 1 and 2. Your results of course may vary, but with these things you have to trial and error. Same here - 4 rigs with 6 RX480's - all with Celeron procs - run very nice with -i 0 |
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3752
Merit: 1710
|
|
November 11, 2016, 07:05:49 PM |
|
Anyone here running R9 290 REFERENCE with STILT BIOS?
Trying to get a good speed but I am stuck at 85 Sol/s with "-i 0" at 1050/1250.
According to his BIOS manual
The recommended memory frequency is 1375MHz - 1450MHz for Elpida and 1375MHz - 1475MHZ for Hynix.
However I am getting the same speed with any memory clock.
|
|
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
November 11, 2016, 07:12:23 PM |
|
I got this output on v4.0
ZEC - Total Speed: 234.442 H/s, Total Shares: 12, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:00
ZEC: GPU0 77.947 H/s, GPU1 77.873 H/s, GPU2 0.000 H/s, GPU3 78.623 H/s
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:22 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 1)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:23 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
ZEC: Share accepted (31 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:29 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (32 ms)!
ZEC: 11/11/16-06:17:31 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 3)
ZEC: Share accepted (47 ms)!
GPU0 t=53C fan=5%, GPU1 t=66C fan=2%, GPU2 t=68C fan=57%, GPU3 t=67C fan=79%
WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 4 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 5 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
WATCHDOG: GPU 5 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
Restarting OK, exit...
there is no GPU4 or 5 and its GPU2 that hung.
thanks
Boysie
GPU 3 What exactly does GPU 3 mean / imply? if you have 2 core gpu then v4 log files seems to name each core a single gpu whereas previous versions listed a 2 core gpu as 1 single gpu in the log file |
|
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
|
November 11, 2016, 07:16:29 PM |
|
Anyone here running R9 290 REFERENCE with STILT BIOS?
Trying to get a good speed but I am stuck at 85 Sol/s with "-i 0" at 1050/1250.
According to his BIOS manual
The recommended memory frequency is 1375MHz - 1450MHz for Elpida and 1375MHz - 1475MHZ for Hynix.
However I am getting the same speed with any memory clock.
290x ref with Stilt BIOS, yes.... But all my 290x do 80~90 sol/s with 1000/1250. Like you say, changing memory speed does nothing, as does changing GPU speed. I think in my case either the CPU(Celeron G1840) or PCIe bus is holding them back. I have an i3 4170 coming soon to see what difference, if any, that makes. Also going to try changing all the PCIe slots to gen 2, as the ones on gen 1 setting appear to be the slower ones. i'm going to try some BIOS mods tonight, tighter timings etc as most of my 290x are using stock memory straps/timings. I've only modified them to drop voltage. |
|
|
|
|
vapourminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4326
Merit: 3521
what is this "brake pedal" you speak of?
|
|
November 11, 2016, 07:27:01 PM |
|
Can anyone tell me your speed with R9 380 4gb? I'am getting roughly 45 Sols/s.
mine 380 2G doing around 42-44 my 2 GB sapphire nitro 380ITX (1100/1400) gets 48-50 -i 1 v4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
gribgo
|
|
November 11, 2016, 07:28:19 PM |
|
Claymore I am getting this message every time I mine on miningpoolhub
ZEC - Total Speed: 132.051 H/s, Total Shares: 412, Rejected: 0, Time: 01:57
ZEC: GPU0 70.845 H/s, GPU1 61.206 H/s
DevFee: ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
GPU0 t=87C fan=54%
DevFee: ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'europe.equihash-hub.miningpoolhub.com' <46.101.243.246> port 12023
DevFee: ZEC: Authorization failed
: {"id":2,"result":false,"error":null}
|
|
|
|
|
