|
|
|
|
|
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Brob12321
|
 |
November 08, 2016, 02:02:20 AM |
|
Thanks, looks like the price is on the decline just like the original lol although there is some pretty good volume at least. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brob12321
|
|
November 08, 2016, 02:07:36 AM |
|
I feel like Polo wouldn't want to add this coin because of the original coin that's already listed. They really only did that for ETH because of the whole mess that was associated with that. But who knows I could be wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
TheDasher
|
|
November 08, 2016, 02:35:00 AM |
|
I feel like Polo wouldn't want to add this coin because of the original coin that's already listed. They really only did that for ETH because of the whole mess that was associated with that. But who knows I could be wrong. There is a 20% tax mess here. |
|
|
|
|
|
paramind22
|
|
November 08, 2016, 02:55:12 AM |
|
Would be nice to have the specs they're looking for posted in one place. |
|
|
|
PJNova
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 1
|
|
November 08, 2016, 03:44:41 AM |
|
FIX the OP or make a new thread with someone who can write a decent post Here is the bare minimum outline.
[ANN]
- logo
- official coin acronym (ZCL / ZCC )
- coin specs
- github
- wallet
- official website
- pools
- exchanges
- miners
- List of things we need
- ex Translations
- windows wallet
- Rewrite and update OP
- ect
(Make it clean clear and consise this whole project looks like a joke on the OP)
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoClub
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
cryptocollectorsclub.com
|
|
November 08, 2016, 04:14:55 AM |
|
Looks good, picked up a couple.
|
...
|
|
|
|
zanzibar
|
|
November 08, 2016, 04:32:55 AM |
|
I agree, OP needs to be updated, then let's get this sucker on Polo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gsxrboy
|
|
November 08, 2016, 04:43:57 AM |
|
Community working hard, this has potential.
|
|
|
|
|
|
coinfusion
|
|
November 08, 2016, 07:06:07 AM |
|
I was waiting for the launch time to be announced in the OP, but it's still saying it's not launched yet. I should have been refreshing github rather than bitcointalk, apparently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DarkStar1O9
|
|
November 08, 2016, 07:56:23 AM |
|
I don't think taking out slow start was a good idea, it's not the same market safe dynamics then.
|
|
|
|
placebo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
November 08, 2016, 07:57:53 AM |
|
Big scam... better stay with the original one and not give money away to this scam.
|
|
|
|
|
|
szachta
|
|
November 08, 2016, 07:58:55 AM |
|
How to download wallet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
houlala1
|
|
November 08, 2016, 09:47:48 AM |
|
Big scam... better stay with the original one and not give money away to this scam.
Legendary member said it's a scam Don't buy |
|
|
|
|
|
merkalor
|
|
November 08, 2016, 09:49:34 AM |
|
Proof of burning the masterkey or not ?
Proof of scam yes |
LISK Develop Decentralized Applications & Sidechains in JavaScript with Lisk!
|
|
|
shimlbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 08, 2016, 10:13:39 AM |
|
Big scam... better stay with the original one and not give money away to this scam.
Legendary member said it's a scam Don't buy and this legendary member is the biggest troll of earth |
|
|
|
|
|
bolivarcoin
|
|
November 08, 2016, 10:27:37 AM |
|
All haters here saying ZCC its scam because 20% dsnt go to devs  |
|
|
|
superresistant
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1117
|
|
November 08, 2016, 10:52:18 AM |
|
All haters here saying ZCC its scam because 20% dsnt go to devs Launching a 100% copy of a crypto, telling almost no one, with no delay, only to instamine it (mining 100% of it by being the first) and dump it on shady small exchange is the definition of a scam. This is the definition of it, there is no excuses or reasons to justify it. Now if people like it and want to play that game, fair enough that's their problem but I just want to say fuck the hundreds of noobs that will come and cry because they bought that shit. Fuck them. And fuck the hypocrites pretending to buy that shit only to dump it on other fools. Fuck them even more. Have a good day. |
|
|
|
|
PJNova
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 1
|
|
November 08, 2016, 11:06:54 AM |
|
All haters here saying ZCC its scam because 20% dsnt go to devs Launching a 100% copy of a crypto, telling almost no one, with no delay, only to instamine it (mining 100% of it by being the first) and dump it on shady small exchange is the definition of a scam. This is the definition of it, there is no excuses or reasons to justify it. Now if people like it and want to play that game, fair enough that's their problem but I just want to say fuck the hundreds of noobs that will come and cry because they bought that shit. Fuck them. And fuck the hypocrites pretending to buy that shit only to dump it on other fools. Fuck them even more. Have a good day. 1.) "100% copy of a crypto" It is by definition not 100% because some changes to parameters were made. 2.) "telling almost no one, with no delay" The coin was announced days before hand on Bitcointalk and Twitter. The actual launch was performed days after the initial announcement and was announced on twitter and Bitcointalk. 3.) instamine it (mining 100% of it by being the first) several working miners and a working pool were available at launch 4.) dump it on shady small exchange Miners sell any coin they mine because mining has costs, it is not an indication of the coins utility. That said this coin does look like a fucking joke. It had a fair launch but a really absent dev who probably needs to be replaced tbh. the coins parameters are very favorable the problem is the lack of dev activity. ie. DEV REFUSES TO FIX THE WORST OP I HAVE SEEN IN 5 YEARS OF CRYPTO. |
|
|
|
|
|
