[ANN][BCC] Bitconnect Coin - Decentralized Cryptocurrency

[klidex]

Hello Sir,

I want to buy BCC,

If anyone want to sell BCC then send me private message.

Thanks

anyone trying to buy just seems like bullshit,

they use new account to asking people who sell it, am i wrong?

[1714944442]

1714944442

[1714944442]

1714944442

[1714944442]

1714944442

[1714944442]

1714944442

[robelneo]

Bitconnect must have seven lives to be able to raise over 1000BTC, but my concern is that there is no way to verify these funds on blockchain also the questions raised have not been attended to yet

If 100 people invested here,100 new bitcoin address should be shown,because each user has their own unique address to deposit,but of course we can always ask for wallet account,but deposit and withdraw are ongoing,this could be the reason why dev cannot provide the funds on blockchain.

[nemgun]

Bitconnect must have seven lives to be able to raise over 1000BTC, but my concern is that there is no way to verify these funds on blockchain also the questions raised have not been attended to yet

If 100 people invested here,100 new bitcoin address should be shown,because each user has their own unique address to deposit,but of course we can always ask for wallet account,but deposit and withdraw are ongoing,this could be the reason why dev cannot provide the funds on blockchain.

Normally they will start not to respond on ANN threads after ICO but this bitconnect coin dev already not responding even when IcO is still on going. hows that for a proof?

If those project with escrows afford to scam people, why can't they?

I have been posting on this thread for quite some time and have seen and read dev's respond why not do a back read and check the dev's post,this is going nowhere and has become redundant,one guy asking questions about the project,dev will answer after a few days,another noob will ask the same question again,it's redundant..

i am very sorry if that hurts your butt.  its just not fun to back read what was replied by  the dev as i can't find him after 10 pages.
so why was he hiding?

there are reasons why they can't reveal themselves as a team right? and one of these reasons is that if investors knew them, they're screw.  did they answer this already? can you link me to it if you knew.

So following all the accusations in the page i decided to do a small investigation on BCC.
I helped them to solve a small bug in a web page, after that, they offered a donation, so i followed the donation address back in blockchain.info, i went up to annother address with 300 BTC, i even confirmed that it is the same address who sends to the escrow, there are a lot of movements in the address, however, i had to fetch in order to find this address because it seems they are using coin mixers, as there are a lot of addresses to check before finding the 300 one.
But i really do believe they have the 1200 btc, the ico ends in 12 hours, so we will have more informations on it later today.
When they had the 1000 btc this thread was not active at all, there was only 4 pages of discussion, so i don't think that BCC was looking for bitcointalk's investors, they are just telling us what they are doing, the ICO was aleready running, and he runned for a long time, so they aleready have investors, internal investors, plus i don't think that Edwardar haven't checked if it is a scam or not, because he is playing his reputation here too as he is the campaign manager for signatures.
This thread's stars are Robelneo and Electroniccash, as they draw a lot of people to the discussion.
However i still believe it is not a scam, regarding all the addresses and amounts passing by, even if i don't have the proof that x or y address belongs to them. And i think that they aleready started to use the ico funds, and this is why the ico is internal. I can also tell you that the platform is worth around 100 BTC because it is as good as an exchange, so, mainly, bitcointalk is just a marketing way for them.
And i strongly believe that if people are complaining about this coin is due to bittrex, when they refused to hold the ICO (if i remember).
Again, Bittrex is not a trust granter, look at the flash ico, completly failed, but no one is accusing them of scam. Their ICO is still running while it was planned to be ended the 7th january 2017, you can still buy, so it looks they extended but no one announced it.
So please, let's whait and see what will happen next. Remember that most of the actual ICOs are failing (flash, icobid ...), except BCC, simply because they convinced their community to invest.

[Mugamer]

well the total investment getting larger each day

1734253.844808 BCC (1414.24413991 BTC) Total Sold Coin

even it will not get listed in any exchange, BCC still probably not scam!! if after ICO ended they give a prove of investment to us and they agree to convert BCC into BTC for all investor

Totally agree. As long as they keep working with maximum efforts, I believe this coin will soon appear on some trading platform. Investors will soon realize how good and how awesome BCC is. BCC will absolutely bring some profit to all of us

That is nice project. a big amount of bitcoin was collected from ICO launching. I will buy some Bitconnect coins when it is available on the exchanges.
I hope this coin will have a good plans in the future.

[sulfurtank]

well the total investment getting larger each day

1734253.844808 BCC (1414.24413991 BTC) Total Sold Coin

even it will not get listed in any exchange, BCC still probably not scam!! if after ICO ended they give a prove of investment to us and they agree to convert BCC into BTC for all investor

Totally agree. As long as they keep working with maximum efforts, I believe this coin will soon appear on some trading platform. Investors will soon realize how good and how awesome BCC is. BCC will absolutely bring some profit to all of us

U are gullible to shits. Whats good in it? No chain, no funding, no roadmap, absolutely nothing to offer. U are a carpenter with low income, and I suspect that u was paid in advance for hyping and praising trashy dust.

[nemgun]

well the total investment getting larger each day

1734253.844808 BCC (1414.24413991 BTC) Total Sold Coin

even it will not get listed in any exchange, BCC still probably not scam!! if after ICO ended they give a prove of investment to us and they agree to convert BCC into BTC for all investor

Totally agree. As long as they keep working with maximum efforts, I believe this coin will soon appear on some trading platform. Investors will soon realize how good and how awesome BCC is. BCC will absolutely bring some profit to all of us

U are gullible to shits. Whats good in it? No chain, no funding, no roadmap, absolutely nothing to offer. U are a carpenter with low income, and I suspect that u was paid in advance for hyping and praising trashy dust.

Your laziness is chocking me.
Read more before posting please, blockchain is live, project is prefunded, roadmap in the website, everything in OP post or both websites.

[electronicash]

Bitconnect must have seven lives to be able to raise over 1000BTC, but my concern is that there is no way to verify these funds on blockchain also the questions raised have not been attended to yet

If 100 people invested here,100 new bitcoin address should be shown,because each user has their own unique address to deposit,but of course we can always ask for wallet account,but deposit and withdraw are ongoing,this could be the reason why dev cannot provide the funds on blockchain.

Normally they will start not to respond on ANN threads after ICO but this bitconnect coin dev already not responding even when IcO is still on going. hows that for a proof?

If those project with escrows afford to scam people, why can't they?

I have been posting on this thread for quite some time and have seen and read dev's respond why not do a back read and check the dev's post,this is going nowhere and has become redundant,one guy asking questions about the project,dev will answer after a few days,another noob will ask the same question again,it's redundant..

i am very sorry if that hurts your butt.  its just not fun to back read what was replied by  the dev as i can't find him after 10 pages.
so why was he hiding?

there are reasons why they can't reveal themselves as a team right? and one of these reasons is that if investors knew them, they're screw.  did they answer this already? can you link me to it if you knew.

So following all the accusations in the page i decided to do a small investigation on BCC.
I helped them to solve a small bug in a web page, after that, they offered a donation, so i followed the donation address back in blockchain.info, i went up to annother address with 300 BTC, i even confirmed that it is the same address who sends to the escrow, there are a lot of movements in the address, however, i had to fetch in order to find this address because it seems they are using coin mixers, as there are a lot of addresses to check before finding the 300 one.
But i really do believe they have the 1200 btc, the ico ends in 12 hours, so we will have more informations on it later today.
When they had the 1000 btc this thread was not active at all, there was only 4 pages of discussion, so i don't think that BCC was looking for bitcointalk's investors, they are just telling us what they are doing, the ICO was aleready running, and he runned for a long time, so they aleready have investors, internal investors, plus i don't think that Edwardar haven't checked if it is a scam or not, because he is playing his reputation here too as he is the campaign manager for signatures.
This thread's stars are Robelneo and Electroniccash, as they draw a lot of people to the discussion.
However i still believe it is not a scam, regarding all the addresses and amounts passing by, even if i don't have the proof that x or y address belongs to them. And i think that they aleready started to use the ico funds, and this is why the ico is internal. I can also tell you that the platform is worth around 100 BTC because it is as good as an exchange, so, mainly, bitcointalk is just a marketing way for them.
And i strongly believe that if people are complaining about this coin is due to bittrex, when they refused to hold the ICO (if i remember).
Again, Bittrex is not a trust granter, look at the flash ico, completly failed, but no one is accusing them of scam. Their ICO is still running while it was planned to be ended the 7th january 2017, you can still buy, so it looks they extended but no one announced it.
So please, let's whait and see what will happen next. Remember that most of the actual ICOs are failing (flash, icobid ...), except BCC, simply because they convinced their community to invest.

without that link going to the address with such amount of btc, its still a scam. BITCONNET COIN IS a SCAM
if this claims doesn't make these dev come here to respond to it, i guess they are now hiding and all you can do is hold your bcc on your own.

"keep it for life, its all yours" - that's your dev talking.

[robelneo]

Bitconnect must have seven lives to be able to raise over 1000BTC, but my concern is that there is no way to verify these funds on blockchain also the questions raised have not been attended to yet

If 100 people invested here,100 new bitcoin address should be shown,because each user has their own unique address to deposit,but of course we can always ask for wallet account,but deposit and withdraw are ongoing,this could be the reason why dev cannot provide the funds on blockchain.

Normally they will start not to respond on ANN threads after ICO but this bitconnect coin dev already not responding even when IcO is still on going. hows that for a proof?

If those project with escrows afford to scam people, why can't they?

I have been posting on this thread for quite some time and have seen and read dev's respond why not do a back read and check the dev's post,this is going nowhere and has become redundant,one guy asking questions about the project,dev will answer after a few days,another noob will ask the same question again,it's redundant..

i am very sorry if that hurts your butt.  its just not fun to back read what was replied by  the dev as i can't find him after 10 pages.
so why was he hiding?

there are reasons why they can't reveal themselves as a team right? and one of these reasons is that if investors knew them, they're screw.  did they answer this already? can you link me to it if you knew.

So following all the accusations in the page i decided to do a small investigation on BCC.
I helped them to solve a small bug in a web page, after that, they offered a donation, so i followed the donation address back in blockchain.info, i went up to annother address with 300 BTC, i even confirmed that it is the same address who sends to the escrow, there are a lot of movements in the address, however, i had to fetch in order to find this address because it seems they are using coin mixers, as there are a lot of addresses to check before finding the 300 one.
But i really do believe they have the 1200 btc, the ico ends in 12 hours, so we will have more informations on it later today.
When they had the 1000 btc this thread was not active at all, there was only 4 pages of discussion, so i don't think that BCC was looking for bitcointalk's investors, they are just telling us what they are doing, the ICO was aleready running, and he runned for a long time, so they aleready have investors, internal investors, plus i don't think that Edwardar haven't checked if it is a scam or not, because he is playing his reputation here too as he is the campaign manager for signatures.
This thread's stars are Robelneo and Electroniccash, as they draw a lot of people to the discussion.
However i still believe it is not a scam, regarding all the addresses and amounts passing by, even if i don't have the proof that x or y address belongs to them. And i think that they aleready started to use the ico funds, and this is why the ico is internal. I can also tell you that the platform is worth around 100 BTC because it is as good as an exchange, so, mainly, bitcointalk is just a marketing way for them.
And i strongly believe that if people are complaining about this coin is due to bittrex, when they refused to hold the ICO (if i remember).
Again, Bittrex is not a trust granter, look at the flash ico, completly failed, but no one is accusing them of scam. Their ICO is still running while it was planned to be ended the 7th january 2017, you can still buy, so it looks they extended but no one announced it.
So please, let's whait and see what will happen next. Remember that most of the actual ICOs are failing (flash, icobid ...), except BCC, simply because they convinced their community to invest.

Everything in this forum including Bitcoin are investment,there's no such thing as safe investment,stakes and shares sometimes falls,bitcoin sometimes drops ,it's about being confident in your investment and trusting what you see and analyze it according to your past experience ..

Only invest what you can afford to lose,it is taught by gurus and your mentor,even Bitconnectcoin is not  safe investment,let us see first how they deliver the goods,even Nakamoto did not reveal himself but he deliver the goods..

[aioc]

Bitconnect must have seven lives to be able to raise over 1000BTC, but my concern is that there is no way to verify these funds on blockchain also the questions raised have not been attended to yet

If 100 people invested here,100 new bitcoin address should be shown,because each user has their own unique address to deposit,but of course we can always ask for wallet account,but deposit and withdraw are ongoing,this could be the reason why dev cannot provide the funds on blockchain.

Normally they will start not to respond on ANN threads after ICO but this bitconnect coin dev already not responding even when IcO is still on going. hows that for a proof?

If those project with escrows afford to scam people, why can't they?

I have been posting on this thread for quite some time and have seen and read dev's respond why not do a back read and check the dev's post,this is going nowhere and has become redundant,one guy asking questions about the project,dev will answer after a few days,another noob will ask the same question again,it's redundant..

i am very sorry if that hurts your butt.  its just not fun to back read what was replied by  the dev as i can't find him after 10 pages.
so why was he hiding?

there are reasons why they can't reveal themselves as a team right? and one of these reasons is that if investors knew them, they're screw.  did they answer this already? can you link me to it if you knew.

So following all the accusations in the page i decided to do a small investigation on BCC.
I helped them to solve a small bug in a web page, after that, they offered a donation, so i followed the donation address back in blockchain.info, i went up to annother address with 300 BTC, i even confirmed that it is the same address who sends to the escrow, there are a lot of movements in the address, however, i had to fetch in order to find this address because it seems they are using coin mixers, as there are a lot of addresses to check before finding the 300 one.
But i really do believe they have the 1200 btc, the ico ends in 12 hours, so we will have more informations on it later today.
When they had the 1000 btc this thread was not active at all, there was only 4 pages of discussion, so i don't think that BCC was looking for bitcointalk's investors, they are just telling us what they are doing, the ICO was aleready running, and he runned for a long time, so they aleready have investors, internal investors, plus i don't think that Edwardar haven't checked if it is a scam or not, because he is playing his reputation here too as he is the campaign manager for signatures.
This thread's stars are Robelneo and Electroniccash, as they draw a lot of people to the discussion.
However i still believe it is not a scam, regarding all the addresses and amounts passing by, even if i don't have the proof that x or y address belongs to them. And i think that they aleready started to use the ico funds, and this is why the ico is internal. I can also tell you that the platform is worth around 100 BTC because it is as good as an exchange, so, mainly, bitcointalk is just a marketing way for them.
And i strongly believe that if people are complaining about this coin is due to bittrex, when they refused to hold the ICO (if i remember).
Again, Bittrex is not a trust granter, look at the flash ico, completly failed, but no one is accusing them of scam. Their ICO is still running while it was planned to be ended the 7th january 2017, you can still buy, so it looks they extended but no one announced it.
So please, let's whait and see what will happen next. Remember that most of the actual ICOs are failing (flash, icobid ...), except BCC, simply because they convinced their community to invest.

without that link going to the address with such amount of btc, its still a scam. BITCONNET COIN IS a SCAM
if this claims doesn't make these dev come here to respond to it, i guess they are now hiding and all you can do is hold your bcc on your own.

"keep it for life, its all yours" - that's your dev talking.

I think you are putting words to the dev's mouth,you are not even an investors here or a member of their dashboard,that's make you an ignorant on Bitconnectcoin because all you are posting are generics,

[electronicash]

Just think about it.

they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.

[nemgun]

-snip-

I think you are putting words to the dev's mouth,you are not even an investors here or a member of their dashboard,that's make you an ignorant on Bitconnectcoin because all you are posting are generics,

You shouldn't tell to people that they are ignorants, it is unfair, even if we don't share the same point of view, we are members of the signature campaign, we have to answer to questions and accusations of everyone here, because before participating to the campaign we check and verified the project ( i guess you did, as i did), so we must always answer in a pragmatic way. We are more in a "HelpDesk" like answer type, this is why we quote people's questions and try to answer as good as we can.
But, effectively, the identity is not that important, it is more about the project itself, its business plan, the roadmap, the reliability ... you are right Robelneo, any investment can be droped, crashes happens in stock markets even when you know everyone's identity (ftse, cac40, wallstreet ... ) with justified and approved actions, but, one should make the difference between a scam, and a project with breaches.
As a developer i saw that the platform is really functionnal and that a lot of work have been pulled there, so the developer team believes in the project, and they coded it well. while i believe there are two kinde of scams, the first one (1st degree) is the kinde of developer who uses templates without providing any work, who's only goal is to run with ICO funds. And the second (2nd degree), is where the dev imagine a project, an idea, they provide no business plan, they don't know how to realise the project, and they don't care about, they offer an approximative ICO, this project is at 99% sure to fail, as they will start investments straight after the ICO, even the roadmap is approximative, as they will need so much time to release the project that the coin will be completly dumped, at the end, they find them selves with a huge lack of funds, of developers, of everything, while the head is still believing in his project.
That's why everyone shall first read, understand, and assimilate a project ( as i did) before engagin, investing, participating. This is why i try to answer to everyone, using my knowledge.

[nemgun]

Just think about it.

they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.

You are locked in the escrow part, think about it.

You have a project, you got a community, you asked them to invest, they did it, and then you thought "Hey, why don't i do the same in bitcointalk ?". Now, thinking that most of  the people on your platform invested without an escrow you decide the do it again.
It is as easy as that, why should someone use an escrow when he aleready collected a lot of BTC without it ? it doesn't sounds logical to me.
Now, you can go to the signature section and check for edwardard's address, and try to follow them upward, you will find a lot of addresses with huge amounts of BTC, don't go too far away, because i suppose it is coin mixer then, or exchange because the sums are too high.

[aioc]

Just think about it.

they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.

 Wallet is existing,coins is existing,roadmap is existing,pools are existing investors get what they paid for immediately so why held an escrow,escrow are for those works that are not yet created .

You need an escrow if you will launch the wallet and the coins because nothing yet in existing..

[electronicash]

Just think about it.

they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.

You are locked in the escrow part, think about it.

You have a project, you got a community, you asked them to invest, they did it, and then you thought "Hey, why don't i do the same in bitcointalk ?". Now, thinking that most of  the people on your platform invested without an escrow you decide the do it again.
It is as easy as that, why should someone use an escrow when he aleready collected a lot of BTC without it ? it doesn't sounds logical to me.
Now, you can go to the signature section and check for edwardard's address, and try to follow them upward, you will find a lot of addresses with huge amounts of BTC, don't go too far away, because i suppose it is coin mixer then, or exchange because the sums are too high.

they should have post it on the first page to make it legit. those devs can always deny everything. they may even deny they created this thread.   swear to god they can.

edward their signature campaign escrow doesn't have even have the light green trust. master p did it, so are those with green trust. their accounts doesn't matter to them, they can always buy another. so long as those accounts aren't connected to their real world account, they can still turn nuts still.

prove me wrong but if for instance they get this coin listed on exchange, they'd be gone FOREVER and bcc is all yours without a value.

[yhlsqj]

Just think about it.

they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.

Escrow is not the issue if they have supported for a community for long time. The current issue is the bitcoin fund address, I also doubt 1400 btc raised is a bluff or hype, until OP shows the fund proof

[smyslov]

Just think about it.

they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.

You are locked in the escrow part, think about it.

You have a project, you got a community, you asked them to invest, they did it, and then you thought "Hey, why don't i do the same in bitcointalk ?". Now, thinking that most of  the people on your platform invested without an escrow you decide the do it again.
It is as easy as that, why should someone use an escrow when he aleready collected a lot of BTC without it ? it doesn't sounds logical to me.
Now, you can go to the signature section and check for edwardard's address, and try to follow them upward, you will find a lot of addresses with huge amounts of BTC, don't go too far away, because i suppose it is coin mixer then, or exchange because the sums are too high.

they should have post it on the first page to make it legit. those devs can always deny everything. they may even deny they created this thread.   swear to god they can.

edward their signature campaign escrow doesn't have even have the light green trust. master p did it, so are those with green trust. their accounts doesn't matter to them, they can always buy another. so long as those accounts aren't connected to their real world account, they can still turn nuts still.

prove me wrong but if for instance they get this coin listed on exchange, they'd be gone FOREVER and bcc is all yours without a value.

Is this guy talking about every coin here or just acting a noob or a fortune teller,all his post are nonsense,he deviate from subjects to prove his point making it a general topic you should post it altcoin section for disscussion.

[nemgun]

Just think about it.

they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.

 Wallet is existing,coins is existing,roadmap is existing,pools are existing investors get what they paid for immediately so why held an escrow,escrow are for those works that are not yet created .

You need an escrow if you will launch the wallet and the coins because nothing yet in existing..

Exactly, but an escrow is also a warranty of trust, it can help to bring in more investors because of the escrow's fame, but in this case, Electroniccash can't understand is that BCC have aleready hitted the minimum, and they aleready have the reputation, just have a closer look, they tried to use Bittrex but apparently they failed because of Bittrex, and it is totaly understandable as bittrex charges a lot, like 10% plus 5BTC and more on, iti s not reliable. It is less money for the project, and it wouldn't be fair for the other investors, who haven't asked for an escrow. So the escrow is not mandatory, and some of them don't hesitate to pump from the company's ressources, i better like the BCC team to use the budget for Bittrex as a buy-back in case of a dump to secure the currency price.

[vanarebane]

Just think about it.

they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.

Escrow is not the issue if they have supported for a community for long time. The current issue is the bitcoin fund address, I also doubt 1400 btc raised is a bluff or hype, until OP shows the fund proof

The proof of long time? I never seen this site in the community, I am close to bitcoin community, none of my friends have known this site. So if no proof, you are just spread fake news.

[olubams]

I have said this times without number and this thread have continue to be one accusation and another counter accusation and this has been on and on since who knows when. Simply because of a simple thing which is Transparency. IT could be true that funds might have been raised else, also it might not be compulsory to use Escrow so far its ok to all and sundry but what others are asking of is where are the funds going? Show us... I believe when this is done, the thread can be about something more productive and not just this unnecessary bickering here and there...

[nemgun]

Just think about it.

they were doing ICO so they know for sure they need the escrow for it. who in the right mind right now would do ICO without escrow. we all know these guys aren't newbies here in bitcointalk. they do have high rank account here, in fact they can give me a red trust for asking how this ICO come to realization without escrow but then of course they won't be doing it because they'd be busted.

Escrow is not the issue if they have supported for a community for long time. The current issue is the bitcoin fund address, I also doubt 1400 btc raised is a bluff or hype, until OP shows the fund proof

The proof of long time? I never seen this site in the community, I am close to bitcoin community, none of my friends have known this site. So if no proof, you are just spread fake news.

Again, i investigated the domain name, and here is the result of whois.domaintools :
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Domain Name:                                 BITCONNECT.CO
Domain ID:                                   D74141685-CO
Sponsoring Registrar:                        NAMECHEAP, INC.
Sponsoring Registrar IANA ID:                1068
Registrar URL (registration services):       http://www.namecheap.com
Domain Status:                               clientTransferProhibited
Registrant ID:                               TSZ0Z3T2KKHZDBEZ
Registrant Name:                             WhoisGuard Protected
Registrant Organization:                     WhoisGuard, Inc.
Registrant Address1:                         P.O. Box 0823-03411
Registrant City:                             Panama
Registrant State/Province:                   Panama
Registrant Postal Code:                      00000
Registrant Country:                          Panama
Registrant Country Code:                     PA
Registrant Phone Number:                     +507.8365503
Registrant Facsimile Number:                 +51.17057182
Registrant Email:                           
b7074be43a1e4cce8fe9e9f41f95090b.protect@whoisguard.com
Administrative Contact ID:                   A2IER553D4IO5V2I
Administrative Contact Name:                 WhoisGuard Protected
Administrative Contact Organization:         WhoisGuard, Inc.
Administrative Contact Address1:             P.O. Box 0823-03411
Administrative Contact City:                 Panama
Administrative Contact State/Province:       Panama
Administrative Contact Postal Code:          00000
Administrative Contact Country:              Panama
Administrative Contact Country Code:         PA
Administrative Contact Phone Number:         +507.8365503
Administrative Contact Facsimile Number:     +51.17057182
Administrative Contact Email:               
b7074be43a1e4cce8fe9e9f41f95090b.protect@whoisguard.com
Billing Contact ID:                          WL2YK22SZLHCVAAH
Billing Contact Name:                        WhoisGuard Protected
Billing Contact Organization:                WhoisGuard, Inc.
Billing Contact Address1:                    P.O. Box 0823-03411
Billing Contact City:                        Panama
Billing Contact State/Province:              Panama
Billing Contact Postal Code:                 00000
Billing Contact Country:                     Panama
Billing Contact Country Code:                PA
Billing Contact Phone Number:                +507.8365503
Billing Contact Facsimile Number:            +51.17057182
Billing Contact Email:                       
b7074be43a1e4cce8fe9e9f41f95090b.protect@whoisguard.com
Technical Contact ID:                        I52EBWBX1UYFCCZM
Technical Contact Name:                      WhoisGuard Protected
Technical Contact Organization:              WhoisGuard, Inc.
Technical Contact Address1:                  P.O. Box 0823-03411
Technical Contact City:                      Panama
Technical Contact State/Province:            Panama
Technical Contact Postal Code:               00000
Technical Contact Country:                   Panama
Technical Contact Country Code:              PA
Technical Contact Phone Number:              +507.8365503
Technical Contact Facsimile Number:          +51.17057182
Technical Contact Email:                     
b7074be43a1e4cce8fe9e9f41f95090b.protect@whoisguard.com
Name Server:                                 NS1.DREAMHOST.COM
Name Server:                                 NS2.DREAMHOST.COM
Name Server:                                 NS3.DREAMHOST.COM
Created by Registrar:                        NAMECHEAP, INC.
Last Updated by Registrar:                   NAMECHEAP, INC.
Domain Registration Date:                    Tue Feb 09 07:08:17 GMT 2016
Domain Expiration Date:                      Sat Feb 08 23:59:59 GMT 2020
Domain Last Updated Date:                    Mon Aug 01 14:48:25 GMT 2016
DNSSEC:                                      false
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

They exist since more than a year regarding domain name registration, and they will still be here untill 2020.
If you reverse the ip (dedicated server) you will finde 3 websites, the last one is still under construction.
The server is based in california, operating from Panama (FP).

And here is ScamAdviser :

Website: bitconnect.co
Title: Bitcoin Community-Earn, Buy, Sell and Trade | Bitconnect
Description: World bitcoin community for bitcoin and other crypto users to earn, learn, buy, sell and t
Type: Community,bitcoin

Domain Age: 333 Days
Website Speed: Slow
Website Value: $16698.78

Organisation: WhoisGuard, Inc.
Owner: WhoisGuard Protected
Owner Address: P.O. Box 0823-03411
Owner City: Panama
Owner Postcode: 00000
Phone Number: +507.8365503  [Panama]
Phone Type: VoIP telephony :Panamá Skycom Communication, S.A. / Galaxy Communication, Corp
Email:   [United States]

Owner Country : Hidden  [Unknown]
Website Location  : United States  [United States]

Probable website origin :-
 88%;   [Unknown]  Unknown
 6%;   [Panama]  Panama
 5%;   [United States]  United States

Notes:-
[Alert Result] The owner of the website is using a service to hide their identity
[Alert Result] This website is 333 Days old
[Good Result] This website is deemed to be popular by Alexa with a ranking of 144262

Analysis Details:-
Although this website appears to be based in United States there are other countries involved and you should review this information carefully and decide if it is as you expect.Although being a new website, does not make it un-trustworthy, as with any new business you should be extra vigilant and do your own research before placing an order or making an investment.
This site is using an anonymous service - which prevents us from identifying the site owner. This can sometimes be just so that the owner does not receive spam, but be aware that many scam sites use this as a method to hide their identify. If this is an ecommerce site - we would suggest you confirm the business address with the website owners.