Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2019, 02:09:01 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 [160] 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 ... 318 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] (QTUM) - A Scalable Smart Contract Platform w/ Proof of Stake  (Read 429567 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (2 posts by 2 users deleted.)
stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 06:16:26 AM
 #3181


Name calling again?  Grin

That's all you got!

Is that all I got, or are you just retarded? Because if you knew how to read you would notice there is more there than just name calling in my post. On the other-hand, all you have are these pathetic attempts to deflect.

Whatever, as you already said youself: the burden of proof lies on qtum. They haven't provided it. Therefore, the ICO must have been a complete failure. SAD!

You wish!

I don't need to wish, it is evident based on the logic you outlined yourself. Not my words, yours. Sorry the ICO was such a failure.
1560737341
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560737341

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560737341
Reply with quote  #2

1560737341
Report to moderator
1560737341
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560737341

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560737341
Reply with quote  #2

1560737341
Report to moderator
1560737341
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560737341

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560737341
Reply with quote  #2

1560737341
Report to moderator
NEW GAME FORMAT
JACKPOT UP TO $50000+
Guess The Symbols Of a Real Ethereum Hash
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1560737341
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560737341

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560737341
Reply with quote  #2

1560737341
Report to moderator
1560737341
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1560737341

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1560737341
Reply with quote  #2

1560737341
Report to moderator
stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 06:19:51 AM
 #3182

Here's the address for qtum's ICO funds: https://blockchain.info/address/1DBiehhnU9xjq14spVxALsTjAEgH9BGmB (I can say whatever I want and post it as truth without providing any proof just like the qtum team has done, because that is how reality works in their world)

Even less than I thought!  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy
stackoverflow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 06:25:55 AM
 #3183


Name calling again?  Grin

That's all you got!

Is that all I got, or are you just retarded? Because if you knew how to read you would notice there is more there than just name calling in my post. On the other-hand, all you have are these pathetic attempts to deflect.

Whatever, as you already said youself: the burden of proof lies on qtum. They haven't provided it. Therefore, the ICO must have been a complete failure. SAD!

You wish!

I don't need to wish, it is evident based on the logic you outlined yourself. Not my words, yours. Sorry the ICO was such a failure.

How is that a failure when all the exchanges were sold out as they announced?

You think they're lying? prove it!
stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 06:26:39 AM
 #3184


Name calling again?  Grin

That's all you got!

Is that all I got, or are you just retarded? Because if you knew how to read you would notice there is more there than just name calling in my post. On the other-hand, all you have are these pathetic attempts to deflect.

Whatever, as you already said youself: the burden of proof lies on qtum. They haven't provided it. Therefore, the ICO must have been a complete failure. SAD!

You wish!

I don't need to wish, it is evident based on the logic you outlined yourself. Not my words, yours. Sorry the ICO was such a failure.

How is that a failure when all the exchanges were sold out as they announced?

You think they're lying? prove it!

I don't have to prove anything, because that's not how things are done around here. I can just say it is so and it is so. Pretty awesome!
szafa
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 06:28:29 AM
 #3185

Yunbi have not qtum in trading yet or i am not good to find.
stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 06:29:41 AM
 #3186

And remember everybody this is a quote from stackoverflow: ""the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"

And as we all know qtum is the one who declared a successful ICO, and I am only denying that Smiley
So according to stackoverflow himself I don't have to provide any proof to deny it, they are the ones that need to provide proof to confirm it.
stackoverflow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 06:32:16 AM
 #3187

And remember everybody this is a quote from stackoverflow: ""the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"

And as we all know qtum is the one who declared a successful ICO, and I am only denying that Smiley
So according to stackoverflow himself I don't have to provide any proof to deny it, they are the ones that need to provide proof to confirm it.

The proof is the numerous exchanges which witnessed the success  Grin
stormia
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 06:33:32 AM
Last edit: March 27, 2017, 06:59:55 AM by stormia
 #3188

And remember everybody this is a quote from stackoverflow: ""the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"

And as we all know qtum is the one who declared a successful ICO, and I am only denying that Smiley
So according to stackoverflow himself I don't have to provide any proof to deny it, they are the ones that need to provide proof to confirm it.

The proof is the numerous exchanges which witnessed the success  Grin

I don't think you understand what proof means. This is crypto we are talking about, there is objective evidence on the blockchain and that is the only thing that can be trusted. Why should we trust exchanges controlled by the team themselves when we could rely on a trustless system to obtain our proof? It's so simple to do, and the fact you and the team are still fighting this is a gigantic red flag. This struggle you guys are putting up is equivalent to admittance. There is no reason for it except that you need to hide something.

My theory: The ICO did not raise anywhere near 15 mil, but you are going to pretend it did until release, because although you didn't raise 15 mil you have control of the vast majority of the coins because you "purchased" them from the exchanges under your own control. All you need to do is maintain some confidence in the coin until release, and then you can dump to make up for all the money you didn't raise in the ICO.

You could prove that wrong in an instant, but you don't because apparently you can't. And let me make one thing clear, until objective evidence of the ICO funds (the addresses) are shared with the community I will be in here alllllllll the way up until and past the launch making sure nobody who comes here forgets or is unaware that the team has failed to bear their burden of proof and provide this simple and standard degree of transparency that they themselves alluded to before the ICO.

Remember, your own words: "the burden of proof is on the one who declares, not on one who denies"
Qtum declared a successful ICO, I am just denying it Smiley
TheBobyHunter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 494


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 06:38:22 AM
 #3189

Yunbi have not qtum in trading yet or i am not good to find.

i think you must wait, if you want qtum trading
because ico selling in qtum coin is not finish, maybe the first trade in livecoin, because ico selling use livecoin
titibach
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 07:18:18 AM
 #3190

so this was self brought within 90 minutes? that really is a special kind of stupid.
wheresmycoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 619
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 10:42:55 AM
Last edit: March 27, 2017, 10:57:02 AM by wheresmycoin
 #3191

if nothing goes wrong, there were a couple promising icos recently but qtum is probably going to be the most successful crypto since ethereum.
BlastHazard
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10

The World We Live In Today...


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 10:59:10 AM
 #3192

if nothing goes wrong, there were a couple promising icos recently but qtum is probably going to be the most successful crypto since ethereum.


Unfortunately I missed out on this one, looks good though being a bitsa.
titibach
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 11:03:05 AM
 #3193

if nothing goes wrong, there were a couple promising icos recently but qtum is probably going to be the most successful crypto since ethereum.


why you are whoring yourself for a project with a scammer as the ceo is beyond me.
This is nothing and will amount to nothing as soon as he dumps out his free coins.
Been warned.
wheresmycoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 619
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 27, 2017, 11:16:55 AM
 #3194

if nothing goes wrong, there were a couple promising icos recently but qtum is probably going to be the most successful crypto since ethereum.


why you are whoring yourself for a project with a scammer as the ceo is beyond me.
This is nothing and will amount to nothing as soon as he dumps out his free coins.
Been warned.

The business world is far more complicated than you think it is supposed to be, not only qtum's.

Things can go wrong with this project, not saying this won't go wrong.
provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 27, 2017, 03:20:49 PM
 #3195

if nothing goes wrong, there were a couple promising icos recently but qtum is probably going to be the most successful crypto since ethereum.


why you are whoring yourself for a project with a scammer as the ceo is beyond me.
This is nothing and will amount to nothing as soon as he dumps out his free coins.
Been warned.

The business world is far more complicated than you think it is supposed to be, not only qtum's.

Things can go wrong with this project, not saying this won't go wrong.

finally there are some reasonable and good input in this thread. Smiley
provenceday
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 27, 2017, 03:26:55 PM
 #3196

based on 2 solid blockchain project, bitcoin and ethereum,

Qtum have big potential.

if the project can be released in 2017, this will be big.
Gleb Gamow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1119



View Profile
March 27, 2017, 10:01:03 PM
 #3197

Amazing how all those people who invested in Qtum's nonprofit, non-investment thingy registered in Singapore opted to not come to this thread and post their fuckin asses off after my last post hours ago. It's almost like, what I've more than alluded to, they're nonexistent.

We may have gotten lucky in that the Bruce Peterson of Qtum, cocksuckeroverflow, truly abandoned this thread.  Kiss Kiss Kiss Perhaps he's busy trying to break into my user accounts on this forum most recently (within hours ago) according to all the alerts I've been getting via emails.
stackoverflow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 28, 2017, 02:22:42 AM
 #3198

Glebby talking to himself now  Grin

Someone living by that river better call 911!
Gleb Gamow
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1119



View Profile
March 28, 2017, 03:20:22 AM
 #3199

Glebby talking to himself now  Grin

Someone living by that river better call 911!

At least I more homies on this thread than you do, for I don't see many echoing your sentiment excepting Newbies posting exclusively here, most likely Team Qtum's shill accounts.
solix
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 180
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 28, 2017, 04:56:44 AM
 #3200

Glebby talking to himself now  Grin

Someone living by that river better call 911!

At least I more homies on this thread than you do, for I don't see many echoing your sentiment excepting Newbies posting exclusively here, most likely Team Qtum's shill accounts.

Gleb and I are homies now thanks to the battle scars of the Legends Room. I get nervous when Gleb shows up on a thread. He's one of those guys that makes me most happy by never making an appearance. I warned him we'd cross paths again soon... I just didn't think it would be 30 minutes later.

Your Ad here! PM us now if you'd like to advertise here.
Pages: « 1 ... 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 [160] 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 ... 318 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!