Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[Swordsoffreedom]

BitStar is open their campaign for OCTOBER

check here

Hero and Senior Members (limited to 22 participants)
0.1 BTC for a minimum of 50 posts per month

Full Members and Members (limited to 16 participants)
0.05 BTC for a minimum of 50 posts per month

Yeah :


Bitstars.net : (Thread)
Payment period: Monthly
Minimum posts: 50  posts
Payments: 0.10 btc for Sr. Member and above  //  0.05 btc for Members and Full member
Miscellaneous: Your signature must exclusively using our signature

THIS CAMPAIGN IS ALREADY FULL! PLEASE CHECK BACK FOR NEXT MONTH!

Status changed to full and they paid out Septembers users
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=734298

[Kakmakr]

I have not been paid by ShibaRoll campaign.

Send them the PM to request payment, and got nothing. Then I also see the thread is "watched only" so I could not comment.

I waited 48 hours, before I moved onto the next signature campaign.

I guess, they closed shop, but they still on this overview.

The OP's profile was also dormant. Last Active:    September 21, 2014, 07:40:49 AM

[busterroni]

I have not been paid by ShibaRoll campaign.

Send them the PM to request payment, and got nothing. Then I also see the thread is "watched only" so I could not comment.

I waited 48 hours, before I moved onto the next signature campaign.

I guess, they closed shop, but they still on this overview.

The OP's profile was also dormant.

Try emailing the site.

[erenna]

I have been paid by Crypto-Games.net

Starting another week today!

[jaberwock]

I have not been paid by ShibaRoll campaign.

Send them the PM to request payment, and got nothing. Then I also see the thread is "watched only" so I could not comment.

I waited 48 hours, before I moved onto the next signature campaign.

I guess, they closed shop, but they still on this overview.

The OP's profile was also dormant. Last Active:    September 21, 2014, 07:40:49 AM

It is always suspicious when a signature campaign closes his topic while campaign is running.

Do you know if other people received or not?

[Mitchell]

I, finally, updated MoneyPot. I think I got everything now, if not, please tell me (once).

[hilariousandco]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=809660.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=810268.0

Two new deals. One from OneDice and Barwick Mining. Stunna has alleged that OneDice is probably a scam site though, but I reckon they will probably pay out for their signatures (or at least for a bit).

[ACCTseller]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=809660.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=810268.0

Two new deals. One from OneDice and Barwick Mining. Stunna has alleged that OneDice is probavly a scam site though but I reckon they will probably pay out for their signatures (or at least for a bit).

The previous owner of the RandyFolds account was PM spamming several people who have threads open on the digital goods section selling forum accounts (via group PM) trying to sell his account for 1 BTC (I can't find the PM but he PMed myself, QuickSeller and AccountTrader) he then PMed just me a while later offering to sell it for .8 BTC. I found him to be annoying AF but I suspect that someone purchased the account for the positive trust (presumably to get people to join their signature campaign w/o escrow)

EDIT: this if regarding the OneDice campaign

[hilariousandco]

Thanks for that. I've posted it in the thread about him in the Scam Accusation's sub (not sure if you already told Stunna or not). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=809084.msg9064241#msg9064241

I think he'll probably pay for the sig campaign going for a longcon on the casino instead.

[ACCTseller]

Thanks for that. I've posted it in the thread about him in the Scam Accusation's sub (not sure if you already told Stunna or not). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=809084.msg9064241#msg9064241

I think he'll probably pay for the sig campaign going for a longcon on the casino instead.

He said he will pay "trusted" members upfront for 50 posts so I would say he would pay only this amount to earn additional trust among members. I also see that he did not put a limit as to how many people can participate (which is unusual for a new site as they are generally not large enough to have a large advertising budget). By getting more people to participate they would get more people to deposit funds at their site and they would likely hope they can run away with customer funds within a month when the amount of customer funds gets large enough.

I do see that TECSHARE removed his positive trust so he is no longer a trusted member.

[hilariousandco]

If what Stunna alleges is true - which it looks like it probably is - the previous casino did pay for their signature  campaign I believe. He also did state there would be a restriction:

Is there a limit to the number of members you are looking to accept? This might not be much of a problem since you only accept Senior Members and up, but it may be a good idea to define that as soon as possible. Also, instead of upfront payment to select users, wouldn't it be better to use escrow? Not only are some willing to do this job for free, but it offers much better assurance to both parties.

Limit will probably be 50 people

Almost anyone will get upfront payment so I don't think thee is a need for escrow.

Someone contacted me for upfront payment of 0.05 for 50 posts and he does barely 4-5 posts a month, those type of accounts will be declined on upfront payment.

[u9y42]

Thanks for that. I've posted it in the thread about him in the Scam Accusation's sub (not sure if you already told Stunna or not). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=809084.msg9064241#msg9064241

I think he'll probably pay for the sig campaign going for a longcon on the casino instead.

He said he will pay "trusted" members upfront for 50 posts so I would say he would pay only this amount to earn additional trust among members. I also see that he did not put a limit as to how many people can participate (which is unusual for a new site as they are generally not large enough to have a large advertising budget). By getting more people to participate they would get more people to deposit funds at their site and they would likely hope they can run away with customer funds within a month when the amount of customer funds gets large enough.

I do see that TECSHARE removed his positive trust so he is no longer a trusted member.

I asked him about member limits, and he says he is considering limiting it to 50 members, which although a large number isn't unusual, I think. Also, according to him, most users would get paid upfront - at least judging by his example. I would still prefer escrow though.

EDIT: hilariousandco beat me to it...

EDIT2: that reminds me: what about the suggestion of editing the OP to contain information about whether or not a campaign has funds in escrow? It currently details those that pay upfront, but I think this would also be useful information to have.

[BAGOBO]

Barwick Mining Signature Campaign (Thread)
Payment period: monthly
Minimum posts: 50 posts
Payments: FM = BTC 0.04 , SM = BTC 0.09 , H/L = BTC 0.1
Miscellaneous: Full Members 9 Slots, Sr. Member 6 slots, Hero/Legendary 6 slots. Has to be at least Full Member without any negative trust. Only our signature allowed in your space. You can not change the address during the campaign. Can be disqualified if : You remove signature at any time during the period,You gain a negative default trust and/or get banned, Change of ownership of account, You repeatedly troll/harass/flame/spam and/or break forum rules

[Mitchell]

Barwick Mining Signature Campaign (Thread)
-snip-

Added, thank you!

The Escrow part will be added once I redo the whole table, which will then also show if a signature campaign has paid in the past or not (PYNC).

[u9y42]

[...] The Escrow part will be added once I redo the whole table, which will then also show if a signature campaign has paid in the past or not (PYNC).

Great, looking forward to it. Let us know if you need people to gather information about currently running campaigns.

Meanwhile, one more campaign:

CoinPiler (Thread)
Payment period: Monthly.
Minimum posts: 100 posts per month.
Payments: S/H/L: 0.1BTC per month.
Miscellaneous: Must have a minimum of 1000 posts to enroll. Maximum of 30 participants.

You can see more detailed information here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=746016.msg9077387#msg9077387 (in the "For Regular Contributor" section). So far, it seems not to be using escrow.

[Mitchell]

Great, looking forward to it. Let us know if you need people to gather information about currently running campaigns.

-snip-

I will! Adding the CoinPiler campaign now.

[redsn0w]

Barwick Mining Signature Campaign (Thread)
-snip-

Added, thank you!

The Escrow part will be added once I redo the whole table, which will then also show if a signature campaign has paid in the past or not (PYNC).

Hey @bitcoininformation,

Can I ask you why the Barwick min. sig. campaign was added to  the section "Closed for new participants"  ? it is not  CLFNP  .

[Mitchell]

Hey @bitcoininformation,

Can I ask you why the Barwick min. sig. campaign was added to  the section "Closed for new participants"  ? it is not  CLFNP  .

I assumed that [x/x Slots] meant that it is full. Why else would it be red and not, for example, green? Let me check and move it if required.

[redsn0w]

Hey @bitcoininformation,

Can I ask you why the Barwick min. sig. campaign was added to  the section "Closed for new participants"  ? it is not  CLFNP  .

I assumed that [x/x Slots] meant that it is full. Why else would it be red and not, for example, green? Let me check and move it if required.

this is the  answer    :

You just starter this sig campaign and all slots are full?

not still full yet

9/9 slot it means 9 slot remaining

No problem I want only to inform you  , sorry for the trouble.

[Mitchell]

this is the  answer    :

-snip-

No problem I want only to inform you  , sorry for the trouble.

Ah, thanks for telling me man! Will move them right now