Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[busterroni]

Bitcoin-Tutorials sig campaign has paid out week one! https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=799602.0

Screw all dah haters

[rohnearner]

There are so many Signature promotion that are not yet listed by OP..? +There should be a different category " Potential Scam " for hyips and other obvious scam that will turn scam sooner or later, with a "Non-Recommended" sign over them.

[Mitchell]

There are so many Signature promotion that are not yet listed by OP..? +There should be a different category " Potential Scam " for hyips and other obvious scam that will turn scam sooner or later, with a "Non-Recommended" sign over them.

Tell me what campaigns aren't listed and I shall add them.

[williamj2543]

There are so many Signature promotion that are not yet listed by OP..? +There should be a different category " Potential Scam " for hyips and other obvious scam that will turn scam sooner or later, with a "Non-Recommended" sign over them.

Bitcoininformation shouldn't be your scam detector, he is simply listing all the signature campaigns. You should choose your campaign wisely.

[PYramid Head]

There are so many Signature promotion that are not yet listed by OP..? +There should be a different category " Potential Scam " for hyips and other obvious scam that will turn scam sooner or later, with a "Non-Recommended" sign over them.

Tell me what campaigns aren't listed and I shall add them.

I guess the other scam from the some people from cyptcominer?

Anyway seems like they already ran away

[u9y42]

I guess the other scam from the some people from cyptcominer?

Anyway seems like they already ran away

You mean, the guys from the Tradefocus campaign? If they are indeed the same people that were behind Cryptcominer (which seems likely), they will probably be back on Monday - I think they said at some point they didn't work weekends.

[Malin Keshar]

I guess the other scam from the some people from cyptcominer?

Anyway seems like they already ran away

You mean, the guys from the Tradefocus campaign? If they are indeed the same people that were behind Cryptcominer (which seems likely), they will probably be back on Monday - I think they said at some point they didn't work weekends.

Last time they stopped to pay on weekend, too.

[rhino34567]

I guess the other scam from the some people from cyptcominer?

Anyway seems like they already ran away

You mean, the guys from the Tradefocus campaign? If they are indeed the same people that were behind Cryptcominer (which seems likely), they will probably be back on Monday - I think they said at some point they didn't work weekends.

Last time they stopped to pay on weekend, too.

I checked them out, they are most likely a complete scam.

[rohnearner]

There are so many Signature promotion that are not yet listed by OP..? +There should be a different category " Potential Scam " for hyips and other obvious scam that will turn scam sooner or later, with a "Non-Recommended" sign over them.

Bitcoininformation shouldn't be your scam detector, he is simply listing all the signature campaigns. You should choose your campaign wisely.

There are some sig campaign out there who don't even need any detection they are just obvious scams. like hyips etc.

[Omikifuse]

I guess the other scam from the some people from cyptcominer?

Anyway seems like they already ran away

You mean, the guys from the Tradefocus campaign? If they are indeed the same people that were behind Cryptcominer (which seems likely), they will probably be back on Monday - I think they said at some point they didn't work weekends.

Last time they stopped to pay on weekend, too.

I checked them out, they are most likely a complete scam.

most likely? lol

Everyone knows they are scam, even those that are in the campaign. The question is how long until they disappear with all money and when will they stop to pay the signature.

[williamj2543]

There are so many Signature promotion that are not yet listed by OP..? +There should be a different category " Potential Scam " for hyips and other obvious scam that will turn scam sooner or later, with a "Non-Recommended" sign over them.

Bitcoininformation shouldn't be your scam detector, he is simply listing all the signature campaigns. You should choose your campaign wisely.

There are some sig campaign out there who don't even need any detection they are just obvious scams. like hyips etc.

I think HYIP should just not be added, unless they have daily payouts, because if they run away you only lose a day or two's pay.

[hilariousandco]

most likely? lol

Everyone knows they are scam, even those that are in the campaign. The question is how long until they disappear with all money and when will they stop to pay the signature.

Sadly most people won't care as long as they get paid, which they may initially but wont eventually, much like the site they're advertising for.

[redsn0w]

most likely? lol

Everyone knows they are scam, even those that are in the campaign. The question is how long until they disappear with all money and when will they stop to pay the signature.

Sadly most people won't care as long as they get paid, which they may initially but wont eventually, much like the site they're advertising for.

Yes , we cannot obligate an user to not endorse a signature .. I think everyone is free to put his signature.

[suchmoon]

There are so many Signature promotion that are not yet listed by OP..? +There should be a different category " Potential Scam " for hyips and other obvious scam that will turn scam sooner or later, with a "Non-Recommended" sign over them.

Bitcoininformation shouldn't be your scam detector, he is simply listing all the signature campaigns. You should choose your campaign wisely.

There are some sig campaign out there who don't even need any detection they are just obvious scams. like hyips etc.

I think HYIP should just not be added, unless they have daily payouts, because if they run away you only lose a day or two's pay.

You see the problem right in your own post, don't you? What's the definition of an obvious scam? Daily payouts ok with you, how about every other day?

In other words you would have to define a bunch of rules, which wouldn't fit EVERYONE's risk tolerance anyway, so why bother. Let bitcoininformation publish the sig campaigns, and let everyone decide for themselves. There is no substitute for personal responsibility.

[tspacepilot]

@bitcoininformation: have you received some sort of official blessing for putting paid adverts in your OP?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=749961.msg8466370#msg8466370

I do enjoy the irony of the disclaimer about how bitcoininformation doesn't endorse any content in his advert alongside his plans to not list any hyip/ponzi stuff in the OP.

Guess people are still people.

[ACCTseller]

@bitcoininformation: have you received some sort of official blessing for putting paid adverts in your OP?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=749961.msg8466370#msg8466370

Yes he has. He posted it several pages back

[tspacepilot]

One guy who is not bitcoininformation says "it's somewhere in there".  I suppose the man himself will be able to dig up the permission if he has it.

[ACCTseller]

One guy who is not bitcoininformation says "it's somewhere in there".  I suppose the man himself will be able to dig up the permission if he has it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.msg8570962#msg8570962

Took 30 seconds to find

[botany]

Bitstars.net is mentioned twice in the OP - under PNYC and CFNP. 

[freedomno1]

Bitstars.net is mentioned twice in the OP - under PNYC and CFNP. 

Indeed it is and even has a different rate table nice observation
Technically looking at links one is dated August one October

August one is done and moved to october so the current CLFNP is this one
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=807195.0