Re: Updated Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

[Kakmakr]

Everyone is going on about Tradefocus being a Ponzi, but they gladly accept PBMining with open arms?

From what I have read on this forum, PBmining is a Ponzi too. They have shown no evidence of physical mining being done.

The only reason, why they would rush a signature campaign like this, is because the incoming money needed to feed the Ponzi are drying up and they need new blood, to feed the system.

Mark my words, we will see a bubble burst soon. ^laugh^

[redHeadBlunder]

Everyone is going on about Tradefocus being a Ponzi, but they gladly accept PBMining with open arms?

From what I have read on this forum, PBmining is a Ponzi too. They have shown no evidence of physical mining being done.

The only reason, why they would rush a signature campaign like this, is because the incoming money needed to feed the Ponzi are drying up and they need new blood, to feed the system.

Mark my words, we will see a bubble burst soon. ^laugh^

There is evidence that mining is done. Their payout address is linked to addresses that have roughly the same amount of estimated hashpower as what they advertise.

To advertise PB mining is not advertising a ponzi

[Kakmakr]

As I said, Physical proof.

Those things can be manipulated. Take Genesis as an example - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=768281.140
Their CEO invited Gavin Anderson to their mining operation, to validate what they doing. Total transparency from this company, gives physical proof, that they mining, what they posting on websites.

If you have proof, that PBmining are doing the same, feel free to post it here, and I will strike through everything I posted on here about them.

To me, PBmining is a Ponzi and no different than Tradefocus or any other HYIP / Ponzi doing the rounds.

We just choose to look the other way, when a company exist for a long time.

I have been long con'ed with Ponzi's before, and they lasted more than 2 to 3 years and yes, I still play with it, because I know the risk involved.

Is this ethical? Most certainly not, but it's in no more ethical than using PBmining and saying that it good.

[apsvinet]

As I said, Physical proof.

Those things can be manipulated. Take Genesis as an example - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=768281.140
Their CEO invited Gavin Anderson to their mining operation, to validate what they doing. Total transparency from this company, gives physical proof, that they mining, what they posting on websites.

If you have proof, that PBmining are doing the same, feel free to post it here, and I will strike through everything I posted on here about them.

To me, PBmining is a Ponzi and no different than Tradefocus or any other HYIP / Ponzi doing the rounds.

We just choose to look the other way, when a company exist for a long time.

I have been long con'ed with Ponzi's before, and they lasted more than 2 to 3 years and yes, I still play with it, because I know the risk involved.

Is this ethical? Most certainly not, but it's in no more ethical than using PBmining and saying that it good.

It's nonsense to call PBmining a HYIP when it's not a high yielding investment at all, it's a slow return until you possibly hit break even. It's not promising 3.5% daily on your investment like the other scams do.

[boumalo]

As I said, Physical proof.

Those things can be manipulated. Take Genesis as an example - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=768281.140
Their CEO invited Gavin Anderson to their mining operation, to validate what they doing. Total transparency from this company, gives physical proof, that they mining, what they posting on websites.

If you have proof, that PBmining are doing the same, feel free to post it here, and I will strike through everything I posted on here about them.

To me, PBmining is a Ponzi and no different than Tradefocus or any other HYIP / Ponzi doing the rounds.

We just choose to look the other way, when a company exist for a long time.

I have been long con'ed with Ponzi's before, and they lasted more than 2 to 3 years and yes, I still play with it, because I know the risk involved.

Is this ethical? Most certainly not, but it's in no more ethical than using PBmining and saying that it good.

It's nonsense to call PBmining a HYIP when it's not a high yielding investment at all, it's a slow return until you possibly hit break even. It's not promising 3.5% daily on your investment like the other scams do.

It's a low yield high risk investment program then?

[monetizator4]

Let me subscribe to this topic.
I don't see any interesting campaign for Juniors right now, but who knows...

[boumalo]

Let me subscribe to this topic.
I don't see any interesting campaign for Juniors right now, but who knows...

There are many campaigns for Jr at the moment, don't know if they are all full but you can still ask to be added when a seat opens up; you are not going to be paid a lot to advertise with a Jr account but being paid at all is already very nice!

[monetizator4]

There are many campaigns for Jr at the moment, don't know if they are all full but you can still ask to be added when a seat opens up; you are not going to be paid a lot to advertise with a Jr account but being paid at all is already very nice!

You are right. I´ve joined BitBiz.io campaign (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=751691.0) that supports exactly Junior Members.

[redsn0w]

Hey guys,

@bitcoininformation  the Barwick Mining Signature Campaign is closed , so I think you can delete  its from the actual list . I paid all the enrolled users :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=810608.msg9146100#msg9146100


Again : Thanks for this fantastic thread . 

Cheers.

[michietn94]

Hey guys,

@bitcoininformation  the Barwick Mining Signature Campaign is closed , so I think you can delete  its from the actual list . I paid all the enrolled users :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=810608.msg9146100#msg9146100


Again : Thanks for this fantastic thread . 

Cheers.

The fastest official signature campaign's payout i've ever see   

[erenna]

Crypto-Games.net is closed (or temporarily suspended). Previous payments are correctly done.

[apsvinet]

As I said, Physical proof.

Those things can be manipulated. Take Genesis as an example - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=768281.140
Their CEO invited Gavin Anderson to their mining operation, to validate what they doing. Total transparency from this company, gives physical proof, that they mining, what they posting on websites.

If you have proof, that PBmining are doing the same, feel free to post it here, and I will strike through everything I posted on here about them.

To me, PBmining is a Ponzi and no different than Tradefocus or any other HYIP / Ponzi doing the rounds.

We just choose to look the other way, when a company exist for a long time.

I have been long con'ed with Ponzi's before, and they lasted more than 2 to 3 years and yes, I still play with it, because I know the risk involved.

Is this ethical? Most certainly not, but it's in no more ethical than using PBmining and saying that it good.

It's nonsense to call PBmining a HYIP when it's not a high yielding investment at all, it's a slow return until you possibly hit break even. It's not promising 3.5% daily on your investment like the other scams do.

It's a low yield high risk investment program then?

That would be more accurate, I don't think there's a "high risk" though, as they've proven to be reliable for a large amount of time now.

[BitCoinDream]

Is there any existing campaign offering 0.1BTC/week or 0.4BTC/month to Sr. Members ?

[BTCfan668]

Is there any existing campaign offering 0.1BTC/week or 0.4BTC/month to Sr. Members ?

You should read the OP but no. The time for very high paying (on max per month basis) campaigns is at least temporarily beyond us.

[marcotheminer]

Is there any existing campaign offering 0.1BTC/week or 0.4BTC/month to Sr. Members ?

Nope, Primedice offers that to staff only!

[crazy-pilot]

BitDice.me (Thread)
Minimum posts: You must post at least 20 posts every two weeks.
Miscellaneous: All spots are full as per the OP and you are holding funds in escrow so I don't think PNYC is appropriate  as you will pay from escrow if they don't. They retroactively changed the min number of posts after many people signed up.

[redsn0w]

BitDice.me (Thread)
Minimum posts: You must post at least 20 posts every two weeks.
Miscellaneous: All spots are full as per the OP and you are holding funds in escrow so I don't think PNYC is appropriate  as you will pay from escrow if they don't. They retroactively changed the min number of posts after many people signed up.

I think he has already added them , it is under Coinpiler in the "Payment not yet confirmed" section .

[crazy-pilot]

BitDice.me (Thread)
Minimum posts: You must post at least 20 posts every two weeks.
Miscellaneous: All spots are full as per the OP and you are holding funds in escrow so I don't think PNYC is appropriate  as you will pay from escrow if they don't. They retroactively changed the min number of posts after many people signed up.

I think he has already added them , it is under Coinpiler in the "Payment not yet confirmed" section .

I am saying it is in the incorrect section. The payment should be confirmed as he is holding escrow for the payments. The campaign is full so it should be listed under CFNP (closed for new participants)

[Mitchell]

I am saying it is in the incorrect section. The payment should be confirmed as he is holding escrow for the payments. The campaign is full so it should be listed under CFNP (closed for new participants)

You are totally right. I shall update the OP accordingly.

[btc-facebook]

Bitcoin-Tutorials.com Signature Campaign! (Thread)
Miscellaneous: The campaign is now closed for new participants. Please move the campaign from active to CLFNP